It’s never too early to start campaigning

(cross-posted at Daily Kos)

In the 2006 election season, Democrats picked up 30 seats in the House and 6 seats in the Senate. Because senators have 6-year election cycles, there’s not an immediate need to worry about their re-election prospects. However, because the House holds elections every 2 years, we’ll be forced to defend our substantial gains soon. To that end, Adam Nagourney of the New York Times actually wrote a decent article that chronicles the initiatives the House leadership is taking to help out representatives who will have undoubtedly have a tough election in 2008. According to a graphic in the Times article, the following representatives are involved in the program:

  • Joe Courtney (CT-02)
  • Patrick Murphy (PA-08)
  • Ron Klein (FL-22)
  • Nancy Boyda (KS-02)
  • Harry Mitchell (AZ-05)
  • Baron Hill (IN-09)
  • Tim Walz (MN-01)
  • Gabrielle Giffords (AZ-08)
  • Tim Mahoney (FL-16)
  • Chris Carney (PA-10)
  • Jerry McNerney (CA-11)
  • Joe Sestak (PA-07)
  • Nick Lampson (TX-22)
  • Zack Space (OH-18)

The 110th Congress has not even been sworn into office. But in a measure of the determination not to surrender the majority in two years, Representative Nancy Pelosi, the presumptive speaker, has instructed aides to begin acting immediately to help Democrats who won by small margins in districts where President Bush did well in 2004 or who coasted in because their opponents were mired by controversy. Those new members are methodically being given coveted spots on high-profile committees, in particular the Financial Services Committee, a magnet for campaign contributions, and the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, a platform from which to send money for projects back home.

Their names will be affixed as co-sponsors atop big-ticket measures on ethics and stem cell research that are to be voted on in the first 100 hours of the new Congress, Democratic leaders said.

The special group has attended orientation sessions on topics like delivering constituent services and getting their names regularly into local newspapers.

I do like how these orientation sessions that this particular group has been attending deals with local issues. One of the reasons Democrats did well in 2006 is that the elections became more of a national referendum on the Bush administration and the Republican Party than it was necessarily about the individual performance of the representatives on a local level. In the summer of 2005, I interned at my congresswoman’s office (Rep. Nita Lowey of New York’s 18th District), and the vast majority of the issues that constituents called in about weren’t national issues. They were specific matters on an individual level such as obtaining the necessary paperwork for green cards. In fact, the only national issue that I remember there being multiple calls about was CAFTA (which Lowey voted against, reflecting the sentiment of the constituent calls I had received). Similarly, when I volunteered on the campaign of Rep.-elect Patrick Murphy, there was a heavy focus on the national issues, particularly Iraq. However, constituents, when they contact a representative’s office, will almost always be concerned about a local matter and not a national one. That’s why I appreciate the attention to constituent services and getting attention in local papers.

Another good point made in the article is how the committee assignments for the new representatives are a good match for the newly-elected representatives. For example, Murphy (the only Congressional member to have served in the current conflict in Iraq) and Rep.-elect Joe Sestak of Pennsylvania’s 7th District (a retired admiral) are both on the Armed Services Committee, which will play to their strengths. Rep.-elect Tim Mahoney of Florida’s 16th District will be on the Financial Services Committee, which makes sense given his professional background in the financial services field. In Connecticut’s 2nd District, Rep.-elect Joe Courtney defeated Rob Simmons by roughly 90 votes. A large part of Simmons’ campaign was based on keeping the submarine base in Groton open (something that all Connecticut politicians appeared to claim credit for), so it makes sense that Courtney will be seated on the Armed Services Committee. In the Times article, Rep.-elect Nancy Boyda (KS-02) notes that input on committee assignments was taken:

Nancy Boyda of Kansas, who startled Democrats by winning with 51 percent of the vote, was given her first choice, Armed Services, after, she said, she informed Democratic leaders of the prevalence of veterans in a district that had largely escaped Democratic notice until the final week before Election Day.

“They are doing everything they can to match up my district with committee assignments,” Ms. Boyda said. “That has been a huge help.”

It will be interesting to see if we can hold on to some of these districts in 2008, as the turnout in a presidential election year will undoubtedly be higher for the GOP. Our work will definitely be cut out for us in such districts as TX-22, KS-02, and PA-10, where Democrats were elected this year in areas where Bush won in 2004 by more than 20 percentage points. Perhaps the best example of what all of our newly-elected representatives should be doing is Rep.-elect Dave Loebsack (IA-02), who unseated moderate Republican Jim Leach in a Democratic-leaning district. Although he won by a narrow margin, it’s a seat that, barring a serious challenge from the GOP, we should be able to hold. Nevertheless, Loebsack continues to campaign throughout his district, making sure to acquaint himself with his constituents:

So even before his Jan. 4 induction as a member of the 110th Congress, Loebsack has been applying campaign-like vigor to raising his profile and developing a stronger rapport with his new congressional constituents — keeping a busy schedule of town hall meetings and “listening posts” in cities and towns across the southeastern Iowa district.

[…]

Since winning on Nov. 7, Loebsack has met with chambers of commerce across the 2nd District and has held meetings with local residents from Ottumwa in the southern part of the district to Cedar Rapids in the north.

“I don’t want this to be a period when I’m somehow out of touch with people in the district,” Loebsack said. “After all, I’m going to Congress to represent them.”

Local observers say Loebsack’s series of constituent events is a smart way to raise his profile during the “honeymoon” period between his election and the start of the 110th Congress. As an academic from the northern part of the 2nd — which also includes strongly Democratic-leaning Iowa City, home to the University of Iowa — Loebsack needs to build his ties with the more rural and conservative voters, including some Democrats, in the southern part of the district.

Likewise, Rep.-elect Steve Kagen (WI-08) has been making the rounds in his district, which had been held by the GOP gubernatorial candidate in Wisconson, Mark Green:

…Kagen has hardly broken stride since Nov. 7, storming the district in an attempt to gain political traction.

Kagen, who has been assigned to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure by House Democratic leaders, said he is trying to build support among small business owners — and any other constituents he can reach, for that matter. He said in an interview with CQPolitics.com that he stops to say hello if “there are two cars outside a building.”

The lesson to be learned from those like Loebsack and Kagen – who aren’t in the ‘special group’ that the House leadership has deemed necessary to train separately – is that it’s never too early to start campaigning. It’s an unfortunate reality in the House, where representatives have to juggle the concern of properly representing their district while keeping an eye on a re-election that comes too soon. That’s one of the reasons I’ve decided to start Progressive Wave, a blog which will be tracking all of the new Democratic members in Congress. Many of them will have a tough re-election campaign in 2008 (and beyond), and by having local bloggers keep tabs on what is occurring within the district, it’ll be easy to point to a record of accomplishment when the next election rolls around.

The 2006 Democrats of the Year

(cross-posted at Daily Kos)

Many of us have met Time’s choice for Person of the Year – You – with some derision. If the criteria of the award were to be literally followed (“the individual or group of individuals who have had the biggest effect on the year’s news”), then it would always be the entire human population.

However, I thought it would be a good exercise to write about who the ‘Democrats of the Year’ were in 2006. The mainstream media, as evidenced by Time, would probably select Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and Rahm Emanuel – those most often credited for the electoral victories a month ago. Here are mine, complete with requisite title:

John Murtha, Howard Dean, and Ned Lamont

How a political insider, a political outsider, and a political nobody rocked the American political landscape.
John Murtha

Congressmen John Murtha wasn’t particularly well-known to the general public before the end of 2005. Elected to represent Pennsylvania’s 12th District in 1974 as one of the Watergate Babies, Murtha perhaps was best known until now as being investigated in relations to the Abscam scandal. But that all changed on November 17, 2005, when Murtha – arguably one of the more hawkish Democrats in the House and certainly not one of its more progressive members – came out with this  surprisingly blunt assessment of the war in Iraq, a conflict he had once strongly supported:

“The U.S. cannot accomplish anything further in Iraq militarily. It is time to bring them home,” said Rep. John Murtha of Pennsylvania, a former Marine intelligence officer in Vietnam and the senior Democrat on the House appropriations subcommittee that oversees military spending.

