Thanksgiving on the Rez

This story was forwarded to me by a friend on the Rez. Looking at the email addresses in the header it’s amazing  to see the name of a Chief and a high ranking elected tribal leader. One of the comments:

This contribution represents my sentiments exactly. I offer it to those of you who are teachers, especially parents, and ask you to read it to your students now that this “holiday” is upon us. Please pass it on. You might consider making this an annual event. It is called waking up the Americans –

So here is the story of Thanksgiving from another perspective…
Why I Hate Thanksgiving
by Mitchel Cohen

With much material contributed by Peter Linebaugh and others whose names have over the years been lost.

The year was 1492. The Taino-Arawak people of the Bahamas discovered Christopher Columbus on their beach.

Historian Howard Zinn tells us how Arawak men and women, naked, tawny, and full of wonder, emerged from their villages onto the island’s beaches and swam out to get a closer look at the strange big boat. When Columbus and his sailors came ashore, carrying swords, speaking oddly, the Arawaks ran to greet them, brought them food, water, gifts. Columbus later wrote of this in his log. Here is what he wrote:

“They brought us parrots and balls of cotton and spears and many other things, which they exchanged for the glass beads and hawks’ bells. They willingly traded everything they owned. They were well-built, with good bodies and handsome features. They do not bear arms, and do not know them, for I showed them a sword, they took it by the edge and cut themselves out of ignorance. They have no iron. Their spears are made of sugar cane. They would make fine servants. With 50 men we could subjugate them all and make them do whatever we want.”

And so the conquest began, and the Thanotocracy — the regime of death — was inaugurated on the continent the Indians called “Turtle Island.”

You probably already know a good piece of the story: How Columbus’s Army took Arawak and Taino people prisoners and insisted that they take him to the source of their gold, which they used in tiny ornaments in their ears. And how, with utter contempt and cruelty,Columbus took many more Indians prisoners and put them aboard the Nina and the Pinta — the Santa Maria having run aground on the island of Hispañola (today, the Dominican Republic and Haiti). When some refused to be taken prisoner, they were run through with swords and bled to death. Then the Nina and the Pinta set sail for the Azores and Spain. During the long voyage, many of the Indian prisoners died. Here’s part of Columbus’s report to Queen Isabella and King Ferdinand of Spain:

“The Indians are so naive and so free with their possessions that no one who has not witnessed them would believe it. When you ask for something they have, they never say no. To the contrary, they offer to share with anyone.”Columbus concluded his report by asking for a little help from the King and Queen, and in return he would bring them “as much gold as they need, and as many slaves as they ask.”

Columbus returned to the New World — “new” for Europeans, that is — with 17 ships and more than 1,200 men. Their aim was clear: Slaves, and gold. They went from island to island in the Caribbean, taking Indians as captives. But word spread ahead of them. By the time they got to Fort Navidad on Haiti, the Taino had risen up and killed all the sailors left behind on the last voyage, after they had roamed the island in gangs raping women and taking children and women as slaves. Columbus later wrote: “Let us in the name of the Holy Trinity go on sending all the slaves that can be sold.” The Indians began fighting back, but were no match for the Spaniard conquerors, even though they greatly outnumbered them. In eight years, Columbus’s men murdered more than 100,000 Indians on Haiti alone. Overall, dying as slaves in the mines, or directly murdered, or from diseases brought to the Caribbean by the Spaniards, over 3 million Indian people were murdered between 1494 and 1508.

What Columbus did to the Arawaks of the Bahamas and the Taino of the Caribbean, Cortez did to the Aztecs of Mexico, Pizarro to the Incas of Peru, and the English settlers of Virginia and Massachusetts to the Powhatans and the Pequots. Literally millions of native peoples were slaughtered. And the gold, slaves and other resources were used, in Europe, to spur the growth of the new money economy rising out of feudalism. Karl Marx would later call this “the primitive accumulation of capital.” These were the violent beginnings of an intricate system of technology, business, politics and culture that would dominate the world for the next five centuries.

All of this were the preconditions for the first Thanksgiving. In the North American English colonies, the pattern was set early, as Columbus had set it in the islands of the Bahamas. In 1585, before there was any permanent English settlement in Virginia, Richard Grenville landed there with seven ships. The Indians he met were hospitable, but when one of them stole a small silver cup, Grenville sacked and burned the whole Indian village.

The Jamestown colony was established in Virginia in 1607, inside the territory of an Indian confederacy, led by the chief, Powhatan. Powhatan watched the English settle on his people’s land, but did not attack. And the English began starving. Some of them ran away and joined the Indians, where they would at least be fed. Indeed, throughout colonial times tens of thousands of indentured servants, prisoners and slaves — from Wales and Scotland as well as from Africa — ran away to live in Indian communities, intermarry, and raise their children there.

In the summer of 1610 the governor of Jamestown colony asked Powhatan to return the runaways, who were living fully among the Indians. Powhatan left the choice to those who ran away, and none wanted to go back. The governor of Jamestown then sent soldiers to take revenge. They descended on an Indian community, killed 15 or 16 Indians, burned the houses, cut down the corn growing around the village, took the female leader of the tribe and her children into boats, then ended up throwing the children overboard and shooting out their brains in the water. The female leader was later taken off the boat and stabbed to death.

