Sunday Griot: The Christmas Totem

Well, hello everyone! Nice to see you all here today, taking time as you get ready for Christmas to come listen to an old storyteller. I’m getting ready too — as soon as I’m finished posting it’ll be time to go eat breakfast and then go to our church’s Christmas Eve service. But I couldn’t leave without a Christmas present for you.

It’s not a story per se. More of an observation. I do hope you enjoy it, though, and maybe it’ll make you think of your own Christmas tree in a slightly different way.

A couple of years ago my wife and I took a cruise to Alaska. One of our stops was the Totem Heritage Park in the village of Saxman, near Ketchikan. The guide told us the stories behind some of the totem poles displayed there, including one depicting Abraham Lincoln’s Secretary of State, William Seward. Seward was of course the man who negotiated the purchase of Alaska for the United States, and after the purchase was complete he went to Alaska to see what he’d bought. The natives of Tongass Island carved a totem pole in his honor and threw a potlatch for him. Now when the Tlingits throw a potlatch for you, they have a big feast and give you lots of gifts, and then they expect you to return the favor by throwing a potlatch for them. When Seward didn’t reciprocate, they took down the totem pole with his likeness on it, painted his face red as a sign of shame, and put it back up!

Every totem pole is supposed to tell a story, whether it’s the story of how Raven tricked the world into being, or the genealogy of a great chief, or just the story of an untrustworthy government official.

My wife and granddaughter put up our Christmas tree a couple of days ago while I was at work, and it’s finally starting to feel like Christmas. Sitting in the front room, looking at the tree with its lights and ornaments, I had the thought that a good Christmas tree, like a good totem pole, should tell you a story.

When I look at the Christmas trees downtown or at the mall or at other commercial establishments, they’re pretty, but they don’t tell me anything. They look like they were designed by someone with an MBA in Marketing who is more interested in getting you into the store and making you forget how much you hate holiday crowds long enough to part with some of your money than in creating any real holiday spirit.

Now take a look at our Christmas tree. We can start at the bottom, with a tree skirt my father-in-law crocheted. He had rheumatic fever as a child and wasn’t able to go outside and get in trouble with the other kids, so his grandmother taught him how to crochet. Up until shortly before his death he spent most evenings relaxing in front of the TV, happily crocheting tablecloths, bedspreads, and doilies. It may seem a little out of character for a guy who was built like a bear (a small black bear, not a grizzly, but a bear nonetheless) who looked more like the mechanic and welder he was than a crocheter, but that was Alvin, and now that he’s gone we’re glad to have this reminder of him.

Just atop the tree skirt are a couple of two-foot-tall Victorian-style Santas. Actually, these gentlemen look more like Father Christmas than Santa Claus. They look like they’ve stepped off of a card that says “Merry Christmas 1898.” One is clad in green rather than red. They carry walking staffs and small bags with teddy bears and candy canes poking out of them. They look like the kind of St. Nicholas who would trudge through the snow to deliver presents rather than flying around in a sleigh. If you knew me you might think they’re some kind of reaction against the over-exposed rotund gentleman familiar from Thomas Nast cartoons and Coca-Cola ads, but they’re not really. I just like the look of the old style Santas. They go well with some of the other ornaments on the tree, like the pennyfarthing bike.

Looking around the tree, there are ornaments of every description, and most of them have a story behind them. Over here is a 101 Dalmatians we bought at a McDonalds when they were promoting the Glenn Close live-action version of the film. Next to it is an ornament I bought in a set from the Quality Paperback Book Club because it reminded me of similar ornaments we had on the tree when I was young. Over there, next to the black ballerina we bought the last time we went to see The Nutcracker at the Pacific Northwest Ballet because it reminded us of our granddaughter, is a handblown Egyptian ornament we picked up when the Royal British Columbia Museum in Victoria hosted an exhibit of Egyptian antiquities. There’s a Chuck Jones coyote chasing the Roadrunner around a decorated cactus. There’s Mickey Mouse and Peter Pan and Eeyore and other Disney figures my daughter loves, admiring packages or tangled up in a sting of lights. The garland of origami boxes stretches twice around the tree now. My wife’s been folding the boxes out of two-inch paper squares for over ten years now and stringing them together to make the garland.

And at the very top of the tree, looking down on the nativity scene on the bench in front of the TV, is the angel. Not a spire, not a star, but a Christmas angel. It’s a Chrstmas tree, after all, and while we have caroler ornaments and angels playing psaltries and a Santa Claus or two, it wouldn’t do to ignore the Story that started it all.

Every year the tree changes a little as new ornaments are added and old ones are stored away because we don’t have room for them anymore. This year a Radko blown-glass Yosemite Sam that was one of my wife’s favorites decided to take a dive off the tree, with predictable results. Radko ornaments are meant to be pretty, not to survive a four foot drop. We added a two-inch plastic icicle. It’s not much, but when my granddaughter was finished Christmas shopping with money she’d saved from her allowance, she had one dollar left and bought her first ornament with it. Someday we hope it will be part of her family’s Christmas totem.

What our tree lacks in coordinated decoration, it makes up in personality. There isn’t another tree like it anywhere in the world, and we like it that way. It’s the closest thing our family has to a totem pole. It tells our family’s story like no diary, no document, nothing else in this world ever could, because we’ve written it ourselves, light by light, ornament by ornament.

We Few, We Band Of Bloggers

Today, on what I hope is a momentous and joyous occasion, I wanted to quote from the Bard. And amazingly enough, I found a seldom-quoted draft of one of his better known speeches. I guess it wasn’t his fault that November 7th has a saint with such a dorky name . . .