“The war in Iraq is not going as advertised,” said Murtha, who in October 2002 voted for the resolution authorizing President Bush to take military action to oust Saddam Hussein. “It’s a flawed policy wrapped in illusion. The American public is way ahead of the members of Congress.”

[…]

“We cannot continue on the present course. It is evident that continued military action in Iraq is not in the best interest of the United States of America, the Iraqi people or the Persian Gulf region,” said Murtha…

Despite Murtha’s fairly conservative voting record as a Democrat, the White House didn’t hesitate to immediately paint Murtha in the same way it paints all enemies – as an extremist:

In a broadside issued Thursday night, Bush spokesman Scott McClellan said that it is “baffling that [Pennsylvania Rep. John Murtha] is endorsing the policy positions of Michael Moore and the extreme liberal wing of the Democratic party.”

[…]

White House Counselor Dan Bartlett called Murtha’s position “out of the mainstream of his own party,” and said that “immediate withdrawal would be, as one general on the ground put it, a recipe for disaster.”

Until then, the Republican Party had done a pretty good job of declaring anyone who disagreed with its national security policy anti-American or some other epithet, regardless of their actual political leanings. But any sort of attacks that the White House and its right-wing allies may have tried to ingrain into public sentiment ground to a halt just the next day, when the most junior member of the House, Jean Schmidt, publicly implied that Murtha was a coward:

A few minutes ago I received a call from Colonel Danny Bubp, Ohio Representative from the 88th district in the House of Representatives. He asked me to send Congress a message: Stay the course. He also asked me to send Congressman Murtha a message, that cowards cut and run, Marines never do.

Ever since the smear machine of the right wing went too far, Murtha has been virtually untouchable. Since then, Murtha has continued to be strong voice on withdrawing from Iraq as soon as possible. Despite an attempt to Swift Boat his record as a Marine, Murtha easily won re-election this past November with 61% of the vote. Although his position within the Democratic caucus may have been hurt slightly by his race for the position of House Majority Leader, which he ultimately lost to Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-MD), no one did more to single-handedly shift the debate on Iraq from one about whether or not we should leave to when we should leave. No matter how much the Bush administration tries to say that leaving is not an option, Iraq has become worse each and every day we stay there. The violence increases, more American troops are killed, and we cannot afford to stay there any longer. The latest polling on Iraq shows that 70% of Americans disapprove of Bush’s handling of the war, and a majority (54%) want the troops brought home within a year.

John Murtha is an unlikely choice to be a force for change in the Democratic Party. His dealings on the Appropriations Committee is the kind of insider wheeling-and-dealing that we need less of in Congress. But his change of heart on Iraq shook the political establishment and gave the party a clear direction on what we should do in Iraq. Making a clear distinction between the ‘stay-the-course’ position of the GOP and the call for change that Murtha initiated helped shift the terms of the debate on Iraq.

Howard Dean

(yKos photo hat tip to Majikthise)

When the high-flying presidential campaign of Howard Dean came crashing down in Iowa, the political establishment claimed that the former governor of Vermont was permanently damaged politically. He had campaigned as a loud and proud outsider, and his style endeared himself to grassroots activists who had long been ignored by the Democratic Party. Here is Kos’ take on Dean’s memorable speech to the California Democratic Party, way back on March 16, 2003:

He started by blasting Bush’s invasion, and the crowd was instantly hooked. It was electrifying. The whole convention center hushed, hanging on his every words (only Rep. Maxine Waters had a similar effect). Dean raised the rhetoric gradually, drawing louder applause each time. People were loving it. He uttered Wellstone’s line: “I’m here to represent the Democratic Wing of the Democratic Party”. People went wild. His speech was repeatedly interrupted by chants of “we want Dean!”.

But the most amazing part was the finale, with a fiery Dean pounding the podium:

    I want my country back!

    I don’t want to listen to fundamentalist preachers anymore!

When Dean uttered this last line, the whole place went nuts. Utter pandemonium. It was literally one of the most amazing sights I have ever seen.

When Dean decided to run for DNC chairman, there were many attempts to outflank him. Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi supported former Rep. Tim Roemer (D-IN). Others, such as Martin Frost, Ron Kirk, and Donnie Fowler vied for the spot, but Dean ended up winning the voice vote unanimously, largely based on his promise to provide the Democratic Party at the state level with money to rebuild a decadent (and sometimes non-existent) grassroots organization. Perhaps not surprisingly in light of future developments to come, one of Dean’s biggest backers for the position was…John Murtha.

“I am not with him on all the issues, but he understands the party’s problems, what we need to do and how to get there,” said Murtha. “And he has executive experience…A lot of people in the party don’t understand just where we are. We need a change. We need something different.”

The cornerstone of Dean’s platform was the 50-State Strategy. The Democratic Party had fallen far behind the GOP in terms of organizing at the grassroots level throughout the nation, as we had become far too focused on ‘swing’ states and districts in elections instead of running competitively everywhere. The D.C. insiders who were used to having power in their hands, though, thought it was foolish:

BEGALA: No. I think Candy’s report was spot on.

[Dean] — yes, he’s in trouble, in that campaign managers, candidates, are really angry with him. He has raised $74 million and spent $64 million. He says it’s a long-term strategy. But what he has spent it on, apparently, is just hiring a bunch of staff people to wander around Utah and Mississippi and pick their nose. That’s not how you build a party. You win elections. That’s how you build a party.

Many of us thought that the 50-State Strategy would not show any results for several years, at the very least. Pundits such as Begala thought it was stupid. But in the 2006 elections, we won some seats in surprising places – whether it be in Kansas’ 2nd District, where Nancy Boyda scored an unlikely upset, or in California’s 11th District, where Jerry McNerney knocked off Richard Pombo after getting trounced in 2004. The media has already begun to rewrite the narrative, crediting outgoing DCCC chair Emanuel with expanding the field. But if Emanuel had his way, we wouldn’t have taken the House in 2006. Here’s the spot-on analysis from Down With Tyranny (emphasis added is mine):

Despite all the praise being heaped upon Rahm Emanuel for the Democratic Party takeover of the House of Representatives, his strategy was a failure. The simple fact is that Emanuel’s plan was to   target 21 Republican seats as part of his Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee’s “Red to Blue” strategy, and as of right now, while Democrats needed to take 15 seats to regain control, only nine of those 21 DCCC picked seats have changed hands (three are still in contention). Most of these candidates were “hand-picked” by Emanuel, based on his perception of their prospects to win election—and most of them failed, often by significant margins– and at great financial cost.

Howard Dean’s presidential campaign was about bringing people back into the political process. As DNC chair, the 50-State Strategy has been a nationwide continuation of returning the Democratic Party to the people. He had to fight a lot of people in public and private – including the four Democrats (Reid, Pelosi, Schumer, and Emanuel) who are given the bulk of the credit for the electoral gains made this years. But it was Dean’s strategy of expanding the playing field everywhere that made 2006 an historic election. If you let people know that their voices will be heard, even the unexpected can happen.

Ned Lamont

At the beginning of 2006, none of us knew who Ned Lamont was. But we got an early heads-up that we would be hearing more about a Greenwich cable executive in the near future:

In the coming weeks and months, Ned will lay out his plan to use the grass-roots and the net-roots to dethrone Lieberman and then proceed to Washington to take back the power in this country from the huge corporations, special interests, big-money lobbyists and their obedient minions in Congress.

