Walden, not the Pond. HR 4200/Action

The effects of logging are vastly underrated by most of the general public. They still do not connect the increasing contamination of their water with the logging of watershed.   Anybody who needs water to live should be concerned.

The Walden Logging Bill, HR 4200, is scheduled for a vote on the House floor this week. The vote is expected on Wednesday. American Lands Alliance is scheduling a national call in day today, May 16th.

The bill attempts to portray natural disturbance events such as fire, rain, insects, snow and ice storms as “catastrophic events” and claims that fast track logging is needed to recover and restore forests after natural disturbance events.

You can read about it here.

More down below…..

They are shouting FIRE! in a crowded theater. It is the same tactic used again and again. And they offer us a dream of temporary safety, a myth, if we will just give up what few protections for the environment that are left.

HR 4200 is a direct assault on the National Environmental Policy Act, NEPA, which I wrote about in my first dKos diary.

The cost of this bill will be tremendous, both financially for taxpayers, and ecologically for the state of sustainability of our homeland. Check out the taxpayer costs of the Biscuit Fire “Recovery” project as an example. Salvage logging, one of the most ecologically dangerous practices in modern forestry, employs an overriding short-term economic rational as an excuse to summarily ignore all current ecological knowledge about the long- term biological sustainability of forests. The sole objective of salvage logging is to convert trees into money, thus replacing the art of forestry with the technology and economics of cutting trees.

Jeffery St. Claire’s excellent article on Chainsaw George explains some of the history of fire, and the beginnings of Corporate theft of our forest resources.

Forest fires became stigmatized only when forests began to be viewed as a commercial resource rather than an obstacle to settlement. Fire suppression became an obsession only after the big timber giants laid claim to the vast forests of the Pacific Northwest. Companies like Weyerhaeuser and Georgia-Pacific were loath to see their holdings go up in flames, so they arm-twisted Congress into pour millions of dollars into Forest Service fire-fighting programs. The Forest Service was only too happy to oblige because fire suppression was a sure way to pad their budget: along with the lobbying might of the timber companies they could literally scare Congress into handing over a blank check. [For an excellent history of the political economy of forest fires I highly recommend Stephen Pyne’s Fire in America.]

Ah, fear again.

Well, I fear HR 4200 a lot more than I do fire, and I have been up close and personal with one at my home. Anyone who has tried to walk through where the forest used to be after a timbering operation can tell you that the fuel load is increased, not lessened. And the firefighters agree with me! Or perhaps better put, I agree with them.

Wildland firefighters’ group seeks defeat of salvage logging bill

[Washington, DC] A group representing wildland firefighters Tuesday called on Congress to defeat a bill aimed at speeding up logging dead timber and planting new trees after storms and wildfires. The bipartisan bill demands that areas hit by disasters greater than 1,000 acres be restored quickly, before the commercial value of fire-killed timber diminishes, and insects and rot set in. But Oregon-based Firefighters United for Safety, Ethics and Ecology said the bill could increase fire risks and undermine efforts to reduce hazardous fire conditions near communities. “Post-fire logging and planting does not ‘recover’ a burned forest, but rather, sets it up for future high-severity burning,” said Timothy Ingalsbee, the group’s executive director and a former firefighter for the U.S. Forest Service. Young, densely stocked timber plantations are prone to sudden “blowups” of extreme fire, and can start crown fires in nearby old-growth stands, said Ingalsbee, whose group includes about 80 professional firefighters from Alaska to Virginia. The bill awaiting action in the House “not only will create more hazardous fire conditions, but it will divert financial resources away from one of the most urgent needs of society: community wildfire protection,”

The best available science shows that logging in forests after natural disturbances can be extremely damaging and can actually increase fire risk by leaving piles of limbs and branches on the ground. Letting trees regenerate naturally works better than logging and replanting. Bulldozers destroy naturally regenerating fragile seedlings. Logs left in place following fires or other disturbances are crucial building blocks, providing nutrients for the reemerging forest. In a recent letter, 169 scientists including some of the most prominent forest ecologists in the nation wrote to warn Congress that HR 4200 “…is misguided because it distorts or ignores recent scientific advances.”  American Lands Alliance

Adbusters.org has a fine bunch of economists working on sustainability issues.