This day is call’d the feast of Willibrord.
They that outlive this day, and come safe home,
Will stand a tip-toe when this day is nam’d,
And rouse them at the name of Willibrord.
They that shall live this day, and see old age,
Will yearly on the vigil feast their neighbours,
And say ‘To-morrow is Saint Willibrord.’
Then will they strip their sleeve and show their scars,
And say ‘These wounds I had on Willibrord’s day.’
Old men forget; yet all shall be forgot,
But they’ll remember, with advantages,
What feats they did that day. Then shall our logins,
Familiar in their mouths as household words-
Refinish69 and Second Nature,
BooMan, Isis, Psifighter37,
Man Eegee and Dada and the rest-
Be in their flowing cups freshly rememb’red.
This story shall the good man teach his son;
And Willibrord — Willibrord shall ne’er go by,
From this day to the ending of the world,
But we in it shall be remembered-
We few, we happy few, we band of bloggers;
For those to-day that shed their blood with me
Shall be my kin; and be they ne’er so vile,
This day shall gentle their condition;
And slackers in this country now-a-bed
Shall think themselves accurs’d they were not here,
And hold their ballots cheap whilst any speaks
That on Saint Willibrord’s day reclaimed their country.

Mike Stark will press charges against George Allen

The news was all over blogtopia (yeah yeah yeah Skippy) this afternoon: Calling All Wingnuts proprietor, law student and gadfly Mike Stark was assaulted today by several members of Senator George Allen’s staff. (Don’t sweat the provocative headline; read the story itself. It’s a real corker. Violent outbursts, indeed.)

Well, Mike is fighting back. He’s pressing charges against Senator Macaca.

I will be pressing charges against George Allen and his surrogates later today. George Allen, at any time, could have stopped the fray. All he had to do was say, “This is not how my campaign is run. Take your hands off that man.” He could have ignored my questions. Instead he and his thugs chose violence. I spent four years in the Marine Corps. I’ll be damned if I’ll let my country be taken from me by thugs that are afraid of taking responsibility for themselves.

All I can say is you go, Mike.

h/t Crooks and Liars

UPDATEDx2 – Let’s let Olbermann know we have his back

Update [2006-9-28 2:9:32 by Omir the Storyteller]: I just sent off the mail. According to my count, if we count the entire Damnit family, plus Cali Scribe’s husband, there were forty signatories to the letter. Excellent! Thanks to all of you for giving one of the few rational voices on television some support.

I set up an account on my own mail server to send this from. If I get a reply I will post it, and point the respondent to this diary so they can see the outpouring of support (and catch up with anyone who missed the cutoff — sorry, but as I said, I wanted to get this out while the incident was fresh in everyone’s minds.)

————-

Update [2006-9-27 19:59:55 by Omir the Storyteller]: Thanks to everyone for the support. I’ve posted a proposed letter to KO in comment #31 — please take a look at it and let me know if it conveys your feelings. I would like to get the letter sent off tonight, while the incident is fresh in the collective minds of all concerned.

————-

This is going to be a short diary based on an idea that came to me while I was reading Steven D’s front page post, American Terrorist. If you haven’t read it, please go read it now.

Then please come on back because I have a very simple action item I want to propose.
In response to the anthrax incident, boran2 said he sent Keith Olbermann a personal email or support.

That made the light bulb go off in my head. I said,

Let’s put together a collective email that we can send to KO and basically say “BooMan Tribune, a tiny little corner of the liberal blogosphere, has your back on this.”

So I want to ask a few questions.

First off, what should we say in such an email? (I guess the first question would be “Is this a good idea?”, but I hope the answer to that would be a self-evident “Yes.”

Second, who besides KO should it go to?

Third, what’s the best way to submit it to all involved?

Floor’s open.

"You have no First Amendment rights here," or, Kip Hawley is an idiot

Every so often you read a story that just makes you react strongly. You know . . . throw things at the TV, send the dog and cat for cover, use language that wilts the begonias, that sort of thing.

OK, that happens pretty much on a daily basis. This one, however, takes the cake. A petty security official has declared the First Amendment null and void in the security checkpoint area of Milwaukee where he has staked out his fief.

What was the offense? A bomb threat? A hijacking hoax? Declaring that one has illegal substances on or about their person?

Nope. The hapless traveler took the plastic bag the TSA issued him to put his toothpaste and hair gel into, and wrote “Kip Hawley is an idiot” across the front of it.

Kip Hawley, you see, is the secretary of the Transportation Security Agency and, ultimately, this Barney Fife wannabee’s boss.
Here is a substantial portion of the story as posted on the Flyertalk.com user forums:

Yesterday, while discussing the new rules a fellow Flyertalker suggested we write “Kip Hawley is an Idiot” on the outside of our clear plastic quart bags. So I did just that.

At the MKE “E” checkpoint I placed my laptop in one bin, and my shoes, cell phone and quart bag in a second bin. The TSA guy who was pushing bags and bins into the X-ray machine took a good hard look, and then as the bag when though the X-ray I think he told the X-ray operator to call for a bag check/explosive swab on my roller bag to slow me down. He went strait to the TSA Supervisor on duty and boy did he come marching over to the checkpoint with fire in his eyes!

He grabbed the baggie as it came out of the X-ray and asked if it was mine. After responding yes, he pointed at my comment and demanded to know “What is this supposed to mean?” “It could me a lot of things, it happens to be an opinion on mine.” “You can’t write things like this” he said, “You mean my First Amendment right to freedom of speech doesn’t apply here?” “Out there (pointing pass the id checkers) not while in here (pointing down) was his response.”

At this point I chuckled, just looking at him wondering if he just realized how foolish that comment was, but I think my laugh pushed him over the edge as he got really angry at this point. A Milwaukee County Sheriffs deputy was summoned – I would have left at this point, but he had my quart bag with my toothpaste and hair gel.

When the deputy got over the TSA supervisor showed him the bag and told him what had happened to that point. After he had finished I started to remind him he had left out his statement that my First Amendment rights didn’t apply “here” but was cut off by the deputy who demanding my ID. I asked if I was under arrest, and his response was “Right now you are not under arrest, you are being detained.” I produced my passport and he walked off with it and called in my name to see if I had any outstanding warrants, etc. The TSA supervisor picked up the phone about 20 feet away and called someone? At this point two more officers were near by and I struck up a conversation with the female officer who was making sure I kept put. I explained to her who Kip Hawley was, why I though he was an idiot, and my surprise that the TSA Supervisor felt my First Amendment rights didn’t’ apply at the TSA checkpoint. She didn’t say much.

