[UPDATE] The Codex Alimentarius and the Freedom of Choice

I would like to copy here a long e-mail I received today and put it up for discussion as it affects the life of all of us, and as often we are not aware of what is happening. I believe this needs to be put an the radar screen! (bold are mine)

I received an urgent plea from a colleague to forward a somewhat lengthy and occasionally redundant letter and call to action regarding a global movement that would limit access to natural remedies.  Before I copy the whole email into this post, I would like to say that the two countries where Codex has the greatest grip are the two mentioned in the email:  Germany and Norway.  I have had occasion to see first hand what happens.  Vitamin C jumped to $48 a bottle in Norway.  I exported some cilantro to Norway.  The price to the consumer was more than 12 times the cost to the importer.  There are profit margins and then there are ways of exploiting people when they are already down on their luck.

When I was consulting in Germany, the doctor phoned the local pharmacist and asked them to show me around.  Basically, in the front of the apotheke, you could buy toothpaste and shampoo and one brand of essential oils for aesthetic rather than medical uses.  When I asked about milk thistle, it was in the back, neatly stored in drawers.  A customer could buy certain things without a prescription, but only if the pharmacist considered the request appropriate.  However, many items we take for granted were only available by prescription.  These included most vitamins, enzymes, probiotics, and many herbs.

Across the street, there was a grocery store.  It sold traditional herbal products in liquid and tablets and the health claims on the bottles exceeded what I would have thought permissible, but one could buy St. John’s wort and hawthorn berries along with artichoke juice and digestive bitters.

In Europe, the reaction against Codex has been vehement.  Literally, hundreds of millions of signatures opposing Codex have been collected and when Codex has met, there have been unbelievable demonstrations, ergo the increasing secrecy and attempts to railroad controls into place without the public realizing what is happening.

Obviously, we have seen this occurring on a rampant scale in our country and many of us spend a lot of time signing online petitions and trying to make our opinions count for something.  It’s very hard to keep this up when more and more rules are being made every moment and our elected officials are sometimes trying to whitewash themselves by claiming they hadn’t read legislation before they voted.  I am going to urge you to read the post and to forward it to others because your freedom of choice in health care is at stake.

Many blessings,

Ingrid

_____

Dr. Darrell L Wolfe, Ac. Ph.D.
The Wolfe Clinic
1-800-592-9653
Over 25 years preventing and treating chronic illness.
<http://www.thewolfeclinic.com>

Join my newsletter: <mailto:healthtips@thewolfeclinic.com>

May 16 2005

Hi Folks,

A couple of months ago I wrote a note about the CODEX ALIMENTARIUS (food code) and about how your life could be severely affected if this law passes.

Now, I want to give you some updated information, especially on a recent legal ruling in Europe.  First, though, if you are as angry and concerned as I am about this please read the following carefully and then make sure to contact everyone you know to prevent this attack on our freedom of choice. I encourage you to forward this important message to everyone on your contact list. As well, you should telephone, mail or email your elected representatives!

Write your government officials and tell them your opinion on this matter – NOW. http://www.congress.org/congressorg/dbq/officials/

In Canada write your M.P. <http://canada.gc.ca/directories/direct_e.html>

Your right to choose your vitamin, mineral, herb and other supplements may end before the end of this year (2005). The large Drug Companies would prefer that you were oblivious to this fact and kept like a mushroom. (In the dark and fed Sh_t)

If these laws come into effect all supplements and Vitamins will need a prescription. They will also be produced and supplied only by the Drug Companies. This means that a low quality bottle of Vitamin E (90 caps) may soon cost you a doctors visit and well over eight hundred dollars. The pharmaceutical companies even include baking soda and table salt on their list of, soon to be called, “drugs” that they wish to sell and control. The following is a compilation of information I have received from a large number of sources:

After July, North American supplements will be defined and controlled by the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the World Health Organization (WHO).

It is called the CODEX ALIMENTARIUS (food code) and it is setting the supplement standards for all countries in the WTO. CODEX met secretly in November, 2004 and finalized ‘Step 8 (the final stage)’to begin implementation in July, 2005, severely restricting the use and availability of numerous vitamins, minerals and other supplements.