By 1621, the atrocities committed by the English had grown, and word spread throughout the Indian villages. The Indians fought back, and killed 347 colonists. From then on it was total war. Not able to enslave the Indians the English aristocracy decided to exterminate them.

And then the Pilgrims arrived.

When the Pilgrims came to New England they too were coming not to vacant land but to territory inhabited by tribes of Indians. The story goes that the Pilgrims, who were Christians of the Puritan sect, were fleeing religious persecution in Europe. They had fled England and went to Holland, and from there sailed aboard the Mayflower, where they landed at Plymouth Rock in what is now Massachusetts.

Religious persecution or not, they immediately turned to their religion to rationalize their persecution of others. They appealed to the Bible, Psalms 2:8: “Ask of me, and I shall give thee, the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession.” To justify their use of force to take the land, they cited Romans 13:2: “Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.”

The Puritans lived in uneasy truce with the Pequot Indians, who occupied what is now southern Connecticut and Rhode Island. But they wanted them out of the way; they wanted their land. And they seemed to want to establish their rule firmly over Connecticut settlers in that area.

In 1636 an armed expedition left Boston to attack the Narragansett Indians on Block Island. The English landed and killed some Indians, but the rest hid in the thick forests of the island and the English went from one deserted village to the next, destroying crops. Then they sailed back to the mainland and raided Pequot villages along the coast, destroying crops again.

The English went on setting fire to wigwams of the village. They burned village after village to the ground. As one of the leading theologians of his day, Dr. Cotton Mather put it: “It was supposed that no less than 600 Pequot souls were brought down to hell that day.” And Cotton Mather, clutching his bible, spurred the English to slaughter more Indians in the name of Christianity.

Three hundred thousand Indians were murdered in New England over the next few years. It is important to note: The ordinary Englishmen did not want this war and often, very often, refused to fight. Some European intellectuals like Roger Williams spoke out against it. And some erstwhile colonists joined the Indians and even took up arms against the invaders from England. It was the Puritan elite who wanted the war, a war for land, for gold, for power. And, in the end, the Indian population of 10 million that was in North America when Columbus came was reduced to less than one million.

The way the different Indian peoples lived — communally, consensually, making decisions through tribal councils, each tribe having different sexual/marriage relationships, where many different sexualities were practiced as the norm — contrasted dramatically with the Puritan’s Christian fundamentalist values. For the Puritans, men decided everything, whereas in the Iroquois federation of what is now New York state women chose the men who represented the clans at village and tribal councils; it was the women who were responsible for deciding on whether or not to go to war. The Christian idea of male dominance and female subordination was conspicuously absent in Iroquois society.

There were many other cultural differences: The Iroquois did not use harsh punishment on children. They did not insist on early weaning or early toilet training, but gradually allowed the child to learn to care for themselves. And, they did not believe in ownership of land; they utilized the land, lived on it. The idea of ownership was ridiculous, absurd. The European Christians, on the other hand, in the spirit of the emerging capitalism, wanted to own and control everything — even children and other human beings. The pastor of the Pilgrim colony, John Robinson, thus advised his parishioners: “And surely there is in all children a stubbornness, and stoutness of mind arising from natural pride, which must, in the first place, be broken and beaten down; that so the foundation of their education being laid in humility and tractableness, other virtues may, in their time, be built thereon.” That idea sunk in.

One colonist said that the plague that had destroyed the Patuxet people — a combination of slavery, murder by the colonists and disease — was “the Wonderful Preparation of the Lord Jesus Christ by His Providence for His People’s Abode in the Western World.” The Pilgrims robbed Wampanoag graves for the food that had been buried with the dead for religious reasons. Whenever the Pilgrims realized they were being watched, they shot at the Wampanoags, and scalped them. Scalping had been unknown among Native Americans in New England prior to its introduction by the English, who began the practice by offering the heads of their enemies and later accepted scalps.

“What do you think of Western Civilization?” Mahatma Gandhi was asked in the 1940s. To which Gandhi replied: “Western Civilization? I think it would be a good idea.” And so enters “Civilization,” the civilization of Christian Europe, a “civilizing force” that couldn’t have been more threatened by the beautiful anarchy of the Indians they encountered, and so slaughtered them.

These are the Puritans that the Indians “saved”, and whom we celebrate in the holiday, Thanksgiving. Tisquantum, also known as Squanto, a member of the Patuxet Indian nation. Samoset, of the Wabonake Indian nation, which lived in Maine. They went to Puritan villages and, having learned to speak English, brought deer meat and beaver skins for the hungry, cold Pilgrims. Tisquantum stayed with them and helped them survive their first years in their New World. He taught them how to navigate the waters, fish and cultivate corn and other vegetables. He pointed out poisonous plants and showed how other plants could be used as medicines. He also negotiated a peace treaty between the Pilgrims and Massasoit, head chief of the Wampanoags, a treaty that gave the Pilgrims everything and the Indians nothing. And even that treaty was soon broken. All this is celebrated as the First Thanksgiving.

My own feeling? The Indians should have let the Pilgrims die. But they couldn’t do that. Their humanity made them assist other human beings in need. And for that beautiful, human, loving connection they — and those of us who are not Indian as well — paid a terrible price: The genocide of the original inhabitants of Turtle Island, what is now America.

Let’s look at one example of the Puritan values — which were not, I repeat, the values of the English working class values that we “give thanks for” on this holiday. The example of the Maypole, and Mayday.

