The Church of Scientology: Why It Must Be Stopped (Part 1)

The Rehabilitation Project Force, or RPF for short.  It is a little-known branch of Scientology’s elite corps of followers.  However, it is where the elite go when they have fallen from the Church’s good graces.  It is also one of the more controversial policies the Church has, and is (like nearly all of their policies) cloaked in the right to practice religion.

“Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them…”
Karl  Popper  

More below the fold.
Scientology’s elite organization, known as the Sea Org, has very strict guidelines that its members must follow.  When someone has stepped out of line, whether it be for talking to friends or family who have since left the Church, or speaking critically of the current Church leader David Miscavige, it is known as being ‘out ethics.’  That person is then sent to the RPF.




Rare photo of workers on RPF at Los Angeles org, right off of Sunset Blvd.  Circa 1998.  Source.

The RPF is, for all intents and purposes, a type of gulag.  The workers are made to run everywhere–walking is not permitted.  They are to wear heavy black uniforms (like in the photo above).  They are fed very little and are paid six cents more than sweat shop workers in China (approx. 36 cents an hour.)

There are harrowing accounts of what life must be like for these wayward souls, as recounted by an ex-Sea Org member:

“The third dramatic glimpse into RPF life came from Ann Bailey, who was involved in moving Scientology into its newly acquired former hospital (called the Cedars Sinai complex) [Diarist’s note: this facility is on Sunset Blvd]in the summer of 1978. After the move, which taxed her physical endurance, she found herself assigned to guard the secret, upper level doctrinal (Operating Thetan or OT) documents [Diarist’s note: OT 3, of which members like Tom Cruise and John Travolta have surpassed, is what South Park devoted a memorable episode to explaining] that were in a room without a door. They were in the former hospital’s old morgue, and she sat there for hours amidst the lingering “smell of death and chemicals and dissection” (Bailey, n.d.: 60). Then:

    [s]uddenly during the third hours I was aware of shadows in the corridor beyond me. [T]hey were people. Slowly I realized that an entire group of people lived and worked down there. I was so tired [that] it took me time to realize who they were. Then it hit me. [The were t]he Cedars RPF. They lived and worked down in this stinkhole.This was their Org. Then I really found out what had happened to them. Filthy, tired, skeletons appeared before me and started begging to see the OT folders. I thought I looked bad, but I looked beautiful compared to them. They crowded around me pushing and shoving, then the mood turned ugly. They started hitting each other to get into the room behind me. I realized what had happened. They had been totally broken. They were animals, not humans. I saw four of my friends, one a Class Nine OT, fighting to get by me. They were punching each other in the face, pulling hair, kicking. And way down in this cellar no one could hear them, no one cared.

    Someone suddenly hit me hard. I realized [that] they were turning their anger on me[. T]hey would beat me up to get the folders. I guess in periods of deep stress we all go a little insane — [s]urvival of the fittest. From somewhere in my tired brain, strength came. I stood up with all my TR’s [i.e., Scientology communication drills] as in as they had ever been, [and] all my training on control of groups came back. ‘Friends,’ I said, ‘Believe me, I am your friend. By some strange fate I am not with you on the RPF. But believe me if you don’t get out of here right now, I know [that] you will be punished. Go now before it’s too late.’ And they ran away into the dark. When I sat down I was trembling all over. Because the real intent of my message had been for them to get out of the hospital. Leave Cedars. But I don’t think any of them got the message (Bailey, n.d.: 61-62).

As the above photo illustrates, this policy is still being implemented today–in my documentary (currently in post-production) I have numerous testimonials about what is still taking place.  

But how does one get to this point?  How is one broken down to such a degree?  The answer lies in the policies that Church management imposes on staff members, even if they’re never sent to RPF:

Scientology courses are designed to make students dependent on their instructors so it is “easier to brainwash them,” a disaffected Church of Scientology communications supervisor testified Tuesday in Multnomah County Circuit Court.
The Oregonian

Indeed, we can see Hubbard’s thoughts on the subject in a book he wrote himself:

Brainwashing is a very simple mechanism. One gets a person to agree that something might be a certain way and then drives him by introverting him and through self-criticism to the possibility that is that way. Only then does a man believe that the erroneous fact was a truth. By gradient scale of hammering, pounding and torture, brainwashers are able to make people believe that these people [i.e., the victims] saw and did things which they never did do (Hubbard, 1957: 84; also quoted in Hubbard, 1976b: 55).