After he was assured I didn’t have any warrants out the first office came back and I had my first chance to really speak, I explained that I was just expressing my opinion and my writing should be protected my by First Amendment rights. When he didn’t respond, I then repeated that the TSA Supervisor stated my First Amendment rights didn’t apply at the TSA check point and I asked if he (the deputy) agreed that was the case. He responded by saying “You can’t yell fire in a crowed theater, there are limits to your rights.

At this point I chucked again

I asked how this was even remotely like shouting “Fire” in a crowd, and his answer was “Perhaps your comments made them feel threatened.”

It’s no wonder people feel threatened, with at least one major television network devoted exclusively to making them feel afraid. Incidents like this aren’t new. Dissident John Gilmore, for instance, was kicked off a plane for wearing a 1″ button that said “Suspected Terrorist.” I’m sure you can figure out what his point was. Teachers getting kicked out of Presidential rallies for wearing T-shirts promoting peace. An Iraqi blogger being kicked off a plane for wearing a T-shirt that said, “I will not be silent,” in Arabic. (Somehow I doubt the perpetrators of this particular atrocity would have known if the T-shirt said “Coca-Cola” in Arabic, a shirt I’ve seen a number of times myself.)  

I talked to my mother on the phone on Sunday. Every time one of us calls she asks if I’m ever going to come visit her in Montana. I would love to do so, of course; she’s getting up there in years and not in the best of health. But I wince every time I think about having to go through the nightmare of airport security. (And thanks to bean-counters at Amtrak, the train doesn’t even go through Billings anymore — a town that was named for the son of a Northern Pacific executive and where the old part of the city was laid out in a grid with the railroad as its base.)

My daughter and granddaughter would love to go to Disneyland. I’d love to take them. But apart from the money it costs for such an excursion, again, I’d have to go through the guantlet to get on the plane.

It’s just not worth it.

I can appreciate that people are nervous enough about flying these days, in spite of the fact that cheeseburgers will do you more harm than planes will. But this is just a symptom of what we as a country have become. In the short span of a generation or two we have gone from “We have nothing to fear but fear itself” to “We have nothing to embrace but fear itself.” Whatever happened to “Give me liberty or give me death?”

Maybe we should start writing that on the sides of those TSA bags.

Working Together Part VII: Mother Jones (a Sunday Griot special)

Wow! Thank you all for being here today. You should all give Kahli a hand; she came up with a diary subject that lured me out of semi-retirement.

I don’t know how many people these days know about Mother Jones. Some, like me, had never heard of her before they heard of the magazine by that name. Others might have known that she was a labor organizer.

Oh, my friends, she was more than that. But I’m getting ahead of myself.

She was thirty feet tall, bulletproof and breathed fire.

OK, not really. But to laborers and capitalists alike of her day, she was scarier than any movie monster could have been, because she had super-powers unheard of today: She wasn’t afraid of any thing, she wasn’t afraid of any one, she believed without question that her cause was just and she told the truth and let the chips fall where they may.

She was born Mary Harris, but the world knew her as Mother Jones. She truly comforted the afflicted and afflicted the comfortable. And how!

Mary Harris was born in 1836 in County Cork, Ireland. She claimed in later life to have been born in 1830, but in my admittedly speculative opinion this was probably to make her more formidable as an opponent. Who wouldn’t come to the defense of an old woman? She came by her temperament honestly; her grandfather was hanged because he fought for Irish independence, and her father had to flee to Canada to avoid a similar fate. Soon after her grandfather’s death the family joined the father near Toronto, where Mary went to school and learned a seamstress’ trade.

In 1861 Mary married George Jones, an iron moulder, and they settled in Tennessee. Their happiness was not to last; in 1867 a yellow fever epidemic struck and killed George and their children. She packed up and moved to Chicago, where she took up her trade as a seamstress. From her vantage point above the city, she could see the injustices in American society:

We were located on Washington Street near the lake. We worked for the aristocrats of Chicago, and I had ample opportunity to observe the luxury and extravagance of their lives. Often while sewing for the lords and barons who lived in magnificence on the Lake Shore Drive, I would look out of the plate glass windows and see the poor, shivering wretches, jobless and hungry, walking along the frozen lake front. The contrast of their condition with that of the tropical comfort of the people for whom I sewed was painful to me. My employers seemed neither to notice nor to care.

Summers, too, from the windows of the rich, I used to watch the mothers come from the west side slums, lugging babies and little children, hoping for a breath of cool, fresh air from the lake. At night, when the tenements were stifling hot, men, women and little children slept in the parks. But the rich, having donated to the ice fund, had, by the time it was hot in the city, gone to seaside and mountains.

(All quotes in this diary are from The Autobiography of Mother Jones. The link points to an online, public domain version of her autobiography. It is fairly short and deserves to be read by any student of labor, class warfare or hellraising.)

The great Chicago Fire of 1871 destroyed Mary’s dressmaking business. This placed one of the most important weapons in her arsenal: her husband and children were gone and all her worldly possessions were destroyed. She literally had nothing left to lose but her life, and that prospect didn’t seem to worry her.

During her time in Chicago Mary had spent her off time meeting with the Knights of Labor, an organization that sought to organize the working class as a whole rather than by trade specialty. After the fire she spent more and more time with the Knights of Labor, eventually formally joining the organization and resolving to dedicate her life to better the conditions of working people everywhere.

For fifty years she traveled around the country with no fixed address, seemingly appearing wherever there was a strike. In 1910 she described herself to Congress:

“I live in the United States,” said I, “but I do not know exactly where. My address is wherever there is a fight against oppression. Sometimes I am in Washington, then in Pennsylvania, Arizona, Texas, Minnesota, Colorado. My address is like my shoes: it travels with me.”

