GOP ‘strategist’ shoots Capito in the foot

Crossposted from West Virginia Blue.

I read the latest drivel from rightwing “strategist” and former West Virginia Republican Party executive director Gary Abernathy and had the usual reaction: “That’s it? That’s all you’ve got?”

Once again, Abernathy treats politics like it’s a junior high school clique and he’s the gossipiest girl in school.

In taking aim at State Sen. John Unger, however, Abernathy inadvertantly shot Unger’s opponent, vulnerable Rep. Shelley Moore Capito in the foot.

Unger’s WEPM  radio cohost, news director Chris Strovel, took a job as a field staffer for Capito. Now I’m about as partisan as you can get and no fan of Capito’s, but my initial reaction was I was glad Strovel finally got a job that would pay him money. After carrying water for conservatives for years, it was about time he got some pay back for his efforts.

My second thought was how weird the Martinsburg Journal was for not mentioning Unger in their story on Strovel.

But Abernathy, political “strategist” that he is, tries to make it about Unger.

Probably no one knows John Unger better than Chris Strovel, and the fact that Strovel is taking a job with the person Unger wants to topple should tell us all we need to know about Unger and the feelings of the people who know him best.

That’s it? That’s all he’s got?

As a regular listener of Panhandle Live, I know that Strovel and Unger have commented on their friendship and respect for each other many times over the years.

Now Abernathy can either call Strovel a liar or he can admit he is desperately throwing any kind of mud, including made-up mud, to find something to stick to Unger.

Considering how often Abernathy has made up shit about Unger, it’s pretty safe to say Strovel is not a liar.

But what is interesting is how Abernathy’s post also reveals about his “skill” as a political “strategist.”

I’m an amateur blogger. I saw how he shot Capito in the foot immediately. Professional Republicans are probably screaming, “Abernathy, you f’n idiot! Capito doesn’t need friends like you!”

You see, in his poor effort at reading the tea leaves, Abernathy highlights a story that:

  1. Shows a veteran staffer of Capito’s left her before an election where many consider her vulnerable. In other words the rats are leaving her sinking ship.
  2. We can read Strovel’s words for ourselves and not only does he not say anything negative about Unger, he also does not say anything positive about his new boss Capito.

Now I’m not dumb like Abernathy, so I won’t read anything into that and unlike Abernathy I’ll let Strovel speak for himself.

But if Abernathy wants to continue to make things up, I’ll be happy to report soon on what I “dug” up on him. It’s despicable behavior even for a Republican and it is something he has never denied doing.

However, with “strategic” “thinking” like his latest, it is easy to see why the West Virginia GOP tossed Abernathy aside.

Two ball soccer with squirt guns

The other day I created a new game for my three children.
When we play “soccer” it’s the 6-year-old and I on one team vs. the 9-year-old and the 3-year-old because my middle daughter is very competitive with my oldest, who is very easy going about it. The 3-year-old inevitably wants to be on Daddy’s team so after the first couple of kicks it’s 3-on-1. One goal is the wall of the shed where I store the mowers and bikes. The other goal is along a row of pine trees where I carved out a tree cave for the girls.

Mostly it’s to create an excuse to make them run back and forth in the back yard so that they burn off energy and get exercise. But 3-on-1 isn’t always very much fun for even the most easiest going of daughters. And the youngest feels left out because she tends to spend her time in the middle of the field.

So I threw in an extra soccer ball and armed the three girls with squirt guns and said in the new rules it was everybody against everybody although you could partner up with people to bring down the ball but who ever scored the goal got the point and whoever shot me good with a squirt gun got a point.

It turned out to be a very fastpaced game that’s lots of fun and a good metaphor (or is it simile?) for my experience as a political blogger for a state blog.

Especially in West Virginia.

The other day a right wing blogger, Chris Stirewalt of the State Journal (I’ve dubbed him Bow Tie Boy because…well, if you follow the links you’ll see why) made it clear he could not understand how Clem and I at West Virginia Blue could be so against coal-to-liquid and still be working so hard to elect our Democrats.