In the US, the President and Congress agreed to the takeover when the WTO treaty was signed, therefore these supplement standards WILL BE ENFORCED BY THE WTO AND WILL OVERRIDE US LAWS. CODEX violations are/will be punished by WTO trade sanctions.

CODEX Includes:

No supplement can be sold for preventive or therapeutic use. (Obviously they know nothing of Vitamin C preventing and curing scurvy, Vitamin D preventing and curing rickets and osteoporosis, or vitamin B curing and preventing anemia. It also ignores the mountain of evidence showing our diets are chronically deficient in essential nutrients because of factory-style farming practices).

Any potency higher than RDA (recommended daily allowance, aka minimal (strength) is a ‘drug’ requiring a prescription and must be produced by drug companies.

Over 5000 safe items now in health stores will be banned, terminating health stores as we now know them. CODEX regulations become binding internationally. New supplements are banned unless given very expensive CODEX testing and approval.

CODEX now applies to Norway and Germany, among others, where:
Zinc tablets rose from $4 per bottle to $52.

Echinacea (an ancient immune-enhancement herb) rose from $14 to $153.
Both examples above are now allowed by prescription only. They are now ‘drugs’.

Vitamin C above 200mg is banned for over-the-counter and sold as a prescription drug only.

Niacin above 32 mg is banned for over-the-counter and sold as a prescription drug only.

Vitamin B6 above 4 mg is banned for over-the-counter and sold as a prescription drug only.

Same for Amino Acids like arginine, lysine, carnitine, etc.

Same for the Omega Essential Fatty Acids and many more supplements including DMEA, DHEA,CoQ10, MSM, beta-carotene, etc.

The CODEX rules are not based on real science. They were made by a few people meeting in secret; not necessarily scientists.

In 1993 the FDA and drug companies tried to put all supplements under restriction and prescription, but over 4 million Americans told congress and the president to protect their freedom of choice on health supplements. The DSHEA law was passed in 1994 which does so, but this will be overruled by CODEX and the WTO.

Virtually nothing about it has been in the media. What the drug corporations have failed to do through congress, they have gotten by sneak attack through CODEX with the help of a silent media. I’m sure most Crack dealers are more honest.

Canadian Author Helke Ferrie, has a clear, concise explanation of the dangers of “Codex.”  Read this, and get worried:

LIFE UNDER CODEX

In the mid-1990s my mother, then in her 80s, had a stroke. She lived in Germany. When she left hospital, I was ready with a nutritional plan that included high-dose vitamins: C, E, and B – especially Inositol, as well as Co-enzyme Q 10. I went to the pharmacy, whose owner was a family friend for some 25 years, and handed him my list.

He handed me a small packet with a price sticker of DM 200 (then about $200) containing vitamin E capsules manufactured by one of Germany’s largest pharmaceutical companies. The source was synthetic, not the “mixed” version from living plant sources I wanted which contains the whole E spectrum. The package contained a total of 10,000 international units of E, the equivalent of a mere 25 capsules of 400 IU each that we are used to buying (I take that many in 3 days). Our bottles contain 90 capsules and cost about $20. If Codex rules in Canada, we will likely pay $800 for a bottle of 90 capsules of low-quality vitamin E – if Health Canada lets us buy that many at once, and if you can find a doctor willing to prescribe it.

He then handed me a tube-shaped metal container with vitamin C effervescent tablets. Each tablet, when dissolved in water, would release 10 mg of vitamin C in a refined sugar solution. Thus, this ridiculously low amount, was to be taken in a toxic medium that would neutralize the vitamin without it doing anything at all. The cost: about $10 for 12 tablets.

Then he asked me, “What’s Co-enzyme Q 10? Are you allowed to buy all this in Canada in such dangerous dosages?” When I told him what I take daily, his eyes popped. Then I asked, “Why can’t I buy these supplements here?” He replied, “Well, Germany is a Codex country.” Oddly, Germany has several government-run hospitals where environmental illness is treated with nutrients only, intravenous vitamin C etc. Life is full of paradoxes and few more follow below.

CODEX AND THE EU

Dr. Carolyn Dean, a medical doctor and naturopath well known to Toronto readers, is currently the president of “Friends of Freedom International” in which capacity she attended the Codex meeting in Bonn last November. She describes Codex as “the ultimate Big Brother marching backwards into the future.”
Effective 1 August, all vitamin and mineral supplements on the so-called “positive list”, including everything from Beta Carotene to Zinc, will only be available in the 25 EU countries if they comply with specific rules set out in the 10 June 2002, EU Directive Relating to Food Supplements. All products must show maximum safe levels “as established by science.”