Stay tuned.  And remember – you heard it here first.

There had been a deep and increasing unhappiness with Joe Lieberman festering in Connecticut over the years. His full-throated support of the Iraqi conflict – at times, he sounded (and still does sound) like more of a neoconservative than some Republicans – was the last straw, and his fate was sealed by a kiss after the 2005 State of the Union address. ctkeith started DumpJoe.com and handed out the legendary Kiss buttons. The local Connecticut blogging scene took the lead on chronicling the rise of Lamont and the slippery, sliding decline of Lieberman. Ordinary citizens such as Spazeboy, CT Blogger, CT Bob, and the activists at My Left Nutmeg, to name a few, elevated netroots activism to a higher level. From Lamont’s surprising showing at the nominating convention to his stunning primary victory to his eventual defeat in the general election, his campaign was about the people of Connecticut. The call to action that Dean issued resonated everywhere, and nowhere was that more evident than during the senatorial election in the Nutmeg State, where a former vice presidential nominee became a pariah within his own party despite his re-election.

Even though Lamont was not victorious in the general election, his triumph in the primary resulted largely from one issue: Iraq. Lieberman’s strong pro-war stance has been well-documented, and it came to be his biggest liability. His op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, entitled Our Troops Must Stay, illuminated his absolute cluelessness about the true situation in Iraq (despite having visited the country numerous times) and highlighted how out of touch he was with his Democratic base. Lamont, on the other hand, ran on a simple platform when it came to Iraq:

I salute the patriotism and wisdom of Congressman Murtha and others who emphasize that “stay the course” is not a winning strategy for Iraq or America. Our best chance of success requires that the Iraqis take control of their own destiny. America should make clear that we have no designs upon their oil and no plans for permanent bases. While we will continue to provide logistical and training support as long as we are asked, our frontline military troops should begin to be redeployed and our troops should start heading home.

No longer could the position of bringing the troops be called extremist – John Murtha provided ample cover from that claim. Even though Dick Cheney went as far as to say that Lamont’s victory in the primary helped al Qaeda types, the position resonated with the people who voted in the primary. The actualization of Lamont’s lead on August 8th, from leading in the polls to winning an election, rocked the boat (to borrow one of the Lamont campaign’s favorite phrases). No longer was supporting the war considered to be an asset to anyone so as to appear ‘strong’ on national security. Instead, it was a repudiation of foolhardy cheerleading of a conflict that had gone on too long in the wrong direction. In the general election in November, Republicans – particularly moderates – suffered because the GOP became associated with the increasingly unpopular war in Iraq. Patrick Murphy won the election in Pennsylvania’s 8th District over his opponent largely because of his strong stance on getting out of Iraq – and his Republican opponent’s inability to define an equally clear position. Lamont may have been deemed an extremist by the media, but his stance on Iraq, validated by the primary victory in August, accelerated the debate as to when we should leave Iraq.

Ned Lamont won’t be sworn in on January 4 as the junior senator of Connecticut. But his campaign, defined by the position that John Murtha took on Iraq and aided by the people that Howard Dean has inspired to become more active in politics, was the realization of what a revitalized Democratic Party looks like in the future. In the end, it left a legacy of arguably being the most important political campaign in the fall. The Norwich Bulletin puts it best:

No, Ned Lamont didn’t win his race Tuesday. But if the Democrats were to name a Most Valuable Player for this election season, it would surely be him.

More importantly, he may become more — a figure in history whose actions triggered major changes in the United States, its government and its policies.

At $16 million, that’s a bargain.

On launching a new blog

(cross-posted at Daily Kos)

Launching a new blog is difficult. This probably doesn’t come as much of a revelation to many here; getting an audience and attracting readers on a consistent basis is hard to do. In the weeks after the election, HigherPie and I began to put into place the infrastructure of a new blog called Progressive Wave. However, because we are both college students, we’ve had to shelve a lot of potential progress because of the impending final exam period. Because of a lot of lost time, it’s hard to say whether or not people will remember the work we’ll be doing once the 110th Congress convenes, so I’d like to take this chance to re-introduce ourselves and our mission. For those of you who would like to read an extended version of what will appear below, I welcome you to read a previous diary I wrote more than a month ago on Progressive Wave.
In a nutshell, Progressive Wave will solely be a blog that chronicles our new representatives and senators in Washington, D.C. We’re looking to do a mix of traditional blogging – covering bills that our congressmen and congresswomen will be introducing, scouring local newspapers for articles written about them, and so forth – while mixing in an element of citizen journalism. That is, if we have the opportunity, we would also like involved bloggers to do firsthand coverage on their local representatives or senators should they do a public event, for example. For example, I plan on driving down to Washington, D.C. on January 4 – the day the 110th Congress is sworn in – to cover the day’s festivities with Rep.-elect Patrick Murphy (PA-08) and Rep.-elect Joe Sestak (PA-07). Essentially, we’d like to mix Blogging 1.0 with what kid oakland calls Blogging 2.0.

One of the problems with recruiting bloggers for this project is that it is so big. We have 41 new representatives in the House (as one can tell, we still need to add Ciro Rodriguez) and 9 new senators in the Senate. Here’s who we have covered at the moment:

  • AZ-05: Harry Mitchell
  • AZ-08: Gabrielle Giffords
  • CA-11: Jerry McNerney
  • CT-02: Joe Courtney
  • CT-05: Chris Murphy
  • HI-02: Mazie Hirono
  • IA-01: Bruce Braley
  • IA-02: Dave Loebsack
  • KS-02: Nancy Boyda
  • KY-03: John Yarmuth
  • MN-05: Keith Ellison
  • NY-19: John Hall
  • NY-20: Kirsten Gillenbrand
  • PA-07: Joe Sestak
  • PA-08: Patrick Murphy
  • PA-10: Chris Carney
  • TX-22: Nick Lampson
  • WI-08: Steve Kagen
  • MD-Sen: Ben Cardin
  • PA-Sen: Bob Casey
  • VA-Sen: Jim Webb

That’s already a lot of people that we’ll have coverage on. But there are still many newly-elected representatives and senators that we do not have bloggers for:

  • CO-07: Ed Perlmutter
  • FL-11: Kathy Castor
  • FL-16: Tim Mahoney
  • FL-22: Ron Klein
  • GA-04: Hank Johnson
  • IN-02: Joe Donnelly
  • IN-08: Brad Ellsworth
  • IN-09: Baron Hill
  • MD-03: John Sarbanes
  • MN-01: Tim Walz
  • NC-11: Heath Shuler
  • NH-01: Carol Shea-Porter
  • NH-02: Paul Hodes
  • NJ-13: Albio Sires
  • NY-11: Yvette Clark
  • NY-24: Michael Arcuri
  • OH-06: Charlie Wilson
  • OH-13: Betty Sutton
  • OH-18: Zack Space
  • PA-04: Jason Altmire
  • TN-09: Steve Cohen
  • TX-23: Ciro Rodriguez
  • VT-AL: Peter Welch
  • MN-Sen: Amy Klobuchar
  • MO-Sen: Claire McCaskill
  • MT-Sen: Jon Tester
  • OH-Sen: Sherrod Brown
  • RI-Sen: Sheldon Whitehouse
  • VT-Sen: Bernie Sanders

As you can see, we will still need many more bloggers to help us out. If you live in one of the districts or states listed above – even if they are already covered – we would appreciate any assistance you could provide. For the most part, to be frank, there will probably be many days where there’s nothing definitive to write about. That being said, this is an open-source project when it comes to content; you write when you want to, about what you want to. The only requirement is that it pertains to the particular representative or senator, or the event noted will affect their district or state in a large manner.

