DeLay Blames Democrats for…Everything

In a speech to the Heritage Foundation on Thursday, Tom DeLay (indicted alleged money launderer), gave a rousing spiel about how the Republicans in DC are moving ahead with their “Reform, Restrain, and Redesign” plan to fix out of control spending. He then went on to blame the Democrats for congress’s unwillingness – that’s the Republican-controlled congress – to straighten out the mess they’ve made.

He also blamed Democrats, complaining that they haven’t offered any suggestions on how to cut spending. He said they created a congressional budget process that makes it difficult to cut spending.

“We’ve been operating off a Congress designed by Democrats,” he said.

The Republicans took control of Congress in 1995.

link

Would you like some cheese with that whine, Tom?

Perhaps Mr Indicted should help out his Republican buddies by giving them some handy tips on how to move money around without anybody noticing.

With a plan that’s more rightly called “Resist, Refuse and Recuse”, the Republicans have once again shown where their loyalties lie and it’s not with what’s best for the American people.

They resist calls to cut pork. They refuse to raise taxes during wartime. They recuse themselves from any responsibility for their gross mismanagement of the people’s money and their bloated government while they happily slash entitlement programs to punish the poor and middle class.

Yet, DeLay spouts:

But what about the so-called new Democrats who were supposed to moderate their party? What happened to all the talk after the 2004 elections that Democrats would be more solution-oriented and less partisan? Where are the moderate, accountable New Democrats who could help us restrain spending, reform antiquated federal programs, and offset the costs of the looming Katrina recovery? Have the so-called “Blue Dogs” now become the “Red-Ink Dogs”? Have these responsible moderates really thrown in their lot with the Michael Moore, Howard Dean extreme?

Which part of YOUR REPUBLICANS ARE THE ONES IN POWER don’t you get, Tom?

Now that you’ve resigned as majority leader, maybe you should see if you can get a stint in Vegas. I hear there’s a market there for has beens.

Plamegate: Is a Final Report Required by Law?

Is the Attorney General’s office required to provide congress and/or the public with a report on Patrick Fitzgerald’s investigation into the CIA leak case? Greg Sargent at The American Prospect makes a convincing case for just that.

The controversy swirls around a set of regulations that former AG Janet Reno added to the Code of Federal regulations in 1999: 28 CFR 600 – General Powers of Special Counsel and the fact that deputy AG Comey (AG Gonzales recused himself from the case at the time), who directed the terms of Fitzgerald’s authority in his 2003 letter, stated: “Further, my conferral on you of the title of “Special Counsel” in this matter should not be misunderstood to suggest that your position and authorities are defined and limited by 28 CFR Part 600.”

Sargent raises two important questions in his article. First of all, “does the attorney general’s office have the authority to unilaterally exempt the special counsel from federal regulations?” The second, “Does the attorney general’s office have to follow them?” is the gist of Sargent’s article. He posits that, if the AG’s office is bound by the regulations, not only is it required to receive regular briefings on the investigation, it must also “give “notification and reports” on the probe to Congress at various points in the investigation, including its conclusion.” Sargent quotes Section 600.9:

The discussion section of 600.9 states that they [the reports] are supposed to be “brief,” but — and this is important — are also meant to reassure the public that the probe is sound: “to help ensure congressional and public confidence in the integrity of the process, the regulations impose on the Attorney General these reporting requirements to the Judiciary Committee of the Congress.”

What’s more, the rules say: “The Attorney General may determine that public release of these reports would be in the public interest, to the extent that release would comply with applicable legal restrictions.”

Sargent concludes:

If Fitzgerald isn’t beholden to Reno’s regulations, what rules are governing his investigation? If the AG doesn’t report to Congress — and the vast majority of the investigation’s findings remain secret — how will the public be reassured that Fitzgerald’s probe into the conduct of our most powerful public officials accomplished justice? Even if Comey has successfully exempted Fitzgerald — and the attorney general’s office — from the regulations, why did he do it in the first place, and was he trying to prevent the public from learning about the probe? Can it be reversed?