In 1517, 25 years after Columbus first landed in the Bahamas, the English working class staged a huge revolt. This was done through the guilds. King Henry VIII brought Lombard bankers from Italy and merchants from France in order to undercut wages, lengthen hours, and break the guilds. This alliance between international finance, national capital and military aristocracy was in the process of merging into the imperialist nation-state.

The young workers of London took their revenge upon the merchants. A secret rumor said the commonality — the vision of communal society that would counter the rich, the merchants, the industrialists, the nobility and the landowners — would arise on May Day. The King and Lords got frightened — householders were armed, a curfew was declared. Two guys didn’t hear about the curfew (they missed Dan Rather on t.v.). They were arrested. The shout went out to mobilize, and 700 workers stormed the jails, throwing bricks, hot water, stones. The prisoners were freed. A French capitalist’s house was trashed.

Then came the repression: Cannons were fired into the city. Three hundred were imprisoned, soldiers patrolled the streets, and a proclamation was made that no women were allowed to meet together, and that all men should “keep their wives in their houses.” The prisoners were brought through the streets tied in ropes. Some were children. Eleven sets of gallows were set up throughout the city. Many were hanged. The authorities showed no mercy, but exhibited extreme cruelty.

Thus the dreaded Thanatocracy, the regime of death, was inaugurated in answer to proletarian riot at the beginning of capitalism. The May Day riots were caused by expropriation (people having been uprooted from their lands they had used for centuries in common), and by exploitation (people had no jobs, as the monarchy imported capital). Working class women organizers and healers who posed an alternative to patriarchal capitalism — were burned at the stake as witches. Enclosure, conquest, famine, war and plague ravaged the people who, in losing their commons, also lost a place to put their Maypole.

Suddenly, the Maypole became a symbol of rebellion. In 1550 Parliament ordered the destruction of Maypoles (just as, during the Vietnam war, the U.S.-backed junta in Saigon banned the making of all red cloth, as it was being sewn into the blue, yellow and red flags of the National Liberation Front).

In 1664, near the end of the Puritans’ war against the Pequot Indians, the Puritans in England abolished May Day altogether. They had defeated the Indians, and they were attempting to defeat the growing proletarian insurgency at home as well.

Although translators of the Bible were burned, its last book, Revelation, became an anti-authoritarian manual useful to those who would turn the Puritan world upside down, such as the Family of Love, the Anabaptists, the Diggers, Levellers, Ranters, and Thomas Morton, the man who in 1626 went to Merry Mount in Quincy Mass, and with his Indian friends put up the first Maypole in America, in contempt of Puritan rule.

The Puritans destroyed it, exiled him, plagued the Indians, and hanged gay people and Quakers. Morton had come over on his own, a boat person, an immigrant. So was Anna Lee, who came over a few years later, the Manchester proletarian who founded the communal living, gender separated Shakers, who praised God in ecstatic dance, and who drove the Puritans up the wall.

The story of the Maypole as a symbol of revolt continued. It crossed cultures and continued through the ages. In the late 1800s, the Sioux began the Ghost Dance in a circle, “with a large pine tree in the center, which was covered with strips of cloth of various colors, eagle feathers, stuffed birds, claws, and horns, all offerings to the Great Spirit.” They didn’t call it a Maypole and they danced for the unity of all Indians, the return of the dead, and the expulsion of the invaders on a particular day, the 4th of July, but otherwise it might as well have been a Mayday!

Wovoka, a Nevada Paiute, started it. Expropriated, he cut his hair. To buy watermelon he rode boxcars to work in the Oregon hop fields for small wages, exploited. The Puget Sound Indians had a new religion — they stopped drinking alcohol, became entranced, and danced for five days, jerking twitching, calling for their land back, just like the Shakers! Wovoka took this back to Nevada: “All Indians must dance, everywhere, keep on dancing.” Soon they were. Porcupine took the dance across the Rockies to the Sioux. Red Cloud and Sitting Bull advanced the left foot following with the right, hardly lifting the feet from the ground. The Federal Agents banned the Ghost Dance! They claimed it was a cause of the last Sioux outbreak, just as the Puritans had claimed the Maypole had caused the May Day proletarian riots, just as the Shakers were dancing people into communality and out of Puritanism.

On December 29 1890 the Government (with Hotchkiss guns throwing 2 pound explosive shells at 50 a minute — always developing new weapons!) massacred more than 300 men, women and children at Wounded Knee. As in the Waco holocaust, or the bombing of MOVE in Philadelphia, the State disclaimed responsibility. The Bureau of Ethnology sent out James Mooney to investigate. Amid Janet Reno-like tears, he wrote: “The Indians were responsible for the engagement.”

In 1970, the town of Plymouth Rock, Massachusetts held, as it does each year, a Thanksgiving Ceremony given by the townspeople. There are many speeches for the crowds who attend. That year — the year of Nixon’s secret invasion of Cambodia; the year 4 students were massacred at Kent State and 13 wounded for opposing the war; the year they tried to electrocute Black Panthers Bobby Seale and Erica Huggins — the Massachusetts Department of Commerce asked the Wampanoag Indians to select a speaker to mark the 350th anniversary of the Pilgrims’ arrival, and the first Thanksgiving.