Her fiery speaking style, a mixture of her natural abilities and the education she gained in the company of the Knights of Labor, endeared her to the working people she served. Their bosses . . . well, they didn’t want her anywhere near “their” workers. Friends and foes alike began to call her “Mother Jones.”

Let me take a brief picture of what life was like back in those days. If you were a miner, miller, railroad worker or other laborer, you most likely worked 10 hours a day, at least. Twelve-hour days were not uncommon. You would work at least six days a week. Usually if you worked on Sunday you would get time off to go to church — a church owned by the company. And in return, you were paid not in dollars, but in scrip issued by the company you worked for. Scrip that, of course, had no value outside the company. So, your wife had to buy food and clothes at the company store. You paid rent to the company for the house you lived in. Your expenses were always higher than your earnings, because the company charged exorbitant prices, so you were always in debt, and even if you weren’t, it was hard to go anywhere or make anything of yourself, because you had no money to do it with and were in debt to the company besides.

When the old song Sixteen Tons says

You load sixteen tons, what do you get?
Another day older and deeper in debt.
St. Peter, don’t you call me ’cause I can’t go,
I owe my soul to the company store

it isn’t kidding or exaggerating.

In fact if you couldn’t work or the debt got too high, your family might have to pitch in. Women would work in mills or doing other labor. Often their children would join them, some as young as four although it was uncommon to see a child younger than six working. These children would move in and around heavy, dangerous machinery. It was hard work, and took its toll. Few went to school, and those who did paid a price:

“How old are you, lad!” I asked him.

“Twelve,” he growled as he spat tobacco on the ground.

“Say son,” I said, “I’m Mother Jones. You know me, don’t you! I know you told the mine foreman you were twelve, but what did you tell the union!”

He looked at me with keen, sage eyes. Life had taught him suspicion and caution.

“Oh, the union’s different. I’m ten come Christmas.”

“Why don’t you go to school!”

“Gee,” he said-though it was really something stronger – “I ain’t lost no leg!” He looked proudly at his little legs.

I knew what he meant: that lads went to school when they were incapacitated by accidents.

Need I mention that the schools were owned by the company as well?

And of course, the corollary to this was that if you incurred the displeasure of the mine owners — by trying to organize the other workers into a union, for instance, or by participating in a strike — you not only lost your job, you lost your home, and since you were forbidden to set foot on company land again (which often extended for many miles around the mine itself), you lost all your friends.

At the other end of the spectrum were the mine owners and foremen. The foremen had better working conditions than the miners, so long as the miners produced. At the top of the chain were those who owned the companies — the ones Mother Jones had looked down on in Chicago as she sewed. They reaped the benefit of the bitter crop they had sown, living in fancy mansions and eating and drinking well. They could afford anything they could buy — houses, yachts, congressmen, entire states. John Rockefeller — yes, that John Rockefeller — owned the Colorado Iron and Fuel Company, and had an iron grip on the state government, a fact not lost on Mother Jones:

One day I read in the newspaper that Governor Ammons of Colorado said that Mother; Jones was not to be allowed to go into the southern field where the strike was raging.

That night I took a train and went directly to Denver. I got a room in the hotel where I usually stayed. I then went up to Union head-quarters of the miners, after which I went to the station and bought my ticket and sleeper to Trinidad in the southern field.

When I returned to the hotel, a man who had registered when I did, came up to me and said, “Are you going to Trinidad, Mother Jones!”

“Of course,” said I,

“Mother, I want to tell you that the governor has detectives at the hotel and railway station watching you.”

“Detectives don’t bother me,” I told him.

“There are two detectives in the lobby, one up in the gallery, and two or three at the station watching the gates to see who boards the trains south.”

I thanked him for his information. That night I went an hour or so before the coaches were brought into the station way down into the railway yards where the coaches stood ready to be coupled to the train. I went to the section house. There was an old section hand there.

He held up his lantern to see me. “Oh, Mother Jones,” he said, “and is it you that’s walking the ties?”

“It’s myself,” said I, “but I’m not walking. I have a sleeper ticket for the south and I want to know if the trains are made up yet. I want to go aboard.”

“Sit here,” he said, “I’ll go see. I don’t know.” I knew he understood without any explaining why I was there.

“I wish you would tell the porter to come back with you,” said I.

He went out his light bobbing at his side. Pretty Soon he returned with the porter.

“What you want, Mother?” says he.

“I want to know if the berths are made up yet?” “Do you want to get on now, Mother?” “Yes.”

“Then yours is made up.” I showed him my tickets and he led me across the tracks.

“Mother,” he said, “I know you now but later I might find it convenienter not to have the acquaintance.”

“I understand,” said I. “Now here’s two dollars to give to the conductor. Tell him to let Mother Jones off before we get to the Santa Fe crossing. That will be early in the morning.”

“I sure will,” said he.

I got on board the sleeper in the yards and was asleep when the coaches pulled into the Denver station for passengers south. I was still asleep when the train pulled out of the depot.

Early in the morning the porter awakened me. “Mother,” he said, the conductor is going to stop the train for you. Be ready to hop.”

When the train slowed down before we got to the crossing, the conductor came to help me off.

“Are you doing business, Mother!” said he. “I am indeed,” said I. “And did you stop the train just for me!”

“I certainly did!”

He waved to me as the train pulled away. “Goodbye, Mother.” It was very early and I walked into the little town of Trinidad and got breakfast. Down at the station a company of military were watching to see if I came into town. But no Mother Jones got off at the depot, and the company marched back to headquarters, which was just across the street from the hotel where I was staying.

I was in Trinidad three hours before they knew I was there. They telephoned the governor. They telephoned General Chase in charge of the militia. “Mother Jones is in Trinidad!” they said.

“Impossible!” said the governor. “Impossible!” said the general.

“Nevertheless, she is here!”