Those nutrients found in the mythic “balanced diet” are to be subtracted from the final values, and Article 6 (2) decrees that labels shall “not attribute to food supplements the property of preventing, treating or curing a human disease, or refer to such properties.”

So, the Directive’s “science” knows nothing of Vitamin C preventing and curing scurvy, Vitamin D preventing and curing rickets and osteoporosis, or vitamin B curing and preventing anemia. It also ignores the mountain of evidence showing our diets are chronically deficient in essential nutrients because of factory-style farming practices.

To “ensure a high level of protection for consumers and facilitate their choice”, they even included baking soda and table salt. We must assume they will be unavailable as of 1 August anywhere in Europe – with interesting consequences for the tourist industry in the baked goods paradises Austria, Switzerland and France.

Now, there is also a “negative list” covering essential fatty acids, phytonutrients, all the enzymes and more. Those cannot be marketed at all, until the EU scientific committee in charge has made a final decision. So, forget omega-3 and omega-6 fats, cod liver oil, and much more.
The effect of this directive will be that thousands of products and businesses will be gone this year. In the UK alone some 21 million people will suddenly have no access to any supplement vitamins, minerals, enzymes, fatty acids and more. Since the onus is on businesses to produce the scientific information on safety, they can’t produce or sell anything – not even to physicians who have the power to prescribe any toxic drug as well as any essential nutrient. Obviously, there will be ludicrous enforcement issues: Picture basement-concocted vitamins sold in dark alleys alongside crack and Ecstasy.

Here is a fact. Contrary to pharmaceutical drugs, there are few fatalities from supplements. Can you just imagine the news coverage if vitamins and supplements created the amount of death that drugs do?

There is no need for more control of supplements than is already in place, which is substantial. Instead of drastically restricting supplements, why don’t they better control and restrict the extremely dangerous pharmaceutical drugs which are now killing us at the rate of a major airline crash per day?

Behind the Codex Alimentarius Commission is the United Nations and the World Health Organization working in conjunction with the multinational pharmaceutical cartel and international banks.  Its initial efforts in the US with the FDA were defeated, so it found another ally in the FTC. Now Codex, with the FTC and the pharmaceutical cartel behind it, it threatens to become a trade issue,

Codex began simply enough when the U.N. authorized the World Health Organization and the Food and Agriculture Organization to develop a universal food code.  Their purpose was to ‘harmonize’ regulations for dietary supplements worldwide and set international safety standards for the purposes of increased trade. Standardize labeling and regulatory requirements between countries to facilitate increased international trade.

Pharmaceutical interests stepped in and began exerting their influence. Instead of focusing on food safety, Codex is using its power to promote worldwide restrictions on vitamins and food supplements, severely limiting their availability and dosages.

Real Goals of Codex

This is to bring about international ‘harmonization.’ While global harmony sounds benign, is that the real purpose of this plan? While the stated goal of Codex is to establish unilateral regulations for dietary supplements in every country, the actual goal is to outlaw health products and information on vitamins and dietary supplements, except those under their direct control. These regulations would supersede domestic laws without the people’s voice or vote in the matter.

According to John Hammell, a legislative advocate and the founder of
 International Advocates for Health Freedom (IAHF), here is what we have to look forward to:

“If Codex Alimentarius has its way, then herbs, vitamins, minerals, homeopathic remedies, amino acids and other natural remedies you have taken for granted most of your life will be gone. The name of the game for Codex is to shift all remedies into the prescription category so they can be controlled exclusively by the medical monopoly and its bosses, the major pharmaceutical firms. Predictably, this scenario has been denied by both the Canadian Health Food Association and the Health Protection Branch of Canada (HPB).”

The Codex proposals already exist as law in Norway and Germany where the entire health food industry has literally been taken over by the drug companies. In these countries, vitamin C above 200 mg is illegal as is vitamin E above 45 IU, vitamin B1 over 2.4 mg and so on. Shering-Plough, the Norway pharmaceutical giant, now controls an echinacea tincture, which is being sold there as an over the counter drug at grossly inflated prices.

