There is dissent in New Orleans; beautiful, raucous, noisy, profane, righteous, brave dissent.
Public housing residents in New Orleans just won’t give up. In fact, judging from the increased turnout from protest to protest, the grass roots movement in New Orleans to reopen public housing is growing.
Elderly residents of public housing in New Orleans have told me personally that they will continue to fight until they are on their death beds. Several have said they have nothing to lose. In this video of the April 4th protest at the St. Bernard Housing Development, in which residents clashed with police and HANO security just for the right to enter their flood-damaged apartments, wheelchair-bound Gloria Irving is heard to exclaim, “If I have to die I want to die in New Orleans.”
Cynthia Wiggins, public housing resident and organizer, said at the recent HANO Board meeting, in which 250+ residents wrested control of the meeting from the hands of the newly appointed HUD reciever, Donald Babers, “What are you going to do, start arresting women and children?”
An exasperated, frightened Babers tried in vain to remain in control of the meeting, but wound up conceding to the residents, and allowing them to speak before regular business. Then, in further defiance of business as usual, after Babers ended the comment period,
residents began to chant “No justice, no peace”, preventing any sense of normalcy for the remainder of the meeting. Babers quickly adjourned the meeting, and fled soon afterwards by police escort.
Now, residents are speaking to lawyers, and simultaneously planning a tent city to be constructed just outside of the St. Bernard Housing Development for June 3rd. This tent city will remain open as long as St. Bernard remains closed, residents have vowed.
There is much at stake. The collusion between liberals, conservatives and urban planners, to stake out and create a new New Orleans, devoid of neighborhoods of poverty, is clashing head on with the passionate desire of residents, including public housing residents, to return home to their neighborhoods and communities.
Fueling the growing desperation of residents to return is FEMA reneging on initial promises to provide vouchers for evacuees for one year to 18 months. Low income residents are beginning to pack their bags and head back to New Orleans, some to still partially-closed Iberville public housing, in a desperate attempt to find housing, after FEMA has withdrawn the welcome mat for Texas for low-income Katrina evacuees.
nearly a third are receiving notices that they no longer qualify,
FEMA officials said. For the rest, benefits are also being cut: they
will have to sign new leases, pay their own gas and electric bills
and requalify for rental assistance every three months.
The process has been marked by sharp disagreements between the agency
and local officials, and conflicting information given to evacuees
about their futures. Although agency officials say they never
promised a full year of free housing, many local officials around the
country say yearlong vouchers were exactly what FEMA agreed to
provide.
“They’re going to bum rush the city when the FEMA vouchers run out,” one public housing resident said several weeks ago, ” and while the “bum rush” has yet to occur, residents are coming back. I just spoke to a public housing resident, an elderly woman in Iberville, who is illegally occupying her apartment.
“They are putting people in jail for illegaly occupying their apartments,” she said. “I guess I’ll be an elderly person in jail.” . Indeed, word is spreading that panic-stricken evacuees in Houston are packing, even as we speak, to return to a still devastated New Orleans, because they can’t afford the rents in Houston without assistance.
Already, in the partially reopened Iberville Housing Development in downtown New Orleans, HUD is enforcing a rule that only lease holders are allowed to live in the apartments, and HUD has begun evicting family members and friends of the lease holders.
Evictions in New Orleans’ private stock of housing is nothing new post-Katrina, with rents sky-rocketing, and landlords taking advantage of the devastated housing situation and gauging tenants.
Now evictiion notices are being used to insure that the Iberville community remains largely closed, with just 166 families back, out of the 850 that lived there pre-Katrina.
Some of the families that are back and are waiting to come back are receiving notices that they have to remove all of their belongings from their units, under the guise of a mold problem. Only problem is, HUD isn’t offering alternative housing to those who are being asked to leave.
New Orleans had the largest population of people in public housing and Section 8 housing pre-Katrina, in the United States. 49,000 people lived in HUD subsidized housing pre-katrina. Nearly half of those were in public housing. Low income housing provided shelter for those who created and fed the unique culture of the city. Now, with the city’s rent stock drastically depleted from flooding, without low-income housing, New Orleans will become what some white developers, and the Times Picayune, basically have proposed: a museum to the culture that once was.