He could have picked several issues. You look at our blog and I’m constantly on Senator Jay Rockefeller (multiple posts a week, sometimes multiple posts a day) to investigate torture, I’m constantly posting on pro-choice issues when our representatives are anti-choice; and Clem has totally owned the liquid coal issue. On stem cell research, our lone Republican voted with the majority of Democrats while our two Democratic representatives Rahall and Mollohan voted with the Republicans. And we haven’t been supportive of our Democratic legislature either on the state issue of tabletop gaming.

So to explain to him and to our West Virginia readers in the state and Capitol Hill, I followed up with this On Blogging:

Most definitely what Digby said.

Go listen to her to understand what political blogging means.

I’ve seen some references from people on the right unable to understand us. Of course they can’t understand us. By temperament, the right is authoritarian to the point they’d love nothing more than to live in a dictatorship (and that’s not hyperbole). The RNC faxes and emails the talking points. The GOP side of the aisle in Congress use them in speeches, the hate radio mongers like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity repeat them to listeners and so the rightwing message trickles down to even the lowly political editor at The State Journal who so earnestly repeats it. That is how the rightwing echo chamber works.

We’re Democrats. We work differently. We do not belong to an organized political party as becomes apparent to anyone who has ever volunteered for a campaign. We’re more like a big messy family. We disagree — sometimes quite loudly — about different ideas. But the ties that bind us together are much stronger than the issues that separate us. That is why we can criticize our Congressional delegation and still work to elect them. Because while they have been wrong about many issues, they’ve been absolutely right on so many more. Our Democratic caucus in Congress, particularly Senator Robert C. Byrd and Rep. Nick Rahall (WV-03), have been among the finest in standing up to the attempts by the imperial-minded President George W. Bush to assume anti-American, dictatorial powers.

When we disagree with them we do not hesitate to try to steer them in the right direction. We push ideas and take stances that sometimes run counter to the views held by our elected Democrats. That is because the best ideas often grow from the grassroots and are pushed by people like us to our elected officials.

It might be easier for our Democrats in the short-term if we operated like the right, but it’s not good in the long-term. President Bush has shown just how dangerous it can be when our politicians only listen to the people who agree with them.

There has been much made lately by the Sean Hannitys of the world that political blogs are pushing the Democratic Party to the left as if that is a bad thing. What those “pundits” ignore is that bloggers are just people and we are reflecting the views held by the majority of Americans whether it is on ending the occupation that keeps our soldiers pinned down in Iraq’s civil war or providing health care to all Americans. We’re pushing the Democratic Party to the left because that is where the American people are going and that is where the party should be.

There are times I really feel though we’ve been very successful in working as bloggers to push our agenda.

It’s just like 2 ball soccer. Sometimes you partner up with an opponent to get the ball down the field and sometimes you oppose your occasional team mate.

Before the 2006 election, I’d written numerous posts on the old West Virginia Blue blogger site and here on coal mine operator Don Blankenship trying to buy the West Virginia legislature. About two weeks before the election, if I recall correctly, I got an email from a man in Washington, D.C., and I recognized the name from Crashing the Gates as a political consultant. And not one who was written about in a favorable light. He asked me to call and gave me his cellphone and it was late, but I called anyway. He had seen my diaries on Blankenship and we talked for an hour about Blankenship and West Virginia politics and messaging. He wouldn’t tell me who his client was at the time, but it wasn’t hard to figure out. A week later I received in my mailbox as did just about every other West Virginian a slick mailer tailored to each district where a Blankenship delegate or senator was running about Blankenship’s efforts. Of the 42 candidates heavily funded to the tune of millions by Blankenship, 40 Democrats run to 2 of his candidates. Did I cost Blankenship his election? Of course not. I could never have funded the mailers or put together the message to reach all of the West Virginians. But I did play a part and was part of a successful Democratic team effort.

Meanwhile, we successfully drafted our WV-02 Democratic candidate John Unger, a state senator I’ve known for more than a decade, who also was courted by the DCCC, who I know for a fact were influenced in part by us lefty bloggers. How often are the grassroots-netroots and the DCCC kicking the ball down the field together to take a shot on goal?

It’s wild and wonderful and at times it’s easy to forget who is scoring the goals because the real goal is something different.

Chasing fireflies

Crossposted at The Mystery of the Haunted Vampire and West Virginia Blue.

