Why Reverend Wright MUST Lose the Democratic Nomination

I wish MSM would stop pretending that Senator Barack Obama is running for the democratic nomination. I know it’s politically correct to hide a black revolutionary behind a button-down shirt and white grandparents, but it does the American public no service.

As long as  the American public continues to be fooled into thinking it is voting for Obama, it can be  misled into voting for Wright. Obama’s more reasonable posture about racial relations, connections with leaders on both sides, speeches urging Americans of all stripes to bridge divisions, and his appealing policies could gain a real foothold among both black and white voters.

Furthermore, HRC talking “obliterate” and McCain singing “bomb, bomb, bomb” Iran, makes them look hella scary. But if the American public knew their REAL rival loves Farrakhan and hates  America, they’d sound like the voices of sanity.  
Let’s face it, the McCain Keating association, HRC’s unsavory past with all its “Gates” and financial shenanigans and impeachment–Obama has none of this baggage.  But remember: OBAMA IS NOT THE ONE WE NEED TO VET!  

So far, Obama hasn’t denounced America or rattled nukes at Iran. He’s looking like a pretty viable candidate against Clinton, and as though he could beat McCain, given that he offers an alternative to Bush.

So we must demand that  Chris Matthews, Andrea Mitchell, Nora O’Donell, and Joe Scarborough stop mincing words. Stop using euphemisms like “associate, “spiritual advisor,” “political liability.”

OBAMA is the associate. OBAMA is the advisee. OBAMA is Wright’s only   political asset. But at the end of the day,  WRIGHT is the ONE ON THE BALLOT!    

What will a PASTOR PRESIDENCY look like?  

How bout some old black guy dancing around in a dashiki using subversive word-play and FOUL LANGUAGE in the oval office?

Edward Kennedy and Susan Eisenhower and Bill Richardson and John Kerry and Bill Bradley can say they have endorsed Obama all they want.  You know they HEART Rev Wright!

Ask yourself this: do I want Pastor Wright to answer the red phone at 3 a.m.? Sure, HRC might get bitchy and obliterate the  caller’s country, and McCain might bomb,bomb,bomb…

But the Pastor will deliver an OFFENSIVE sermon. You don’t think the most reasonable foreign lunatic would hesitate to  launch a missile just to put a stop to Wright’s  G.D. PREACHING?

Don’t let your respect for Obama or his politics get in your way. Whatever anyone tells you, a vote for Obama is not a vote for Obama.

Maybe democrats can run Obama in 2012, but right now he’s only going along with the masquerade to make his preacher pal look good.

Wright for U.S. President–NOT!

Furzeball Interviews Hillary about FALN Pardons

FALN members pose threat, FBI official says

September 22, 1999_Web posted at: 12:21 a.m. EDT (0421 GMT)

