Tom Hamburger and Peter Wallsten of the Los Angeles Times set the stage for less than satisfying results on election night.
As the midterm campaign enters the homestretch, the GOP congressional juggernaut that has dominated national politics for more than a decade may be over. Polls show Democrats extending their leads in pivotal races across the country. But the man largely responsible for the Republicans’ glory days — and arguably still the most powerful political operative in the United States — is far from discouraged.
A three-part plan
Instead, Rove is giving a virtuoso performance designed to prevent the Democrats from taking control of the House and Senate or, if that is no longer possible, to hold down the size of the Democratic victory to make it easier for the GOP to come back in 2008. His plan is three-pronged: to reenergize any conservatives who may be flagging; to make sure the GOP’s carefully constructed campaign apparatus is functioning at peak efficiency; and to put the resources of the federal government to use for political gain.
Correct me if I am wrong, but it is a little premature to say that Karl Rove is ‘giving a virtuoso performance’. There are several elements to running a national campaign, which is really what Rove is responsible for. The first, and most important, is message. And, on that score, it appears by every measure that Karl Rove has miscalculated. Caught snooping on American’s phone calls without a warrant, Rove decided to attempt to turn criminal vulnerability (and an impeachable offense) into a political strength. Likewise, with the Hamden Supreme Court decision that rejected the administration’s approach to handling suspected terrorists. Rove moved to make their crimes legal, and turn opposition to criminality into softness on defense. He got half his legislation passed (not the part on the NSA), but the message has so far failed to resonate with the electorate at all.
Instead, the polls show that the GOP has lost their edge on matters of national security. The GOP has no edge on any issue in this campaign. They are reduced to lying about taxes and making ominous intonations about future terror attacks. And, while Karl Rove doesn’t set our foreign policy, he is responsible for politicizing it. A failed foreign policy now falls, not on the bipartisan Washington establishment that authorized the use of force in Iraq, but on the Republicans that rubberstamped three years of ensuing failure, graft, and corruption without any meaningful oversight and even an iota of willingness to take advice from the loyal opposition.
This is hardly a virtuoso performance. So, then, the question becomes: can Karl Rove save the GOP’s bacon by throwing pork projects and media events at vulnerable candidates. For example, can the number one enemy of the environment be saved by pretending to give a shit about wetlands?
And when environmentalists from the San Francisco Bay Area sharpened their attacks on Rep. Richard W. Pombo (R-Tracy), chairman of the House Resources Committee, the White House political office arranged for President Bush to stop in his district to sign legislation protecting wetlands — with Pombo standing by his side.
I don’t think that is going to fool anyone. Every paper in California has chimed in to call Pombo a national disgrace, particularly on the environment. So, what’s next for the Maestro?
This week, Rove and his staff will turn to their endgame.
They will oversee a mobilization of political employees from Cabinet agencies, Capitol Hill and lobbying firms — many of them skilled campaign veterans — to more than a dozen battleground states. Many will act as “marshals,” supervising the “72-hour plan” developed by Rove in 2001 with Ken Mehlman, the former White House political director who now heads the Republican National Committee
People are already voting in many states. The so-called 72 hour operation is one explanation for the GOP exceeding polling expectations in 2002 and 2004. We all know the other explanation: voter suppression, fraud, and theft. These latter efforts are where the Republicans excel. And that is the only virtuoso performance left to the Republicans. If the votes get counted correctly, this will be a landslide, and I don’t care how many snowmobilers the GOP identifies and drags to the polls. No one likes a loser, and the GOP are losers in the current election narrative. They are going to lose.
Do More Than Vote MoveOn’s Call for Change MoveOn’s Pre-Halloween Phone Parties DNC DSCC
I think the biggest Rovian blunder lately is the “Stay the course, no we didn’t mean that, what did we mean?” fiasco. Talk about trouble with messaging at the end of the campaign!!!
Here’s hoping Rove’s toy, Redneck horn has fallen silent.
To see Dubya’s mid-term election night’s dream, –
link here: ‘Time to cut and run George.’-London Sunday Telegraph
all this and more. Worthy of a read is
Niall Ferguson’s “The road to delusion”- the 1958 parallel- London Sunday Telegraph (7 pages):
Thanks for the much-needed dose of reality, Boo. I’m so sick of seeing all the fawning, even from the left, about Rove’s “genius”, blablabla. He’s a school bully with the advantage that there’s nothing he won’t do to get his way. That really does make things a lot easier. And he’s assembled a gang of the like-minded, including Bush, to carry out his will.
It’s kind of meta-thing, I think: Rove uses his clout and bullying to build an image of “genius” and fearsomeness, and timid liberals buy it and make the lie true by their own cowering. The only thing we have to fear from Rove is fear itself (and criminal activities, of course).
The GOP can’t win elections without their base. Nor can they win with only their base. Rove’s major tactic was to fire-up the Christian Right while depending on voters who don’t follow politics (the vast majority on either side) yet tend to vote Republican.
And running massive negative ads which have a tendency to suppress voter turn-out. This reduces the total percentage of the voter while simultaneously raising the percentage of the total vote of the Christian Right.
Let’s say there is an election where the potential voters are split 50/50. If a negative ad campaign causes one loosely attached Dem voter to not vote that changes the vote percentage to 49.5 GOP to 48.51 Dem.
If you will notice the negative ads tend to be associated with some ad campaign, Gay Marriage, waged by a surrogate, e.g., Dobson’s Family Values, calculated to bring a loosely attached GOP voter to vote. When successful this changes the percentage to a GOP advantage of (roughly) 51.5 to 48.51. Which is, more or less, the national GOP winning advantage.
This works as long as the loosely attached and non-Christian Right vote stays somewhat constant between the parties. If, however, the loosely attached GOP vote becomes disenchanted and doesn’t vote (an own goal negativity), becomes Fed-Up and a loosely attached Dem vote, and/or the attacks drive the loosely attached Dem vote to go out and vote or some combination … Things Change.
A Lot.
Now the arithmetic shifts the other way and in once scenario – not the best case, btw – the 51.5/48.51 GOP lead becomes 47.94/51.98 Dem advantage. Or a 2.99% GOP win turns into a 4.04% Dem win.
This is what happens in tipping point Wave Elections.
Gerrymandering works by cleverly shifting district boundaries by historical evidence of voting preference. By definition historical voting patterns do not include surprises which is, after all, what Wave Elections are. When the advantage switch is applied to all districts the 4.04% becomes a Catastrophe Point for the GOP and massive losses in House seats are the result.
This is what Rove is facing.
Note the percentages again. Both winning margins are within the MOE of most House District polling. IF we are going to have a Wave Election polling won’t pick it up. The potential is flying below the possibility of detecting it.
The cute thing is Rove can’t do much about it. The analysis presented is based on what he has been successfully doing and he isn’t going to stop doing what has been successful. At some, unknown and unpredictable, point he is going to fail.
Miserably.