Frank James, who is a Wampanoag, was selected. But before he was allowed to speak he was told to show a copy of his speech to the white people in charge of the ceremony. When they saw what he had written, they would not allow him to read it.

First, the genocide. Then, the suppression of all discussion about it.

What do Indian people find to be Thankful for in this America? What does anyone have to be Thankful for in the genocide of the Indians, that this “holyday” commemorates? As we sit with our families on Thanksgiving, taking any opportunity we can to get out of work or off the streets and be in a warm place with people we love, we realize that all the things we have to be thankful for have nothing at all to do with the Pilgrims, nothing at all to do with Amerikan history, and everything to do with the alternative, anarcho-communist lives the Indian peoples led, before they were massacred by the colonists, in the name of privatization of property and the lust for gold and labor.

Yes, I am an American. But I am an American in revolt. I am revolted by the holiday known as Thanksgiving. I have been accused of wanting to go backwards in time, of being against progress. To those charges, I plead guilty. I want to go back in time to when people lived communally, before the colonists’ Christian god was brought to these shores to sanctify their terrorism, their slavery, their hatred of children, their oppression of women, their holocausts. But that is impossible. So all I look forward to the utter destruction of the apparatus of death known as Amerika — not the people, not the beautiful land, but the machinery, the State, the capitalism, the Christianity and all that it stands for. I look forward to a future where I will have children with Amerika, and … they will be the new Indians.

*

Mitchel Cohen is co-editor of “Green Politix”, the national newspaper of the
Greens/Green Party USA, www.greenparty.org, and organizes with the NoSpray
Coalition, www.nospray.org and the Brooklyn Greens.

Pizza Nightmare: Total Surveillance Society

A dozen years ago a couple of friends and I were just sitting around on a rainy evening and we got a phone call. Never guess who it was….

A dozen years ago a couple of friends and I were just sitting around on a rainy evening and we got a phone call. Never guess who it was….
It was Pizza Hut calling to tell us that they were having a Tuesday night pizza delivery special. Wow, why are you calling us we thought? Well, we have installed a new computerized ordering system and you have ordered from us before, so since things were slow the system is having us call prevoius customers to offer tonight’s special. It was a good deal as I remember, so we ordered the two medium pizzas, 3 free Cokes, and free delivery. Too weird.

You think that was scary? Dude – I’ve got a great idea, let’s order a pizza. To view this video, you must have Flash player installed on your computer and please remember to turn up the sound.

Action: Tell Congress it’s Time to Stop Blocking Marijuana Research

I just received an email from the Drug Policy Alliance. Members of Congress are circulating an important Dear Colleague letter. For more please read below:

Members of Congress are rallying support to end an unjustifiable monopoly on the production of marijuana for research purposes in the United States. You can urge your Member of Congress to assist in ending this bureaucratic hurdle which impedes much-needed medical research, and support the University of Massachusetts-Amherst’s application to produce marijuana for FDA-approved research. Email Congress right now!

click here

more…

On Wednesday, September 21, 2005, Congressmen John Olver, Michael Capuano, Barney Frank and Dennis Kucinich sent out a Dear Colleague letter to Members of Congress in an attempt to rally Congressional support to send a letter to DEA Administrator Karen Tandy. The letter requests that the DEA end a federal monopoly on the production of marijuana for medical research and approve the application of Dr. Lyle Craker of the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

At present, the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) has an unjustifiable monopoly on the production of marijuana for research purposes in the United States, grown under contract to NIDA at the University of Mississippi. Federal law clearly requires adequate competition in the manufacture of marijuana for research purposes. UMass-Amherst is attempting to produce marijuana for FDA-approved research. With the current standards in place, no other institution in the country can produce or import marijuana for research purposes. This is the only drug in which the federal government has a monopoly over production.

The University of Massachusetts – Amherst is one of the nation’s most distinguished research universities, and it is highly qualified to manufacture marijuana for legitimate medical and research purposes with effective controls against diversion.

Providing assistance and rallying support, the Drug Policy Alliance has helped UMass-Amherst and the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS) on their proposal which would break past the government monopoly on marijuana research.

Please do your part: Email Congress right now!

click here

This Week In Marihuana

cannabis

The past three weeks have been pretty devastating, so I have not posted a diary in quite a while. I still collected marijuana news, but I just could not bring myself the write a diary that would just get lost in things that are so much more important. But, it also gave me time to think and reflect about the things that have been said by our elected officials about African-Americans. Even though things may have looked like they have changed in this country in the past 70 years we really have not come that far from testimony at hearings for the Marijuana Tax Act made by Harry Anslinger that marijuana had a violent “effect on the degenerate races.”

With all of the heavy stuff that has been going down in the past few weeks I thought that I would start off with some humour…
I was sent an email with a link to this video posted at Dave Barry’s Blog. Too funny for words.

One of the nice things about the Internet is that it mirrors the interconnectiveness of things in the real world. Here is an example demonstrated in the story One cash crop no longer green. The Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics, working in conjunction with the Grady County Sheriff’s Office, sprayed herbicides by hand on wild marijuana, which they admitted has little to no THC. Why by hand? Well, they usually spray from a helicopter, but theirs was on loan in the Hurricane Katrina effort. So, think about this for more than a second. Does the War on Some Drugs have a effect on the ability of our government to respond to emergencies and pay for these essential services? Would the money put into this war on our own be better of being spent on improvements in vital infrastructure and emergency preparedness?