These are questions that Democrats and everyone with an interest in the Plame affair need to be asking.

Torture: What is Bush Hiding?

Acting like a sleazy, tin-pot dictator of a third-rate banana republic, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld this week refused to allow UN human rights investigators access to detainees at Gitmo. The UN personnel are concerned about reports of widespread hunger strikes and numerous suicide attempts. Rumsfeld prefers instead to restrict access to the International Red Cross because its findings are kept confidential.

According to the Reuters article, the military claims that only 27 detainees are currently involved in hunger strikes. The detainees lawyers estimate that number is closer to 200. Rumsfeld claims it’s all a publicity stunt.

He added, “There are a number of people who go on a diet where they don’t eat for a period and then go off of it at some point. And then they rotate and other people do that.”

Sloughing off responsibility for what’s happening under his watch, he said:

Rumsfeld appeared to distance himself from the decision to force-feed detainees.

“I’m not a doctor and I’m not the kind of a person who would be in a position to approve or disapprove. It seems to me, looking at it from this distance, is that the responsible people are the combatant commanders. And the Army is the executive agent for detainees,” Rumsfeld said.

Last week, it was revealed that the Pentagon has further violated detainee rights by force feeding them without advising their lawyers. A US District Court ordered that the lawyers be notified beforehand. Force feeding hunger strikers is discouraged by an international declaration:

”The ICRC backs a 1975 Tokyo declaration by the World Medical Association [WMA] stating that doctors should not participate in force-feeding but keep prisoners informed of the sometimes irreversible consequences of their hunger strike, [ICRC chief spokeswoman Antonella Notari] added”.

While there is no international law against force-feeding, the WMA declaration “sets guidelines for doctors involved in hunger strikes and says they should not participate in force-feeding.” The American Medical Association endorsed the declaration.

As we already know, the Bush administration has virtually no regard for international treaties or declarations that get in the way of their flagrant disregard for human rights.

In addition to the hunger strikes, numerous detainees have attempted suicide. The military views these actions as purely manipulative on the part of the prisoners. One detainee’s lawyer actually witnessed such an attempt while visiting one of his clients, Jumah al-Dossari:

On October 15th in the afternoon, I was meeting with him when he needed to use the bathroom, and without describing in elaborate detail the procedures at Guantanamo, that requires my calling M.P.s to come and move him from our meeting area to a small adjacent cell where there’s a toilet. The M.P.s arrived. I left the room. Several minutes later, the M.P.s came out after having moved Jumah into the cell. After a few moments, I decided that I should check and see whether he was finished, so that I could come in and speak with him again.

I opened the door to the room that houses both the meeting area and the cell. The first thing I saw was a pool of blood on the floor, and strangely in that first moment, my initial thought was that he had made himself vomit blood because this is a symptom that he has complained about, and I had the strange thought that maybe he was trying to convince me that it was a genuine symptom and not something that he had made up. A second later, I looked towards the area of the cell, however, and saw Jumah hanging by his neck from the top of a mesh metal wall that encloses the cell. He also had what appeared to be a very serious gash on the inside of his right arm, which was causing him to bleed on himself and also on the floor.

I immediately yelled for M.P.s, who arrived quickly. I called Jumah’s name several times, but he did not respond, and as best I could tell, appeared to be unconscious. The M.P.s arrived, cut him down from the noose that was holding him and put him on the floor. Still didn’t seem that he was conscious, and I also didn’t see him bleeding at all. Within a moment or so, I was asked to leave the room, or ordered to leave the room might be more accurate, and as I did I saw Jumah seeming to gasp, which at least struck me as a good sign.

The lawyer, Mr Colangelo-Bryan, was not allowed to see Mr al-Dossari later that day or since then. You can read or listen to his interview with Democracy Now’s Amy Goodman here.

As a WaPo editorial declares today:

No wonder Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld has denied permission to U.N. human rights investigators to meet with detainees at Guantanamo: Their accounts would surely add to the discredit the United States has earned for its lawless treatment of foreign prisoners.