“We have had her well watched, the hotels and the depots,” they said.

“Nevertheless, she is here!”

Mother Jones loved the working people she fought for, and they loved her right back. It certainly seemed that she could go anywhere she wanted and find a place to stay and plenty to eat when she got there. Her lifestyle did have its disadvantages, though — there were long stretches where she didn’t even dare to undress because she was afraid she would have to leave on a moment’s notice.

If she had many friends among the working classes, she had many enemies among the rich and powerful. Not all of them were mine owners or state governors. She had no use for those she considered traitors to their class, such as John Mitchell, the president of the United Mine Workers. Mitchell earned her enmity when she denounced the intention of a group of miners to subscribe to a $10,000 house for Mitchell when their dwellings were barely worthy to be described as hovels. She derided him in her autobiography for practices like traveling around Europe, studying their labor unions at UMW expense while staying in fine hotels and traveling first class, while miners in America were either working like slaves or striking for an eight-hour work day and a fair wage.

Those who kept their word and helped her in her fight for the working man earned praise from her. For instance, she had high praise for George W. P. Hunt, several times governor of Arizona:

I came to know Governor Hunt, a most human and just man. One day I saw the governor stop his machine and ask a poor man with his bundle of blankets over his back, where he was going. The man was a “blanket-stiff,” a wandering worker. His clothes were dusty. His shoes in slithers. He told the governor where he was going.

“Jump in,” said the governor, opening the door of his machine.

The man shook his head, looking at his dusty clothes and shoes.

The governor understood. “Oh, jump in,” he laughed. “I don’t mind outside dirt. It’s the dirt in people’s hearts that counts!”

Governor Hunt never forgot that although he was governor, he was just like other folks.

Perhaps no incident from the life of Mother Jones is more characteristic of her and her struggles than an incident known as the March of the Mill Children. Mother loved children, and they loved her. It broke her heart that children not only had to work so hard at the young ages required of them in her lifetime, but that in some ways owners preferred them, because children were docile and easy to “manage.”

In 1903 the mill workers of Kensington, Pennsylvania were on strike. There were 75,000 striking workers, and over 10,000 of them were children. She would look over the poor wretches, dirty, stooped, broken in spirit and all too often in body. Many of them were missing fingers, thumbs, or entire limbs from run-ins with dangerous machinery. At the time Pennsylvania had a law forbidding children under 12 from working, but the influence of the mill owners was strong enough that the law was essentially meaningless. Mothers would perjure themselves swearing to the childrens’ ages; the alternative was starvation.

I asked the newspaper men why they didn’t publish the facts about child labor in Pennsylvania. They said they couldn’t because the mill owners had stock in the papers.

“Well, I’ve got stock in these little children,” said I,” and I’ll arrange a little publicity.”

Mother gathered a group of children together, showing the public their hunched frames and missing limbs and declaring that the mansions of Philadelphia were built upon the broken bodies of these children, and those in charge of the companies and the government seemed to neither know nor care. The newspapers printed the quote, the universities began to discuss the question, and the working children of Kensington became the topic of discussion for a while, but Mother Jones wanted more.

She asked the parents of some of the children if they would allow her to take them on an excursion from Philadelphia to New York. She promised to return them safe and sound. They consented, and a few agreed to go along to help with the children. Mother had two destinations in mind: Wall Street, where she hoped to meet with J. P. Morgan, the owner of the mines where many of the children’s fathers worked; and Oyster Bay, the summer home of President Theodore Roosevelt. Roosevelt had several children of his own, and she hoped he would equate his own children with the ones she marched with.

They started with a mass meeting in Philadelphia, and then marched for New York. The weather was hot, and the children tired easily, but at least they didn’t have to work from sun-up to sun-down. In addition they took advantage of every brook and stream along the way to wade and play in. Farmers heard about their journey and came out to meet them with wagonloads of food. Their wives provided clothing and money. Streetcar conductors would give the children free rides on the interurban railroads.

It was a chance to be a child for once instead of an under-aged wage slave.

All along the way Mother Jones arranged meetings, alerting the citizens along the way to the horrors of child labor. Finally they reached the outskirts of New York, only to be denied entry into the city by the commissioner of police.

Mother Jones went across the river on her own to see the mayor, a man named Seth Low. Mayor Low professed sympathy to her cause, but said he had to stand by his police commissioner. She asked on what grounds they were to be denied entrance into the city; the mayor said it was because they were not citizens of New York.

“Oh, I think we will clear that up, Mr. Mayor,” I said. “Permit me to call your attention to an incident which took place in this nation just a year ago. A piece of rotten royalty came over here from Germany, called Price Henry. The Congress of the United States voted $45,000 to fill that fellow’s stomach three weeks and to entertain him. His highness was getting $4,000,000 dividends out of the blood of the workers in this country. Was he a citizen of this land?”

“And it was reported, Mr. Mayor, that you and all the officials of New York and the University Club entertained that chap.” And repeated, “Was he a citizen of New York!”

“No, Mother,” said the mayor, “he was not.”

“And a Chinaman called Lee Woo was also entertained by the officials of New York. Was he a citizen of New York?”

“No, Mother, he was not.”

“Did they ever create any wealth for our nation!”

“No, Mother, they did not,” said he.

“Well, Mr. Mayor, these are the little citizens of the nation and they also produce its wealth. Aren’t we entitled to enter your city!”

They were allowed to enter the city. Mother asked to speak in Madison Square, but was refused. Again, she pointed out that the single-taxers spoke there. “Yes,” said a police captain, “but they might get twenty people to show up, and you might get twenty thousand!” In the end they secured a location on Twentieth Street, and Mother gave her speech to a robust crowd.

The next day, Mother and the children went to Coney Island as the guests of the owner of the wild animal exhibit. Mother, ever the showman, arranged for some of the children to be placed in cages near a backdrop showing a Roman gladiator scene:

I told the crowd that the scene was typical of the aristocracy of employers with their thumb down to the little ones of the mills and factories, and people sitting dumbly by.