WASHINGTON (CNN) — Little more than a week after the release from prison of 11 Puerto Rican nationalists following a grant of clemency by President Clinton, a top FBI official has told Congress that the convicted FALN members are terrorists who still pose a threat. I think they’re criminals and terrorists and represent a threat to the United States,” Assistant FBI Director Neal Gallagher told Congress Tuesday, in the FBI’s first public statement on the president’s decision to grant clemency to 16 Puerto Rican nationalists. Although the White House decision to invoke executive privilege prevented the FBI from explicitly describing the Bureau’s recommendation on granting clemency, Gallagher left no doubt where the FBI stood on the issue.
Alright. Let’s play furzball!
Senator Clinton, you’re a gutsy lady. This can’t be easy for you.
Ya know, I’m a woman. And I have sixty years experience as a woman.  
Well, I want to thank you for that. Now  I just want to give you an opportunity  to respond to these allegations that, uh, as FIRST LADY of the United States, when your husband was the PRESIDENT, you supported clemency for FALN, a terrorist group.
I withdrew my support, so, no, I didn’t. Actually, this was done under my husband’s administration and I disagreed with it. I had nothing to do with it and we didn’t have terrorists when Bill and I were in the White House.
Well, we are very grateful for your service. And then you went to New York, didn’t you?    And you won a seat in the New York Senate. Senator Clinton, that’s why 9/11 is so tough for you, isn’t it?
Exactly. I rescued a few hundred people from the towers, and then, I just remember this huge roar, ha, ha,  and they were telling us you better duck because the World Trade Center could fall on you at any moment.  I was so angry.  I just threw my attache case across Ground Zero…
When you read that this unrepenetant terrorist, Bill Ayers, a former member of the WEATHER UNDERGROUND, when he said he wished–let me read it here, Senator.  “I wish we had done more.”  How does that make you feel?
SHAME ON YOU, WILLIAM AYERS!  
O.k. O.k. Now he made this comment on 9/11–whatever. It was published then.  Senator, what do you think the American people need to ask Obama about his involvement with  a 70’s terrorist who is married to another terrorist? I mean it’s not exactly your typical let’s go duck hunting couple is it?
I’m not going to judge Barack Obama. I don’t know anything about him. No one does. All he’s ever done is been black and give a couple of speeches.
Yes. So it’s fair to ask if he can do anything else.
He’s no McCain.
Johnny’s a great guy, isn’t he? Now, I’m gonna have to ask you to respond to these graffiti artists in San Francisco  who say that your husband pardoned FALN so you could get the  Hispanic vote in New York. This one, “Cinque’sblackandhe’sback,” argues that you shouldn’t bring up Obama’s participation in the Weather people because–
What’s the sound of one hand clapping? It’s not analogous. I was busy helping starving children all over the world. After I made it possible for all of them to eat, I took a nap  And then I officially withdrew my support in a statement.      
So  you didn’t actually have anything to do with the release of the FALN 16, did you? Is the Obama campaign just kinda whining by bringing up this FALN thing?
Ya know. I’m tough. So I’m not going to comment on that.
O.k. So I’ll ask you this: Do you think Obama is a terrorist?
How would I know? He has said he is not a terrorist.  So, no, no,no!  I have no proof that he did any of these bombings with his friends and fundraisers in the Weather _Underground.
Let me ask it this way: Do you think that Obama’s close ties with a former domestic terrorist will continue to be  an issue for the American people?
Yes,yes,yes!
************************ Article above at cnn.com
http://www.cnn.com/...

WallStreet Journal article on FALN
http://online.wsj.com/public/article_print/SB120277819085260827.html

Youtube re: HRC claim she’s been vetted vs. FALN story
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1SovbQR0 jE

LES MIZ: Chasing Obama through ABC’s Sewer

They were at it again last night, chasing Jean ValJean through the same stinking sewer with their same phoney patriotism. This time they planted a lapel pin,a whisper of Hamas, and an old land mine Sean Hannity wired up.

Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos, sharing the role of  Javert, the obsessive police inspector, stirred the waters to roiling. But last night, Senator Obama was sick of running through their muck. He was tired of playing Frederick March to their Charles Laughton.

As for HRC, she’s no Annie Oakley, but she knows how to swim with the sharks. She knows it’s better to hunt than be hunted.

As she put it, “everyone has rummaged in it [her baggage]  for years.” She made out that she’s cleared customs, but Obama needs a body cavity search.  

Nothing Obama says will satisfy his inquisitors. If they won’t take a character reference from the likes of   Kennedy, Casey, Richardson, Dodd,   Durbin, Kerry,Leahy, and Tom Daschle! From Rockefeller,l Bradley, Hart, Brzezinski! Susan Eisenhower not good enough?

Not good enough the stellar array of military officers, city mayors, governors, 100 + newspapers, Harvard Law school, keynote speech at Democratic Convention in ’04, miles of paper trail from state and U.S. senate, oh no! We need to know how Reverend Wright really feels about America.

Two best selling autobiographical books, a host of interviews,  press conferences, endless debates and stump speeches, a few “historical” speeches before the entire nation thrown in, but we gotta grill Obama some more on what he thinks about race, Reverend Wright, and his grandmother. Nash McCabe! Get over here now and find out why this Taliban disguised as a fellow democrat doesn’t wear a flag pin!

Mais oui.  Must be something he’s hiding in that carry-on.

Monsieur Obama, Arretez! Eet iz a matter of zat leetle loaf of bread you steal twenty year ago…    
************************
When words are not enough

Obama has something more convincing, a much bigger flag than he could possibly find room for on a lapel. He’s got the widest and deepest and perhaps most dedicated constituency of any politician in American history. He’s got us.

Who are we? We are  steel workers and teachers; anti-war protestors and Vietnam Vets; Muslims and Catholics, Protestants and Jews, atheists and Zen Buddhists.

We are white, latino, black, Pacific Islander, Asian. We are Italian and Irish and Polish and Hispanic and Anglo Americans.  We are ivy-leaguers who drink budweiser and truck drivers who prefer Manhattans.

We are young men and old women; from  small towns and big cities; immigrants and Native Americans; republicans and democrats; of  all socio economic groups, from all fifty states.