The indoctrination techniques, however, are for another post.  In closing, I’m asking people to join protests worldwide in support of the new peoples’ movement known as Anonymous, who has decided to take on this corrupt crime syndicate.  And if you can’t join Anonymous in solidarity, begin your own research and then put pressure on your elected representatives and ask them why this international enterprise isn’t being investigated in your own country.  Thank you for reading and stay tuned to more posts on the Church of Scientology.

“If you really want to enslave people, tell them that you are going to give them total freedom.”
–L. Ron Hubbard  

Cross-posted at Daily Kos

"Working for the Clampdown": The American Conservative Sounds the Alarm

It only took a few paragraphs in a $500 billion, 591-page bill to raze one of the most important limits on federal power.

How’s that for an opening line? Listen: this is how many Democrats and Republicans handed over another nugget of power to our dear Chimperor in September of 2006:

More Below the Chimp…

Above, Bush scolds ‘Mercuns for not trusting his decisions

Section 1076 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 changed the name of the key provision in the statute book from “Insurrection Act” to “Enforcement of the Laws to Restore Public Order Act.”

Rather Orwellian and definitely creepy, don’t you think? Before I get into the mechanics of this redefined Act, here’s a little bit of “Insurrection Act” history for those of you, like me, who fell asleep during history class:

Congress passed the Insurrection Act in 1807 to severely restrict the president’s ability to deploy the military within the United States…The Insurrection Act of 1807 stated that the president could deploy troops within the United States only “to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy.”

Here’s the nifty part about Section 1076–it adds on these choice words: “natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition” thereby expanding our Megalomaniac-in-Chief’s power over the other branches as well as our Constitution.

Scratching your head right now? Like I was, you’re probably wondering how that shit got slipped in and was passed with near-unanimous consent. In the immortal words of John Conyers (paraphrased because of poor memory):

“My dear boy, do you really think that we read every bill that comes before us?”

Here’s a partial list of the guilty parties–and please don’t be drinking or eating food when you read this:

…Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), the ranking Democratic member on the Senate Armed Services Committee, co-wrote the provision along with committee chairman Sen. John Warner (R-Va.). Sen. Ted Kennedy openly endorsed it, and Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.), then-chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, was an avid proponent.

Kudos to Senator Patrick Leahy, however, as he fought the inclusion of Section 1076 and continues to fight it today, commenting: “Using the military for law enforcement goes against one of the founding tenets of our democracy.”

Maybe there are some of you that think this diary is alarmist. That’s cool. But many people thought that critics of the PATRIOT Act, Gitmo, the Iraq War, warrantless wiretapping and COINTELPRO-era tactics against protesters were full of hot air. And if that doesn’t make you pause, just stop and think: what if some lone nutball decides to blow up a pipe bomb in a heavily populated area, like a ballpark or in the Capital? Do we really need to give the other nutball in the White House another reason to trample our rights in the name of “national security” Newspeak?

Be afraid. Be very afraid.

UPDATE: Fuck fear. The junta on Pennsylvania Ave. is already selling that. Contact your Congresscritters and tell them to join that wonderful curmudgeon from Vermont in opposing Section 1076.

Snippets from The American Conservative with special thanks to James Bovard for his excellent analysis over at 9.11 Truth.org

This Week on the Terror Timeline: Part 5

Paul Thompson’s The Terror Timeline is the indispensable research tool for anyone interested in the events leading up to, during, and after the events of September 11th, 2001.
 
Welcome to the fifth installment of a weekly “series” that will showcase an item found on the Timeline.

More below the fold…



Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl

March 14th, 2002: U.S. Indicts Saeed for Murder of Daniel Pearl

Attorney General Ashcroft announces a second U.S. criminal indictment for Saeed Sheikh, this time for his role in the kidnapping and murder of Daniel Pearl (the Wall Street Journal reporter who, incidentally, was investigating Pakistani ISI involvement in the 9.11 attacks).  The amount of background information given about Saed is very brief, and of all his many terrorist acts since he was released from prison in 1999, the only one mentioned is that he fought in Afghanistan with al-Qaeda in September and October 2001.  The indictment and Ashcroft fail to mention Saeed’s financing of the 9.11 attacks, and no reporters ask Ashcroft about this earlier. [CNN, 3.14.02; Los Angeles Times, 3.14.02]

It’s worth noting that Saeed Sheikh was known to have strong ties to both Pakistan’s ISI (a fearsome intelligence apparatus) and Mohammad Atta, the “leader” of the 9.11 hijackers:

February 6, 2002: Western Media Largely Ignores Links Between Saeed Sheikh, ISI, and 9.11

