Highs and Lows of Obama’s CIA Speech

When President Obama made remarks in front of CIA employees today, he broke his speech into three parts. The first and the third were dedicated to praising their service and sacrifice and aren’t all that interesting to read. But the second section was Obama at his very best.

It would be preferable to watch video of this to see his mastery of delivery. Immediately after he refers to his ‘Amen Corner’ he becomes very emotional. I’m going to make few remarks below.

Second, you need to know that you’ve got my full support. For decades, the American people have counted on you to protect them. I know that I’ve come to personally count on your services; I rely on your reporting and your analysis, which finds its way onto my desk every single day.

And I know you’ve got a tough job. I know there’s no margin for error. And I know there are endless demands for intelligence and there is an urgent necessity to collect and analyze information, and to work seamlessly with other agencies to act on it. And what makes it tougher is when you succeed –- as you so often do — that success usually has to stay secret. So you don’t get credit when things go good, but you sure get some blame when things don’t. Now — (laughter) — I got a “Amen” corner out here. (Laughter.)

What Obama says here is quite true. Our understanding of the CIA is almost defined by our memories of their most glaring failures and abuses, and that creates a distorted picture. Remember that Valerie Wilson was working on Iran and nuclear proliferation in one part of the CIA while people were torturing detainees in another part. We learned about the distortion of WMD evidence from disgusted CIA employees who leaked information. There are many hard-working, dedicated, decent people working at the CIA, and there always has been.

Now, in that context I know that the last few days have been difficult. As I made clear in releasing the OLC memos — as a consequence of a court case that was pending and to which it was very difficult for us to mount an effective legal defense — I acted primarily because of the exceptional circumstances that surrounded these memos; particularly the fact that so much of the information was public, had been publicly acknowledged, the covert nature of the information had been compromised.

I have fought to protect the integrity of classified information in the past, and I will do so in the future. And there is nothing more important than protecting the identities of CIA officers. So I need everybody to be clear: We will protect your identities and your security as you vigorously pursue your missions. I will be as vigorous in protecting you as you are vigorous in protecting the American people.

Obama is reminding the CIA who didn’t protect their identities. He’s also telling them that he will fight against investigations that will disclose the identities of covert officers. There is a subtle message here. He’s not verbalizing it, but he’s sticking his neck out for the CIA and taking a lot of criticism for it. He wants and expects their loyalty in return. He doesn’t want any grumbling about this next part.

Now, I have put an end to the interrogation techniques described in those OLC memos, and I want to be very clear and very blunt. I’ve done so for a simple reason: because I believe that our nation is stronger and more secure when we deploy the full measure of both our power and the power of our values –- including the rule of law. I know I can count on you to do exactly that.

For me, this is the most important part of the speech. He is telling the CIA that he expects them to act nobly for noble purposes. He’s counting on them to carry out their jobs in ways that are consistent with American values. All that bullshit about how the CIA has to be just as dirty as our adversaries is bullshit, and it backfires time and time again.

There have been some conversations that I’ve had with senior folks here at Langley in which I think people have expressed understandable anxiety and concern. So I want to make a point that I just made in the smaller group. I understand that it’s hard when you are asked to protect the American people against people who have no scruples and would willingly and gladly kill innocents. Al Qaeda is not constrained by a constitution. Many of our adversaries are not constrained by a belief in freedom of speech, or representation in court, or rule of law. I’m sure that sometimes it seems as if that means we’re operating with one hand tied behind our back, or that those who would argue for a higher standard are naïve. I understand that. You know, I watch the cable shows once in a while. (Laughter.)

What makes the United States special, and what makes you special, is precisely the fact that we are willing to uphold our values and our ideals even when it’s hard, not just when it’s easy; even when we are afraid and under threat, not just when it’s expedient to do so. That’s what makes us different.

So, yes, you’ve got a harder job. And so do I. And that’s okay, because that’s why we can take such extraordinary pride in being Americans. And over the long term, that is why I believe we will defeat our enemies, because we’re on the better side of history.

He’s flat-out saying that he’s willing to fight with a handicap. He knows it has risks and sometimes puts us at a temporary disadvantage. And that’s okay. This is the most progressive expression of national security values I’ve seen expressed by a U.S. president. It’s totally unapologetic. There’s no conditionality about it. It’s okay to fight this way precisely because fighting this way is what allows us to take pride in being American.

Part of me wants to ask when the hell we ever tried living up to these ideals and what gives us the right to take pride in what has never been attempted? But it’s never too late to start doing the right thing. At least we have these ideals, and if we start living up to them then we’ll have cause for pride.

So don’t be discouraged by what’s happened in the last few weeks. Don’t be discouraged that we have to acknowledge potentially we’ve made some mistakes. That’s how we learn. But the fact that we are willing to acknowledge them and then move forward, that is precisely why I am proud to be President of the United States, and that’s why you should be proud to be members of the CIA. (Applause.)

Acknowledging these mistakes is a step. Most presidents would not have acknowledged them. Most wouldn’t have had the courage to release largely unredacted OLC memos on torture. Obama deserves a ton of credit for that. But he’s moving forward too quickly. We have to atone for these mistakes. The law, both international and domestic, actually demands that we atone for it. Obama gave a tremendous speech that expressed the best aspirations of the American people. But he also demonstrated one of our primary faults. We so want to believe in our own ideals that we’ll try any trick to avoid living with our shortcomings. The CIA should not be feeling proud right now. They should be feeling a deep and abiding shame. It’s not Obama’s job to shame them, and he needs them to function. But he has no business thwarting justice. It’d be nice if everyone would cooperate with Obama’s desire to move forward, but that’s no more likely than it was that the Iraqis would throw flowers and chocolates at our troops. It’s wishful thinking based on an inflated belief in our own innate goodness. We’re not that exceptional.

Good politics breaks down when confronted with cold hard reality. I admire what Obama is trying to do and the style in which he is doing it. But he’s making a mistake to shield people from accountability. We are still going to have to come to terms with what was done in our names. And there are people in the CIA that need to help us atone for our sins. There are people from the Bush administration that have to pay for what they set in motion. It’s not about retribution, it’s about atonement and justice. I wish Obama understood that better.

Author: BooMan

Martin Longman a contributing editor at the Washington Monthly. He is also the founder of Booman Tribune and Progress Pond. He has a degree in philosophy from Western Michigan University.