Last night, MSM and HRC insulted, demeaned, and stereotyped a huge swath of America.  Still chewing on Obama’s clumsy but well-intended analysis of the political  mind-set of some traditional voters n PA, HRC  goes after a vast cross section of her fellow Americans with a baseball bat and her elitist corporate-media pals.  

Last night, WE were treated like thieves in our own house. WE were accused of stealing the silver candlesticks WE have paid for.      
Citizens, it’s we who are chased through the sewer; we who are made suspect; we who are called guilty by association with our choice of candidate.

To the barricades!

As General Pershing said when he landed in France:  Obama, we are here.    

The Assassination Of Jeremiah Wright: Youtube, the new smart bomb

On the anniversary of Martin Luther King’s assassination, I want to address another assassination, this one by youtube, our new smart bomb.

I’m talking about the assassination of Pastor Jeremiah Wright. Like MLK, Pastor Wright is a prophetic preacher. As did MLK, he preaches equality and non-violence. And as did MLK, he has become the target of a concerted campaign to discredit and defame him. Nothing personal. It’s not about him. It wasn’t about MLK either.

In the virtual world we live in, we can blow up hope and goodness with the click of a mouse.

Before Obama surged to a lead over Clinton, most Americans knew next to nothing of Pastor Wright’s 36 years at Trinity Church. They didn’t know and they didn’t care that
Wright had increased the congregation to bursting, opened up 70 ministries, and saved the poor from starving, the homeless from dying
on Chicago’s cold streets.

On the verge of retirement, Pastor Wright could look back on the kind of life most of us wish we had, but are too self-centered to have earned. His was a life of service and inspiration. His huge flock loved him; his pastoral peers respected him; his sermons were legendary.

Reverend Wright was to the pulpit what Bobby Knight was to basketball. He would retire a star in Pastoral circles, but also a man who had made a real difference, the kind of man who stood out, the kind of man commended by Lyndon B. Johnson, invited to the White House by Bill Clinton.Then came Obama’s steep, unbroken rise; with it, Pastor Wright’s unprecedented fall.

This morning, writing this, I’m listening to Chris Hitchens carry on about Obama’s “Crack-pot” pastor on “Meet The Press.” A month after Fox fired up its smear-campaign by proxy, it still sets the terms of the debate.

Ted Russert, Hitchens, and Andrew Sullivan re-hash the same abrupted bits from the same audio-bite. Hitchens makes the well-worn case that Obama must “do something” about “his Jeremiah Wright problem.” Never mind Obama’s historical speech on race– even if blacks and whites wept as one listening to it–Obama hasn’t done enough.

Daily, hourly,Obama’s ex-pastor draws the wrath of T.V. hosts and bloggers, paranoics and pundits. In this collective public eye, Obama’s campaign, in fact, his entire political past and future, boils down to the youtube Gotcha.

Tim Russert glances slyly at his notes as though they’re classified. Looks up. Arches brows slightly. He lays his cards on the table. The pundits marvel.

Full House! Obama, Wright, Farrakhan, and KHADAFI! Ted’s got KHADAFI! They chaw on a secret trip to Libya and speculate about how hot things will get when the rest of MSM discover Obama is Khadafi’s secret agent. Ted shuffles again.

Ted puts the white grandmother on the table. He looks from one pundit to another. They assume the stance, Oxford Deans debating Foucalt.

En Garde! He’s using his grandmother.

Touche! He loves his grandmother.

Parry: Typical white grandmother. Thrust What did he mean?Typical white grandmother?

Parry, thrust, parry, thrust

Obama needs to tell America exactly which of Wright’s statements he objects to.

The controversial ones.

But what does controversial mean?Lunge: He needs to come clean with America about his relationship with his pastor.Leaning in for the kill: Why did he sit in those pews all those years?

Missing from the loop-to-loop is Wright himself, the real Wright. But since he’s only collateral damage, his total absence is fitting. OOPS, we hit a pharmacy when we meant to hit a despot. So let’s bomb,bomb,bomb again.
WRIGHT AS PROPHET: WHY CLINTON and MSM WON’T ARGUE THE REAL MESSAGE OF “CHICKENS COME HOME TO ROOST”

I don’t know Reverend Wright personally. But I do know a great deal more about him than the mass of online and television critics who work themselves and their audience into a frenzy over “the constant litany” they imagine Wright “spewed” at Obama and his family. These critics, whether high-paid journalists or bloggers named “mad dog”, extrapolate the man and his ministry from the “youtubed” hit job, and palm it off as scholarship.