Pakistani police publicly name Saeed Sheikh and a terrorist group he belongs to, Jaish-e-Mohammed, as those responsible for reporter Daniel Pearl’s murder.  [Observer, 2.24.02]  In the next several months, at least 12 Western news articles mention Saeed’s link to al-Qaeda [ABC News, 2.7.02; Boston Globe, 2.7.02; Associated Press, 2.24.02; Los Angeles Times, 3.15.02], including his financing of 9.11, (see Timeline entry for these numerous sources) and at least 16 articles mention his links to the ISI (see Timeline entry).  However, many other articles fail to mention either link.  Only a few articles consider that Saeed could have been connected to both groups at the same time [London Times, 2.25.02; London Times, 4.21.02; Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, 3.3.02], and apparently, only one of these mentions he could be involved in the ISI, al-Qaeda and financing 9.11.  [London Times, 4.21.02].  By the time Saeed is convicted of Pearl’s murder in July 2002, Saeed’s possible connections to al-Qaeda and/or the  ISI are virtually unreported in U.S. newspapers, while many British newspapers are still making one or the other connection.

Rumsfeld stated that Saeed could very well have been an ISI “asset”.  It’s also been reported that FBI Director Mueller was informed by the Indian government that Saeed had wired money to Mohammad Atta while the infamous hijacker was in the U.S.

This is one of the strongest leads for state-sponsored assistance regarding the attacks of Sept. 11th, 2001.

To enter the rabbit hole, click here.

Daniel Pearl image from Rotten.com.

This Week on The Terror Timeline: Part 4

Paul Thompson’s The Terror Timeline is the indispensable research tool for anyone interested in the events leading up to, during, and after the events of September 11th, 2001.  

Welcome to the fourth installment of a weekly “series” that will showcase an item found on the Timeline.  

More below the fold…
March 5, 2002: Israeli Spies Reportedly Tracked 9.11 Hijackers

It is reported that many spies in the uncovered Israeli spy ring seemed to have been trailing the 9.11 hijackers.  At the least, they were in close proximity.  For instance, five Israeli spies are intercepted in the tiny town of Hollywood, Florida, and four 9.11 hijackers are known to have spent time in Hollywood, Florida. [Le Monde, 3.5.02; Reuters, 3.5.02; Jane’s Intelligence Digest, 3.15.02].  

In one case, some Israeli spies lived at 4220 Sheridan Street, only a few hundred feet from where Mohammed Atta was living at 3389 Sheridan Street.  Israeli spies appear to have been close to at least ten of the 19 9.11 hijackers.

Click here to enter the rabbit hole.

The Oklahoma City Bombing Revisited


While browsing through Raw Story today, I happened upon a strange and disturbing news item.  The title?  

Affidavit: McVeigh had high-level help.

Crossposted at On Feingold and Swiss Cheese. More below…  
Oklahoma City bombing conspirator Terry Nichols says a high-ranking FBI official “apparently” was directing Timothy McVeigh in the plot to blow up a government building and might have changed the original target of the attack, according to a new affidavit filed in U.S. District Court in Utah.

Nichols charges, in the affadavit, that the federal government is engaging in a cover-up in order to escape culpability for its role in the Oklahoma City bombing.  According to the Salt Lake Tribune:

The affidavit was filed in a lawsuit brought by Salt Lake City attorney Jesse Trentadue, who believes his brother’s death in a federal prison was linked to the Oklahoma City bombing. The suit, which seeks documents from the FBI under the federal Freedom of Information Act, alleges that authorities mistook Kenneth Trentadue for a bombing conspirator and that guards killed him in an interrogation that got out of hand.

But I digress.  I know what you’re probably thinking: more tin-foil nuttery, you might say.  Disgusting, looney allegations from the disgusting, looney mind of an extreme right wing fanatic.  Well color me crazy, but I think it’s worth taking another look at this case.  Here’s why:

On December 26th, 2006, CBS News broke an AP story about a Congressional investigation’s report.  The report concluded as follows:

…the FBI didn’t fully investigate whether other suspects may have helped Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols with the deadly 1995 attack, allowing questions to linger a decade later…The report also sharply criticizes the FBI for failing to be curious enough to pursue credible information that foreign or U.S. citizens may have had contact with Nichols or McVeigh and could have assisted their plot.

What is doubly outrageous to me, and should be to many Americans (including the families of the 168 victims), is the following statement the subcommittee chairman gave regarding the investigation:

“We did our best with limited resources, and I think we moved the understanding of this issue forward a couple of notches even though important questions remain unanswered,” Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., the subcommittee chairman, said in an interview with The Associated Press.