From demolishing Iberville to build a Jazz City (I thought New Orleans was a “jazz” city), to containing the former home of Fats Domino in a “living museum”, the liberal and conservative, white elite of New Orleans want a sanitized version of the Big Easy, with a drastically reduced population of working class African Americans. And they have national help to bring this about from liberal urban planners.
Black Commentator has an article right now on its front page, by Adolph Reed and Stephen Steinberg, on the collusion between liberals and conservatives, on the continuing efforts to scatter and displace neighborhoods of poverty in New Orleans, and all over the country.
Besides, what kind of policy simply moves the poor into somebody else’s back yard, without addressing the root causes of poverty itself, and in the process disrupts the personal networks and community bonds of these indigent people? Contrary to the claim of the petition, the “careful studies” that have evaluated the “moving to opportunity” programs report very mixed results, and why should one think otherwise? Unless the uprooted families are provided with jobs and opportunities that are the sine qua non of stable families and communities, “move to opportunity” is only a spurious theory and an empty slogan.
Residents of public housing pay rent, $350 and up. Many have strong neighborhood communities and ties, in particular, the St. Bernard Housing and the B.W. Cooper developments.
Residents of the St. Bernard development have a lengthy history of activism, and are determined, vocal and passionate in their efforts to reclaim their neighborhood. Sharon Jaspers, long-time resident there, said at the May 3rd HANO meeting,
Using cell phones and word of mouth as tools for organizing, displaced residents have come in from Texas for protests on chartered vans and buses. In their efforts to destroy public housing, HUD bureaucrats have run into a brick wall of grass roots support that’s gaining strength, and numbers.
HUD has allowed public housing buildings to sit and deteriorate: they did not “blue tarp” the roofs to prevent further water damage; the Lafitte complex is boarded up with steel doors and windows, creating a mold condition much worse than would have been.
Residents are eager to get into their units to begin cleaning them. Many Iberville residents took it upon themselves and cleaned their own units, and are now occupying them “illegally”.
Dismantle FEMA? HUD is miserably failing its stated mission to “…increase access to affordable housing free from discrimination. To fullfill this mission, HUD will embrace high standards of ethics, managment and accountability…”
Alphonso Jackson, Secretary of HUD, recently stated that they only wanted the “best” residents back in public housing, alluding to and reinforcing the stereotype that public housing residents don’t work.
Free from discrimination? You be the judge.
All this bullshyt about how it’s so much better in New Orleans without all the crime and noise and such–when there was only a small percentage of our folks actually cutting up and acting the fool.
This is just like Guiliani’s reign in New York. Police and minority relations hit its low point while he was mayor, jacking up blacks and Latinos off the streets, and killing and maiming absolute bystanders. But at the same time he was giving hell to folks, liberals were applauding his efforts at ‘cutting down crime’ and ‘making the city safe.’ All code words for ‘let’s get these folks out, even if it means killing the innocent.’
Well, the innocents are being killed in New Orleans as we speak. Nearly 9 months after Katrina and nothing, but nothing has been done. But they sure can do Mardi Gras, and not finish the levees. You’ve got to hear from a Sports Illustrated article how bad it really is in New Orleans.
I know there are many people like myself who are following events in NOLA from a distance as best we can.
About all I can do at the present is promise to take the Federally related issues up with my congresspeople at their next appearances here in the state.(Assume also emails and phone calls to W DC.)
You have given me background knowledge that will enable me to have a productive discussion with them.
Should you have further details that don’t find their way to this dairy feel free to use my email in sig line.
I expect to return and investigate the links in more detail later.
Thanks for your offer to lobby congress. We’re determined to turn this into an international issue. International laws are being violated, that protect displaced people and their right of return.
. . neighborhoods of poverty. . .
The singular feature of all great cities is the mix of people across economic and racial lines. As someone who builds things, I find “public housing” the most rehensible concept every conceived. Stated as it exists: let’s put all the poor people in vertical “beehives”, with no hope of ownership, no open space, and no integratation of businesses within walking distance.
Commented before, the salient message to the functionally useless government agencies is simple: just. send. money. “Public housing” under the current construct of regulation, racism, and redlining, will produce absolutely no benefit for the people of NOLA in the future.