There might be no greater joy on the planet than watching a 6 year old chase fireflies on a pleasant June evening.
I had finished mowing tonight and was putting tools away in the tool shed. The sun was setting beyond the hills and the sky above the ridgeline to the west was a light blue while to the east it was dark and the first stars were out. My daughter chased fireflies and asked me to join her and instead I watched. “There’s one,” she said. “Ooh, I almost caught it…Dad, you’re not chasing them.”

She took me by the hand. “Do you want to see where we picked the blackberries?” she asked. I told her yes and she guided me through the twilight darkness around their treehouse and behind a neighbor’s abandoned, wooden shed bordering our property. She and her siblings had picked a large bowlful of berries during the day. “They grow so quick,” she said. “We must have picked 200,000!”

We walked back to the yard and she chased another firefly.

High above a silver crescent of a moon hung while fireflies sparkled over the neighbor’s cornfield behind our back yard. A bat circled over us snatching bugs in flight. “Cool,” she said as I pointed it out to her. “Do you think it’s a vampire?” I told her it probably wasn’t.

I leaned down and kissed the top of her head. “Do you know how happy you make me?” I asked quietly.

“Yeah,” she said nonchalantly. “I know.”

The Untold Story of YearlyCarnacki

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
About 20 of us – bloggers and family members – met at the National Zoo in Washington, D.C. for the third annual YearlyCarnacki. (The first year we met in Harpers Ferry, last year in Baltimore. Next year might be in Philadelphia, although there’s the danger of monsters.

YearlyCarnacki got off to a pleasant start. The weather was beautiful though hot. As usual, it was like herding cats to get people together in the same place, but nevertheless we were walking together to see the lions and tigers when I noticed a commotion behind us.

I followed the gaze of the people. President George W. Bush had picked that day of all days to go to the zoo.

Nuts, I thought.

I was there with my 6-year-old Carnacki Girl and didn’t want to risk yet another confrontation with the White House administration with her with me.

I decided the best reaction for me was to pretend as if he wasn’t even there, like he was an inconsequential nothing.

“Hey, there’s Bush,” said jsmdlawyer. “I’m gonna moon him.”

His wife grabbed him in an embrace and told him not in front of the children. I looked over and jsmdlawyer’s son Wolf Boy was pulling up his pants. He had already mooned the president.

We walked over to the tiger pen and then to the lion pen when it happened.

The President of the United States had fallen into the pen with the lions.

I went into full-blown crisis mode. This was an emergency. “Quick,” I told my daughter. “Run over there and get daddy some popcorn.”

Emergency averted, I waited for her return and the other bloggers from Daily Kos and Booman Tribune lined up next to me to watch.

Then the thought hit me. Nuts, I thought. If the lion eats President Bush, that means my nemesis Dick Cheney would become even more Presidenter. He’d be the Presidentist!

“Somebody ought to…” I managed to get out of “Somebody ought to do something” when I felt hands grip me tightly from both sides and hurl me over the wall and into the lion’s den. As I fell I saw that DCDemocrat, BooMan, kredwyn and JanetTinMD had thrown me in while Brother Feldspar and JEB took pictures.

Nuts, I thought. Once again I recalled too late the risk of hanging out with quicker thinking people.

I splashed across the lagoon to do what I could to protect President Bush, a man I despised.

As I looked into the lion’s eyes, my life flashed across my life: growing up in Alabama; working as a seamstress; refusing to give up my bus seat to James Blake; going to jail…when it hit me. I was about to die and the wrong life was flashing before me.
Nuts, I said.

President Bush ran shrieking from the lion. He sprang into a tree with a surprising nimbleness, climbed the trunk, raced across a branch and jumped into the arms of a man with a yellow hat.

It wasn’t the President of the United States. It was a monkey.

“Come along, George,” the man said, and then I wasn’t so sure.

A zoo keeper lowered a ladder into the pen. The lion yawned and looked lazily at me. I climbed out and CabinGirl handed me a towel.

“So was that the president?” I asked the zoo keeper.

She shook her head no.

“How embarrassing,” I said.

“It happens here all the time,” she said.