“We want President Roosevelt to hear the wail of the children who never have a chance to go to school but work eleven and twelve hours a day in the textile mills of Pennsylvania; who weave the carpets that he and you walk upon and the lace curtains in your windows, and the clothes of the people. Fifty years ago there was a cry against slavery and men gave up their lives to stop the selling of black children on the block. Today the white child is sold for two dollars a week to the manufacturers. Fifty years ago the black babies were sold C. 0.D. Today the white baby is sold on the installment plan.

“In Georgia where children work day and night in the cotton mills they have just passed a bill to protect song birds. What about little children from whom all song is gone?

“I shall ask the president in the name of the aching hearts of these little ones that he emancipate them from slavery. I will tell the president that the prosperity he boasts of is the prosperity of the rich wrung from the poor and the helpless.

“The trouble is that no one in Washington cares. I saw our legislators in one hour pass three bills for the relief of the railways but when labor cries for aid for the children they will not listen.

“I asked a man in prison once how he happened to be there and he said he had stolen a pair of shoes. I told him if he had stolen a railroad he would be a United States Senator.

“We are told that every American boy has the chance of being president. I tell you that these little boys in the iron cages would sell their chance any day for good square meals and a chance to play. These little toilers whom I have taken from the mills –deformed, dwarfed in body and soul, with nothing but toil before them -have never heard that they have a chance, the chance of every American male citizen, to become the president.

“You see those monkeys in those cages over there.” I pointed to a side cage. “The professors are trying to teach them to talk. The monkeys are too wise for they fear that the manufacturers would buy them for slaves in their factories.”

I wish I could tell you the march was an unqualified success, but in some ways it was a failure. There is no record that Mother Jones got her meeting with J. P. Morgan, and President Roosevelt refused to meet with her or even answer her letters. However, public attention was turned to the plight of the working children, and Pennsylvania soon passed a law raising the minimum work age to 14.

In some ways the story of the Children’s March is typical of Mother Jones’ career as a union organizer and a hellraiser (for so she styled herself). When she wasn’t in prison or otherwise being held incommunicado, she fought for the rights of the working class, not only in this country but wherever there was injustice. The quote at the beginning of this story is from Congressional testimony she gave with regard to the Mexican revolution against the corrupt rule of Diaz. For every step forward she made, it seems she ended up going back a step and a half. Workers sometimes gained their objectives when they organized, but just as often or more so they wound up having their strikes broken by scabs, armed goons (sometimes with the aid of the military), foreigners who didn’t understand what was at stake, or fear. Sometimes she saw gains she had worked hard for — and encouraged others to work, fight and sometimes die for — co-opted by the bribing of lawmen, lawmakers, government officials and even union officials. She fought all her life against a public apathy toward where their standard of living came from, having to constantly shock them out of complacency to get them to help her in her cause. She fought on even though she saw these defeats throughout her lifetime.

Why?

Well, it goes back to what I said at the top of this diary. She wasn’t afraid of any thing, she wasn’t afraid of any one, and she was willing to stand up and tell the truth as she saw it, regardless of who she offended or what feathers she ruffled. She was a hellraiser. She wasn’t interested in women’s suffrage — she felt the question of labor was too important to be sidetracked by other issues. She is the author of the quote I’ve been using as a sig here ever since I started researching the story:

“You must stand for free speech in the streets,” I told them.

“How can we,” piped a woman, “when we haven’t a vote?”

“I have never had a vote,” said I, “and I have raised hell all over this country! You don’t need a vote to raise hell! You need convictions and a voice!”

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

In these times of mass disenfranchisement, that quote takes on a whole new meaning.

And that’s what I want to leave you with at the end of my diary. Mother Jones didn’t just sit around dithering about what was to be done. She got out and raised hell, and by God wouldn’t it be wonderful if we had more people doing that today. There are a few of them. Cindy Sheehan comes to mind. So does Michael Moore, and their targets hate them for it. But there aren’t enough people out raising hell. Some are scared; some still feel they have something to lose; some just haven’t overcome inertia enough to do anything yet.

Just think what Mother Jones could have done if she’d have had a blog.

I’m just sayin’ . . .

Let’s Declare War On Cheeseburgers

Let’s face it, these violent killers have gone unchecked far too long. We need to eradicate the cheeseburger and the threat it poses to our way of life.

Don’t believe me? Take a look below the fold.
Of course it sounds silly (or maybe not, depending on who you listen to and what you read), but stay with me for a minute here.

Hat tip to an article by Christopher Null over at Yahoo! News. He was looking at the latest hoopla over the recall of some Dell laptop batteries and did some research to find out how much at risk you are from an exploding laptop. Since he’s already done the research, I decided to see how the likelihood of dying as the result of a terrorist attack is, relatively speaking, compared to the risks Null dug up.

First, let’s define what the numbers mean. Each set of numbers shows the relative proportion of Americans who die from a particular cause every year. So with a rough count of 300,000,000 Americans, that means if 1,000,000 of us falls into a particular category, the odds are 300,000,000 / 1,000,000 or 1 in 300 that any given individual — you, me, Granny, George W. Bush or your two-headed brother-in-law — will be affected.

In the context of deaths due to a particular cause, a higher number means that fewer people died of that cause, a lower number means more deaths. So to oversimplify things, right now, higher is better.

Clear? OK, let’s proceed.

Wikipedia reports that approximately 3,000 people died as a direct result of the attacks on this country on September 11, 2001. No further incidents of mass attack have materialized since then (at least not on domestic soil), so it is probably fair to guess that those 3,000 individuals are the sum total of American lives lost directly due to terrorism in the past five years. That places the incidence of deaths due to terrorism in this country at 1 death per year per 500,000 people over the past five years (300,000,000 / (3,000 / 5)). That’s probably a pretty fair number to work with, since the number of terrorism-related deaths prior to then was negligible.

