Nemesis

Chalmers Johnson is arguably the most important writer in the United States these days. His “Blowback” trilogy on American empire is a landmark classic.

He is a distinguished professor at the University of California at Berkeley. An old cold warrier, he is an East Asia specialist.

The first volume in what unexpectedly became a trilogy was Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire (2000, rev. 2004).  Blowback is a CIA term for the nasty consequences of meddling in other countries. This book was little noticed before 9/11. Afterwards, when much attention was directed to the question of “why they hate us,” the book became a classic.

The second volume is: The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic (2004).  This book led to one of my favorite small social experiments. My small law firm has several U.S. citizens, all educated and mature adults, plus one law clerk from an African country. I made a prediction, and it came true.  I called a mini-staff meeting and asked everybody how many military bases they think the United States maintains around the world.  The Americans gave answers like:  5?  15?  maybe 25?  The African said: it must be over 1,000.  Ding ding ding!

I mean really. WTF do we think we are, we Americans?!

More below the fold…
The third volume is:  Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic (2007).  It was just released this month.

Everybody needs to go to amazon.com right now and order it! Get multiple copies.

Here are four paragraphs from the prologue that show why I think this one short book is more effective than 10,000 diaries on the blogosphere:

Until the 2004 presidential election, ordinary citizens of the United States could at least claim that our foreign policy, including our illegal invasion of Iraq, was the work of George Bush’s administration and that we had not put him in office.  In 2000, Bush lost the popular vote and was appointed president thanks to the intervention of the Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision.  In November 2004, regardless of claims about voter fraud, Bush won the popular vote by over 3.5 million ballots, making his wars ours.  The political system failed not because we elected one candidate rather than another as president, since neither offered a responsible alternative to aggressive war and militarism, but because the election essentially endorsed and ratified the policies we had pursued since 9/11.

Whether Americans intended it or not, we are now seen around the world as having approved the torture of captives at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, at Bagram Air Base in Kabul, at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and at secret prisons around the world, as well has having seconded Bush’s claim that, as a commander in chief in “wartime,” he is beyond all constraints of the Constitution or international law.  We are now saddled with a rigged economy based on record-setting deficits, the most secretive and intrusive American government in memory, the pursuit of “preventive” war as a basis for foreign policy, and a potential epidemic of nuclear proliferation as other nations attempt to adjust to and defend themselves from our behavior, while our own, already staggering nuclear arsenal expends toward first-strike primacy.

The crisis the United States faces today is not just the military failure of Bush’s policies in Iraq and Afghanistan, the discrediting of America’s intelligence agencies, or our government’s not-so-secret resort to torture and illegal imprisonment.  It is above all a growing international distrust and disgust in the face of our contempt for the rule of law.  Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution says, in part, “all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land.”  The Geneva Conventions of 1949, covering the treatment of prisoners of war and civilians in wartime, are treaties the U.S. government promoted, signed, and ratified.  They are therefore the supreme law of the land.  Neither the president, nor the secretary of defense, nor the attorney general has the authority to alter them or to choose whether or not to abide by them so long as the Constitution has any meaning.

Despite the administration’s endless propaganda about bringing freedom and democracy to the people of Afghanistan and Iraq, most citizens of those countries who have come into contact with our armed forced (and survived) have had their lives ruined.  The courageous, anonymous young Iraqi woman who runs the Internet Web site Baghdad Burning wrote on May 7, 2004:  “I don’t understand the ‘shock’ Americans claim to feel at the lurid pictures [from Abu Ghraib prison].  You’ve seen the troops break down doors and terrify women and children. . .curse, scream, push, pull, and throw people to the ground with a boot over their head.  You’ve seen troops shoot civilians in cold blood.  You’ve seen them bomb cities and towns.  You’ve seen them burn cars and humans using tanks and helicopters. . . .I sometimes get e-mails asking me to propose solutions or make suggestions.  Fine.  Today’s lesson: don’t rape, don’t torture, don’t kill, and get out while you can–while it still looks like you have a choice. . . .Chaos? Civil war?  We’ll take our chances–just take your puppets, your tanks, your smart weapons, your dumb politicians, your lies, your empty promises, your rapists, your sadistic torturers and go.”