So if you are interested, please let me know here. The only thing required is your email address, so if your email is not listed in your profile, just shoot me an email at the address in my profile. HigherPie will get an email out to you quickly with the sign-up, as well as an inquiry for a brief bio about yourself (which can contain as much or as little information as you’d like). We’ve already written some content, but we will not officially begin to blog on a regular basis until January 4. In the meantime, feel free to join our group at DFALink.

Finally, I’d like any suggestions possible on how best to effectively run our new blog. Whether it be how to ensure that some sort of readership level is attained, or whether you have qualms about the design – any advice is welcome. I truly do appreciate it.

Barack Obama is the next generation

(cross-posted at Daily Kos)

In October of 2004, a couple weeks before the election, I had the privilege of attending a rally for the Democratic challenger to Senator Arlen Specter, Joe Hoeffel, at which Barack Obama was present. Ostensibly a rally for the Kerry/Edwards ticket and Hoeffel, the then-candidate for the U.S. Senate in Illinois overshadowed the home state candidate with his inspirational life story and his recounting of the beginning of a campaign in Illinois that had been a long shot before he won the primary. After his speech finished, Obama lingered to sign autographs and to take pictures with students like myself who had skipped class to attend the rally.

A lot of the debate in the blogosphere has centered around various aspects of Obama as he ponders whether to run for president in 2008. But there seems to be one observation that a lot of people are missing in the blogosphere: his appeal to those in my generation.
One of the main tools that anyone in the blogosphere should use to evaluate youth sentiment are the social networking websites that have sprung up. There is MySpace, but it is a much more loosely structured website than its counterpart, Facebook. Facebook is now open to anyone in the public (it had previously been a website for college students only, and its main members are still predominantly in college), so feel free to sign up and verify any of the statistics I cite. The main way of evaluating a politician’s popularity in general is to search the groups that are present and see how many members are in each. If one does a search for Barack Obama, you will see that almost all of the groups that exist – most of which call for Obama to run for president – are highly positive. One group in particular, Barack Obama for President in 2008, has over 26,000 members – a huge number for any politically-related group on Facebook. The group has spawned its its own website, complete with a blog. For good comparison, the official Democratic Party group has just over 4,000 members. Take a look, on the other hand, for the results that turn up when one searches for groups related to Hillary Clinton. At an initial glance, the anti-Hillary groups far outnumber those who support her.

So why does there seem to be such an overwhelming contingency of support for Obama among younger Americans – those deemed to be not as interested in politics? Simply put, he represents a much different voice in politics than many of us are used to. I grew up during the Clinton years and have become involved in the political process during the Bush administration, and the memories I have of both are overwhelmingly negative. Granted, most of the negativity has come from the GOP and its right-wing minions, but as a 20 year-old, the rhetoric I have heard in the political arena has been near-devoid of positive thinking and optimism. Obama represents a change from the usual rhetoric, no matter how empty it may seem to those of us who wish to scrutinize his record. I recognize that much of the blogosphere has possibly had a chance to live in a time when political discourse wasn’t so hostile, but young adults like myself haven’t had a chance to experience that yet.

Another reason why many young people support Obama, aside from his relative youth to the rest of the field, is that we see, in him, the embodiment of the real America. The Senate consists 94 Caucasians and 6 minorities – Obama being one of the six. It’s obviously not reflective of the changing demographics of the country. Popular music, no matter how good or bad one thinks it may be, is populated by minority musicians. Younger Americans are the product of multiracial families. In a nation whose face is changing, Obama is the person who represents this change. Perhaps it’s a symptom of being what John Heilemann of New York Magazine calls a cipher, but in Obama, many do see the senator as someone who has the opportunity to reunite the country. But in a time where there’s a lot of despair in the country and around the world, Obama inspires hope because to people like myself, he relates much better to us than many existing politicians do.

This brings me to my next point, one I think Chris Bowers gets it right on when he looks at Obama in the context of the ‘culture wars’ stemming from the 1960s.

I have to admit a powerful, internal hunger to see the ground shift within the “culture wars” away from the long-standing paradigm of the 1960’s. As someone born in 1974, as is probably the case with everyone in Generation X and forward, I just can’t identify with all of that. As we have seen from 1992-2006, every single Baby Boomer based election will probably continue to be about Vietnam, the “counter-culture,” the south as a distinct region, single-issue advocacy, “electability,” and old, linear and single-issue based discussions of ideology. Enough already!

The fact that social issues always seem to be brought up in elections turns a lot of youth off. Why? Because young adults are overwhelmingly liberal when it comes to social issues. Taking a look at a CIRCLE fact sheet (PDF link) compiled 2 years ago, and it’s no wonder that young Americans my age wonder why the hell people seem so consumed about battling over supposed hot-button issues. Here’s a short summary of some of the findings:

  • Over 80% support equal protection in housing and employment, and from hate crimes; 63% support civil unions; 56% support gay marriage; and 70% oppose job discrimination against homosexuals. These findings would seem to be supported by a cursory look at Facebook again, where a group, Legalize Same-Sex Marriage, has 100,000 members.
  • Countering the xenophobia that seems to be latently present in discussions about immigration in the present, an overwhelming supermajority (76%) of young voters believe immigrants should be offered the same rights as everyone else.

In a Bloomberg/LA Times poll conducted this summer, the pollsters seem to agree that the issues that so-called ‘values’ voters care about are ones that are turning younger Americans away from the GOP:

Bush’s 2004 re-election strategy also may have damaged his party’s standing with younger voters by stressing things intended to drive religious voters concerned about social issues to the ballot box, such as opposition to gay marriage.

“The very cultural issues the president wants to use to rally his party’s base are exactly the issues that are alienating younger voters,” said Ross Baker, a political scientist at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey. “Across a broad swath of social issues, younger Americans see the administration as being out of line with what they believe.”

Perhaps it’s wrong of young Americans to be turned off by the discourse, but there’s a very strong streak of social liberalism that exists today – and whenever these social issues are discussed in the public arena, it’s in the context of the past, particularly the 1960s, that many of us don’t have an understanding about. Therefore, there’s a strong inclination to tune out a discussion because it doesn’t make sense to the young adult who didn’t grow up under those circumstances.

Booman has his own take on Obama; he doesn’t associate with the senator for different reasons:

I am not really post-Vietnam. I don’t come from the 1990’s MTV multi-ethnic, major urban center, cosmopolitan, post-identity politics type of place that Chris comes from. And that might strike Chris as strange since I am highly educated and cosmopolitan and live in a major urban center. But, that is not how I experience politics. I see just as much appeal in John Edwards’s little mill town upbringing as I see in Obama’s eclectic experiences. And I don’t at all think that the majority of the voting public (which is older than me) is going to go all ga-ga over Obama’s multi-cultural post-identity politics identity.

The fact of the matter is that very few political pundits, bloggers, or any other observers of politics can understand the Obama phenomenon unless you are one of the youth in the present. Adam Conner, part-time guest blogger at MyDD, blogger at RunObama.com, and someone only a few years older than myself, had this to say about Obama’s appearance in New Hampshire:

First, the energy in the room today was absolutely incredible. I’ve really never seen anything like it, particularly when you consider that the New Hampshire primary is at least a full 388 days from now (the final date hasn’t been set yet).

[…]

Another word on today’s sizable audience of 1,500. If you’re an active Democrat in New Hampshire, you’re pretty much constantly inundated with opportunities to see Presidential candidates speak. And to pay $25 dollars to see someone…forget about it. So for an event to gather this much attention, it seemed consensus among folks from NH that I spoke to that this wasn’t just flavor of the month kind of attention. There’s definitely something there. And holy shit, I’ve never seen a political candidate be mobbed in a crowd like Obama was. Rock Star might be the most accurate description because I can’t think of anything I’ve ever seen that even comes close to comparing.