Paul Hawken

A spider can spin silk as strong as kevlar, without using high temperatures or sulphuric acid. Trees use sunlight and water to make cellulose, a sugar with greater bending strength than steel. In his acclaimed book Natural Capitalism, http://www.natcap.org/  Paul Hawken (with co-authors Amory and Hunter Lovins) proposes an industrial system where natural resources are treated as capital, and “smart designers apprentice themselves to nature” to learn the secrets of efficient production.

HR 4200, same old same old. Profit for Corporations at cost to taxpayers.

The Walden Logging Bill sacrifices accountability and transparency in federal decision making by casting aside the most important law the public has to provide meaningful and informed input on federal projects – the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). All projects authorized under the bill would be exempt from NEPA, which requires that federal projects undergo a “look before they leap” review that takes into account sound science, a reasonable range of alternatives, and lets the public know about a project and its environmental impacts before moving forward.  

Please make the call. Click on your rep to find phone number.

Hopeless? Act.

Update: Hemp based economy possible?

While engaged in a discussion over at dKos on query of Dems supporting legalization of Marijuana, ben masel posted a comment with a link to Thomas to a bill introduced in June, by Rep Paul, Ron [TX-14],  

that would amend the Controlled Substances Act to exclude industrial hemp from the definition of marihuana, and for other purposes.

Jump into the field with me for a minute….
Perhaps Mr Paul recognizes the need to Do Something about our energy crisis, but viewing his list of introduced bills, I suspect that it has something to do with taxes, and tax credits, as that seems to be a pretty strong focus of his this year, or perhaps Big Oil is setting up to make alternatives their new cash cow, as they are doing with wind.

Whatever the motivation is, whether you say marijuana or marihuana, I’ll take it.   I hope all will write reps, urging this bill forward and over the hump to amending the law that prohibits the use of this saving grace of a plant.

Unable to edit origional Hemp diary from last march, it is here, for those who wish to see.

It could be a Hemp based economy.

There’s a Hemp bill in California that needs the attention of all California Boo-sters.

But wait. Some background….

We used to make a lot of things from hemp. Hemp farmers were happy. Not because they were getting high on it, but it do love to grow, is hardy, and bugs don’t much like to fool with it.

 

In 1937 Congress passed the Marihuana Tax Act which effectively began the era of hemp prohibition.

 During WW2, the government cranked up hemp production, but   After the war ended,  quietly shut down all the hemp processing plants and the industry faded away again.
The Hemp Industry Assoc.

Image hosted by Photobucket.com

I say let’s crank that sucker back up again…so follow me down to where the roots feed….
 

A bi-partisan group of Hawaii state legislators sent a letter to President Bush in 2001 informing him that “… industrial hemp is a state agricultural issue, not a drug issue. Banning hemp products intended for consumption will negatively impact industrial hemp manufacturing and production, thus impairing America’s farmers and manufacturers.

 In 1997, the USDA Forest Products Laboratory in Madison, Wisconsin conducted an evaluation of hemp as a potential feedstock for the paper industry in that state. They concluded that “… hemp could profitably be used as a fiber source for the paper industry” and that “Wisconsin farmers could meet the demand for fiber by the fine paper manufacturers of Wisconsin.

 The Vermont State Auditor’s Report on the Domestic Cannabis Eradication/Suppression Program (DCE/SP), published in 1998, found that the national average for ditchweed seized under the DCE/SP in all 50 states was 99% as of 1996. The study notes that over $9 million was spent on this program in 1996 and that out of 422,716,526 cannabis plants eradicated, 419,660,022 were low-THC ditchweed, also known as industrial (feral) hemp. The report recommends that policymakers who are concerned that the federal cannabis eradication program focuses so heavily on wild industrial hemp consider lobbying the DEA to change the DCE/SP grant to target cultivated cannabis more exclusively.

