“The Law is King” – Blumenthal
by Patrick Lang (bio below)
“But let’s just say, in 10 years or a few years, a president is elected who doesn’t want to do those things, but you’ve given him this kind of power. What happens then?”
“Well,” Cheney replied, “it will be up to him whether or not he uses it.”
Quoting Above the VP to CNN’s Dana Bash on Air Force Two (CNN Transcript, Dec. 20, 2005)
Cheney’s idea of the head of state invested with absolute power is a venerable one. Bush’s presidency is the latest experiment to achieve it. Yoo’s memos are the founding documents. But the idea lacks an American pedigree.
The original commentary on it appeared in a pamphlet published in 1776, “Common Sense,” written by Tom Paine:
“But where says some is the King of America? I’ll tell you Friend, he reigns above, and doth not make havoc of mankind like the Royal Brute of Britain. Yet that we may not appear to be defective even in earthly honors, let a day be solemnly set apart for proclaiming the charter; let it be brought forth placed on the divine law, the word of God; let a crown be placed thereon, by which the world may know, that so far as we approve as monarchy, that in America THE LAW IS KING. For as in absolute governments the King is law, so in free countries the law ought to be King; and there ought to be no other. But lest any ill use should afterwards arise, let the crown at the conclusion of the ceremony be demolished, and scattered among the people whose right it is.” Paine
By Sidney Blumenthal for Salon magazine
++++++++++++++++
“The Oath”
by Patrick Lang (bio below)
“BASH: You talked about the fact that you briefed Congress voluntarily, that you do have a review process. But let’s just say, in ten years or a few years, a president is elected who doesn’t want to do those things, but you’ve given him this kind of power. What happens then?
CHENEY: Well, it will be up to him whether or not he us it.
BASH: Does it concern you that somebody you met you wouldn’t necessarily trust with that kind of power.
CHENEY: The fact is the law is the law. The Constitution is there. It’s been adhered to and followed in this case. And you know, when you go to war, when you’re attacked on your homeland, when you lose 3,000 people in a couple of hours one morning, and you’re faced with a possibility that same organization might try to attack the United States with even a deadlier weapon, perhaps nuclear weapon if they could get their hands on it, or a biological agent, you have to actively go after the terrorists.
Now, after 9/11, the 9/11 Commission that criticized everybody in the government because you couldn’t connect the dots. Now we’re connecting the dots and they’re still complaining. So seems to me you can’t have it both ways.
The fact of the matter is this is a good solid program. It has saved thousands of lives. We’re doing exactly the right thing. We’re doing it in accordance with the Constitution and the laws of the United States. And it ought to be supported.
This is not about violating civil liberties because we’re not. This is about defending the country against further terrorist attacks. That’s exactly what we’re sworn to do.”
Again quoting Above the VP in Pakistan and to CNN’s Dana Bash on Air Force Two (CNN Transcript, Dec. 20, 2005)
I remember that the VP’s oath has to do with defending the constitution against all enemies “foreign and domestic.”
So, I guess the question should be: “Who is an enemy of the constitution?”
Pat Lang
Col. Patrick W. Lang (Ret.), a highly decorated retired senior officer of U.S. Military Intelligence and U.S. Army Special Forces, served as “Defense Intelligence Officer for the Middle East, South Asia and Terrorism” for the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and was later the first Director of the Defense Humint Service. Col. Lang was the first Professor of the Arabic Language at the United States Military Academy at West Point. For his service in the DIA, he was awarded the “Presidential Rank of Distinguished Executive.” He is a frequent commentator on television and radio, including MSNBC’s Countdown with Keith Olbermann (interview), CNN and Wolf Blitzer’s Situation Room (interview), PBS’s Newshour, NPR’s “All Things Considered,” (interview), and more .
Personal Blog: Sic Semper Tyrannis 2005 || Bio || CV
Recommended Books || More BooTrib Posts
Novel: The Butcher’s Cleaver (download free by chapter, PDF format)
“Drinking the Kool-Aid,” Middle East Policy Council Journal, Vol. XI, Summer 2004, No. 2
Hell’s bells, Pat. The enemy of the constitution is whoever Dick and George decide it is!
Most recently, it’s included my mainstream middle-class John Kerry-lovin’ friend in the Midwest … yes, she still loves John Kerry and wants him to run in ’08. (Oh well … but it’s indicative of what kind of a regular person she is.)
Anyway, she goes to a weekly little anti-Iraq-war and bring-the-troops-home protest. It’s a small group of friends who’ve done it for a while.
Suddenly, they’ve had an influx of new members.
And last Saturday, someone walked around in obvious view, and took photographs of every one of their license plates.
Isn’t it gratifying to know that, thanks to Dick and George, the government is spying on ordinary Americans?