Limited resources.  The attack on the Murrah building that day was the single greatest act of domestic terrorism pre-9/11.  And this subcommittee was given limited resources.  Perhaps this had something to do with having “limited resources”:

Rohrabacher’s subcommittee saved its sharpest words for the Justice Department, saying officials there exhibited a mindset of thwarting congressional oversight and did not assist the investigation fully.

The report rebukes the FBI for not fully pursuing leads suggesting other suspects may have provided support to McVeigh and Nichols before their truck bomb killed 168 people in the main federal building in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995.

So is it a leap to entertain the possibility that other elements may have been at play in this crime?  Not when you begin looking at other loose threads that the FBI left untied, such as:

Witness accounts that another man was seen with McVeigh around the time of the bombing. The FBI originally looked for another suspect it named John Doe 2, even providing a sketch:

 …but abruptly dropped that line of inquiry. The subcommittee concludes that decision was a mistake.

Phone record and witness testimony that persons associated with Middle Eastern terrorism in the Philippines may have had contact with Nichols, and that Nichols took a book about explosives to the Philippines.

And this from February 2005, via MSNBC:

The FBI believed Timothy McVeigh tried to recruit additional help in the days before the deadly 1995 Oklahoma City bombing and gathered evidence that white supremacist bank robbers may have become involved, according to government documents never introduced at McVeigh’s trial…The retired FBI chief of the Oklahoma City investigation, Dan Defenbaugh, said he was unaware of some evidence obtained by The Associated Press and that the investigation should be reopened to determine whether the robbery gang was linked to McVeigh.

Also noteworthy via The American Free Press:

There are now serious allegations that the FBI, using an informer as a conduit, supplied McVeigh and Nichols with the blasting components the two used to construct explosive devices, one of which may have been employed in the tragic Oklahoma City bombing.

That informant’s name is Roger Moore.  He has a hallowed spot in this twisted little conspiracy:

Moore, a Royal, Ark. gun dealer, claimed to have been robbed by McVeigh and Nichols of some 66 guns, cash and gold coins in November 1994. The FBI and federal prosecutors claimed that the proceeds were used to finance the OKC operation.

However, the defense team undermined that theory by producing a signed motel receipt proving McVeigh was in Akron, Ohio, on the date in question. This did not keep either the prosecutors or the news media from repeating the robbery story.  It is still widely believed.

Moore, who used the alias “Bob Miller,” according to Nichols, later changed his story and said that it definitely was not McVeigh and Nichols who had robbed him, but he apparently was attempting to plant the opposite impression at the time. Townspeople remembered Moore going from barroom to barbershop the week of the alleged robbery, describing McVeigh and asking if anyone had seen him in the area.

At the time, Moore was a confidential informant for two FBI agents named Ross and Hayes, out of the Hot Springs office. The two were the same agents who discovered the “stolen” guns in a sack behind the house trailer of Michael Fortier in Kingman, Ariz., a few days after the bombing.  Fortier was later implicated in the conspiracy and is serving a 20-year sentence

I don’t know if the FBI was truly involved, as Nichols alleges.  I don’t know if Middle Eastern terrorists had a hand in this attack.  But I suspect there is more at play.  After all of these strange threads of behavior and evidence, does it seem crazy to request that this investigation be reopened?

This Week on The Terror Timeline: Part 3 [with poll]

Paul Thompson’s The Terror Timeline is the indispensable research tool for anyone interested in the events leading up to, during, and after the events of September 11th, 2001.  

Welcome to the third installment of a weekly “series” that will showcase an item found on the Timeline.  

More below the fold…
July 22, 2002-February 20, 2003: Saudi Princes and Pakistani General Later Implicated in 9/11 Plot Die Mysteriously

Three prominent members of the Saudi royal family die in mysterious circumstances.  Prince Ahmed bin Abdul-Aziz, a nephew of the Saudi king, prominent businessman, and owner of the winning 2002 Kentucky Derby horse, is said to die of a heart attack at the age of 43.  The next day, Prince Sultan bin Faisal, another nephew of the king, dies driving to Prince Ahmed’s funeral.  A week later, Prince Sultan bin Faisal supposedly “dies of thirst” in the Arabian desert.  Seven months later, on February 20, 2003, Pakistan’s air force chief Mushaf Ali Mir, dies in a plane crash in clear weather, along with his wife and closest confidants.  Controversial author Gerald Posner implies that all of these events are linked together and the deaths not accidental, but have occurred because of the testimony of captured al-Qaeda leader Abu Zubaida in March 2002.  The deaths all occurred not long after the respective governments were told of Zubaida’s confessions.  Only one other key figure named by Zubaida remains alive: Saudi Intelligence Minister Prince Turki al-Faisal.  Posner says, “He’s the J. Edgar Hoover of Saudi Arabia,” too powerful and aware of too many secrets to be killed off.  Prince Turki lost his Intelligence Minister job ten days before 9/11, and is later made Saudi ambassador to Britain, giving him diplomatic immunity from any criminal prosecution. [Why America Slept, by Gerald Posner, 9/03, pp.190-94; Time, 8/31/03]