The same is true of ginkgo and many other herbs, and only one government controlled pharmacy has the right to import supplements as medicines which they can sell to health food stores, convenience stores or pharmacies.”

It is now a criminal offence in parts of Europe to sell herbs as foods. An agreement called EEC6565 equates selling herbs as foods to selling other illegal drugs. Action is being taken to accelerate other European countries into ‘harmonization’ as well.

There is some hope.

A couple of days ago there was tremendous news for the millions of people in Europe who choose to use food supplements. Following a landmark challenge in the European Courts of Justice (ECJ) brought by the Alliance for Natural Health and Nutri-Link Ltd to the contentious Food Supplements Directive, which effectively proposed to ban 75% of vitamin and mineral forms, Advocate General Geelhoed, the senior adviser to the ECJ, gave his Opinion in favour of the Alliance’s case.

What does this mean? That the chances of consumers being able to continue using the natural food supplements they believe are beneficial to their health are now greatly increased. There has been uproar about the proposed EU ban, and maybe, against the odds, the consumer is going to come out on top in what is a remarkable modern day case of David and Goliath.

In a statement released in Luxembourg today at 0830 GMT, the Advocate General concluded that:

The Food Supplements Directive infringes the principle of proportionality because basic principles of Community law, such as the requirements of legal protection, of legal certainty and of sound administration have not properly been taken into account.

It is therefore invalid under EU law.
It should be stressed that the Advocate General’s pronouncement is not a ruling. That will come from the ECJ judges, later – probably around June. But typically, in the vast majority of cases, the Court Judgment follows the recommendations of the Advocate General.

If the Advocate General’s recommendations are adopted, in effect, the ban on vitamin and mineral forms not included on the EU’s ‘Positive list,’ due to come into effect on 1 August 2005, will be declared illegal.  In essence, the positive list of allowable nutrient forms will be deemed to be too narrow, too restrictive, and based on flawed science.

This would avoid the totally irrational situations that the Food Supplements Directive would otherwise create. For example, synthetically produced selenium would have been allowed on the positive list, while the natural source found in Brazil nuts would not; synthetic forms of Vitamin E (often used in ‘adverse’ vitamin studies reported in the media) would be allowed, but the natural, most beneficial food forms would not.

I should note that this ruling in no way effect the upcoming implementation of Codex laws in North America. The news is encouraging but the fight is far from over and we need to do everything we can to persuade our politicians to listen to us and not heed the words of the scummy drug corporations and blindly follow their grandiose plans for world domination.

So, what can be done at this late hour?

Don’t be a mushroom! Get out of the dark. Spread the word as much as possible and inform yourselves fully.

God Bless,

Dr. Darrell L Wolfe, Ac. Ph.D.
<http://www.thewolfeclinic.com>

I also posted this on LeSpeakeasy and on the NET, if you want to copy this diary and posted elsewhere, please feel free to do so. I feel this issue is to important to let it slip and it is important to spread the information.

I have been looking into the topic more deeply and found some interesting sites for more information.

More information here:

http://www4.dr-rath-foundation.org/PHARMACEUTICAL_BUSINESS/health_movement_against_codex/

and here:

http://ahha.org/walterguidelinesoverview05.htm

and here:

http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2003/08/30/meet_codex_alimentarius.htm

[UPDATE] The Iraq-Salvatorian Solution

Okay, I do it. I came across this story and it just doesn’t let me go. But it will be another one of my stories thrown together in a hurry. Some of this I posted already on the open thread. So first a big SORRY for the stile.

I came across this story on the Website called Free Iraq and originally was in Arabic. The story is called:

“Combat terrorism” by causing it.

“A few days ago, an American manned check point confiscated the driver license of a driver and told him to report to an American military camp near Baghdad airport for interrogation and in order to retrieve his license. The next day, the driver did visit the camp and he was allowed in the camp with his car. He was admitted to a room for an interrogation that lasted half an hour. At the end of the session, the American interrogator told him: `OK, there is nothing against you, but you do know that Iraq is now sovereign and is in charge of its own affairs. Hence, we have forwarded your papers and license to al-Kadhimia police station for processing. Therefore, go there with this clearance to reclaim your license. At the police station, ask for Lt. Hussain Mohammed who is waiting for you now. Go there now quickly, before he leaves his shift work”.
The driver did leave in a hurry, but was soon alarmed with a feeling that his car was driving as if carrying a heavy load, and he also became suspicious of a low flying helicopter that kept hovering overhead, as if trailing him. He stopped the car and inspected it carefully. He found nearly 100 kilograms of explosives hidden in the back seat and along the two back doors.