He produces some of the finest rants ever written, combined with cool and magisterial scholarship.  Again, I strongly encourage everybody to get this book.

Nemesis, of course, is “the goddess of retribution, who punishes human transgression of the natural, right order of things and the arrogance that causes it.”  If God is just, there is Hell to pay in this country.

Peace and Militarism at Church–Updated

In MilitaryTracy’s last diary two days ago, there was this exchange:
LINK
I had mentioned being upset by a prayer in church for the troops that was not combined with any prayer for civilians in Iraq nor for world peace. Someone demanded to know why I had not stood up and protested in church. Well, you just don’t do that in a large Catholic church, for many reasons, as several people pointed out. But I promised that I was going to write to the pastor.  Here is the letter I have just sent:

Dear Father x. and Father x.:

My wife x and I have been members of St. x for almost two years. We were honored as “benefactors” by the Cardinal. x teaches catechism at St. x.

I want to object to a prayer that is commonly said at Mass, and which was said in particular at the beautiful Sunday 6 p.m. Mass two days ago with Father x.  During common prayers, a prayer was said for the safety of U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, with no related prayers.

I don’t mind a prayer for the safety of U.S. troops.  But frankly, I think it is obscene, un-Christian, idolatrous, sacreligious, and grossly militaristic to constantly say that prayer without EVER combining it with a prayer for the safety of the millions of people whose lives have been disrupted or destroyed by the U.S. invasions of those countries.  And it is equally unbalanced to constantly say that prayer without a call for world peace.

It is a tragedy that approximately 3,000 American soldiers have died in Iraq and Afghanistan.  But all human beings are equally children of God.  That should especially be understood by the universal, Catholic church.  It is also true that many tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians have been killed by U.S. action in Iraq–credible scientific information puts that number in the HUNDREDS of thousands. I think it is shameful that in two years I have never seen a SINGLE sign of concern for that slaughter at St. x.  Jesus was not a Republican.

I would respectfully request your thoughts on this, and I hope you will please pass this message along to whomever it is that composes the common prayers for Mass.

UPDATE: I did get a response, in less than 24 hours. I’ll put it in a comment.

An Epitaph for George W. Bush

“Great crimes are always committed by great ignoramuses.”

–Voltaire:  Letter to Rousseau, Aug. 10, 1755, in George Seldes, The Great Quotations (Pocket Books 1969 ed.).

Christmas Blues

I hate this time of year. Five main reasons (leading up to nice little political rant):

  1. Since age 10, horrified by disconnect between mother’s forced Christmas cheerfulness and her alcoholic confusion (and violent rages).
  2. When I was 23, my younger brother killed himself two days before Christmas (today is the anniversary).
  3. My wife and I have been unable to have children, and several adoption efforts blew up horribly, and the dogs don’t understand the Christmas stuff. Every day is Christmas for them if they get a walk and some attention. Not having children is especially hard this time of year. (We’re making Christmas dinner for some kids, and helping out many more in lots of different ways, but it’s not quite the same.)
  4. This particular year has been very bad for my business.
  5. I’m horrified beyond belief by the disjunction between all the cheerful Christmas lights and the horrors of Iraq and torture and the other crimes of the Bush regime. I have a 45-minute drive home these days, through the most Republican part of Maryland, and this year I’ve noticed many Christmas light displays in ostentatious red, white and blue. A couple of places have American flag images made out of Christmas lights, right in the midst of Santas and angels and an occasional nativity scene. The conflation of cheap patriotism and materialistic religiosity drives me crazy. There is something truly blasphemous and obscene about putting an American flag, which is dripping with the blood of torture, next to a nativity scene, some kind of horrible total double idolatry.  I feel quite socially isolated (and deranged) with such feelings. I keep fantasizing about stopping at this one place and telling the owner I think it’s a public disgrace that he’s put up a giant flag in lights next to a Santa Claus figure. It’s like Superman: Truth, Justice, and the American Way! He probably would not see my point.