Now let’s compare that number with some other statistics, most of them from Null’s article (most of which in turn come from the National Safety Council) but a few gleaned from other sources, sorted from most likely to least likely:

  • Death from heart disease: 1 in 400
  • Death from cancer: 1 in 600
  • Suicide: 1 in 9,200
  • Death from car accident: 1 in 18,400
  • Being shot to death: 1 in 24,400
  • Death from drowning: 1 in 88,000
  • Death from choking: 1 in 97,000
  • Death from air (or space) accident: 1 in 392,000
  • Death from lightning strike: 1 in 400,000
  • Death from freezing: 1 in 469,000
  • Death from terrorist attack: 1 in 500,000
  • Death from scalding (overly hot tap water): 1 in 11,100,000
  • Death from fireworks: 1 in 26,440,000

This is not new news. Murray Rothschild, writing in the Washington Post on November 25, 2001, paints this picture:

What are the odds of dying on our next flight or next trip to a shopping mall? There are more than 40,000 malls in this country, and each is open about 75 hours per week. If a person shopped for two hours each week and terrorists were able to destroy one mall per week, the odds of being at the wrong place at the wrong time would be approximately 1.5 million to 1. If terrorists destroyed one mall each month, the odds would climb to one in 6 million. This assumes the total destruction of the entire mall; if that unlikely event didn’t occur, the odds would become even more favorable.

In another hypothetical but horrible scenario, let us assume that each week one commercial aircraft were hijacked and crashed. What are the odds that a person who goes on one trip per month would be in that plane? There are currently about 18,000 commercial flights a day, and if that person’s trip has four flights associated with it, the odds against that person’s being on a crashed plane are about 135,000 to 1. If there were only one hijacked plane per month, the odds would be about 540,000 to 1.

Now let’s put this into a scenario that’s a little more pleasant. According to the Washington State Lottery Winner’s Gallery, nine people have won prizes of $1,000,000 or more playing the state lottery over the past year. The population of the state of Washington is approximately 6 million people. So if you live in Washington state, the odds that you will win a major prize in the lottery — assuming of course that everyone in the state plays the lottery, which is by no means the case — are approximately 1 in 670,000. (If we take the prize figure down to $100,000, the odds get better — one in 130,500. You’re still one and a half times more likely to drown, though.) Those numbers are probably at least in the ballpark for any state that has a lottery.

And people still think they can win the lottery, and they still think terrorism is a major threat.

The point of this diary is not to present a bunch of morbid statistics. It’s to tell you that we are worried as a nation about the wrong things. We should be losing weight and stopping smoking to reduce the risk of heart disease and cancer, yet we as a nation obsess about the fear of being killed by terrorists when we are much more likely to be killed by one of our fellow Americans driving a car at the wrong speed in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Last I checked, though, there weren’t three branches of government and numerous media outlets reminding us to be scared of that extra piece of bacon on our cheeseburger. I wonder if that might have something to do with it.

Toward A Grass Roots Political Party: The Indigo Project

I’ve been giving some thought lately to the current political climate in this country. Frankly, it’s a mess. Our opponents are in disarray but still thumping their chests and making threatening growls. Unfortunately, those who should be our standard bearers are in even greater disarray, and don’t seem capable of coming up with a coherent response to the corruption endemic on the other side.

There is currently a great debate going on in the political blogosphere about how to address this crisis. Some say we should attempt to work within the system; some claim the system is horribly broken and only a third party can satisfy those of us who are looking for, in simplistic terms, an alternative other than Right Wing and Not Quite As Right Wing. (Or, as Jim Hightower says, quoted by Militarytracy, “Some people wish we had a third party. I wish we had a second one.”)

Personally, I have so far maintained that the only sensible course of action is to try to take the Democratic Party over from within, because only the Democratic Party has the organizational structure and, frankly, the money, necessary to compete in any realistic manner in the political arena. No third party has ever really made much of a dent in the country’s political life; even Theodore Roosevelt’s Progressive, or “Bull Moose” Party of 1912 and George Wallace’s American Independent Party of 1968, the only third parties of the last 100 years to win any substantial number of electoral votes, failed to make a dent on the American political landscape, disappearing after the defeat or demise of their standard bearers. To me, creating a third party has been unthinkable, an exercise in pain and certain defeat, a fast track to irrelevancy and to splitting the vote on the Left, ensuring a Republican majority.

Yet politics sometimes causes one to think the unthinkable, and I may have stumbled on a way to create a viable third party in this country, or possibly to take over the Democratic Party. Follow me over the flip to see if you agree, or whether Omir has his hat on too tight again.
Let me lay out the steps that would need to happen to create this new political party. As a sort of short-hand I am going to postulate that you, the reader, are my co-conspirator in this, so I will be talking about “we” and “us.”

First, we would need a core, committed group of individuals from all over the country who want to see an alternative to the current political landscape and are willing to make it happen. I would hope we could find a few thousand people to join us in this effort. They would need to be from the big urban areas like New York and Los Angeles and the small towns like Nome and Bozeman and Odessa and Wildwood. They would need to come from blue states like California and Massachusetts and red states like Utah and Mississippi. This has to be a 50-state, 535-district, preferably 3077-county operation if it is going to succeed the way we want it to.

Second, we would need to get those people together and agree on a united party platform. This is the most important part of the entire plan. Not that the other parts aren’t important, but in my opinion the reason the Democrats are floundering so badly at the moment is the perception that they don’t stand for anything.

This is where we steal an idea from the Green Party. If you go to their web site they list ten core principles that their party stands for. I don’t want to just steal their list; I want to come up with a list of our own that the American voter will look at and say, “Yeah, that’s what I think my government should be about.” In fairness to all the other ideas that won’t get chosen, I’m not going to list any here; besides, I think a good list will probably come out of kid oakland’s BMT Electoral Politics Project diaries.