Although, now that I think about it, supporting any Democrat could be considered a seditious offense.
I said it in June and I’m sayin’ it now . . .
Damn Straight, I’m The Enemy
has been turned into an art form.
I read the report of the 9/11 Commission, and don’t recall the section where they recommended unfettered, at-will spying on American citizens.
I think it’s obvious we need congress to act.
I propose they draft legislation to establish a “Do Not Wiretap” registry similar to the “Do Not Call” registry they drew up for the telemarketers.
If our constitution was still being adhered to then of course we’d not require such aditional protection, but since BushCo has been ignoring the law since even before they took up residence in DC, we need to create another remedy to protect ourselves from their criminally intrusive behavior.
So let’s call and write and fax and email all our representatives and senators now. Tell ’em they need to vote for the Do Not Wiretap bill as soon as it’s drawn up.
It might have been nice if DBash would have followed through and asked some questions on just who/how they briefed Congress.
I also remember that idiotic ‘connecting the dots’ crap and I also remember reading that the FBI and other agencies are so short of people they have backlogs of thousands of hours of tapes that they didn’t read…the really bad thing is that I just read recently that the various agencies still have a massive backlog of transcripts that they have not gotten around to reading. What good is spying if there’s no one around to read tapes, etc for months or even years..yeah I feel safer already.
But to get back on track-Tricky Dick number 2 is full of shit as usual. The way to ensure people are safe is to first of all start by following the law and applying to fairly to everyone.
FYI, also from Pat:
I am depressed that so many analysts and spokemen for the media and government continue to treat the subject of the elections in Iraq as though what matters is the PROCESS rather than the OUTCOME.
Ouch! Kinda says it all. If only our politicians could be so honest, we might at least have a foreign policy debate that doesn’t insult the intelligence with homilies about “spreading democracy.”
We could stop making ridiculous, unsubstantiated claims about “flawed elections” & just put it out there:
BAD OUTCOMES (who gives a shit about process?):
Allende
Chamorro
Aristide
Chavez
Morales
I prefer to resist simplistic good/bad, black/white dichotomies.
the only way we can allow this group of men and women to become the controlling authority is to not do anything about them at all!
They must be taken out. All of them. They are not dictators, or are they??!! Just remembering what dubya said a few years ago about being one and the trifectia. We all knew then what he meant but allowed him and others to get their way with the law and such. Now we are paying a big price for it. It is hard to take a piece of candy away from a child that has almost eaten it all, anyhow.
So what now!!?? Either we do impeach, or we let them go on with what they are doing and get by with murder, many times over. What they are doing to Americans and America is going to be the telling story of it all. History will soon be upon us for this administration. What will it write? I am sure nothing that is glorifing or glamorous. It will define the worst president ever and his memes, of course, that carry out his bidding.
If ever this is a God, may he have mercy on all of our souls for allowing this to happen in the land of the free and the home of the brave. The law is the law, for everyone, not just a few.
There you GO AGAIN, Brenda!
story will soon be upon us for this administration. What will it write? I am sure nothing that is glorifing or glamorous.
Sigh.
I worry about that a lot. It’s what keeps me going when I’m tired of writing to my senators and reps, and on and on …
…..
P.S. Everytime I see that book cover image of Hunter S. Thompson, it looks to me like he’s blowing bubbles. I suppose I’m the only one to see it like that 🙂
Susan, who knows, Dear, he just may be blowing them..just might be!!! :o)
“The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.” Edmund Burke
President Bush and his administration have been “a War cabinet” for almost the whole period they have been in office. War is a precondition for extra-ordinary powers and the last incident with the President ordering the surveillance of US citizens is the administrations interpretation of those powers. The strategy seems to be to declare a state of emergency, be it Afghanistan (in my opinion rightly so) or Iraq, in order to retain such powers. And when the institutions empowered to challenge those views are “inefficient” or “silent”, this administration will continue their policy of War until their term expires.
War Powers.
The Constitution divides war powers between the Congress and the President. This division was intended by the framers to ensure that wars would not be entered into easily: it takes two keys, not one, to start the engine of war.
The Constitution’s division of powers leaves the President with some exclusive powers as Commander-in-Chief (such as decisions on the field of battle), Congress with certain other exclusive powers (such as the ability to declare war and appropriate dollars to support the war effort), and a sort of “twilight zone” of concurrent powers. In the zone of concurrent powers, the Congress might effectively limit presidential power, but in the absence of express congressional limitations the President is free to act. Although on paper it might appear that the powers of Congress with respect to war are more dominant, the reality is that Presidential power has been more important–in part due to the modern need for quick responses to foreign threats and in part due to the many-headed nature of Congress.