And now I’m about to rush out to finally do a couple of hours of Christmas shopping that cannot be skipped. Oh cheerio.

This is not written or reasoned well. Just blowing off some angst.

Firing of Rumsfeld & Cheney–The Intervention

This is my first diary since June. It has no links, just some thoughts worth recording.

I’m short on sleep, having stayed up real late for the election then had to get up extremely early to appear in a distant federal court. Five hours of driving in the rain today, mainly on unfamiliar roads while short on sleep. BUT I’M SURE HAPPY TODAY!!

Bush’s press conference today was a wonder. I have a theory about what happened.

Last week, Bush swore that he’d stick with Rumsfeld and Cheney for the next two years. (Blogs commented that it was a strange remark, since Bush has no power to dismiss Cheney.)

Bush and Cheney were also vocal during the campaign in sneering at the Baker-Hamilton Iraq Study Group. To W, that represents the Old Farts (H.W.: “wouldn’t be prudent”). Even the presence of the Great Fixer Baker is nothing to W, who thinks he is annointed.

So what happens today? The Republicans get slaughtered in the elections. (OH HAPPY DAY!!!)

And within hours Bush fires Rumsfeld; makes a big point about how he’s meeting with the Baker-Hamilton group early next week; and appoints Bob Gates (a member of the Baker-Hamilton group, and H.W.’s man) as new SecDef.

Here’s what really happened behind the scenes.

Bush has been dumping repeatedly on his father, and on the conservatives, and on everybody else. The frustration has risen to a fever pitch in all directions. Recently many high-level conservatives such as Richard Viguerie, Pat Buchanan, and many others have called for the downfall of the Bush administration.

So this is what I think:  Very early this morning there was an INTERVENTION (remember, a few days ago, Sullivan famously said on TV that this “isn’t an election, it’s an intevention”).  (It has been notoriously reported that Bush stayed up EXTREMELY LATE last night watching the elections…ALL the way to 11 p.m.!!…so it must have been very early in the morning.)

In the intervention, the Powers That Be (not Bush 1 but the BIG MONEY behind Bush 1), probably in the guise of a call from Pops plus Baker, just simply laid the law down to junior.

The significance of this is not only that Rumsfeld got fired. It’s also that the POWERS have now also fired Cheney. I predict Cheney will be gone, one way or the other, within six months or less.

You heard it here first!

Deletion of Armando Diaries

For the last several days, I’ve been closely following several diaries here regarding Armando’s GBCW extravaganza.

BooMan gets back from Vegas tonight…and it seems all those diaries have been disappeared.

What’s the story with that?

By the way, as far as I can tell, this diary doesn’t violate the rules that BooMan has set. It’s more meta.

Damn! Those suskind diaries had all kinds of interesting debate. Was it *HE* who deleted them, wiping out everybody’s comments? We’re talking hundreds and hundreds of comments deleted.

I hope we’re not seeing the first shots in a Troll Wars outbreak in this peaceable village.

[Update: BooMan had nothing to do with this. It remains a mystery.]

Leonard Cohen, Bob Dylan & Paul Simon

On a lighter note, I’ve been thinking about Leonard Cohen a lot recently. His most recent greatest hits album (The Essential Leonard Cohen (Sony 2002) is the one album I keep playing and replaying these days. Just this week I saw a blurb that claimed that he’s Prince Charles’s favorite singer. Yesterday, driving to work, I heard part of an interview Leonard just did with Terry Gross on the NPR show “Fresh Air.” He has just released a new book of poetry, The Book of Longing. He’s moved beyond the Zen monastery in California where he’s been living the past five years. In response to a question that assumed he’d become a Buddhist, he said softly that that was wrong, he wasn’t a Buddhist, wasn’t looking for a religion, already had one.