The only feasible explanation for this incidence is that the car was indeed booby trapped by the Americans and intended for the al-Khadimiya Shiite district of Baghdad. The helicopter was monitoring his movement and witnessing the anticipated “hideous attack by foreign elements”.

The same scenario was repeated in Mosul, in the north of Iraq. A car was confiscated along with the driver’s license. He did follow up on the matter and finally reclaimed his car but was told to go to a police station to reclaim his license. Fortunately for him, the car broke down on the way to the police station. The inspecting car mechanic discovered that the spare tire was fully laden with explosives.”

Then when I posted this at MoA and b responded with this link: `The Salvador Option. Remember this was a big Newsweek story in January. So this brings Negroponte and Co. to mind, doesn’t it?

Now, NEWSWEEK has learned, the Pentagon is intensively debating an option that dates back to a still-secret strategy in the Reagan administration’s battle against the leftist guerrilla insurgency in El Salvador in the early 1980s. Then, faced with a losing war against Salvadoran rebels, the U.S. government funded or supported “nationalist” forces that allegedly included so-called death squads directed to hunt down and kill rebel leaders and sympathizers. Eventually the insurgency was quelled, and many U.S. conservatives consider the policy to have been a success–despite the deaths of innocent civilians and the subsequent Iran-Contra arms-for-hostages scandal. (Among the current administration officials who dealt with Central America back then is John Negroponte, who is today the U.S. ambassador to Iraq. Under Reagan, he was ambassador to Honduras. There is no evidence, however, that Negroponte knew anything about the Salvadoran death squads or the Iran-Contra scandal at the time. The Iraq ambassador, in a phone call to NEWSWEEK on Jan. 10, said he was not involved in military strategy in Iraq. He called the insertion of his name into this report “utterly gratuitous.”)

Following that model, one Pentagon proposal would send Special Forces teams to advise, support and possibly train Iraqi squads, most likely hand-picked Kurdish Peshmerga fighters and Shiite militiamen, to target Sunni insurgents and their sympathizers, even across the border into Syria, according to military insiders familiar with the discussions. It remains unclear, however, whether this would be a policy of assassination or so-called “snatch” operations, in which the targets are sent to secret facilities for interrogation. The current thinking is that while U.S. Special Forces would lead operations in, say, Syria, activities inside Iraq itself would be carried out by Iraqi paramilitaries, officials tell NEWSWEEK.

Something in me hopes that this all not true. But considering all what has happened, I tend towards believing it.

P.S. Thanks Cabingirl for the push.

 

Update [2005-5-17 14:20:58 by Fran]: Riverbend has a new post, fitting this topic.The Dead and the Undead…

I didn’t think much about the story- nothing about it stood out: an explosion and a sniper- hardly an anomaly. The interesting news started circulating a couple of days later. People from the area claim that the man was taken away not because he shot anyone, but because he knew too much about the bomb. Rumor has it that he saw an American patrol passing through the area and pausing at the bomb site minutes before the explosion. Soon after they drove away, the bomb went off and chaos ensued. He ran out of his house screaming to the neighbors and bystanders that the Americans had either planted the bomb or seen the bomb and done nothing about it. He was promptly taken away.

The bombs are mysterious. Some of them explode in the midst of National Guard and near American troops or Iraqi Police and others explode near mosques, churches, and shops or in the middle of sougs. One thing that surprises us about the news reports of these bombs is that they are inevitably linked to suicide bombers. The reality is that some of these bombs are not suicide bombs- they are car bombs that are either being remotely detonated or maybe time bombs. All we know is that the techniques differ and apparently so do the intentions. Some will tell you they are resistance. Some say Chalabi and his thugs are responsible for a number of them. Others blame Iran and the SCIRI militia Badir.

I read about those explosions through remote control before (but just can not remember where). Wonder if we ever find out what is really going on.