Women

This is a diary about pole vaulting, a stoning, and women.

The Washington Post had a story on teenage pole vaulter Allison Stokke.

I want to highlight something lower down in the article first:

A former gymnast, Stokke had tried pole vaulting as a lark as a freshman in high school. Two months later, she set a school record. She won the 2004 state championship three months after that. Stokke had augmented her natural, pole-vaulting disposition — speed, upper-body strength and courage — by lifting weights three times each week. College programs including Harvard, Stanford and UCLA also recruited her.

During her meet at Cerritos College, Stokke cleared 11 feet, then 12 feet, then 13 feet and qualified for the state meet. By the time she stared ahead at a bar set 13 feet 6 inches, all other nine pole vaulters had maxed out. Stokke warmed up by herself, the only athlete left.

I pole vaulted in high school. I was never as good as Stokke. The best height I ever cleared was 13 feet. I won the league championship and sectional championship, but finished third in the division and had a disastrous regional meet. Too many injuries had caught up to me.

I mention that because I want to emphasis something about Stokke: courage. My track coach always claimed he picked his pole vaulters by finding the craziest people on the team and making them pole vault.

She loved pole vaulting because it was a sport built on intricacies. Each motion required calculation and precision. A well-executed vault blended a dancer’s timing, a sprinter’s speed and a gymnast’s grace. “There’s so much that happens in a vault below the surface,” Stokke said.

As the sun set Friday night, Stokke positioned her pole as if she were jousting and sprinted about 100 feet toward the bar. She ran on her tip-toes, like she’d learned from ballet. As she approached her mark, Stokke bent her pole into the ground and coiled her legs to her chest. She lifted upward, twisting her torso 180 degrees as she passed over the bar. It was a beautiful clearance, and the crowd stood to applaud.

It’s an incredibly hard sport and Stokke has already mastered it, winning the state championship twice.

But what she’s known for on the Internet is something she never sought. She’s been subjected to lewd Internet postings.

Admittedly, she’s a beautiful young woman. But to many, she’s simply an object to lust after.

I know as a man I’ve lusted plenty in my time. But there’s a difference between a glance and open leers.

And that’s what Stokke has been subjected to.

Today, an unofficial web site www.allisonstokke.com went down after The Post featured a story on her.

Farewell

Sorry for having contributed to the unwanted attention, Allison.  We think you’re a phenomenal athlete and wish you the best of luck in your academic and athletic endeavors.

Good for the web site. But they weren’t the egregious offenders:

She gave them the Internet tour that she believed now defined her: to the unofficial Allison Stokke fan page, complete with a rolling slideshow of 12 pictures; to the fan group on MySpace, with about 1,000 members; to the message boards and chat forums where hundreds of anonymous users looked at Stokke’s picture and posted sexual fantasies.

I’m writing about this because it’s just plain wrong. There’s nothing wrong with women who want to show off their sexy side (I’m a huge fan of Shakira), but it is wrong for men to just treat women like Stokke as objects for their gratification.

I would say that didn’t need to be stated, but look at where we are with the treatment of women today.

We’ve got Supreme Court decisions following the 19th century views of women:

Quite simply, these justifications are premised on 19th-century conceptions of women as not being rational agents. And such justifications evidently underpin a great deal of anti-choice discourse and policy (most obviously seen in the fact that the official Republican position is that abortion is murder but women who obtain them should be entirely exempt from legal sanctions.) At least Kennedy was decent enough to give away the show, admitting that these assertions are backed by “no reliable data,” leaving us with meaningless claims that some women may regret their decision to obtain abortions in retrospect. (If some women regret getting married, can we ban that too? How about anecdotal evidence about women who become depressed after becoming mothers, does this justify state-mandated abortions?) These arguments aren’t about women’s health; they’re about assumptions that women are incapable of making moral judgments, period.

We’ve got Supreme Court decisions saying that it is okay that women are valued less than men. Justice Ginsburg:

The problem of concealed pay discrimination is particularly acute where the disparity arises not because the female employee is flatly denied a raise but because male counterparts are given larger raises. Having received a pay increase, the female employee is unlikely to discern at once that she has experienced an adverse employment decision. She may have little reason even to suspect discrimination until a pattern develops incrementally and she ultimately becomes aware of the disparity. Even if an employee suspects that the reason for a comparatively low raise is not performance but sex (or another protected ground), the amount involved may seem too small, or the employer’s intent too ambiguous, to make the issue immediately actionable — or winnable.