Over the decades my three favorite singers have always been Bob Dylan, Paul Simon, and Leonard Cohen. I always think of the three as a set. All three are Jewish. All three are brilliant musicians. All three are even better writers. All three put a tremendous amount of explicitly Christian and Christian/mystical symbolism in their songs, although that goes over the heads of some people. Bob Dylan even went through a born-again Christian phase, though he’s gone back to Judaism as far as I know. I’ve never tracked this down for Paul Simon, but as far as I know he’s always been Jewish. I’m a Catholic, and I was a gifted and industrious poet for more years than I’ve been a lawyer, and I’ve always had a special love for Jewish writers and artists.

As I said, I think these three guys are the greatest. I’ve loved all three all the way back to the 1960s. I got Leonard Cohen’s second album Songs From A Room in 1969, when I was 14. My mother used to joke that she asked the people at the store for a record called “Songs From a Womb,” having heard me wrong. The very first album I bought was Sounds of Silence by Simon & Garfunkel in 1967 (the second album I ever got was Sgt. Pepper by the Beatles–setting me up for an exaggerated view of the quality of the average album!). And of course, the 1960s and 1970s were all-Dylan all the time. I’ve never seen Leonard Cohen in person so far, but his 1985 Halloween show on Austin City Limits is my all-time favorite music video. The first I saw in person was Bob Dylan at the Concert for Bangladesh at Madison Square Garden in 1970. I’ve seen Paul Simon many times. His Concert in Central Park is greater than great, and his Rhythm of the Saints is a candidate for all-time greatest single album by anybody.

I was thinking tonight that my ranking of the three has changed over the years. Bob Dylan has certainly had the greatest fame. Paul Simon has possibly had more commercial success. For a very long time I would have said Bob Dylan was the greatest.  There was a period in the 1980s and 1990s when I would have said that Paul Simon was the greatest. But since about 1999 I’ve come to think that Leonard Cohen is the real gem of the three, and that impression keeps getting stronger.

Among other things, Leonard Cohen is by far the strongest as a pure poet. His poetry is very strong, very original, very beautiful, and very spiritual.

Of the three, I also think Leonard is the more serious thinker about politics. His song stories of partisan resistance, and explorations of the mind of the extremist, go far beyond anything the other two have written.

It’s a frivolous topic, but I’m curious what the rest of you might think. <more below>
Here are the lyrics of two Leonard Cohen songs I particularly like these days, among many, many others. As you may notice, the second one is extremely serious, and extremely prescient, and extremely timely. It also rocks if you hear it.

Alexandra Leaving
–by Leonard Cohen, Ten New Songs (2001)

Suddenly the night has grown colder
The god of love preparing to depart
Alexandra hoisted on his shoulder
They slip between the sentries of the heart

Upheld by the simplicities of pleasure
They gain the light, they formlessly entwine
And radiant beyond your widest measure
They fall among the voices and the wine

It’s not a trick, your senses all deceiving
A fitful dream, the morning will exhaust
Say goodbye to Alexandra leaving
Then say goodbye to Alexandra lost

Even though she sleeps upon your satin
Even though she wakes you with a kiss
Do not say the moment was imagined
Do not stoop to strategies like this

As someone long prepared for this to happen
Go firmly to the window. Drink it in
Exquisite music. Alexandra laughing
Your firm commitments tangible again

And you who had the honor of her evening
And by the honor had your own restored
Say goodbye to Alexandra leaving
Alexandra leaving with her lord

Even though she sleeps upon your satin
Even though she wakes you with a kiss
Do not say the moment was imagined
Do not stoop to strategies like this

As someone long prepared for the occasion
In full command of every plan you wrecked
Do not choose a coward’s explanation
that hides behind the cause and the effect

And you who were bewildered by a meaning
Whose code was broken, crucifix uncrossed
Say goodbye to Alexandra leaving
Then say goodbye to Alexandra lost

Say goodbye to Alexandra leaving
Then say goodbye to Alexandra lost

*****

The future
–by Leonard Cohen, The Future (1992)

Give me back my broken night
My mirrored room, my secret life
It’s lonely here,
There’s no one left to torture
Give me absolute control
Over every living soul
And lie beside me, baby,
That’s an order!
Give me crack and anal sex
Take the only tree that’s left
And stuff it up the hole
In your culture
Give me back the berlin wall
Give me stalin and st paul
I’ve seen the future, brother:
It is murder.