The legacy of Agent Orange

I do not have much time for posting and later on reading the comments. But this should not be ignored or lost.

I would like to display this picture, but don’t know how, so here the link to the picture.

Update [2005-5-2 14:55:48 by BooMan]: BooMan posts your picture:

And here the link to the BBC article: article.

Thirty years after hostilities ended between the US and Vietnam, relations remain strained by one of America’s most notorious weapons during the war, the chemical Agent Orange.
The Vietnamese believe that the powerful weed killer – the use of which was intended to destroy crops and jungle providing cover for the Vietcong – is responsible for massively high instances of genetic defects in areas that were sprayed.

Nguyen Trong Nhan, from the Vietnam Association Of Victims Of Agent Orange and a former president of Vietnamese Red Cross, believes the use of Agent Orange was a “war crime”.

This is not only the legacy of Agent Orange, this is also the legacy of the US. And the way it looks the US is going to leave another disastrous legacy in Iraq. DU’s and other poisons. It seems cancer rates are already up. We might no be able to avoid seeing this kind of picture coming out of Iraq in 30 years, or maybe even earlier, but we can work to stop it from happening in another place.

Many Faces of Democracy

Lately I have become aware that there is a tendency to assume that there is just one form of Democracy. At least that is the conclusion drawn listening to Bush. I think this is a very important topic, to realize that Democracy can have many faces. I also believe this is important for Americans. They have a great constitution, but the implementation of it at present is mildly said – challenged. My guess is that over the next two decades Americans will have to make adjustments to their stile of Democracy.

However, reading comments on different websites and following discussions I have observed, again and again, the following questions coming up: “What can we do?” and “How can we do it?” Thus my thought is that maybe it would be helpful, for the International participants of this website, to share how Democracy is handled in their own countries. Sort of a brainstorming, helping the Americans to become more familiar with other democratic systems, as this information seems to be difficult to access through the MSM. I would be interested too, as I have become aware, after reading a diary on dKos that actually I do not know that much about the British Democracy. I also would be interested to learn how democratic systems function in other countries. Well, I start with my own country – Switzerland. Following is an excerpt from a paper I had to write a couple of years ago, just the basics how the Swiss political system is structured:

First I would like to give a short introduction to the Swiss Political System. Switzerland’s political life is based on direct democracy. The Government is build upon a Parliament, consisting of a Nationalrat (House of Representatives) with 200 members and a Ständerat (Senators) with 46 members. They are elected proportionally, according to the percentage of votes their parties received.  A unique feature is our Bundesrat, a collective of seven counselors elected from the members of parliament. Each year one of these counselors is President of Switzerland. There is no single person with a lot of power; the power on all levels is shared. The highest level is the sovereign – that is the people. Basically the people vote on everything. Certain laws, changes of tax system etc. have to be put to vote automatically.  For others there has to be a referendum, initiated by a group of people, like a political party, the labor union or even private persons. Then there is the initiative – a tool with which the people can introduce laws or changes of laws. A certain number of signatures are needed for the referendums or the initiatives to be voted on.

In a way the Swiss system could be considered a grass root system and it is also a federal system. Is it the best? Heavens forbid – no. For many years I considered it archaic and smiled about it. But since observing the US over the last 4 years, I am starting to appreciate it more.

At times it is frustratingly slow – but then again, by the time it starts finally moving often the problem has already been solved. There is lots of talk, as the rule has to be by consensus on every level. Also the seven counselors have to find a consensus, not an easy feat  considering that they often come from opposing parties; the Bundesrat is also build proportionally. So imagine wingnuts having to work together with liberals. And it works as we have learned not to long ago. Something over a year ago we had this wingnut called Mr. Blocher elbowing himself in to the Bundesrat to become a counselor, while pushing out one of the women. I was furious, as were most Swiss women. But in the meantime I must say that this was probably the best thing to happen. The system clipped his wings. By himself he can do nothing; he depends on the other 6 counselors. His roaring has become a whisper, and even his followers have become more subdued. So I have learned that this system has safe guards, which I really appreciate.