I just can’t understand why the people would want to return to the same structural environment, when they have the motive, opportunity, and numerical superiority to force change in the system.
Neither Rome nor NOLA was built in a day, or even a year.
They want change also. They want to improve public housing. But you can’t do that if it isn’t open, if they aren’t allowed to return.
Their neighborhoods had problems, yes. But if you lose your neighborhoods, you can’t work to fix the problems.
I included quotes from the people who lived there, to illustrate the importance of their communities to these people. People are moving up, and out of public housing. Many of the residents I’ve worked with on this issue have children in college. Some of the residents have professional jobs, but because of an overall lack of affordable housing in New Orleans, chose to stay in public housing.
Because you can’t imagine it, doesn’t mean it isn’t viable.
In case you haven’t noticed, the numbers of homeless in the U.S. is growing. There is a crisis in affordable housing world wide. I suspect you are in favor of home ownernership, perhaps you support HUD’s emphasis on home ownership. Bush has pushed this agenda as a means of empowerment. But not everyone is ready, or willing to take on the responsibility of owning a home.
With the current crisis in affordable housing, we need more public housing, not less. Pre-Katrina, families were doubling and tripling up in New ORleans because of this issue; I know this for a fact. There was a horrible house fire that killed several members of the same family, several generations of that family, last spring.
Pre-Katrina, there was a waiting list of thousands for public housing in New Orleans.
Hopefully, you’ve read that people are being evicted in Houston. THis is an issue of crisis proportions here. Be carefull that your own privilege doesn’t allow you to feel what others are feeling.
I agree with you about the need, just differ about the solution. I’m not suggesting that every person has their own patch of dirt. We had a public housing project out here in CA (about 120 “apartment” units) where the residents – mixed income as is the NOLA community – put together a package of loans and bought the damn thing. They created a group that acted as a functional “homeowner’s association”, and were finally able to recapture their own ground. A community in the best sense of the word.
Thought I mentioned this before: local competition among builders to provide low-cost housing with a cap of (1980-ish) $20,000. They were overwhelmed with projects that met the RFP requirements. The whole thing fell apart when the City would not even negotiate lower fees for permits and assessments.
Cost of building has never been an issue. F*cking bureaucrats? Always.
All of housing is financed, whether through the private or public sector.
The private sector can’t begin, in my opinion, operating under capitalistic, free market principles, meet the needs of individuals for affordable housing. And certainly, not in New Orleans, post-Katrina.
I assure you, rba, if we stop fighting unnecessary wars, and investing most of our resources in the Pentagon, we will have plenty of resources for housing, public and private.
I should have been more clear, the loan package above included some public money. Just suggesting that rather than the usual RFP for a leaseback (public/private “partnership”), the money go direct to a (literal) community-of-interest.
You might be interested to know, as you are a builder, that the public housing buildings in New Orleans fared very well, even with flooding. The iberville complex, built during the New Deal is solid. We visited a couple of weeks after the storm, and couldn’t even find a single old mortar shingle on the ground.
Historically, the developments have always filled up with neighbors and friends for any storm, because people know they are constructed well.
The St. Bernard complex, three stories tall, served as shelter for thousands of neighbors from the surrounding area, after the water moved in. “No one was turned away,” one resident said to me.
heh . . . building in Georgia slated for “earthquake upgrade”. Ball on a crane just bounced, so they ended up using dynamite. They quite literally don’t build ’em like they used to.
has any thought been given to appealing to international human rights groups to list the US as failing to deal with its own Internally Displaced Persons?
It’s so criminal, sick, wrong that this problem exists. The ancestors of the middle class so eager to get rid of these people forget about how their families got help from the Homestead Act and Federally subsidized mortgages … both “public housing” programs in some senses of the words.
We each do better when we ALL do better. Why can’t people see that?
Yes. We are putting together a report on that very issue, based on violations of the Guiding Principles for Displaced Persons that I assume you are linking to. We’ve been encouraged to submit a report to the Human Rights Committee meeting in Geneva this summer. We will also cite the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 26.
We are going to pass this report on to the Black Caucus as well.
sounds great. You folks are doing such great, hard work. Think about reaching out to one of the better papers w/ some national cred, like the Detroit Free Press or the Toledo Blade when your report is ready.