Bill Clinton also has a rock star persona, but when he was president when I was growing up, many of us didn’t get a chance to see it firsthand because he had to defend himself from rabid right-wing partisans. Al Gore and John Kerry, during their respective presidential campaigns, didn’t have it. But in Barack Obama, what you see is what you get – someone who is a riveting speaker from the stump, making a public park in downtown Philadelphia or a crowded hall in New Hampshire go silent when he speaks. Like many others, I’d like to hear a little more substance on the issues from him, but for many youth, this won’t be an issue. Take the matter of Darfur, for example – an issue that many young Americans care about (a Facebook group called 400,000 Faces, for the number of people who have died in the genocide there, has about 348,000 members). Obama has a grade of A+ on Darfur legislation.

I think that for many youth, it won’t necessarily be the definitive record of the past 2-4 years of legislation under Obama’s belt (2 of which were in the Senate minority). Instead, it will be the potential that the senator brings to the table that will inspire many. When RFK ran for president, he had only been a senator for 4 years. But it was the possibility of what could be done, the hope that he brought out in Americans back in 1968 – it was that passion that drove his campaign. For many of my peers, it’s the same passion that exists now for Barack Obama. To us, he represents the best of the next generation of America.

Being a progressive is mainstream

(cross-posted at Daily Kos)

Don’t take it from me that the agenda of John Edwards is ‘progressive’ – that’s what the mainstream media is stating. On the heels of the news that Edwards is will officially enter the 2008 presidential race, the media’s decided to take a closer look at what his agenda may be. Not surprisingly, here’s their first impression:

The 2004 vice presidential nominee already has a retooled campaign agenda that is unabashedly progressive.

Edwards tosses around phrases such as “universal health care” and “public campaign financing.” He criticizes the Bush administration’s “convergence of stupidity” on education and demands the immediate withdrawal of thousands of U.S. troops from Iraq.

So being ‘unabashedly progressive’ means believing in universal health care, public campaign financing, and that Iraq is a mistake? It sounds good to me, but you can tell that the AP writer of this article, Mike Baker, is simply using the word as a substitution for ‘liberal’, whose connotative meaning has become political poison in the U.S. Gone are the days where presidential candidates boasted of their liberalism; instead, as I wrote more than 6 months ago, it’s used by everyone, including the media, to scare people away from Democratic politicians. As one reads later on in the article:

He has taken his renewed liberal message to 39 states since Election Day 2004

I’m perfectly fine with liberalism, but once the media starts painting someone as a liberal, radical left-winger, or anything of the sort, it’s very difficult to remove that perception. Howard Dean was initially labeled a liberal during the 2004 presidential campaign solely because of his position on Iraq (along with his tendency to speak truth to power, among other things), and he was never able to shed the label, even though he was seen as a moderate by those who had worked with him during his tenure as governor of Vermont. Unless Al Gore joins the presidential race, the initial signals seem to be that Edwards will be painted as the ‘leftist’ candidate of the 2008 race.

This leads me to my next point – namely, that Baker simply writes that Edwards ‘tosses’ around phrases such as universal health care. First, even before the 2004 election was decided, Edwards had several ideas about how we could improve the current state of our health care system. Furthermore, his ideas about the issue are incorporated into his general anti-poverty platform. This is from a speech almost 6 months ago:

On the America we want to achieve in the next twenty years, I don’t think the picture is hard to draw. It is an America where we are well on our way to ending poverty. It is an America where every American has health care coverage – not access to health insurance or other wiggle-word ways we try to describe something less than health coverage for every American.

The other thing to make note of is that the three positions that Baker cites as ‘unabashedly progressive’ – well, it’s not just a bunch of liberals who like his ideas. In fact, the general public seems to agree with much of what he has to say. In a recent Bloomberg/LA Times poll, 62% of the public disapproves of Bush’s policy in Iraq. That’s a pretty solid majority of people who, to put it in Edwards’ words, think Iraq was stupid. Additionally, universal health care – something that has been unfairly demonized since the Clinton plan fell through in 1994 – isn’t just one of many other issues:

The public’s second-highest priority for Congress, after arranging for troop drawdowns in Iraq, is to work on providing universal health care coverage in the U.S.

If that’s the second-highest priority that people want Congress to have after Iraq, that says something about the rehabilitation of the public perception of universal health care in the past 12 years. Edwards has played no small role in this effort, going around the country in support of such a policy.

As for public financing of campaigns, an issue that is a little more esoteric in the public forum of political issues, it’s clear that the general public supports this as well. In a bipartisan poll commissioned this summer, the results are nothing short of astounding:

  • Three out of four voters support a voluntary system of publicly funded campaigns. (2) Seventy-four percent of voters support a proposal for voluntary public funding of federal elections (57% strongly) with only 16% opposed.
  • Support for public financing of Congressional elections cross all party lines. Eighty percent of Democrats, 78% of Independents, and 65% of Republicans support this reform.
  • Support of this reform is strong across demographic and regional groups. This reform enjoys strong support across gender lines, age groups, and regionally–garnering no less than 60% support and in most cases around three-quarters support.

[…]

Fully 82% of voters believe it is likely, as a result of publicly financed elections, that candidates will win on their ideas, not because of the money they raise, and 81% believe it is likely politicians will be more accountable to voters instead of large contributors.

This is the problem with the media as it exists today: it portrays common sense ideas that some politicians have as being wildly out of the mainstream. Being a liberal or a progressive or whatever the media would like to call it – it’s a strawman that doesn’t hold up to even the most basic of analysis. People want the troops to start coming home. They believe Iraq was a big mistake. And after we take care of that pressing matter, universal health care is next on the list. Public campaign financing is overwhelmingly supported. If someone advocates ideas that will restore faith in the government by making it work for the people, why is it seemingly portrayed as something radical?

Being a progressive is what being in the mainstream is about. John Edwards recognizes this, and that’s probably a good explanation as to why he’s been outpacing the competition to date. As this article demonstrates, there’s going to be a concerted effort to tear down the progressive efforts of Edwards and others around the country. It’s up to us to point out the truth – that the naysayers are the ones who are in the extreme.

Progressive Wave: We need your help!

(cross-posted at Daily Kos)

A couple days ago, I posted about a new blog I am starting with the help of others. It’s called Progressive Wave, and our stated goal is clear: we will be blogging about, in the form of primarily citizen journalism with some traditional blogging (hard to make it down to Washington, D.C., for example), our new representatives and senators in Congress. As of right now, we have people who will be blogging for us in the following districts and states: AZ-08, PA-07, PA-08, CA-11, KY-03, NY-19, NY-20, and VA-Sen. We have had others express interest in IA-01 and CT-02 as well, but I do not have concrete commitments for them. Even if your district (or one you’d be interested in) is already covered, please feel free to blog for us – the more we can spread the load around within a district, the better it works out for all of us.

Below, you’ll find a general description of what Progressive Wave is all about. I hope you can help us out. Thanks!
It’s great to see citizen journalism in action. A project here at Daily Kos is picking up steam – where we ‘adopt’ a congressional committee and keep tabs on their progress. It’s a great idea, and by all means one that we should encourage; after all, a democracy thrives when its citizens participate actively within it.

Before the election I was thinking of taking a similar principle and applying it to our newly-elected Congresspersons and Senators in the U.S. Congress. Many of our newly-elected representatives come from extremely close races (such as Patrick Murphy in PA-08 or Joe Courtney in CT-02), or they are in areas that will make it a challenge for them to be re-elected every time they are up (Nick Lampson in TX-22 or Nancy Boyda in KS-02). While the Netroots-endorsed list has only included challengers, it’s inevitable that we will have to begin defending our incumbents, beginning in 2008.

And that’s where we come in.