I could go on and on. There are too many recent examples to cite, from threats to women who have the audacity to post their views on the Internet (“blogging while female” one friend described it to me) to the paternalism of Rudy Guiliani’s responses to women asking serious questions.

But I want to highlight this post by Joss Whedon. Like Christy Hardin Smith, it has haunted me.

Last month seventeen year old Dua Khalil was pulled into a crowd of young men, some of them (the instigators) family, who then kicked and stoned her to death. This is an example of the breath-taking oxymoron “honor killing”, in which a family member (almost always female) is murdered for some religious or ethical transgression. Dua Khalil, who was of the Yazidi faith, had been seen in the company of a Sunni Muslim, and possibly suspected of having married him or converted. That she was torturously murdered for this is not, in fact, a particularly uncommon story. But now you can watch the action up close on CNN. Because as the girl was on the ground trying to get up, her face nothing but red, the few in the group of more than twenty men who were not busy kicking her and hurling stones at her were filming the event with their camera-phones.

There were security officers standing outside the area doing nothing, but the footage of the murder was taken – by more than one phone – from the front row. Which means whoever shot it did so not to record the horror of the event, but to commemorate it. To share it. Because it was cool.

I could start a rant about the level to which we have become desensitized to violence, about the evils of the voyeuristic digital world in which everything is shown and everything is game, but honestly, it’s been said. And I certainly have no jingoistic cultural agenda. I like to think that in America this would be considered unbearably appalling, that Kitty Genovese is still remembered, that we are more evolved. But coincidentally, right before I stumbled on this vid I watched the trailer for “Captivity”.

snip

What is wrong with women?

I mean wrong. Physically. Spiritually. Something unnatural, something destructive, something that needs to be corrected.

How did more than half the people in the world come out incorrectly? I have spent a good part of my life trying to do that math, and I’m no closer to a viable equation. And I have yet to find a culture that doesn’t buy into it. Women’s inferiority – in fact, their malevolence — is as ingrained in American popular culture as it is anywhere they’re sporting burkhas. I find it in movies, I hear it in the jokes of colleagues, I see it plastered on billboards, and not just the ones for horror movies. Women are weak. Women are manipulative. Women are somehow morally unfinished. (Objectification: another tangential rant avoided.) And the logical extension of this line of thinking is that women are, at the very least, expendable.

I try to think how we got here. The theory I developed in college (shared by many I’m sure) is one I have yet to beat: Womb Envy. Biology: women are generally smaller and weaker than men. But they’re also much tougher. Put simply, men are strong enough to overpower a woman and propagate. Women are tough enough to have and nurture children, with or without the aid of a man. Oh, and they’ve also got the equipment to do that, to be part of the life cycle, to create and bond in a way no man ever really will. Somewhere a long time ago a bunch of men got together and said, “If all we do is hunt and gather, let’s make hunting and gathering the awesomest achievement, and let’s make childbirth kinda weak and shameful.” It’s a rather silly simplification, but I believe on a mass, unconscious level, it’s entirely true. How else to explain the fact that cultures who would die to eradicate each other have always agreed on one issue? That every popular religion puts restrictions on women’s behavior that are practically untenable? That the act of being a free, attractive, self-assertive woman is punishable by torture and death? In the case of this upcoming torture-porn, fictional. In the case of Dua Khalil, mundanely, unthinkably real. And both available for your viewing pleasure.

Whedon is on full-steam ahead rant mode and it’s a thing of beauty as he gets rolling.

I think he hit it on the head. Men are jealous of women and that’s why they abuse them so in in thought and in deed.

I’m a man. I’ve been one my whole life. And though I’ve dated many women in my life, some seriously and some not so seriously, and though I’m very close to my wife and my ex wife, and though I am the father of young daughters, I am not really qualified to write about women. So I’m posting this in the dead of night when few will see it.