Things are going to slide, slide in all directions
Won’t be nothing
Nothing you can measure anymore
The blizzard, the blizzard of the world
Has crossed the threshold
And it has overturned
The order of the soul
When they said repent repent
I wonder what they meant
When they said repent repent
I wonder what they meant
When they said repent repent
I wonder what they meant

You don’t know me from the wind
You never will, you never did
I’m the little jew
Who wrote the bible
I’ve seen the nations rise and fall
I’ve heard their stories, heard them all
But love’s the only engine of survival
Your servant here, he has been told
To say it clear, to say it cold:
It’s over, it ain’t going
Any further
And now the wheels of heaven stop
You feel the devil’s riding crop
Get ready for the future:
It is murder

Things are going to slide …

There’ll be the breaking of the ancient
Western code
Your private life will suddenly explode
There’ll be phantoms
There’ll be fires on the road
And the white man dancing
You’ll see a woman
Hanging upside down
Her features covered by her fallen gown
And all the lousy little poets
Coming round
Tryin’ to sound like charlie manson
And the white man dancin’

Give me back the berlin wall
Give me stalin and st paul
Give me christ
Or give me hiroshima
Destroy another fetus now
We don’t like children anyhow
I’ve seen the future, baby:
It is murder

Things are going to slide …

When they said repent repent …

Bombshell! Murtha describes Marine massacre of Iraqi civilians

In what may become a major bombshell, Rep. Murtha has issued a statement claiming it is true that U.S. Marines murdered 15 [or possibly 27 or more] innocent and unarmed Iraqi civilians in cold blood in Haditha last November. The murdered included seven women and three children.

The Marine Corps initially lied about it, claiming that the civilians were killed when a bomb went off. But the truth is that the soldiers massacred everyone in several houses, angered about a Marine that had previously been killed.

Stay tuned for more claims that Murtha, who served in the USMC for more than 30 years, is a “coward” and a “traitor.”

Bush to 31% on new USA Today/Gallup Poll

In a new USA Today/Gallup poll
released today, Bush fell to 31%, a new low, with a 65% disapproval rating, a new high. 1,013 people participated in the poll, and I’m pleased to say I got called for this one. I’m happy that my “STRONG DISAPPROVAL!!!!!” answer got factored into the statistics Rove needs to read this week. Heh heh.

This isn’t much of a diary, but I thought this was cool. This was the first time I’ve ever been called for a national political poll.

Participating in our own doom

“The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words. George Orwell made this clear in his novel 1984. But another way to control the minds of people is to control their perceptions. If you can get them to see the world as you do, they will think as you do. Comprehension follows perception. How do you get them to see the reality you see? After all, it is only one reality out of many. Images are a basic constituent: pictures. This is why the power of TV to influence young minds is so staggeringly vast.”

—more below—
[continued] Words and pictures are synchronized. The possibility of total control of the viewer exists, especially the young viewer. TV viewing is a kind of sleep-learning. An EEG of a person watching TV shows that after about half an hour the brain decides that nothing is happening, and it goes into a hypnoidal twilight state, emitting alpha waves. This is because there is such little eye motion. In addition, much of the information is graphic and therefore passes into the right hemisphere of the brain, rather than being processed by the left, where the conscious personality is located. Recent experiments indicate that much of what we see on the TV screen is received on a subliminal basis. We only imagine that we consciously see what is there. The bulk of the messages elude our attention; literally, after a few hours of TV watching, we do not know what we have seen. Our memories are spurious, like our memories of dreams; the blank are filled in retrospectively. And falsified. We have participated unknowingly in the creation of a spurious reality, and then we have obligingly fed it to ourselves. We have colluded in our own doom.”

That is a quote from Philip K. Dick – How To Build A Universe That Doesn’t Fall Apart Two Days Later (Essay)
written 1978, from  “I Hope I Shall Arrive Soon”, published on the Internet at http://www.geocities.com/pkdlw/howtobuild.html.

He was saying that LONG before Arthur Gilroy <grin>.