Then there is one more aspect I would like to share, another one I did not like until I was able to observe the elections in the US. In Switzerland and I think in many European countries, we have what is called the citizen registry. That is everyone living here is registered. It used to have a whiff of police state to me. However, in the meantime I also have become aware that this is strengthening for Democracy. We do not have to register to vote or for elections. Everyone who is registered and Swiss citizen is eligible to vote and can not be purged from the list. So about six weeks before a vote or election the information and documents for voting are mailed to everyone. Then they can be filled out and send back or you can hand in at a polling station.This happened for the first time and automatically after my 18th birthday and has continued since then. The votes are hand counted and if needed recounted. One of the civil duties you can be called for here is to count votes, like in the US you can be called as a juror. We vote here between two to five times per year, depending and how many referendums and initiatives are waiting. Voting and elections in this system is simple and easy.

This is an overview of how Democracy and government works in my country. I hope others from around the world will share how their countries handle it, maybe with their own diary, and I hope this will be an inspiration to the American readers.

After the War Comes Cancer

I read this article this morning and just can’t get it out of my mind. Gives a different perspective to the Schiavo case also. It is so sickening, this theater being played at the US Congress and all this talk about the right to live and family values and bla, bla, bla……

Talk about WMD’s. Americans will be remembered for a long time in Iraq for their Uranium Depleted Bombs, as in Vietnam for Agent Orange – but why is this topic being ignored? How many more children with deformations will have to be born before we note? How much more has the cancer rate in Iraq to increase? Where is the right to live for this children? Where is the right to live a healthy life for these children?

Information collected for a German project investigating the use of uranium-charged ammunition in Iraq shows that when Iraqi women fear for their children’s health, it is with good reason.

After two wars where oil wells were torched, chemical factories bombed and radioactive ammunition fired, the first thing Iraqi women ask when giving birth is not if it is a boy or a girl, but if it is normal or deformed. The number of cancer cases and children born with deformities has skyrocketed after the two Gulf Wars.

“Since 1991 the number of children born with birth deformities has quadrupled,” said Dr. Janan Hassan, who runs a children’s clinic at a hospital in Basra in southern Iraq. “The same is the case for the number of children under 15 who are diagnosed with cancer. Mostly, it is leukemia. Almost 80 percent of the children die because we neither have medicine nor the possibility to give them chemotherapy.”

Doctors have also recorded an extreme rise in cancer cases among adults. “In 2004 we diagnosed 25 percent more cancer cases than the year before and the mortality rate increased eight-fold between 1988 and 1991,” said Dr. Jawad al-Ali of the Sadr Hospital in Basra.

But it’s not just the DU amunition.

In Iraq, burning oil wells, bombed chemical factories, demolished production sites for chemical weapons and even the use of radioactive ammunition are just a few of the things which may have triggered diseases there.

After the War Comes Cancer

I believe this should also be a topic for Americans, as there has been talk about the Gulf War sickness afflicting US Veterans and I have now doubt also current soldiers serving currently in Iraq.

P.S. how does one link correctly?

Peace

This is a trial to write a diary. From reading on Kos and other sites, I have become aware that this world situation is taking a toll on most of us. I guess we all can agree that we would like a better world and most of all peace for all. But what can we do? Well, this morning after talking with a friend on the phone, I decided maybe one thing I can do is to write a diary about this topic.

My friend and I talked about how before the fall of the wall in Berlin, there used to be all those demonstrations for peace and maybe not known to all, there was a world-wide meditation circle, where at 12 noon local time, people where meditating, praying, visualizing or using whatever techniques they had available to them, for peace – just a few minutes. Did it help? Who knows? Fact is, for a while the world seemed to be more peaceful. Maybe it is time to reactivate such a circle again. We have nothing to loose and only to gain. Even if it does not help the world at large, it can help on an individual level to calm a little and deal better with the stress .

In this connection I always think of Gandhi who lived in this world, but never was willing to give up his inner peace and calm, and still, or maybe because of this, became such a powerful force in this world.

Two things I would like to achieve with this diary. Maybe to get this good “force” flowing stronger again and to start a discussion and sharing, on how to best deal on the inner plane with the political situation in this world. We will need some inner strength and endurance if we want to effect a change in this world.

I have been a “New Age-Freak” for many decades now (oh, my God, how time passes) and have learned a few things along the way on relaxation techniques, meditation, yoga and more on this line. Would any of you be interested to learn more about these things in future diaries?