That editorial goes on to chastise Democrats over their handling of the issues of detainee rights:

There is no more important issue before the country or Congress. Yet the advocates of decency and common sense seem to have meager support from the Democratic Party. Senate Democrats staged a legislative stunt on Tuesday intended to reopen — once again — the debate on prewar intelligence about Iraq. They have taken no such dramatic stand against the CIA’s abuses of foreign prisoners; on a conference committee considering Mr. McCain’s amendment, Democratic support has been faltering. While Democrats grandstand about a war debate that took place three years ago, the Bush administration’s champions of torture are quietly working to preserve policies whose reversal ought to be an urgent priority.

While Republican senator John McCain (who will be on CNN’s Larry King Live show Thursday nite) has surely taken on the difficult task of condemning his party’s leaders on the issue of torture, it cannot be said that the entire Republican party – which holds all of the power in Washington these days – is exempt from the type of criticism that this WaPo editorialist is flinging at the Democrats. It’s time for the Republicans to stand up and demand action – to make that “dramatic stand” themselves – because they are the only ones at this point who can actually do anything about the abuses.

Embarrassed by Wednesday’s revelations about secret CIA prisons and with the EU now set to investigate those which may exist in its member states and while Scotland has declared it will investigate US torture flights, the pressure is on the Bush administration to come clean and change its policies. Considering the arrogance and blatant disregard of Bush’s cabal towards human rights, it seems likely that the only way anything will happen is to oust the obstructionist Republicans from the US government so the Democrats can move in and clean house.

Bush Numbers Going Down, Down, Down

A CBS News poll has Bush’s approval rating at 35%.

The only recent president lower at this point in their second term was Richard Nixon.

Comparisons to Richard Nixon. Ouch.

“The president I think has bottomed out. I think last week was the bottom,” said Ken Duberstein, who worked in the team that Ronald Reagan brought in to help recover from the Iran-Contra scandal.

Newsflash, Duberstein: he hasn’t bottomed out yet. You can count on that.

Congress is rated even lower. Only 34 percent approve of its work.

Good thing 2006 is an election year. There’s a change a comin’…

Vice President Cheney has never been as popular as the president, but his favorable rating is down nine points this year to just 19 percent.

19 percent.

Really – what needs to be said about that number? Looks like his relatives, friends and his Halliburton buddies are the only supporters he has left.

This is your Bush administration – one year after Bush proclaimed that he had earned “political capital”. Looks like he’s gone bankrupt and has taken the rest of the country with him.

Iraq’s Puppet President

Iraq is not free. Far from it.

Professor Juan Cole, over at his excellent blog Informed Comment, reminds us what a farce the so-called democracy in Iraq really is. As he notes:

Iraqi President Jalal Talabani said Tuesday before the United Nations: “I categorically refuse the use of Iraqi soil to launch a military strike against Syria or any other Arab country . . . “But at the end of the day my ability to confront the US military is limited and I cannot impose on them my will.”

How many thousands of civilians and soldiers have died in the name of “Iraqi freedom” again? It’s obvious that as long as the US maintains a presence in that country – and it has no plans to leave anytime soon having built the largest US embassy anywhere in the world there and while Rumsfeld “hints” at more US troops being sent in – any elected Iraqi government is powerless and impotent. What exactly did all of those purple-fingered Iraqi people risk their lives for back on election day? And what of their continued suffering to this very day – the suicide bombs, the insurgent attacks, the horrors their children live with every day? What is it all for?

As the esteemed Representative John Conyers said today, speaking at Rosa Park’s funeral, (video and transcript at Brad Blog), “We’ve got to realize that you can’t maintain a Democracy and an Empire, simultaneously.”

It’s not good for the United States and it certainly is not good for the future of the middle east.

Who is the Real Liar, Max Boot?

Over at the so-called “liberal” LA Times, PNAC signatory Max Boot, who doesn’t seem to understand that the reason Scooter Libby and the rest of his neocon buddies are in trouble is because they smeared Joe Wilson and his wife back in 2003, is continuing the vicious lie campaign.

