Absurd New Attack on Obama $1.4 Billion in perks!

Try this right now: go to Google or your search engine of choice and type in Obama perks.  You will get page after page after page of articles screaming about how the Obama FAMILY spent $1.4 billion dollars of our tax money on perks.  The charge comes from a new book by conservative Robert Keith Gray called “Presidential Perks Gone Royal.”

Among the perks are listed “staffing, housing, flying and entertaining.” Wait, staffing? The White House staff is now a presidential PERK?

Here is the nonsense.

More across the jump…
“Aside from a salary, the president gets a $50,000 a year expense account, a $100,000 travel account, $19,000 entertainment budget and an additional million for “unanticipated needs,” he notes.

So, that is far from $1.4 billion. Could it be that most of the rest is actual expenses? Nah…

“”First Lady Michelle Obama drew flack from the media and irate citizens when it was disclosed that, not counting Saturdays and Sundays, she spent 42 days on vacation — within the span of one year.”

Forget that George W. Bush spent over a thousand days of his presidency on vacation and racked up far more travel on Air Force One. The FIRST LADY vacations too much! OUTRAGE!

Seriously, this is what my conservative relatives have their panties in a twist over right now.

The 147 companies that run the world

A scientific analysis has revealed the 147 company “super-entity” that controls most of the world’s economy. Here is an article about the study. And here is the study itself.

I already knew that a small number of corporations was running things, but now we have the scientific analysis to back up the suspicions. This is what deregulation has wrought. Sorry, I don’t have any additional analysis or anything else to add. Maybe someone smarter than me can add more.

I’ve put the list of the top 50 of the 147 across the break. No surprise: they are mostly financial institutions/banks.
The top 50 of the 147 superconnected companies

  1. Barclays plc
  2. Capital Group Companies Inc
  3. FMR Corporation
  4. AXA
  5. State Street Corporation
  6. JP Morgan Chase & Co
  7. Legal & General Group plc
  8. Vanguard Group Inc
  9. UBS AG
  10. Merrill Lynch & Co Inc
  11. Wellington Management Co LLP
  12. Deutsche Bank AG
  13. Franklin Resources Inc
  14. Credit Suisse Group
  15. Walton Enterprises LLC
  16. Bank of New York Mellon Corp
  17. Natixis
  18. Goldman Sachs Group Inc
  19. T Rowe Price Group Inc
  20. Legg Mason Inc
  21. Morgan Stanley
  22. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc
  23. Northern Trust Corporation
  24. Société Générale
  25. Bank of America Corporation
  26. Lloyds TSB Group plc
  27. Invesco plc
  28. Allianz SE 29. TIAA
  29. Old Mutual Public Limited Company
  30. Aviva plc
  31. Schroders plc
  32. Dodge & Cox
  33. Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc*
  34. Sun Life Financial Inc
  35. Standard Life plc
  36. CNCE
  37. Nomura Holdings Inc
  38. The Depository Trust Company
  39. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance
  40. ING Groep NV
  41. Brandes Investment Partners LP
  42. Unicredito Italiano SPA
  43. Deposit Insurance Corporation of Japan
  44. Vereniging Aegon
  45. BNP Paribas
  46. Affiliated Managers Group Inc
  47. Resona Holdings Inc
  48. Capital Group International Inc
  49. China Petrochemical Group Company

* Lehman still existed in the 2007 dataset used

My Voice Over Website

Hi everybody. I don’t post much here anymore, but I still lurk.

I have been trying hard to break into the voice over business for the last few years with only marginal success. In an effort to do more marketing, I have finally gotten my own website online instead of just having a page on a voice over services’ site.

I would appreciate if you could take a look and listen to my demos and give me some feedback. Thanks.

And if anyone here needs any voice overs done for them, I will give you a discounted rate if you let me know you found me through Booman Tribune. If it is for a non-profit or progressive cause/candidate, I may even do it for free.

Progressive Voice For Hire

With the 2012 campaign season starting up, I wanted to let everyone know I am offering to donate my voice or give a discount to progressive candidates and causes.

I started working as a voice over talent a couple of years ago. I have recorded for video games, animation, TV, radio, and internet ads, corporate training videos, phone answering systems, and narration for a biography of Michael Jackson. I recorded my first political ads back in 2008 for two TruthandHope.org web spots.

My contact info is across the bump.
If you need a voice for a campaign ad (TV, radio, or internet) for either a progressive candidate or cause, please contact me: Jeromesantucci(at)verizon(dot)net

VO Card Pictures, Images and Photos

My voiceover website has my promos and trailers, animation, and video game demos, and I am currently working on more.