Third, we would set up an interlocking set of weblogs and wikis. (If you don’t know what a wiki is, it’s a collaboratively-written reference; the best known example is the collaborative encyclopedia Wikipedia, and there’s also a wiki over at Daily Kos called Kospedia.) Each state would have a weblog for communicating ideas on both the national scale (presidential politics, Congressional hijinks) and the local scale (city council races, how the governor is doing, school boards, state legislatures, the works). Ideally there would be a blog for every state in the country affiliated with this new party, and for most cities and/or counties. The blog and wiki would be a central source for both current events (the blog) and issues, positions and the like (the wiki).

While I think the core list of principles is the central idea of this project, the blog network would be essential for communicating what this new party stands for, both to members of the party and to outsiders.

Fourth, I recognize that not everyone has a computer, and not everyone who does is interested in reading inherently biased political web sites. Therefore we need to have organizers on the ground and in the field, spreading the news, going door to door, communicating our core principles to the populace and making sure we get noticed.

Fifth, we would have to tackle the M word. Money drives politics in this country, and to make this plan work we would have to have people willing to fund the party, both through direct contributions and through fund raising. We would have to come up with money both for the candidates we would sponsor, and for the infrastructure of this new party — servers, ISP fees and the like. We don’t have to have fancy digs like the RNC does, but we do need some offices where people can contact us.

Sixth, we would have to come up with some candidates to run on our position. Now it is at this point we need to come up with a name for the movement. I thought about what kind of names would be good, and rejected all the obvious names — Progressive Party, Patriot Party, American Party — mainly because they’d already been used, or were lame in other ways. Then I came up with the idea of colors. Red and blue are off the table, obviously. So is green. Yellow is reserved for the Yellow Elephants. Brown? I don’t think so. Orange is associated with a certain website, though it has some appeal as the color of the Ukranian Revolution.

Purple? Well, not quite. But what about indigo? Hmmm . . . it’s sort of a deeper blue, if you want to think about it too much, and it does have a mood associated with it. The Indigo Party. That will do as well as any other name for now.

All right, so we need some Indigo candidates. Where do we get them? At first, we steal them. We would start out as a movement, something like a PAC, meeting with the candidates in our area and their staffs and asking them to endorse our set of core principles. Those who do become Indigo candidates, even if they are officially Republicans or Democrats. We would promote them, much as the blogosphere is now promoting candidates like Ned Lamont and Darcy Burner. We would run ads telling people that they had signed on to our core principles.

Then, when we have an infrastructure that’s sound enough, we would begin to recruit homegrown candidates of our own. By that time the Indigo Party would be strong enough to run its own candidates — that is, if we haven’t already taken over the Democratic Party. If all goes according to plan, we will then have the infrastructure, the money, and the candidates to begin to give the common American a voice in his or her own government again.

Now I’m sure there are holes in this plan, so I would like to hear your ideas about how it can be improved, or better, how it can be implemented. It will be a lot of hard work — not George Bush-style hard work, but real, hard, work for long hours and little credit. But the result, if it’s done right, would be: We get an opportunity to get out from under the thumb of the Beltway Bandits and take our country back.

What do you think?

Telling A Better Story: Scheherezade and the 2006 Elections

In an article posted on antiwar.com, Professor Ira Chernus makes an interesting point about how the Republicans manage to win elections despite the odds:

[Rove is] borrowing a page from an ancient Iranian storybook and imitating Scheherazade . . . [he] is telling Republican candidates to follow Scheherazade’s rule: When policy dooms you, start telling stories – stories so fabulous, so gripping, so spellbinding that the king (or, in this case, the American citizen who theoretically rules our country) forgets all about a lethal policy.

Follow me over the edge as I tell you what the Republicans’ story is, and how Democrats can one-up it.

You can argue that things are not going well for the party of Rove. Republicans are being indicted faster than we can keep up, scandals dot the landscape, their legislative agenda is a joke, and on and on. So how do they cope? They tell a story every American knows: Cowboys and Indians.

Oh, it’s different from the Tom Mix movies of yore. The Indians live overseas these days, in places like Iraq and Afghanistan, but they still have brown skin and they still shoot at the cowboys — that is to say, us.

The story of America from the Anglo point of view is a compelling one. From time out of mind the good Christian Americans have found the need to expand into the territory of the savage heathen Redskin, who wasn’t using it for anything important anyway. What is the adventure in Iraq but a game of cowboys and Indians writ large, where it’s our job to create civilization in the midst of chaos and make good respectable citizens out God’s lesser children?

It’s a story that every American knows by heart. And the people the Republicans want to recruit see themselves as the cowboys, as the cavalry, as the civilizers who are going to tame this brave new world.

The Democrats need to counter with their own story. And as it happens, they have the perfect story. It’s just as American as the story of the frontier — maybe more so — and it also goes straight to the origins of this country and the people who live here.

It’s a story about a government that’s out of touch with the common man. A story about big business interests who see the country as a cash cow to be milked for all it’s worth.

Our story is about a group of patriots who dared to suggest that we don’t have to subject ourselves to tyrannical rule, by big business or by a unitary monarch. It’s about people who started forging the idea of liberty, of freedom, of being able to choose one’s own rulers. About people who pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor toward throwing off the shackles that had been imposed on them. About men and women who fought and died for the idea of liberty.

We are the patriots. We are the ones fighting the Tories. Remember that only 40% or so of the population of the colonies supported the cause of American independence. By all accounts more than 50% of the American population is against the war in Iraq. Over 65% don’t approve of the way the alleged President is doing his job. The numbers grow every day.

The Republicans want us to be afraid of the terrorist bogey-men. I say, we should be afraid of the ruling elite and what they can do. The Republicans want to tell you stories about cowboys and Indians. I want to tell stories about Patrick Henry and George Washington and Samuel Adams and John Paul Jones.

And Cindy Sheehan and Pete Seeger and Boston Joe and Damnit Janet and everyone else who is putting their life, their fortune, their sacred honor, and everything else they have on the line to try to wrest control of our country from the madmen and crazy women who have taken it over.

And I want you to tell those stories, too.