This report indicates that millions of our tax dollars are wasted on eradicating harmless low-THC industrial hemp plants instead of focusing on the eradication of cultivated marijuana. More recent 2001 statistics show that more than $13 million in taxpayer funds were spent on this boondoggle program. Vote Hemp

In my own state, all I can say is “Bless Virginia’s Legislators little hearts”….

WHEREAS, although industrial hemp is derived from the Cannabis sativa plant, it is distinctive from its better known relative, in that it contains less than one percent of the chemical responsible for its psychoactive properties; and

WHEREAS, similar to jute and flax, industrial hemp’s three principal raw materials–fiber, hurds, and seeds can be used in more than 25,000 products, including textiles, rope, cellulose plastics, resin, particle board, paper products, shampoo, vitamins and oil; and

WHEREAS,WHEREAS,WHEREAS,

 RESOLVED by the House of Delegates, the Senate concurring, That the Commission on Rural Prosperity be requested to consider the growth and production of industrial hemp in Virginia as a means to promote rural prosperity

…..yada yada, that was in 2001, I think. I will need to do a little additional digging and see if any of the requested consideration has occured.

To date, 26 states have introduced hemp legislation and 16 have passed legislation; 5 have legalized its production.Find all legislation related to hemp here.

Ok, so what about California? Consumers, staart your keyboards….

Image hosted by Photobucket.com

The Call to Arms:

COST OF LOBBYING FOR HEMP FARMING BILL IN CALIFORNIA: $11,000.00
BENEFIT OF GIVING FARMERS THE RIGHT TO GROW HEMP: PRICELESS!

The next six months is a crucial time for lobbying legislators about the California Industrial Hemp Farming Act – AB 1147, introduced by Asm. Mark Leno of San Francisco.  Vote Hemp has hired Michael Greene,
of CDS Consulting, to be our lobbyist in Sacramento and help us secure passage. A plan has been created to educate influential members of committees that will be hearing the bill, as well as all members of
both chambers of the legislature and the Governor’s office. Michael Greene will also help us to build grassroots and business support for the legislation. We recently held a press conference in Sacramento to announce AB 1147. Read more at:

We urgently need your help in covering costs for this major effort to secure passage of AB 1147 which could be as much as $11,000 over six months. Fortunately, AlpSnack(http://www.Alpsnack.com) has generously offered to match dollar for dollar donations for this effort.

Every dollar you give over the next six months is actually worth two!

Some of the notable supporters of AB 1147 include the California Certified Organic Farmers, Rain Forest Action Network and Organic Consumers Association.  Despite these groups’ public support, it’s up to the Hemp Industry to pay the bills.  Send donations to:
Vote Hemp
P.O. Box 862
Bedford, MA 01730

And of course, there is a paypal donation button on the site.

The Vote Hemp site also supplies some marvelous links to such sites as the We The Planet vegetable oil  bus tour, The Living Tree Paper Company and Carbohydrate Economy Clearinghouse.

I read, at the Carbohydrate Economy Clearinghouse, that in 1941 Henry Ford built a plastic car made of fiber from hemp and wheat straw. And that anything made from a hydrocarbon can be made from a carbohydrate. That the 21st century should be the era of the carbohydrate (sustainable agricultural products.)That Hemp plastic is biodegradable, synthetic plastic is not.

“Why use up the forests which were centuries in the making and the mines which required ages to lay down, if we can get the equivalent of forests and mineral products in the annual growth of the fields? Many of the raw materials of industry which are today stripped from the forests and the mines can be obtained from annual crops grown on the farms.” -Henry Ford  

Why indeed? WTF? Boy,howdy.  

 “Over 25,000 products can be manufactured from hemp, from cellophane to dynamite.”
Popular Mechanics, 1938

North American Hemp Council

 One acre of hemp can produce as much usable fiber as 4 acres of trees or two acres of cotton.
ecomall/hemp products

Emmasnacker look good in blue hemp clothes, ya think?

Image hosted by Photobucket.com

Oh dear. An extra linky thing here. Wher’d that come from, I wonder.  It’s one that shouts “Read me”, and is food for a whole new diary. You know how it is when a person starts following links. Sometimes they follow you home.