My home recording booth features professional acoustic treatments and equipment.

If you want to help me out in another way, you can also “Like” my voice acting page on Facebook.

Atheist running for congress

For the first time anyone can remember, a major party candidate for federal office has come out as an atheist. Wynne LeGrow posted a diary at the big orange about his candidacy for congress in Virginia’s fourth congressional district.

Rep. Pete Stark (D-CA) recently (2007) admitted that he is an atheist, but he has been in office since 1972, so it was not an issue in his election. Plus Stark is in CA, not VA. No doubt there are others, but they don’t have the courage to come out.

I have done a quick survey of atheist/secularist/humanist websites, and curiously, only one (The Center for Inquiry) has covered this story. Atheist complain a lot about government officials and candidates being unwilling to admit when they are non-believers, so why the lack of coverage? Weird.

As an atheist, it certainly makes me happy that a candidate does have the courage to admit his non-belief. However, I am extremely curious to see how this turns out. Will his declaration of non-belief doom his candidacy? Is he opening himself up to bigotry and stupidity? Does this unnecessarily shift the focus off of the issues? Or is this a step in the right direction? Will he be able to effectively counter the stupidity and expose the bigotry for what it is and turn a potential political liability into a strength?

What do you think?

CO2 into liquid fuel and misc other stuff

Hi everybody. I know I haven’t been around much lately. I got pretty burned out and been busy with other projects.

I don’t really even have the time to post a full diary right now, but wanted to let you all know about a science story I just read. Researchers at UCLA have engineered a bacterium to convert carbon dioxide from the atmosphere into liquid isobutanol through photosynthesis. Isobutanol is a liquid fuel which can be used in place of gasoline, even in cars. So, this could help remove CO2 from the atmosphere while also providing us with an energy source which can fit in with our current energy infrastructure.

Other unrelated random stuff across the break.
Random stuff:

My parents got a new artificial tree this year and would like to know where they might donate their old artificial tree. Their church doesn’t want it. Any ideas?

I have learned a singing technique from central Asia called khoomei. Also known as Tuvan throat singing, khoomei is a type of overtone singing that enables the singer to produce two or more distinct pitches at the same time. If you are interested, you can check out my YouTube account to hear me sing.

If you are looking for holiday gifts, I have T-shirt designs on zazzle including the world famous Grumposaurus Rex.

Lastly, I have posted a new demo on my voice acting page. If you are interested, give a listen and tell me what you think.

Thanks, everybody. And happy holidays (oh no! I took the Christ out of Christmas! This means WAR!).

Tom Coburn is right

I listened with great interest to what Tom Coburn said to the crying woman pleading for help at his town hall meeting a couple of weeks ago. I thought he would be an insensitive prick, but he said something that really struck me as truly insightful:  “The other thing that’s missing in this debate is us as neighbors helping people that need our help.”  Wow! He is so right!

But how could we do this in a fair and efficient way?

Follow me across the bump…
First, in order to be fair, everyone would have to contribute what they can. The wealthy can afford to give a higher percentage of their income, while the poor may not be able to afford much of anything.

Now, we need some way of collecting this money, and someplace to put it until it’s needed. Maybe we could create a non-profit organization to collect and hold the money. We could elect neighbors to oversee the organization. And we would need transparency to make sure there was no corruption.

When someone needed to see the doctor and couldn’t afford it, the central neighborhood fund would pay the bill. And people who wanted to could pitch in a little extra to also be covered by the central fund instead of buying a super-expensive health insurance plan. And the doctors in our neighborhood would also be good neighbors and give a discount to the neighborhood.

Of course, frivolous procedures like boob jobs wouldn’t be covered by the neighborhood (unless it was following a mastectomy). The rules would be decided by the neighborhood organization.

Neighbors helping neighbors. How super groovy. I like Coburn’s idea a lot.

Wait a second… isn’t this the public option?

Drilling In My City

It’s the middle of the night and this will probably be a rambling incoherent diary, but I can’t sleep, so I am going to rant.

I am so fucking angry over the BS about drilling here to lower prices and boost the economy and blah blah blah!

I live in Long Beach, CA. We have both on shore and off shore oil drilling. In fact, our oil Islands are dressed up very prettily; many out-of-towners think they are resort islands.

Gas prices here are still in the $3.50/gallon range for regular, the same as every other SoCal city. So immediately, you can throw out the notion that drilling here will reduce gasoline prices.