Click here to enter the rabbit hole…

This Week on the Terror Timeline: Part 2

Paul Thompson’s The Terror Timeline is the indispensable research tool for anyone interested in the events leading up to, during, and after the events of September 11th, 2001.  

Welcome to the second installment of a weekly “series” that will showcase an item found on the Timeline.  Some of you might find this a pointless exercise.  Others will find some if not all of the items fascinating.

More below…
February 2001: Two Hijackers Seen Living in San Antonio with Swapped Identities

At least six people with no connections to one another later claim they recognize hijackers Satam Al Suqami (Flight 11) and Salem Alhazmi (Flight 77) living in San Antonio, Texas, until this month.  

The management of an apartment building says the two men abandoned their leases at about this time, and some apartment residents recognize them.  However, all the witnesses say that Suqami was going by Alhazmi’s name, and vice versa! [San Antonio, Texas, KENS 5 Eyewitness News, 10.1.01]  

One pilot shop employee recognizes Alhazmi as a frequent visitor to the store and interested in a 757 or 767 handbook, though he also says Alhazmi used Suqami’s name.  [KENS 5 Eyewitness News, 10.3.01]  

The apartment-leasing agent also recalls a Ziad Jarrah (Flight 93) who once lived there in June 2001 and looked the same as the hijacker.  [San Antonio Express News, 9.22.01; Associated Press, 9.22.01 (B)]  Local FBI confirm that a Salem Alhazmi attended the nearby Alpha Tango Flight School and lived in that apartment building, but they say he is a different Salem Alhazmi who is still alive and living in Saudi Arabia.  [KENS 5 Eyewitness News, 10.4.01]  However, that “Salem Alhazmi” says he has never been to the U.S. and has proven to the authorities that he did not leave Saudi Arabia in the two years prior to 9.11.  [Washington Post, 9.20.01]  

The FBI does not explain Satam Al Suqami’s presence.  Neither hijacker is supposed to have arrived in the U.S. before April 2001.

As with so much of the 9.11 story, there are so many anomalies and incredible coincidences.  Why would the hijackers swap their identities?  Were they really who they said they were?  What are the odds that the same man who supposedly never left the Middle East would be identified in Texas by multiple witnesses?  If law enforcement officials are correct in stating that the hijackers weren’t in the country before April, how are they being seen in February?  I want to hear what you think.  

To enter the rabbit hole, click here.

This Week on the Terror Timeline

Paul Thompson’s The Terror Timeline is the indispensable research tool for anyone interested in the events leading up to, during, and after the events of September 11th, 2001.  

I’m introducing a weekly installment that will showcase an item found on the Timeline.  Some of you might find this a pointless exercise.  Others will find some if not all of the items fascinating.  I will present these items–all newsclippings that can be cross-referenced in mainstream news in some capacity or another–in their raw form, meaning with little or no commentary–rarely will I break this rule.  “Why not comment?” you might be asking.  

Paul Thompson says it best: “…[my] purpose…is not to theorize, or speculate, but to compile the facts as they are known to date, based on what has been reported on this issue.”

 Investigate for yourself. See where the rabbit hole takes you, if you’re up for it.  

I hope you find at least some of them worth the short read.  

Mossad Director Ephraim Halevy

February 6th, 2000: Apparent Mossad Attempt to Infiltrate al-Qaeda Thwarted

India’s largest newsweekly reports that it appears a recent Mossad attempt to infiltrate al-Qaeda failed when undercover agents were stopped on their way to Bangladesh by Indian customs officials.  These 11 men appeared to be from Afghanistan, but had Israeli passports.  One expert states, “It is not unlikely for Mossad to recruit 11 Afghans in Iran and grant them Israeli citizenship to penetrate a network such as bin Laden’s.  They would begin by infiltrating them into an Islamic radical group in an unlikely place like Bangladesh.”
[The Week, 2.6.00]

To enter the rabbit hole, click here.