But I couldn’t sleep because the story I read about Stokke weighed on my mind. Others had written much more eloquently and passionately about Dua Khalil, and the SCOTUS decisions.

It seems a far cry from a pole vaulter to the death of a teenage girl in Iraq. It’s not. The sexual objectification of Stokke and the murder of Khalil are both symptoms of the same problem: men don’t treat women as equals.

You hear people mouth the words, but then you hear a Don Imus refer to female athletes as “hos” and you read another account of a young woman murdered by an estranged boyfriend. It’s enough to make me sick of my entire gender.

I had a police friend, a gruff older guy, who told me he hoped his daughter grew up to be a lesbian. He’d been on one too many calls involving an abusive boyfriend who thought it was his right to always have his way and if he didn’t get it he could beat the shit out of the girlfriend. (I don’t mean to put lesbians on a pedestal or to make saints of women, but when I think of the high percentage of idiots I’ve met among my gender I can see where my friend is coming from.)

I’m really sick of the mistreatment of women in this country and elsewhere. I’ve been guilty of it too. For a while when asked if Ms. Carnacki and I planned to have more children, I would answer, I’d like to have a son. I have three beautifully spirited daughters and as Ms. Carnacki reminded (she too is from a family of three girls), it can hurt girls to hear that, as if they’re not good enough. That was never my intent of course. Yet I did it. Now I frequently point out to them how much I love having daughters. And I mean it.

Sexism is stupid. I’d like to think we were evolving as a species beyond the point where such inequality still existed, but we haven’t. We still treat half of the species as if they’re inferior even though they pole vault, break up bar brawls, nurse wounds and most miraculously of all give birth to continue the species.

I want to believe it is getting better for women, but as optimistic as I tend to be it’s hard for me to see much cause for hope because men have made such a mess of the world. When I do see hope, it’s with people like Stokke and my girls and many other women leading the way.

George W. Bush and Osama bin Laden

George W. Bush, press conference, May 25, 2007:

“Yesterday, in my speech, I quoted quotes from Osama bin Laden. And the reason I did was, is that I want the American people to hear what he has to say — not what I say, what he says. And in my judgment, we ought to be taking the words of the enemy seriously.

George W. Bush, press conference, March 12, 2002:

“So I don’t know where he is.  You know, I just don’t spend that much time on him, Kelly, to be honest with you.
George W. Bush should have been impeached for criminal malfeasance in not taking action after he was warned of an impending terrorist threat to the United States and then for his incompetence in going after the masterminds of the plot.

GBCW (Dick Cheney edition)

You’re about to enter another dimension. You’re about to enter The Carnacki Zone.


The men approached me in dark suits and dark sun glasses. “Into the car,” the nearest said.

I shrugged and got in. My choices were mowing the grass or abduction and I didn’t feel like mowing.

“OK, where are we going?” I said.

“To an undisclosed location,” the man next to me said.

I swallowed hard with fear. My last visit with Vice President Dick Cheney had not gone well. Oh I had survived and escaped. But the holy water I had sprayed on him had not destroyed him as I thought. It had only ruined his tie — cut from the skin of a still-living baby panda. He loved that tie. It was a gift from Lynn.

I tried to think what MacGuyver would do to escape. Thinking of MacGuyver made me think of Richard Dean Anderson. That led me to Stargate: SG-1. SG-1 made me think of my favorite sci-fi series Firefly. That made me think of how stupid Fox was for messing up the show and cancelling it before it had a chance to find an audience. The black sedan pulled in through a gate and up a curved drive. I had missed my opportunity to escape.

“Could we go around the block again?” I asked the driver. He looked at me in the rear view mirror.

“Nuts,” I said.

I was led inside. The house smelled of putrid corpses. (By the way, if you google putrid corpses my blog is the third entry out of 82,200 sites. I didn’t know that until just now.)

Vice President Cheney stepped into the entry way from an adjoining room. He carried a shotgun in one hand and a bottle of Crown Royal Special Reserve in the other.

“You aaannngred meeee,” he slurred.

“Oh,” I said. “I do that a lot to people. Especially of late.”

“Nottt mee,” he said. He thumped his chest with the forearm wielding the shotgun. His face turned blank and an alarm sounded. It sounded like it came from his chest. Then I heard the distinct sound of grinding gears and machinery. He thumped his chest again and the grinding noise stopped and I heard a faint hum.

