Mystified by a Kennedy endorsement

Tonight, I watched once again Estevez’s film Bobby. It is very poignant, especially when we hear Robert Kennedy speak.

While browsing on You Tube afterwards, I came upon various postings of Robert Kennedy’s life. I was moved by this and this … and particularly the eulogy by his brother Senator Edward Kennedy.

Not knowing that much about Bobby’s life until now, I was surprised by the many similarities between him and Obama: his politics, his speeches, his following.

I am therefore somewhat mystified by his son’s endorsement of Hillary Clinton. I particularly do not comprehend how he can say, with a straight face, that Clinton stands for “leadership that will represent the people’s interests and not the special interests“.

Hillary Clinton on International Law

Not a diary as such. Just what I believe to be information that needs to be assessed and taken into consideration during this campaign.

It’s an article from Stephen Zunes. He writes:

Perhaps the most terrible legacy of the administration of President George W. Bush has been its utter disregard for such basic international legal norms as the ban against aggressive war, respect for the UN Charter, and acceptance of international judicial review. Furthermore, under Bush’s leadership, the United States has cultivated a disrespect for basic human rights, a disdain for reputable international human rights monitoring groups, and a lack of concern for international humanitarian law.

Ironically, the current front-runner for the Democratic nomination for president shares much of President Bush’s dangerous attitudes toward international law and human rights.

For example, Senator Hillary Clinton has opposed restrictions on U.S. arms transfers and police training to governments that engage in gross and systematic human rights abuses. Indeed, she has supported unconditional U.S. arms transfers and police training to such repressive and autocratic governments as Egypt, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Pakistan, Equatorial Guinea, Azerbaijan, Cameroon, Kazakhstan, and Chad, just to name a few. She has also refused to join many of her Democratic colleagues in signing a letter endorsing a treaty that would limit arms transfers to countries that engage in a consistent pattern of gross and systematic human rights violations. […]

Not only is she willing to support military assistance to repressive regimes, she has little concern about controlling weapons that primarily target innocent civilians. Senator Clinton has refused to support the international treaty to ban land mines, which are responsible for killing and maiming thousands of civilians worldwide, a disproportionate percentage of whom have been children.

She was also among a minority of Democratic Senators to side with the Republican majority last year in voting down a Democratic-sponsored resolution restricting U.S. exports of cluster bombs to countries that use them against civilian-populated areas. Each of these cluster bomb contains hundreds of bomblets that are scattered over an area the size of up to four football fields and, with a failure rate of up to 30%, become de facto land mines. As many as 98% of the casualties caused by these weapons are civilians.  – Link

Given his background, I’m worried.

One Wall Down!

From Rootless Cosmopolitan:

The hole blown by Hamas in the Gaza-Egypt border fence has finally punctured the bubble of delusion surrounding the U.S.-Israeli Middle East policy. In a moment reminiscent of the collapse of the Berlin Wall, through the breach surged some 350,000 Palestinians — fully one fifth of Gaza’s total population, as my friend and colleague Tim McGirk observed at the scene. And what did they do on the other side? They went shopping for the essentials of daily life, denied them by an Israeli siege imposed with the Wehrmacht logic of collective punishment. And the Egyptian security forces didn’t stop them, despite Washington and Israel urging them to, because U.S.-backed strongman Hosni Mubarak would provoke a mutiny among his citizenry and even his own security forces if they were to be ordered to stop hungry Palestinians from eating because Israel has decided that they should starve until they change their attitude. – Link

From Jeff Halper:

I am not a Palestinian; I am not one of the oppressed.  I only hope I can use my privilege in an effective way in order to redeem the gift the people of Gaza have given all of us: the realization that the people do have power and can prevail even in the face of overwhelming power*.  We may each express our responsibility towards the people of Gaza in whatever way most suits us, but as the privileged we must do something.  We owe the Palestinians and the Palestinians writ large at least that. – Link (link added by me)

Hopefully, THIS ONE will be brought down soon … to the satisfaction of both peoples. Fingers crossed!

Bloody Tuesday in Gaza

Israeli forces kill 17 Gazans in less than four hours

Warning: Graphic

More information here

Condemnation has come from the following:

The One Democratic State Group

Anti-Zionist Orthodox Jews – Neturei Karta

Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad

Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas

The head of the Palestinian negotiation team, Ahmad Qurei

Fatah

The Ramallah-based Palestinian Cabinet

The Alternative Information Center

The number of casualties will certainly climb as for lack of medicine and medical equipment in hospitals in Gaza, the wounded are dying, says official.

In retaliation, brigades have bombarded Israeli towns bordering Gaza Strip

There’s call for an end to peace negotiations with Israel. What peace negotiations, asks Barghouti: A total of 122 Palestinians have been killed since Annapolis in both the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

Meanwhile, condolences have been sent to Haniyeh by Iranian and Yemeni presidents.

Some reactions:

Bloody Tuesday makes peace a far-fetched dream

The Consent of Silence

In mourning, perhaps a new dawn

Time may have all but run out for this now.

The Annapolis Conference

There will be a peace summit at Annapolis after all. The date has been set: November 27, 2007.

Talks and preparation towards the summit have brought forth birds of ill-omen from both sides. Yet, because the stakes have never been higher, a few voices are hopeful.  “[P]eace is within reach,” says veteran peace activist Gershon Baskin.

Here’s a run-down of sorts of some developments surrounding this event.

Making the inevitable happen [Via The Magnes Zionist]

What’s brewing in the US? From Prospects for Peace: Annapolis and Beyond: What (Not) to Expect and the follow-up.

What’s brewing in Israel? A spoiler is working hard, it seems, to sabotage the whole process (see here and here).

In Palestine, Khalid Amayreh is prepared for disillusionment. Yet, there’s a sense in his column that he is not utterly convinced that it will not work this time around.

We shall know soon enough.

[Other details at Wikipedia … and on the conference itself here]

Related material:
A Canadian view.
Debate erupts among Jewish groups over Annapolis [Via Open Left]
Likudnik hawks work to undermine Annapolis

Update: See also Annapolis: Saudi and Palestinian dimensions from Helena Cobban of ‘Just World News”.

And what about Israel and Palestine?

Finally! Someone has dared to ask!

From The Washington Note, Clemons calls upon the democratic presidential candidates, in particular Obama, telling him that the time may have come for him to address the Mideast issues.

And what about the real issue in the Middle East? Israel and Palestine?

November will be a big month for the Middle East with November 15th being the date of release of Mohammed ElBaradei’s next IAEI report on Iran — and the Israel/Palestine Peace Summit will take place in Annapolis in a few weeks.

Helping to call for an end to the “fake efforts” in establishing Palestine and using his political weight to make the point that the only pro-Israel strategy for this country is not one that forsakes the Arabs in the region, or the Palestinians who have legitimate grievances that must be dealt with. – Link

À suivre

On another note, but also related to the Israel/Palestine question, Clemons is none too happy with the democratic supporters of torture in the house, i.e. Schumer & Feinstein. Schumer gets slammed here. – [via Gorilla in the room]