Why does this meaningless war continue? Money and power, of course. Sometimes this leaks out and you can spot it easily, much like the latent racism that lurks under the veneer of our society leaked out after Hurricane Katrina. In the Anchorage Press story Why we all can’t just get a bong Southern District press spokesperson Al Overbaugh says:

Operation Headhunter wasn’t that financially lucrative. “We didn’t end up with all that much money in all of our cases.” But, he says, “we can’t put a company in jail, so we go after assets.” Forfeitures (assets seized under federal forfeiture laws) go to the Forfeiture Asset fund. The forfeiture money is usually returned to the state and local law enforcement, with a percentage going to various federal agencies.

I would not be surprised to hear that agencies did not participate wholeheartedly in Operation Headhunter because it wasn’t that lucrative. Of course the resulting public relations campaign was well reported. Hmmmm, no wonder law enforcement is using drug laws to target people just for their assets. More money for the agency, their next operation to get more assets and for the public relations push to do it all over again. Law enforcement should be about enforcing laws, not going after the most lucrative targets.

Reporters seem all to willing to go along with the game and report things like the story State’s war on pot getting more violent by Alan Gathright of the San Francisco Chronicle. Photographer Michael Macor took lots of pictures. That is much better than extensively quoting the latest Campaign Against Marijuana Planting (CAMP) press release, but really all this style of reporting does is ensure that Mr. Macor and Mr. Gathright get to go on helicopter rides!

Interestingly enough the Justice Policy Institute report Efficacy and Impact: The Criminal Justice Response to Marijuana Policy in the United States shows that the surge in marijuana arrests has little effect on usage rates. Well, when the point is to fund your bureau or agency usage rates mean little, that is if you can spin the media in your favor. Harry Anslinger was a master at this, so why change something that has put a lot of kids through college and gotten a lot of people nice pensions?

Once again we end with the political case of Marc Emery. Peter McKnight of the Vancouver Sun tells the story of Canadian Justice Minister Irwin Cotler in his article Cotler caught in a web of hemp. The very real possiblitiy of Marc Emery’s extradition to the United States to stand drugs charges is reported in a very long and thoughtful way. It’s well worth your time.

As always, there is a lot to read and a lot to think about. Once you have please go out and do something positive. I’m Cannabis and that’s it for “This Week In Marihuana.”

Crossposted at dKos and My Left Wing

Hurricane Housing

http://www.hurricanehousing.org

Dear MoveOn member,

Hurricane Katrina’s toll on communities, homes and lives has devastated the nation. Now victims must face the daunting question of where to go next–and we can help.

Tens of thousands of newly homeless families are being bused to a stadium in Houston, where they may wait for weeks or months. At least 80,000 are competing for area shelters, and countless more are in motels, cars, or wherever they can stay out of the elements. The Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Red Cross are scrambling to find shelter for the displaced.

This morning, we’ve launched an emergency national housing drive to connect your empty beds with hurricane victims who desperately need a place to wait out the storm. You can post your offer of housing (a spare room, extra bed, even a decent couch) and search for available housing online at:

http://www.hurricanehousing.org

Housing is most urgently needed within reasonable driving distance (about 300 miles) of the affected areas in the Southeast, especially New Orleans.

Please forward this message to anyone you know in the region who might be able to help.

But no matter where you live, your housing could still make a world of difference to a person or family in need, so please offer what you can.

The process is simple:

You can sign up to become a host by posting a description of whatever housing you have available, along with contact information. You can change or remove your offer at any time.

    Hurricane victims, local and national relief organizations, friends and relatives can search the site for housing. We’ll do everything we can to get your offers where they are needed most. Many shelters actually already have Internet access, but folks without ‘net access can still make use of the site through case workers and family members.

    Hurricane victims or relief agencies will contact hosts and together decide if it’s a good match and make the necessary travel arrangements. The host’s address is not released until a particular match is agreed on.

If hosting doesn’t work for you, please consider donating to the Red Cross to help with the enormous tasks of rescue and recovery. You can give online at:

http://www.redcross.org

As progressives, we share a core belief that we are all in this together, and today is an important chance to put that idea to work. There are thousands of families who have just lost everything and need a place to stay dry. Let’s do what we can to help.

http://www.hurricanehousing.org

Thanks for being there when it matters most.

–Noah Winer and the whole MoveOn.org Civic Action Team
  Thursday, September 1st, 2005

Reagan Library Discovers New Roberts Documents

Crossposted at dKos

Lest I be accused of being a single issue blogger here is something that has not appeared on the radar of many news outlets:

Dems Say Some Roberts Papers a Problem

The National Archives announced on Tuesday that the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif., had discovered a “large volume” of unreviewed and unreleased Roberts documents that were filed under a code instead of under Roberts’ name. Additional employees from the Archives have been sent to the Reagan library to review the documents to determine what or how much can be released, officials said.

There is also the question of the…
Bybee Torture Memo.

Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.), the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, met for more than an hour with Roberts and gave him a copy of a highly controversial 2002 memorandum written by Bush administration lawyers that provided legal arguments for when torture might be appropriate.

Leahy said that even though Roberts had nothing to do with the document, known as the “Bybee memo,” he would like Roberts to discuss the arguments in it and to ask him “in what areas, if any, is the president considered to be above the law.”