We all know that Boot and his cohorts live in the State of Denial and that they are a hopeless cause with their truth-deflecting armour but you have to wonder how, if they continue to add 2 + 2 and get 6, they could ever hope to realize their dream of US global domination at all costs.

Here’s what Boot is spewing in his column titled “Plamegate’s Real Liar”:

Plame doesn’t seem to fit the act’s definition of a “covert agent” — someone who “has within the last five years served outside the United States.” By 2003, Plame had apparently been working in Langley, Va., for at least six years, which means that, mystery of mysteries, the vice president’s chief of staff was indicted for covering up something that wasn’t a crime.

Bullshit.

The problem here is that the one undisputed liar in this whole sordid affair doesn’t work for the administration. In his attempts to turn his wife into an antiwar martyr, Joseph C. Wilson IV has retailed more whoppers than Burger King.

Bullshit.

The least consequential of these fibs was his denial that it was his wife who got him sent to Niger in February 2002 to check out claims that Saddam Hussein had tried to buy uranium.

Bullshit.

it was Mrs. Wilson who “had suggested his name for the trip.” By leaking this fact to the news media, Libby and other White House officials were merely setting the record straight — not, as Wilson would have it, punishing his Mata Hari wife.

Bullshit.

Boot then goes on to cherry-pick quotes from the Senate Intelligence Committee Report to back up his smear on Wilson. No surprise – the ability to cherry-pick is one of the qualifications listed in the neocon job description.

He then concludes:

So much for the lies that led to war. What we’re left with is the lies that led to the antiwar movement. Good thing for Wilson and his pals that deceiving the press and the public isn’t a crime.

I hope Joe Wilson has a good lawyer who is collecting all of these press clippings in preparation to drag liars like Boot into court.

If you missed Larry King’s interview with Joe Wilson on Tuesday nite, you can read the transcript here.

(The views expressed in this piece are my own and not those of the site’s owner, in case you want to sue someone, Mr Boot. Just try it. I dare you. – catnip)

On This Day

On this day, the day of civil rights pioneer Rosa Park’s funeral, we are informed by Dana Priest, writing in the Washington Post, of secret CIA prisons around the world that are beyond the reach of human rights organizations which could advocate on behalf of those who are experiencing abuse and torture that we can’t even begin to imagine if they were allowed access. They’re not – because the Bush administration prefers to hide its ugly, private sins in the name of “freedom”. Their actions are no better than the white-sheeted cowards of the KKK who tortured and lynched African-Americans in the name of power and “purity” for so many decades before public outrage finally took hold.

Those secret detainees have no Rosa Parks. None are free to take their place at the front of the bus in order to spark a rights revolution in their name. The only voice they have is ours.

Just as African-Americans fought so hard for so long in the background to become equal citizens in the face of overwhelming odds only to finally be represented so publicly by that one courageous woman in one simple but profound act, so are we all called to act on behalf of those that US laws continue to treat as non-persons: those being held in dark, horrifying dungeons in foreign countries where the crimes of the Bush administration are perpetuated without remorse or conscience.

No more. NO MORE.

Any US citizen who remains silent in the face of these crimes is complicit. Any citizen of the world who does not stand up and shout on behalf of these voiceless victims has no claim to freedom in their own life because we are all one people, joined by a responsibility to promote humanity at its best. When we fail to do so, we surrender our right to be truly free.

Mrs Rosa Parks made her mark. Will you?

Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them humanity cannot survive.

– His Holiness the Dalai Lama

Joe Wilson on Larry King Live Tonite

Joe Wilson is appearing on CNN’s Larry King Live show this evening and for those who haven’t had a chance to see the show yet, he’s done a bang up job. The second half of the show has a panel including Time Magazine’s Matt Cooper, Sen Richard Shelby, Sen Diane Feinstein and Michael Isikoff of Newsweek.