Funny, those of us Wright offends the least are the most informed about the semon the most “appalling” seconds is extracted from. We have read or watched this tour de force aria as Wright originally sung it.

The singing is heart-rending, masterful, the message as outrageously moral as it gets: only God, not America, not a nation, not a government, is all-powerful, Almighty. Wright’s righteous rage is directed at America’s abuse of power all over the globe. Like MLK, Reverend Wright is ardently anti-war. In sum, Wright’s operatic turn is a passionate and agonized call for an end to America’s militant response to global crises.

What is truly revolutionary is that Wright challenges us to see Japanese and Vietnamese and Latin American lives as EQUAL to our own.

What is “anti-American,” is Wright’s angry condemnation of Truman’s government for unleashing a nuclear holocaust on a civilian, not military target: Nagasaki and Hiroshima.

Contrary to MSM’s spin, he deplores the 9/ll attack, vividly describing the horror he watched that day on television.

In fact, 9/11 brings the sermon on. But not only do we need to contextualize the youtube seconds, but the days following 9/11 when the reckless, bloody cry for revenge, blind revenge trumpeted throughout the American public, MSM, and the Bush Administration.

So Wright’s “the chickens have come home to roost” sermon is a prophetic, bibically-inspired warning to congregation and country to “stop the cycle of violence” God deems unholy. Wright’s warning wasn’t heeded any more than Senator Obama’s measured and secular speech delivered a year later.

In the Gotterdamerung of U.S. sanctioned violence, the war in Iraq is one of the longest and costliest cycles. Thus far, 4,000 U.S . soldiers and hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians have been sacrificed, in part, because Bush and MSM began to connect Sadaam Hussein to 9/11 even before the date Wright gave this sermon. Prophetic? Nostradomus caiber!

The seeds of war were blowing in the wind well before the smoke died down at ground zero. These seeds grew into the full-blown nightmare we can’t seem to wake up from. U.S. sanctions against the Iraqis and two wars has meant not only incalcuable civilian deaths and unjury, but damage to the infrastructure that will surely kill thousands more, just as Nagasaki and Hiroshima suffered from radioactive fallout for generations.

MSM and the Clinton campaign certainly don’t want to argue with Wright’s REAL message– for it is prescient. Better to portray the sermon as blaming the victims of 9/11, than as a warning against a blind vengeance that would take 50 times more life.

MEN OF GOOD WILL STAND UP FOR WRIGHT, CLINTON SITS IT OUT

So this diary doesn’t become a total tome, I won’t detail more of Reverend Wright or Trinity Church’s rich resume. Both have a dedicated history of service to country and community.

But I will explain that President Clinton invited Wright to The White House as a member of a highly select pastoral delegation whose mission was to provide spiritual support to the President during the critical period of his public shaming and contrition. Ironic.

Ironic too that while Clinton now lobbies superdelegates for votes, claiming Wright’s defamation has ruined Obama for the GE, as First Lady, she sat next to Reverend Wright, a fact she has never once mentioned.

But others have attested to Wright’s excellent reputation.

These Christian and Jewish church leaders wrote an open letter calling for an end to the month-long attack on Pastor Wright. Dean Snyder, the pastor at the Clinton’s church has written to Hillary Clinton and made a television appearance decrying Wright’s defamation. Recently, CNN news covered a press conference at which, among others, the President of the United Church of Christ and Trinity’s new pastor joined together to support Wright and to call for a serious discusssion of race and religion.

Their defense trumps “mad dog’s” condemnation because they know what it was like to hear Wright preach. Not one of these esteemed Christians expresses a qualm about Obama’s sitting “in those pews” for twenty years listening to Wright preach.
Not one expresses a qualm about Obama bringing his wife and children to Wright’s sermons.

Rather, Reverend John Thomas, President of UCC, took a turn at the microphone to sum up supporters’ opinions, lauding Wright for his inspired ministry, affirming Wright and Trinity’s stellar reputation in Chicago. Reverend Moss, Trinity’s new Pastor, spoke, as he has before, giving Wright credit for Trinity’s success in its many missions, while his own demeanor showed that the church continues in good hands.