Leahy also complained about the continued absence of documents relating to Roberts and affirmative action that went missing from the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library after they were reviewed by Bush administration staff members.

An investigation by library officials has failed to find the memo Roberts wrote on the subject, along with supporting material.

Questions need to be asked. Democrats need to play the part of the loyal opposition. John G. Roberts Jr. was not chosen to be on the Supreme Court because he is a nice guy, he just plays one on TV.

This Week In Marihuana

cannabis

Crossposted at dKos

Another week has passed and again there were many noteworthy things going on in the cannabis realm. This will be a low graphics version. We will start this week with a lie. Not a big lie, mind you, just another in a series of lies meant to support the Big Lie about marijuana. This one comes from ONDCP Spokesman Tom Riley in this August 21st AFP story Thousands of pot lovers defiantly light-up at US hemp festival about the Seattle Hempfest.

The quote follows…

Federal officials view marijuana as a dependency-producing drug lacking medical benefit and see Hempfest activists as disconnected from reality, according to Tom Rile {sic} of the Office of National Drug Control Policy.

“There’s an urban myth the we are filling jails with low-level marijuana users,” Riley told AFP. “Almost everyone in jail for pot is charged with trafficking in large amounts of marijuana.”

Wow, do these people carry cards in their wallets with this month’s script on it? Do they actually believe what comes out of their own mouths? And the real problem is that the media is a willing enabler by printing such quotes without question. When I was a kid I believed the things that I was told in school. Stuff like the sixth grade anti-drug program that we had. It was not taught by a law enforcement official, so it had a much kid friendly feel to it. The thing that I remember most was that they lit an incense cone that smelled like burning marijuana. The funny thing was is that I don’t remember exactly we were told to do if we smelled this smell that they were introducing to us for the first time. Remember this was over thirty years ago in the Midwest, so it was pre D.A.R.E. In the end the lies that are passed off as fact in anti-drug classes just come back and haunt them – even more so if it is a police officer telling them. A kid tries pot and realizes that they have been lied to. So, the kids things what about the other things that we told? A lot of other drugs are in a different league altogether, but since what they were told about marijuana was a lie then… There is your gateway right there.

The next item on this week’s list is a post made by Jacob Sullum at Reason’s blog – Hit & Run. In the post Stevens: The Constitution Made Me Do It Mr Sullum wrote that:

Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens feels bad about the outcomes of Raich and Kelo but says the Constitution compelled him to support the federal crackdown on medical marijuana in California and the wanton use of eminent domain in Connecticut, both of which he opposes as a matter of policy. Since growing marijuana in your yard for your own medical use is so plainly an element of interstate commerce and a hotel is so obviously a “public use” that justifies forcible property transfers, what choice did he have?

This post was in response to the New York Times story Justice Weighs Desire v. Duty (Duty Prevails) by Linda Greenhouse:

Justice Stevens said he also regretted having to rule in favor of the federal government’s ability to enforce its narcotics laws and thus trump California’s medical marijuana initiative. “I have no hesitation in telling you that I agree with the policy choice made by the millions of California voters,” he said. But given the broader stakes for the power of Congress to regulate commerce, he added, “our duty to uphold the application of the federal statute was pellucidly clear.”

Unfortunately it sounds more like a cop out to me. Justice Stevens feels bad about his decision in Raich and now goes out on the lecture circuit to make his feelings known. Methinks that a legal mind of that caliber could have just as easily have made a better decision and found compelling arguments for it. Plus he would not feel that he had made the wrong decision.

And finally we have the hearings before administrative law judge Mary Ellen Bittner to see if eminent agronomist Dr Lyle Craker of the University of Massachusetts can grow his own marijuana for his research instead of the schwag from Ole Miss. Dr Cracker is already supported by Massachusetts’ senators Edward M. Kennedy and John F. Kerry as well as the ACLU. There is plenty of good reading material on the hearings on the Internet. There is the ACLU press release Hearings Begin Today in ACLU Challenge to Government Obstruction of Medical Marijuana Research. Here is the ACLU’s Medical Marijuana Page. Of course the moralists want to chime in on this one. Focus on the Family had Bill Wilson grab their template and churn out ACLU Wants DEA Approval for Marijuana Research. Be sure to look for the priceless quote from  Dr. Gene Rudd of the Christian Medical and Dental Association.

By far the best coverage of the hearings was the blog by Rick Doblin Notes on the MAPS/Craker/DEA hearing concerning the establishment of a pilot medical marijuana production facility at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. MAPS has the right idea, but right now politics seems to trump science. Let us hope that there will be some good changes on this front soon.

As always, there is a lot to read and a lot to think about. Once you have please go out and do something positive. I’m Cannabis and that’s it for “This Week In Marihuana.”

This Week In Marihuana

cannabis

Crossposted at dKos

Well, it’s that time of year again. There are marijuana festivals being held from coast to coast in the U.S. and Canada. One of the biggest and the oldest is the Seattle Hempfest. Today and tomorrow an estimated 150,000 people will converge on Myrtle Edwards Park in Seattle. The theme this year is education, so I will take this opportunity to share some news and information to educate us all.

$1 Tax Stamp
$1 Tax Stamp

First off, I have had a number of comments that the way I spell marihuana is wrong. Well, it’s not the most common spelling, but it is the spelling that is used in the legal definition of marihuana and hey, it got your attention, didn’t it. Add it to your spelling checker and get on with life.