The project I’ve been working on is entitled The Progressive Wave. Our slogan is ‘Not left, not right, but forward’. In the end, progressives of any stripe are about progress, and that is what our new representatives have a chance to do in Washington. In a sense, I view TPW as a step forward for the blogosphere as well. One of the things I learned about blogging firsthand about the CT-Sen race and the PA-08 race is that citizen journalism is incredibly useful tool for informing the blogosphere at large about the actual circumstances on the ground as it pertains to a race. No longer do we have to rely on traditional media sources for our information, but we can get an unfiltered view of what is occurring directly from the source.

What do I hope to accomplish with TPW? One thing I hope is that we can keep track of all our newly-elected representatives in their travails – whether it be those who held safe seats for us, such as Amy Klobachar in MN-Sen, or those who won by squeakers, such as Jon Tester in MT-Sen. We’ll be keeping a birds-eye view of the legislation they support, critiquing the speeches they give, and also acting as a sort of ‘accountability’ check on Democratic politicians. We don’t want to see those who represent the best and brightest of our future to become disappointments (a junior senator from Illinois comes to mind, at least for me). By informally tracking what they do – as well as attending events when they are in-state and writing about it – you have the power to keep the rest of us up to date. And come campaign time, we will be a veritable source of firsthand information from the ground about the race. Especially for House races, which occur every 2 years, it is paramount that we can report back what is occurring within the district.

What does it require from any of you? Not much, aside from a little of your time. I am aiming to have as many bloggers as possible join the project; we have somewhere around 35-40 House districts that need to be covered, as well as 8 senators (PA, RI, MT, MN, MD, OH, MO, VA) that will also need to be written about. After that, how much participation you’d like to put in is completely up to you. Personally, as I was quite involved in the PA-08 race, I will be attempting to speak with Congressman Murphy occasionally about the latest from Washington. I also hope to speak to some of his staff from the campaign about the field operation and the communications department. I consider this to be an ‘open-source’ blogging project in that there is no set or defined style one has to go about covering their representatives. You make the blog in your image.

That being said, we still need a lot of bloggers. I currently have a few people lined up so far for the following: NY-19, NY-20, AZ-05, AZ-08, VA-Sen, and CA-11. That being said, you can definitely blog those, along with any others you may be interested in. The only requirement of sorts is that it would be preferable that you live in-district, or if not, live within a reasonable distance such that you are not blogging about an area which you are unfamiliar with. If you are interested, please join our group over at DFALink. Our current working comments section can be found here. If you are unable to blog about the races, I’d appreciate any sort of technical support, particularly in the area of graphic design.

Ultimately, this is a project that, at its core, is about local politics. But in the age of the blogosphere, being connected to the Internet is incredibly important. The Progressive Wave is all about supporting our politicians who will move us forward in D.C., but it’s also about taking the blogosphere to the next level – citizen journalism. I hope you’ll join me for the ride.

Adopt a newly-elected congressperson!

(cross-posted at Daily Kos)

It’s great to see citizen journalism in action. A project here at Daily Kos is picking up steam – where we ‘adopt’ a congressional committee and keep tabs on their progress. It’s a great idea, and by all means one that we should encourage; after all, a democracy thrives when its citizens participate actively within it.

Before the election I was thinking of taking a similar principle and applying it to our newly-elected Congresspersons and Senators in the U.S. Congress. Many of our newly-elected representatives come from extremely close races (such as Patrick Murphy in PA-08 or Joe Courtney in CT-02), or they are in areas that will make it a challenge for them to be re-elected every time they are up (Nick Lampson in TX-22 or Nancy Boyda in KS-02). While the Netroots-endorsed list has only included challengers, it’s inevitable that we will have to begin defending our incumbents, beginning in 2008.

And that’s where we come in.
The project I’ve been working on is entitled The Progressive Wave. Our slogan is ‘Not left, not right, but forward’. In the end, progressives of any stripe are about progress, and that is what our new representatives have a chance to do in Washington. In a sense, I view TPW as a step forward for the blogosphere as well. One of the things I learned about blogging firsthand about the CT-Sen race and the PA-08 race is that citizen journalism is incredibly useful tool for informing the blogosphere at large about the actual circumstances on the ground as it pertains to a race. No longer do we have to rely on traditional media sources for our information, but we can get an unfiltered view of what is occurring directly from the source.

What do I hope to accomplish with TPW? One thing I hope is that we can keep track of all our newly-elected representatives in their travails – whether it be those who held safe seats for us, such as Amy Klobachar in MN-Sen, or those who won by squeakers, such as Jon Tester in MT-Sen. We’ll be keeping a birds-eye view of the legislation they support, critiquing the speeches they give, and also acting as a sort of ‘accountability’ check on Democratic politicians. We don’t want to see those who represent the best and brightest of our future to become disappointments (a junior senator from Illinois comes to mind, at least for me). By informally tracking what they do – as well as attending events when they are in-state and writing about it – you have the power to keep the rest of us up to date. And come campaign time, we will be a veritable source of firsthand information from the ground about the race. Especially for House races, which occur every 2 years, it is paramount that we can report back what is occurring within the district.

What does it require from any of you? Not much, aside from a little of your time. I am aiming to have as many bloggers as possible join the project; we have somewhere around 35-40 House districts that need to be covered, as well as 8 senators (PA, RI, MT, MN, MD, OH, MO, VA) that will also need to be written about. After that, how much participation you’d like to put in is completely up to you. Personally, as I was quite involved in the PA-08 race, I will be attempting to speak with Congressman Murphy occasionally about the latest from Washington. I also hope to speak to some of his staff from the campaign about the field operation and the communications department. I consider this to be an ‘open-source’ blogging project in that there is no set or defined style one has to go about covering their representatives. You make the blog in your image.

That being said, we still need a lot of bloggers. I currently have a few people lined up so far for the following: NY-19, NY-20, AZ-05, AZ-08, VA-Sen, and CA-11. That being said, you can definitely blog those, along with any others you may be interested in. The only requirement of sorts is that it would be preferable that you live in-district, or if not, live within a reasonable distance such that you are not blogging about an area which you are unfamiliar with. If you are interested, please join our group over at DFALink. Our current working comments section can be found here. If you are unable to blog about the races, I’d appreciate any sort of technical support, particularly in the area of graphic design.

Ultimately, this is a project that, at its core, is about local politics. But in the age of the blogosphere, being connected to the Internet is incredibly important. The Progressive Wave is all about supporting our politicians who will move us forward in D.C., but it’s also about taking the blogosphere to the next level – citizen journalism. I hope you’ll join me for the ride.

PA-08: Election Night memories

(cross-posted at Deny My Freedom and Daily Kos)

It’s been a few days since that night, but I thought I’d take some time to recap my Election Night. Originally, I had only intended to attend the post-election party for PA-08 Democratic candidate Patrick Murphy, as I had prior academic obligations that I needed to tend to. Nevertheless, I found some time to make it out to the district for some very hurried GOTV work before heading over to the party and having a hell of a night. The campaign had planned 3 waves of GOTV effort, and I made it to campaign headquarters around 4:30 in the afternoon, shortly before the last wave was scheduled to hit the pavement. Water bottles were collected, people collected flashlights for the after-dark canvassing, and then it was time for us to head out. This was it – the final push to make sure we got everyone out to vote. After nearly 10 weekends of volunteering for the campaign, it was coming down to who had the better ground game. Patrick’s campaign had well over 1,000 volunteers in the entire district – an astounding number of people sacrificing their time to help get him elected. Before we headed out, though, we had a pep talk from the man himself…

Patrick emerged from the back to a raucous round of applause from the canvassers who had been gathering for the final wave. He came around and shook hands with those before climbing up on the desk and addressing the crowd. He thanked us for all of our hard work, but he pleaded that everyone get out there, no matter how tired they were. It was the most exciting day of his life, he said, and it was a great sight to see – a true leader rallying the ground troops for one last asphalt assault. He only spoke briefly, as we all had to get going (and so did he – he ended up visiting 35 polling places during the entire day, which was quite a feat considering just how large the district it), but it was the inspiration we all needed to get out for the last 3 hours for our candidate.