“My tickkker,” he said.

“You mean that literally,” I said.

“No heart,” he said, looking forlorn and almost human as if he missed having one.

For a second we looked at each other and I felt a look of understanding occurred. No heart. He was inhuman and could not…

My sympathy must have showed on my face for he grew angry. His anger seemed to sober him up.

“I like to hunt,” he said.

“I’ve heard.”

“I’m gonna hunt you,” he said.

“Oh,” I said.

“The fence is 20 feet high. There are guards at the gate. You cannot escape.”

At that moment, I felt a pang of regret for all the things I would not get to do: Yearly Carnacki (this Saturday, 11 a.m. at the entrance of the National Zoo in Washington, D.C. Click on link for further details); seeing my children growing up; dancing on Jerry Falwell’s grave.

“I’ll give you a five-second head start,” he said.

I turned to run.

“One,” he said and I heard the shotgun blast behind as loud as a cannon.

“You said you’d give me a…,” I said indignantly then slapped my hand to more forehead. “Oh wait, you always lie.”

He cocked another round and I ran out the door around the house and to the trees in the back. I had to think. What would MacGuyver do? Five minutes later my thoughts were interrupted by the crack of a twig. He was close. Too close.

The blast roared in my ears and a tree branch fell down on his head. As he slumped, the whisky bottle slipped out of coat and the shotgun dropped from his hands. I dove for it — and caught it right before it hit the ground.

“Whew,” I said with relief. I opened the bottle and took a swig.

The vice president, however, had picked up the shotgun.

“Nuts,” I said, thinking of bad choices I had made in my life.

As the whisky ran down my throat, however, I knew this wasn’t one of them.

He fired from pointblank range. A flower pot to my side shattered. “It’s much easier shooting the game when it’s domesticated and tied down in front of me,” he said to himself with a growl.

He pumped another shell into the chamber, his lips curled in a snarl and flames — real flames — shooting from his eyes.

“Uh oh,” I said and ran for the front gate. He fired, hitting one of the guards moving to stop me and fired again, screaming curses and killed the other guard. His next shot blasted the gate.

“Damn you, Carnacki,” he shouted as I said goodbye to him and his cruel world. “I’ll get you yet.”

Some day he might. But I know he won’t be getting that bottle of whisky.

MMMmmm. I wonder what’s on Sci-Fi?

Washington, D.C., meetup news — revised schedule

Now with more sanity.

My friend JanetTinMd, a Yearly Carnacki veteran, made an excellent point at Booman Tribune that the schedule was too ambitious to squeeze in the National Zoo and and Smithsonian Museum in one day. So see revised schedule below.

Schedule and details below.

The Zoo is pretty good-sized.  You could spend a whole day there, if you really wanted to walk around and see animals, stand in line for the pandas, and give the children a chance to beg for ice cream and goodies from the gift shop or chase each other in circles ’til they’re dizzy (and give the adults a chance to sit on benches and hang out and foment revolution).  ðŸ™‚
It’s also easy to spend hours in just ONE of the Smithsonian buildings and then wonder where the time went…..  

Not to mention that it will take at least a good half-hour to get from the Zoo to the Mall via Metro.  

Remember our experiences from Harpers Ferry, and trying to keep a group of any size together hopping between two places that are not especially near each other — maybe it might be more relaxing to pick one or the other, either the zoo or one of the museums? (Maybe zoo if the weather is good, one of the museums if it’s raining?) It’s been a while since I went to the zoo, but I’m sure they have places to sit and eat, either picnic or purchase food there…  

Just thinking of a slower pace so we can actually talk and not be too stressed over watching the clock…. though I’ll certainly tag along with what other folks want to do.

The Mid-Atlantic meetup has always been on the Saturday of Memorial Day weekend. Probably more so than other meetups that tend to involve lots of alcohol and wild orgies (I wrote that for any freepers reading this), Yearly Carnacki is a laidback affair, with people bringing their children and with an emphasis on fun as well as politics.

Here’s the plan, and we’re trying to have two meetup times to accomodate those who just want to attend later in the day, a request in past years. Bring a brown bag lunch or pick up something for a picnic.