Let me explain that the United Church of Christ is the white denomination Trinity belongs to. And so, though it is indeed heartening that UCC’s distinguished President, and other men of good judgment and faith, joined Moss on Wright and Trinity’s behalf, it also begs a question:

Why should a predominantly black church need its white leadership to bolster its testimony? Of course, there is the fact that UCC is Trinity’s “parent” denomination. But isn’t it also the case that the white American public gives greater credence to white people’s testimony than to black people’s, to white churches than to black? Why is it that white religious leaders, no matter how divisional and far-fetched,have never been targeted by such a relentless cycle of bad publicity?

The answer rests on the crack in our country’s foundation, on the unequal division of power underlying our institutions, on the taint of money and favor in our media ; and finally, on racial stereotype that far too many white Americans still endorse and propagate, thoughtlessly, recklessly, at times maliciously.

I do believe our shared wound will open and bleed forth before it heals. We can, we will, begin to heal together.

To start, we must reject and denounce this hi-tech character assassination of Reverend Wright and Trinity Church. In doing so, we will demand, not only for this man and this church, but for all, our absolute right to freedom of religion, regardless of color or creed.

The Freudian Slip: IS HILLARY A SOCIOPATH? Pt. 1

The Freudian Slip: Is Hillary a Sociopath?

Dr. Robert Hare, a pioneer in forensic psychology, tells us that many sociopaths are successful, even celebrated. I don’t propose to diagnose Hillary Clinton by diary, but more modestly, to examine one characteristic Dr. Hare finds sociopaths have in common. From CEO to small-time swindler, the sociopath lies.

Hillary lies, repeatedly and recklessly.

She lies when she doesn’t need to.  And she lies as much for self-aggrandizement as for political gain.

Sociopaths, driven by an unnatural appetite to get what they want NOW–a t.v. set or the presidency– can’t suffer the paience it takes to craft a careful lie. And their narcissism, coupled with a complete lack of morality,enables them to advance the most outrageous lies. Lies that make you shake your head in disbelief. Lies that end up on “Meet the Press.”

What me worry Hillary. By the time she’s busted, the lie has done its work. Confronted, she’s cool as a sociopath:”So, I made a mistake.” Or the devil made me do it. I voted for the Iraq war because Bush bamboozled me.


In her run against Obama, Hillary has lied to show she’s got the right stuff to be Commander-in-Chief. Before the Bosnian Bruhaha, she lied to pump up her senatorial role and to finesse positions she once held that could lose her the nomination. In turn, her lies substantiate two sides of the beautifully constructed Election 08 Hillary: courageous but caring. No one is as tough. No one cares as much. In Hillary’s lies, Clara Barton meets Audie Murphy.

Lies to show she’s got CIC and foreign policy cred claim she

  1.  “landed under sniper fire” in Bosnia.
  2.  “helped bring peace to Ireland”
  3.   “negotiated open borders to let fleeing refugees into Kosovo”

The historical record, various eye-witnesses, and contemporaneous sources prove all three claims false “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Further, Hillary  has taken the lion’s share of  credit for SCHIP. Orrin Hatch, with the disclaimer that he likes her, felt honor-bound to answer this claim honestly: “…does she deserve credit for SCHIP? No–Teddy does, but she does’nt.”

It is clear from HRC’s First Lady records, recently released by The National Archives and President Clinton’s Library, as well as numerous eye-witness and Press reports that whatever her private thoughts, HRC waved the pom-poms for NAFTA with gusto.   Ironically, on the eve of the Ohio and Texas primaries, Hillary raised doubts about Obama’s NAFTA stance with a timely but premature AP report. She succeeded in shifting the contest’s outcome. Days after AP was contradicted by its own sources, she continued to hector her rival with yesterday’s news until the clock ran out. Though no longer news, Canadian sources, strangely, now point to Clinton as the NAFTA waffler.  

Hillary’s experience does give her the edge when it comes to manipulating the interface of MSM and the American public. She knows that both are rapid cyclers. She knows that what’s headlines one day is yesterday’s onions the next.

Surely, when she cast her vote to authorize Bush to skirt global consensus and wage a unilateral war against Iraq, she knew she’d have to do damage control on it one day.  But like Scarlett O’hara, she’d think about it tomorrow. I’m talking about her vote on the war in Iraq.

  Let’s not mince words.  I’m talking about her vote FOR the war in Iraq.

 Hillary voted for war in 2002 with her eye on the prize. Within days of the 9/11 attack of WTC, she knew if she was ever to have a shot at the U.S. presidency, she’d have to beat the drums for war. As Manhattan lay still burning, Hillary, the former war protester, formed a strategic political stance that would kill two birds with one stone.  

More next diary: From the ashes of 9/11, a new Hillary rises