Still, you would think that with oil prices sky high, the city should be rolling in dough. You would also be wrong. Our city budget has not ballooned, nor are we sitting on top of a huge surplus (unlike the oil companies). How do I know? There was just a huge uproar because our main library was on the verge of being closed due to budget restrictions. And I just got a notice that city run utilities fees are going up 40%. That and my own 10% pay cut kind of clued me in to the fact the city budget isn’t in such great shape. In fact, our Assemblywoman just got the state legislature to pass a bill to expand the oil drilling by 40% over the next ten years to boost both local and state revenues.

The rant will begin in earnest across the break…
I don’t know what sort of revenue sharing plan the city has with developers and the state. I’ve tried to find out how it works, but there seems to be a pretty thick veil over the whole business. Or maybe I just didn’t know where to look. Anyhow, the new bill is supposed to boost city revenues by $130 million over 10 years with an additional $150 million going to the port and $200 million to the state. If that’s a 40% boost, then we have got to be getting somewhere around $32 million a year right now [(130/10)/0.4=32]. Regardless of the particulars, that is a lot of cash. But I bet it is nothing compared to what the oil companies are making off the oil.

Before I started looking into it, my suspicion was that the energy companies pay the city and state a fixed rate to extract the oil regardless of the price of a barrel of crude. So while the oil companies make their record profits off of the oil extracted from my city’s property, the city is being paid the exact same amount it always has been paid. Thus, no budget explosion, no huge surplus.

One thing I was able to find as I searched to see if my suspicion was right or wrong is something called an Oil Producers Tax (OPT), which is a per barrel tax. Last year, the city increased the OPT from $.15 per barrel to $.40 per barrel. Are you kidding me? 40 cents per barrel? The extra 25 cents per barrel will generate about $3.8 million per year and is earmarked for the police, fire, and other public safety departments exclusively.

Clearly the OPT isn’t the only oil revenue the city generates, but since the city coffers have not expanded the way the oil companies’ profits have, we must not get a % of profits. In fact, let’s do a little math. If $3.8 million is the result of 25 cents per barrel, then they must be extracting about 15.2 million barrels a year. And if we get about $32 million a year in oil revenues (based on the 40% increase figures cited above), then we are getting somewhere around $2 per barrel. So $2.40 per barrel total seems to be what the city generates. Another approx $2.50 goes to the Port and another approx $3.30 to the State (also based on the 40% figures above). That totals somewhere in the neighborhood of $8-$9 per barrel the oil company pays to extract oil from public land and sell at insane profit back to us.

So basically, my city allows the oil companies to drill and drill, and even though gas prices remain astronomical, it has not lowered my gas bills, nor prevented utility payment increases, nor boosted the city budget, nor saved me from the second salary cut in 5 years.

And that’s what really set me on this rant. I saw some stupid pro-drilling web ad tonight, just hours after opening my first paycheck of the school year. See, the school district budget was cut this school year, and my pay as a substitute teacher was cut by 10% as a result. I would make significantly more money if they just paid me babysitter wages of $1 per student per hour. This cut comes 5 years after the unfunded mandates in No Child Left Behind forced pay cuts of 20% for subs in my district! And this a school district that regularly ranks in the top 5 urban school districts nationally and won the Broad Prize as the top urban district a couple of years ago, so it isn’t like we were failing to meet the NCLB requirements or anything. I had almost regained my original wage after the last big slash when this new set of cuts came down. So I now make about 12% less than I did 8 years ago when I started subbing. All the while, oil company profits keep growing and growing.

So fuck all those fucking asshats who lie about drilling here and now as an economic or energy solution. And fuck all the stupid lame-brained dipshits who believe the lies. They can stick their drill baby drill right up their ass baby ass.

Donating My Voice

I am just getting started as a voice over and I’m offering to donate my voice to progressive commercials (now that Obama has ok’d ads by 527s). I recorded my first political spot two days ago (a community organizers TV ad), and I’m recording two others on Friday.

If you need a voice for a campaign ad (TV, radio, or internet) for either a progressive candidate or cause, please contact me:

VO Card Pictures, Images and Photos

My voiceover website only has my cartoon demo, but I am certainly capable of doing commercials, promos, trailers, and narration.

McSame Morph

McSameGif

This is an Animated Gif. I also posted it on YouTube, and you can see it across the break.

Here is the 50% still image:
McSame

Please feel free to spread these around.

Morph created with MorphX
Animated gif created with Adobe Image Ready