The Women Strike Back

From New Jersey to Ohio, proponents of reproductive freedom had a banner election night.

Rachel Cohen of Vox has an excellent article on how abortion politics played out in Tuesday’s elections, which saw the Democrats exceed expectations nationally, almost across the board. It’s important to understand that the Republicans came into this election well aware that their position on reproductive rights was hurting them. They tried out new messaging (and policy) on limiting access to abortion in the hope that they could neutralize the issue. It clearly didn’t work.

The most important test case was in Virginia where the GOP hoped they had a Goldilocks solution.

[Gov. Glenn] Youngkin and anti-abortion groups bet that if they could win in Virginia by running emphatically on a 15-week abortion ban, something they cast as a “reasonable” and “consensus” position, then they could prove to Republicans nationwide that abortion need not be a political loser for their party. (The ban, which they called a “limit,” also would have exceptions for rape, incest, and the life of the mother.) They also hoped that staking out this position would allow them to more easily change the subject to topics they had advantages on, like crime and the economy.

The Democrats ran hard against this proposal and not only kept their narrow Senate majority but won control of the House of Delegates.

The Republicans lost the abortion argument explicitly in Ohio where voters enacted reproductive freedom into the state Constitution. But they took it on the chin in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, too.

In the Keystone State, Democrat Daniel McCaffery defeated Republican Carolyn Carluccio for a seat on the Supreme Court.

McCaffery’s win is the latest in a string of victories for Democrats running on an abortion rights platform following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision overturning Roe v. Wade and ending national abortion rights protections. His campaign was supported by state and national reproductive rights groups that spent millions on advertising and grassroots efforts in the highly competitive swing state.

In the Garden State, the Democrats overcame the scandal surrounding senior U.S. Senator Bob Menendez and actually picked up legislative seats.

Republicans — benefiting from the unpopularity of President Joe Biden, the collapse of two major offshore wind projects and backlash to LGBTQ-friendly policies in public schools — had been hopeful at winning a majority in the state Senate or the Assembly for the first time in more than 20 years…

…Democrats also took on the culture wars by targeting Republicans on abortion rights — an issue that has galvanized the Democratic base since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe last year…

…Facing political headwinds and what appeared to be a motivated Republican base, New Jersey Democrats not only managed to hold onto their state legislative majorities Tuesday night but expand them.

And in Kentucky, incumbent Democratic Gov. Steve Beshear defied conventional wisdom and ran aggressively on abortion rights. He was easily reelected even as Republicans swept all the lower offices. But, as the New York Times notes, those down ballot Democrats “did not run on abortion.”

Another Democrat who didn’t run on reproductive rights is Brandon Presley who was seeking to oust Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves from office.

Mississippi’s governor’s race was the exception to this off-year election’s rule on abortion: The incumbent governor, Mr. Reeves, and his Democratic challenger, Mr. Presley, ran as staunch opponents of abortion rights. And in that race, the Democrat lost.

You might think is was a foregone conclusion that a Democrat would lose in Mississippi, but the race was closely watched for a reason. The simple fact is that Presley did not meet expectations, and it’s possible he could have won if he’d taken Beshear’s approach to the abortion question. But GOP women who might have defected had no one supporting their bodily autonomy.

Author: BooMan

Martin Longman a contributing editor at the Washington Monthly. He is also the founder of Booman Tribune and Progress Pond. He has a degree in philosophy from Western Michigan University.

9 thoughts on “The Women Strike Back”

  1. Here’s my big question: can Trump be the exception to the Republican rule on abortion? He expressed skepticism on abortion bans some time ago already and I’m willing to bet that even hardcore pro-life voters will give him breathing room on abortion (at least while he’s a candidate), so it is quite possible that he can get away with promising to take no action on abortion at the federal level and thereby neutralizing the issue.

    Otherwise, if I were advising the pro-life movement, I would tell them to cut it out with the power moves that aren’t working (e.g. scheduling the elections in August) or the 15-week ban stuff. What they need is to build trust in places like Idaho and Mississippi, where they are likely to be able to hold on to their abortion bans. At least try to show the country that a place like Idaho won’t turn into a nightmare for pregnant women.

    The problem is that Idaho is actually a nightmare and I don’t think they have it in them to build the kind of trust between the political, legal, and medical establishments necessary to a durable anti-abortion society. They don’t want to build trust with the population at large, they want to impose their will on the country. Voters sense this and we’re seeing a reaction that will continue.

    1. At least try to show the country that a place like Idaho won’t turn into a nightmare for pregnant women.
      

      As with all things Republican when it comes to policies which affect women, people of color, or non-heterosexuals, the “nightmare” is their intent. It’s a feature and not a bug. Power, control, and retribution is at the root of all they do.

  2. I’m waiting to see how long it takes for “The New Silent Majority” to become a political catchphrase to describe what might also be described as “The Biden Effect”: low polling numbers for Democrats and low voting numbers for Republicans.

    Unlike Nixon’s “Silent Majority”, today’s silent majority has good reason to keep silent outside of the voting booth: the increasingly violent turn of the Republican party. This is most clear, perhaps, on the issue of abortion: lots of MAGA men prone to domestic abuse and their wives/girlfriends who value the status quo ante of Roe v. Wade…but don’t want to risk their lives by saying so aloud.

  3. So, has the Democratic Party picked up on the ability to win elections running on abortion and marijuana legalization?

    Holy shit. Winning in 2024 has a formula. Please, for fucks sake, tell me that the Democratic Party paid attention.

Comments are closed.