Our driver to our turf that night was CJ, one of Patrick’s fellow soldiers whom he met at West Point. He hadn’t particularly been that involved with the race, but as the weeks counted down towards Election Day, Patrick had placed a call to CJ and asked him to come down and help out with the effort. Indeed, he was extremely tired from the work he had been doing; before Patrick came out to speak, he had dozed off in the field office out of exhaustion. The man has a killer Dave Chappelle imitation, I must say, even if he was tired. My canvassing partner was a fellow college student from Princeton who had made the trip out to Bucks County to volunteer for the day – around his classes, of course. I consider myself a political junkie, but he far outclassed me in his knowledge of the demographic breakdown of races around the country. It was extremely enjoyable to talk about politics with someone who could teach me a thing or two. In addition, two girls from a religious university in Washington, D.C. had made the trip up to get out the vote for Patrick. I was extremely impressed with the turnout from their school; they managed to bring 30 College Democrats up to Bucks County to help out. Compared with the 4 students who came from Princeton, along with those that came from Penn, it shows that there are several vibrant College Democrats chapters around the country – and it gives me hope that the organization, even if it is an utter failure at the national level, will be able to succeed due to the individually motivated local chapters.

I ended up hitting two neighborhoods that night – one in Bristol Township, and one in Bristol Boro. I’m not exactly sure what the difference between the two is, but Bristol was part of Patrick’s base. The sun had just set when we arrived, and we wasted no time in getting to work. Ordinarily, you tend to walk at a someone casual pace during canvassing, but this was the end, so we literally hit the ground running for almost 3 hours straight. We ran from door to door, knocking on doors and making sure to remind people to vote. Midterm elections usually see lower turnout than presidential elections, but nearly everyone I spoke to had voted or were about to go vote. A couple of people hadn’t voted yet, and I informed them of where their polling location was. There were a few grumpy others who said they didn’t vote (that angered me, as usual), and there were even a few on my list who said they didn’t vote for Patrick or were downright hostile. I’m not sure how they made it onto my canvassing list (which was the same fantastic format as it had been in the last couple of weeks – addresses on front, map on back), but I simply proceeded to run off their driveway to the next one. After completing one neighborhood in less than an hour, we stopped back at the headquarters to grab a drink and drive off to the next turf. Unfortunately, because we were ambitious and took on two adjacent turfs simultaneously, we were unable to finish both. While we waited to get picked up, we got news that Brad Ellsworth was already shellacking John Hostettler in IN-08, while John Donnelly, Baron Hill, and John Yarmuth were already leading in IN-02, IN-09, and KY-03, respectively. I was worn out already, but you could tell that the night was getting off to a good start.

We got picked up from our turf and headed over to a nearby Sheraton, where the post-election party was just getting underway. More people were filtering in, and I grabbed a couple of sandwiches and a lot of water before breaking out my laptop. I had difficulty finding a place to sit, so I ended up setting up shop on a stand with a waiter’s tray on it. Surfing many of the smaller blogs was unsuccessful due to undoubtedly through-the-roof traffic, so I stuck with Daily Kos and the official websites that were posting returns. VA-Sen was not looking too promising, but the statewide Pennsylvania races – PA-Gov and PA-Sen – were called for us even before the returns began filtering in. In an ironic twist, the people watching the TV above had it tuned to Fox News; for whatever reason, we were having trouble getting CNN and MSNBC, and the people watching on the big screen had it tuned to the bastion of Election Night coverage known as…Dancing With The Stars. I think a little part of me died when I recognized that ABC was deciding to broadcast garbage like that instead of fully covering the election.

After a while, I headed into the press room – only to find that there were barely any press there. Instead, there was a large host of College Democrats watching TV on a laptop on one side, and a couple of us bloggers – myself, Booman, and CabinGirl – were there surfing the Internet, with a few curious observers surrounding us. Also present was Delaware Dem, who seemed to be enjoying himself and his drinks 🙂 , blogosphere legal expert Adam B, and Philadelphia grassroots organizer extraordinaire Anne Dicker, who was the one who had given me my first ride out to Bucks County to meet Patrick Murphy almost a year earlier. For the most part, myself and Booman chatted about the seats we thought we’d pick up, as well as talking a lot about the incoming results for the VA-Sen race. There was great excitement when more races started rolling in, and a couple of surprises began to come in, such as our eventual triumph in KS-02. On the other hand, it was extremely disappointing to see us lose 3 upstate districts in New York – NY-25, NY-26, and NY-29 – that we should have won. We continued to track Patrick’s race via the Bucks County website, which showed the results from the county that comprises 96% of the district (parts of Northeast Philadelphia and Montgomery County are also in the district). With his intial lead continuing to shrink as the results came in, it became quite the nailbiter. After a while, the wireless connection became so unreliable that I ended up giving up at one point and largely cribbed off of what was showing on TV (Rick Santorum’s concession speech was particularly sweet) and from looking at Booman’s computer.

Eventually, I got a hard-line connection and began looking at all the other races – I was particularly worried about MO-Sen, as Talent was showing around a 5-6% lead at this point. In a few minutes, Webb had miraculously surpassed Allen in VA-Sen, which had me even more disappointed that we could win in Virginia but lose the Senate in Missouri. Nevertheless, after the College Democrats had filtered out, a bunch of local Democratic and labor officials began to crowd around Booman (not facing camera, with the red hat) and CabinGirl’s laptop, essentially appropriating them for their own use. By this time, Patrick’s early advantage in Bucks County had all but disappeared, and there was rapid calculation going on all around in trying to get results from Philadelphia and Montgomery Counties. Using the CNN’s election website, we were able to determine that Patrick was leading by roughly 1000-vote margins in each of the other counties, meaning that those leads would have to hold up for him to win. Fitzpatrick eventually surpassed Patrick in Bucks, and there were many phone calls made as we tried to figure exactly what the results were in the outstanding precincts. Someone pulled over a free-standing canvass with paper on it and beginning trying to tally the results. We figured that Patrick had a 3-digit lead at this point, and the media room was extremely tense, even though we believed we would win, albeit by an extremely narrow margin. Someone then walked in and announced the final results in Philadelphia and Montgomery, along with the remaining precincts in Bucks, and quick calculations were done – and Patrick came out ahead by about 1300-1400 votes. Yes, we merry band of bloggers were there when we called the election for our candidate to deafening yells of triumph and celebration as those outside stood around wondering why we were so excited. In a few more moments, we heard the same celebration occurring outside as well. I shook Booman’s hand and headed out to the main ballroom for Patrick’s impending victory speech. With such a small margin, all of us on this campaign – every staffer, every canvasser, every phonebanker, every blogger – we had collectively helped a wonderfully charismatic young man, a political neophyte, over the top against a Republican congressman who had spent his entire life in public service and was thought of as ‘moderate’ enough to even get the Sierra Club endorsement.

I think even Patrick was overwhelmed when he got to the stage after the crowd had long gotten tired of the Bucks County Democratic chair shooting the wind a bit too long. It was perhaps the most humble political speech you’ll ever hear. Patrick had apparently been told that Fitzpatrick was conceding – but by one of the congressman’s staffers, not by the incumbent himself. He thanked all of us for all the work we had done for him. He took time out to thank his family as well, and he spoke a little bit about the things he planned on fighting for – embryonic stem cell research, minimum wage increases, and affordable health care for everyone, as well as Iraq, of course. Some of the staffers from the campaign were getting emotional as he continued to speak; I can only imagine what it must have felt like for all of them to pour their hearts and their souls into a campaign every day – and to win by such a slim margin at that. In the end, Patrick told us he’d make us proud again – after a time when the GOP made us ashamed of being humans – and with that, he ended his speech to wild cheering and applause from the crowd.