So, onward through the fog…
Here is a humorous story, that had a not so great outcome.

Kenaf
Hibiscus cannabinus L.

The story is told in this two year old article “Was It Pot Or Not?.” The answer, of course, was it was not. It was kenaf purposely planted as deer food. But, because of the way that things work a federal judge ruled that Harrison County Sheriff George H. Payne Jr. had “qualified immunity” as is pointed out in this update from The Clarion Ledger: “Judge: Plants destroyed by mistake.” An honest mistake, but an expensive one, and not just in dollars spent, but at a great cost to us all.

A DEA Task Force agent spots some suspicious plants from the air and notifies the county sheriff. The sheriff and his deputies mobilize their eradication unit and bring in 4WD vehicles, some Stihl weedwhackers and bunch of inmates. They all enter the suspect property without a warrant, because those plants might be a flight risk. With proper supervision and oversight the inmates cut down all of the “marijuana” and load it into trucks to be hauled off. I wonder how hard they were laughing? Never mind the white flowers. Here is what the real stuff looks like. The female is front and center and the males are the scrawny ones that look a little past their prime. Simple enough, eh?

Female

Next up is “Brewing a pot of hysteria” Nature Neuroscience 8, 971-971 (01 Aug 2005) Editorial. Luckily the full text of this editorial has been posted here. It is an excellent read and well worth your time. It does reference the excellent 1999 Institute of Medicine study “Marijuana and Medicine: Assessing the Science Base“. If you have not read it before you really should. Here is the same study in a slightly different HTML format without the pages available in PDF format.

Speaking of editorials about the drug war here is one from an unlikely source, The Washington Times. In the editorial Against the drug war A.G. Gancarsk reviews the book An Analytic Assessment of U.S. Drug Policy by David Boyum and Peter Reuter of the American Enterprise Institute. The full text of this book is available here as an Adobe Acrobat PDF.

And finally we need to talk some more about Marc Emery. Connie Fogal has a very long piece titled “Marijuana and the Loss of Canadian Sovereignty US Interference in Canadian Criminal Law and Policy pertaining to Marijuana” at GlobalResearch.ca. What we need to remember about Marc is that he was the head of a registered political party in Canada who paid his taxes and tried to work the system from the inside. And you thought that his arrest wasn’t politically motivated.

As always, there is a lot to read and a lot to think about. Once you have please go out and do something positive. I’m Cannabis and that’s it for “This Week In Marihuana.”

This Week In Marihuana

cannabis

Crossposted at dKos

This week, as always, I have been doing a lot of reading on Cannabis related subjects. I no particular order here is a sampling of what I have been reading.

There was this little gem from August 10th at DEA Watch:

CNN: Inside the DEA

I have read a lot of stuff, so there’s more at the jump…

In a PR effort to counter the damaging international publicity we’ve been getting over the past 48 hours about Venezuela the WH has invited CNN and other media broadcasters to HQ to tell the public what a wonderful and essential job DEA is doing. The first PR broadcast was aired by CNN this morning on the Wolf BlitZion show, but leave it to Blitzer and CNN to screw it up, as usual.

If and when we can get more time to tell the world that DEA is only interested in fighting drugs and not toppling governments to steal their resources we should be able to counter some of the negative press about us coming out of Caracas.

I’m sorry that I missed it, but I don’t watch CNN. I like to read, so I guess that I miss the propaganda.

Then there is My message to you by Marc Emery. This is an interesting piece. Yes, there is some self promotion, but he has a lot to say. The story starts with:

Marc writes about how he feels about this extradition case, and reflects on what he has done so far in his activist career.

I had that ‘life flashing before me’ moment. The frozen second in time when everything was sharp, clear, and signalled a great convergence of all my effort into this precise moment.

“Marc Emery, you are under arrest for Extradition to The United States of America.”

All my seeds sold, all the millions of dollars I had given to the cause, every speech to free our people, every arrest, jailing and raid I had endured: it was all for this moment in time. “For trafficking in marijuana seeds, for the production of marijuana, and for money laundering”

In 1990, when I became a cannabis activist, all books, magazines, videos, pipes, bongs, everything about even saying the word marijuana was illegal in Canada.

The New York Times had a couple of interesting stories. The first one was Debunking the Drug War by John Tierney and surprisingly it was on their top five e-mailed stories on August the 9th. Mr Tierney hits the nail on the head in this one. He even points out that the media is a willing enabler in this war as well:

America has a serious drug problem, but it’s not the “meth epidemic” getting so much publicity. It’s the problem identified by William Bennett, the former national drug czar and gambler.

“Using drugs,” he wrote, “is wrong not simply because drugs create medical problems; it is wrong because drugs destroy one’s moral sense. People addicted to drugs neglect their duties.”

This problem afflicts a small minority of the people who have tried methamphetamines, but most of the law-enforcement officials and politicians who lead the war against drugs. They’re so consumed with drugs that they’ve lost sight of their duties.

Like addicts desperate for a high, they’ve declared meth the new crack, which was once called the new heroin (that title now belongs to OxyContin). With the help of the press, they’re once again frightening the public with tales of a drug so seductive it instantly turns masses of upstanding citizens into addicts who ruin their health, their lives and their families.