Mr Wilson does not have a high opinion of Karl Rove since Rove claimed his wife was “fair game”. Apparently, Wilson and Rove attend the same church, albeit at different services. The Wilsons go to a more kid-oriented one. Joe said he was surprised that Rove didn’t know his wife Valerie’s name since she’s been mentioned in the church bulletin in the past – just as the name of Rove’s wife has been.

In August, 2004, at the Republican National Convention, in an interview with CNN, Rove denied he was responsible.

KARL ROVE, PRESIDENTIAL ADVISER: I didn’t know her name. I didn’t leak her name.

Wilson made his case, once again, in a matter-of-fact way – debunking all of the right-wing talking points that have been used in their smear campaign against him. He also supports the Dems’ move today to convene a closed-door senate session in order to get to the truth about the Iraq war intel.

Update [2005-11-1 22:19:59 by catnip]:: It’s also significant to note that Wilson said some spouses of those in the foreign service have required extra protection and vigilance since the outing of his wife’s name since she is the wife of a former ambassador and they are now suspect as well as possibly being involved in the US intel community. Those who claim no damage has been done by this leak, even in the face of all evidence to the contrary, are simply wrong.

Read the transcript here.

_____

Meanwhile, back at the NYT ranch, Nicholas Kristof (via Truthout) calls for Cheney to come clean or resign.

Crooks and Liars has the video and transcript of Trent Lott on Hardball distancing himself from his previous support of Karl Rove.

Secret Senate Session: Right-Wing Blogosphere Meltdown

Reacting to today’s push by Harry Reid and Dick Durbin to force a closed session of the senate on pre-Iraq war intelligence, the right-wing blogosphere predictably had a meltdown when they realized their dear leaders had been outmaneuvered.

I scanned their sites so you don’t have to:

Captain’s Quarters:

Headline: Democrats Deny Open Government To American Electorate

threw a tanrum over Joe Wilson, emptiness of Democrats, both in head and heart, cheap political stunts, (on Libby’s indictments) the only indictment he could muster was one in which a very stupid and probably criminal act by a single person could be verified, stupid beyond belief, tired of their crybaby, whining tactics, a big, heaping helping of pompous impotence, Reid has abused it for his petulant tantrums.

Powerline:

Headline: Bless the Dems

Presumably, Reid needed a closed door session to prevent the public from witnessing the spectacle of Democrats making fools out of themselves trying to explain the connection between that indictment and pre-war intelligence on Iraq…That the Dems see throwing a temper tantrum as a way to regain momentum, rather than as reminder to the public that they are unfit to govern, speaks volumes.

Michelle Malkin:

Democratic temper tantrum…Ok, so the Senate is open again after 2 hours locked down. Is it just me or does Sen. Frist seem shaken? I hope it’s just me.

STOP the ACLU:

The only spotlight here is the one the democrats are desperately trying to get back into; Grasping at straws; The disappointment the democrats over the impact of indictment charges for “trying to lie about a crime that wasn’t even committed” have set them in a tail spin.

Blogs for Bush:

Democrats are losing it… part of the Democrats plan to retake the Senate by scandalizing Bush and the Republicans so that they can avoid offering any constructive ideas of their own.

(and, get a load of this!)

We haven’t found WMDs in Iraq?

What about the 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium, the 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents, 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times more deadly than sarin gas), over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form (meant for dispersal over populated areas), and roadside bombs loaded with mustard and “conventional” sarin gas… just to name a few things… Don’t believe me? Get Richard Miniter’s new book…

The Strata-Sphere:
Maybe he [Dick Durbin] wants to recycle his Nazi nonsense – but doesn’t want the press in on it.

We all know that if the Republicans would have pulled this off, their right-wing shills would have been hailing their leaders as: “brilliant!”, “powerful!”, “stunning!”, “cajone-driven!”

Okay – maybe not that last one, but you get the picture.

All I can say is, “Alito who?”

______________________

BT’s live coverage of this historic event:
Part 1
Part 2

Update [2005-11-1 21:7:49 by catnip]:: Don’t forget to watch Joe Wilson on Larry King Live tonite!