11 a.m. — Meet us at the visitor’s center of the National Zoo. More information about the zoo here. Zoo map here (PDF)

1 p.m. — Picnic at the zoo (or lunch at the snack bar for those inclined).

In the event of thunderstorms — severe rain and not just a sprinkle — the alternative location is the Smithsonian Castle near the information desk where we will then pick a museum to tour. Meet there at 11 a.m. in the event of severe rain.

For information on how to meet up with the group if you want to meet us later in the day, shoot me an email.

Washington, D.C., meetup news

We have exciting news for the 3rd annual Mid-Atlantic blogger meetup — aka YearlyCarnacki, at 11 a.m., Saturday, May 26, in Washington, D.C.

Special guests Wesley Clark, Elizabeth Edwards, Senator Jay Rockefeller and Rep. Nick Rahall with musical guests AC/DC are all
invited to attend.

As a matter of fact, everyone is invited to attend.

The Mid-Atlantic meetup has always been on the Saturday of Memorial Day weekend. Probably more so than other meetups that tend to involve lots of alcohol and wild orgies (I wrote that for any freepers reading this), Yearly Carnacki is a laidback affair, with people bringing their children and with an emphasis on fun as well as politics.

Here’s the plan, and we’re trying to have two meetup times to accomodate those who just want to attend later in the day, a request in past years. Bring a brown bag lunch or pick up something for a picnic.

11 a.m. — Meet us at the visitor’s center of the National Zoo. More information about the zoo here. Zoo map here (PDF)

2 p.m. — Picnic on the Mall. We’ll meet at a small park the Folger Rose Garden next to the Smithsonian Castle. We’ll either eat there, or depending how many of us there are, find someplace close to eat.

2:30ish — Depending on the vote, we’ll tour a museum followed, no doubt, by picking a bar for drinking by many.

War whore with bloody hands embraces peace activist

Anna Jarvis organized the first Mother’s Day service in May 1907 in Grafton, W.Va., to honor her mother — a tireless advocate for peace.

Anna Jarvis’ mother had spent most of her life working to bring reconciliation between mothers whose sons had fought for the Union and Confederacy in the Civil War.

She was inspired by Julia Ward Howe, the famous peace activist who wrote in 1870:

Julia Ward Howe wrote the Mother’s Day Proclamation in 1870, as a call for peace and disarmament. An excerpt follows:

“From the voice of a devastated Earth a voice goes up with
Our own. It says: “Disarm! Disarm!
The sword of murder is not the balance of justice.”
Blood does not wipe out dishonor,
Nor violence indicate possession.
As men have often forsaken the plough and the anvil at the summons of war,
Let women now leave all that may be left of home
For a great and earnest day of counsel.
Let them meet first, as women, to bewail and commemorate the dead.
Let them solemnly take counsel with each other as to the means
Whereby the great human family can live in peace…”

The audacity of Rubberstamp Republican Rep. Shelley Moore Capito — who continues to vote for endless war in Iraq — to claim sponsorship of a coin to commerate Mother’s Day is outrageous.

How many mothers in the United States and Iraq are in mourning on this day because their children are dead due to the actions and support of war by people like Capito?


She completely ignores the roots of the Mother’s Day movement — roots well known by Anna Jarvis and a major factor in the original Mother’s Day service.

Capito has blood on her hands.
Today’s story in the Martinsburg Journal is nothing more than a press-release for Capito and the Republican Party.

These war whores try to hide their guilt but they cannot escape the fact that they represent everything that Howe and the Jarvises vehemently opposed.

Howe and the Jarvises worked for peace their whole lives.

They knew that the labors of mothers should never be squandered on the senseless violence of war.

Call Journal Junction at 1-800-448-1895 ext. 333 and leave a message asking why they left out the message of peace behind Mother’s Day and whether it was because it would have embarrassed a supporter of endless war like Capito by pointing out her hypocrisy.

You might also want to ask the reporter Lauren Hough at 304-263-8931 ext. 163 and politely leave a message asking her how Capito’s war stance squares with Jarvis’ love of peace. You might also email her at lhough@journal-news.net.