Later this week The New York Times had a story on Marc Emery by Clifford Krauss This Johnny Appleseed Is Wanted by the Law. Mr Krauss even got an “Overgrow the Government” quote from Mr Emery:

“I have a master plan,” Mr. Emery said in an interview in the offices of his magazine, Cannabis Culture. “I’ve wanted to be the Johnny Appleseed of marijuana, so if we produced millions and millions of marijuana plants all over the world, it would be impossible for governments to eradicate or control all of it.”

In other words, he added, he wants “to overgrow the governments” that punish marijuana users.

Of course I read the story Bush’s War on Pot by Robert Dreyfuss in Rolling Stone. Mr Dreyfuss points out what many people seem to know and that is you don’t win wars by just throwing money at the problem:

By almost any measure, however, the war has been as monumental a failure as the invasion of Iraq. All told, the government sinks an estimated $35 billion a year into the War on Drugs. Yet illegal drugs remain cheap and plentiful, and coca cultivation in the Andes — where the Bush administration has spent $5.4 billion to eradicate cocaine — rose twenty-nine percent last year. “Drug prices are at an all-time low, drug purity is at an all-time high, and polls show that drugs are more available than ever,” says Bill Piper, national affairs director for the Drug Policy Alliance, a drug-reform organization in Washington, D.C. Drug smugglers and South American cocaine growers, he adds, are fast developing new ways to evade U.S. eradication efforts. “All they have to do is double their efforts,” he says. “They can adapt more quickly than the government can.”

Yes, but you sure can pad your budget well and get a nice pension without too much trouble.

And then there is this really long story Cannabis Cure: Miracle or Myth? by Laura McPhee from of all places, Indianapolis, Indiana. In it Ms McPhee takes arch drug-warrior Congressman Mark Souder to task:

According to Indiana Congressman Mark Souder, the use of marijuana for medical purposes is “quackery” and “a myth.” As chairman of the House Subcommittee that oversees the nation’s drug policy, Souder’s opinion echoes that of federal agencies like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA).

According to the DEA, “Marijuana is a dangerous, addictive drug that poses significant health threats to users. Marijuana has no medical value that can’t be met more effectively by legal drugs. Drug legalizers use medical marijuana as a red herring in effort to advocate broader legalization of drug use.”

These statements are presented as fact, and are the basis for nearly all public policy and federal law concerning marijuana, not to mention the “evidence” cited by opponents of medical marijuana like Congressman Souder [for more on Souder, see sidebar]. Opposing viewpoints, indeed contradictory scientific, medical, and legal research, are rarely given credence.

However, an examination of the facts about marijuana demonstrates that the most common and dangerous myths about America’s most widely used illegal drug and its medicinal value are actually those perpetuated by the federal government itself.

So, there is a lot to read, but that is it for This Week In Marihuana.

Is Marihuana Law Enforcement Political?

cannabis

In an interesting story, Pursuit of drug case all smoke, no fire, by Joel Connelly of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer notes that:

With an ill-advised statement politicizing the case that also misspelled Emery’s first name, the DEA boss may help transform a publicity seeker into a Canadian martyr.

Seeking to stop his extradition to the United States — where he faces charges of trafficking in marijuana seeds — Emery’s legal team could use Tandy’s words to telling effect: Their client is being prosecuted for his beliefs.

more below the fold…
It is telling that Marc Emery’s first name misspelled in the statement that Joel Connelly received from DEA in the statement by Karen Tandy:

Consider the contrasting bluster of Tandy’s statement from the DEA home office in the other Washington.

“Today’s arrest of Mark (sic) Scott Emery, publisher of Cannabis Culture magazine and the founder of a marijuana legalization group, is a significant blow not only to the marijuana trafficking trade in the U.S. and Canada, but also to the marijuana legalization movement.”

Why? Tandy gives us a handy dose of innuendo.

“Hundreds of thousands of dollars of Emery’s illicit profits are known to have been channeled to marijuana legalization groups active in the United States and Canada. Drug legalization lobbyists now have one less pot of money to rely on.”

Why is it telling you ask? Because the same misspelling was in the press release from the United States Attorney’s Office, Western District of Washington:

“The tentacles of the Mark Emery criminal enterprise reached out across North America to include all 50 United States and Canada,” said Special Agent in Charge Rodney G. Benson of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). “Mr. Emery utilized the internet to sell his marijuana seeds throughout this country to customers no matter their age. He directed his business with efficiency, was motivated by greed, and will now be prosecuted for this illegal activity.”

So, the press release above and the one distributed, presumably by fax or email, to Joel Connelly and other reporters was written by the same people, or was copied from the same original draft. By the way, the word Internet should be capitalized as well. So Marc Emery, like so many other cases in the history of drug law enforcement, is being prosecuted for political reasons.

Marijuana drug law has always been political. Even the word “marihuana” is a political word. It is no accident that marihuana came from Mexican slang. As is my handle the proper name for this plant is Cannabis sativa. Do a search for the word in the U.S. Controlled Substances Act and you will find it. The original use of the word was in the The Marihuana Tax Act of 1937, which of course was a pet project of Harry Anslinger. He was a master at media manipulation. Everything that he did was to make sure that his bureau did not end up like the Bureau of Prohibition, extinct. You see, the entire purpose of a government agency is to spend their budget this year and get more funding next year. All you have to do is to use the media to make people fear that which they don’t understand. It still works.