I moved my way up through the crowd to shake Patrick’s hand one last time. “Thank you for everything,” I said. “Congratulations, Congressman.”

He’ll make us all proud.

Tomorrow

(cross-posted at Deny My Freedom and Daily Kos)

November 7, 2006.

It’s a date that has been on everyone’s minds since John Kerry conceded the presidential election on November 3, 2004. I have a wristband from Think Blue that I’ve worn every day since then. Two years ago, it was a dark time for our country: a president who didn’t deserve to be in office to begin with had been re-elected, and a congressional majority that had served as a rubber stamp got even bigger.

But you know why we fought on? Because we knew that tomorrow, regardless of what had happened yesterday and today, would always come.

And now it’s here. Tomorrow, we will be heard again.
All of us will at least vote tomorrow. But we have to do more than that. Our country owes an immeasurable amount for the grief, the rage, and the sorrow that this administration has caused, for its incompetence, for its treason. My generation – those of us coming of age now – are the ones who will pay the greatest price in the future for the actions of today. It is we who will have to shoulder the budget deficits that have doubled our national debt. It is we who will have to find some way to take care of our seniors because of the lack of funds for Social Security. It is we who will have to find some way to ensure all Americans can receive health care from a system that is broken beyond belief. It is we who will have to repair the image of America, bit by bit, so that it once again reflects the best our country has to offer – not the darkest demons of human nature.

So tomorrow, we will give it all. If you have work, skip it. If you have classes, skip them. Unless it is a matter of life or death, it is imperative that we do everything we can tomorrow to return America to itself.

Do it for those who died on September 11 because of this administration’s failure to heed intelligence warnings.

Do it for the men and women my age who have given their lives for a war that has no just cause.

Do it for those who died in Hurricane Katrina because of our government’s abject failure to prepare for it.

Do it for the veterans whose sacrifice our government has failed to honor by cutting their benefits.

Do it for the millions of diseased men, women, and children who are hanging in the balance because we cannot fund the science that could very well cure them.

Do it for the millions of families throughout America who go every waking moment hoping that nothing goes wrong because they can’t afford health insurance.

Do it for those who can’t live a better life because Congress won’t raise the minimum wage.

Do it for our senior citizens, who are being forced to pay much higher prices on their drugs due to Medicare ‘reform’.

Do it for the millions of Americans who face financial peril because of the bankruptcy bill.

Do it for those who can no longer seek true justice because of ‘tort reform’.

Do it for our planet, which is racing to the brink of destruction because of global warming.

Do it for the American worker, who has seen their job get shipped overseas, never to come back. Do it for them because our government refuses to pay them to get retrained in another occupation.

Do it for those who have been tortured by us, who have had their rights denied by us, because everyone is a human being and inherently has a set of inalienable rights.

Do it for all Americans, who now have to live in fear that their every waking move is being seen or heard or recorded.

Do it because the following people in our government have made our country worse off, less safe, and widely disdained: George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell, Condoleeza Rice, John Ashcroft, Alberto Gonzales, Paul Wolfowitz, John Bolton, John Negroponte, Paul Bremer, George Tenet, Porter Goss, Michael Hayden, Tom Ridge, Michael Chertoff, Stephen Hadley, Richard Perle, Ari Fleischer, Scott McClelland, Tony Snow, John Roberts, Samuel Alito, and every single Republican member in Congress.

The list could go on, but the message is clear enough: America has had enough.

Tomorrow, we begin the long process of taking back our country. But it’s crucial that each and every one of us takes action.

Because one day, tomorrow may never come. And then it will be too late.

PA-08: My final ground report (with Al Gore!)

(cross-posted at Deny My Freedom and Daily Kos)

I first met PA-08 Democratic candidate Patrick Murphy almost 1 year ago. It wasn’t a big event – we cleared leaves from the local YMCA parking lot and playgrounds with the other candidate in the running for the nomination, former Bucks County commissioner Andy Warren. I didn’t know much about Patrick, but I had heard his biography – Iraq war veteran, law professor, and all-around stand-up guy – and came away very impressed with him as a candidate. He’s come a long way since those days, when his candidacy was seen as something of a longshot due to being a political novice. Nevertheless, the latest polls show a very close race, and Patrick’s picked up the support of Democrats, Republicans, and independents throughout the district, as I’ve seen in the past.

Today was the last day I could volunteer for his campaign, but it was one hell of a day. Patrick’s going to be Representative Murphy in a few days, if this is any indication.
After getting a mere 3 1/2 hours of sleep, I hauled myself out of bed at the unseemly hour of 6:30 AM to meet up with a group of Penn College Democrats to attend an early-morning rally at the local Boilermaker union hall in Bucks County. Surprisingly, there were a dozen of us up at that early hour, mainly for one reason – former Vice President Al Gore was going to be attending the union rally, and that’s a chance in a lifetime that I wouldn’t miss for anything. After being adequately awakened by the below-freezing temperatures of the early morning, we piled into a couple of vans that staffers and volunteers had provided us with today. It was just the start of a very long day, but we managed to stay awake the whole ride, with some employing caffeine in its various forms (Starbucks coffee, Red Bull) to aid the process.

The Rally

When we arrived, the union hall was already packed with supporters, and as usual, the local candidates were warming up the crowd. Chris King, candidate for the 142nd District of the PA State House (on the left, but obscured by the balloons) spoke first. The focus of his speech largely consisted of talking about health care. He noted one really mean-spirited attack – his opponent cited him for receiving ‘free’ health care when he was working for the state government. Yet it is his opponent who is taking money from the health insurance companies that are killing ordinary people with their rapidly rising premiums. Afterwards, John Galloway, the Democratic candidate for the 140th District of the State House, took the stage briefly – literally; he only spoke for one minute, so I honestly do not remember much of what he had to say. The next two speakers were 10th District State Senate candidate Chris Serpico and 6th District State Senate candidate Paul Lang, a disabled Coast Guard veteran who had initially been another potential challenger in the 8th Congressional District before he endorsed Patrick. As he spoke about the need to clean house in Harrisburg, a (previously) unnanounced guest came on the stage to take the floor with Patrick coming shortly behind.

Former senator Max Cleland (D-GA), the victim of one of the worst smear jobs in the history of elected politics in our country, came onstage to a round of rousing applause. The man has led an incredible life after the Vietnam War, and his fighting spirit is still alive and well. He took numerous shots at the Republicans, noting that after Cheney had shot someone, “he was the only one with combat experience in the White House.” The crowd loved him, and I think that Cleland feeds off the energy he gets at these events. I don’t think he’s ever forgotten what happened to him in the 2002 election, and he brought a fire to his speech, talking about how much the Bush administration has screwed up. In addition, he took some good-natured ribbing at Patrick’s youth, noting how at West Point, Patrick was often mistaken as a cadet instead of the constitutional law professor that he was. It was then time for him to introduce Patrick as a man who will be getting two Christmas gifts – a newborn son and becoming the next Congressman from the 8th District. He got a similarly rousing round of applause from the crowd, and I think both he and Cleland are very close.

Initially, Patrick was supposed to be the very quick filler between Senator Cleland and the two Democrats at the top of the ticket in Pennsylvania, PA-Sen Democratic nominee Bob Casey, Jr. and Governor Ed Rendell. After speaking a little bit about what he saw in Iraq, he introduced Rendell and Casey – to a lot of music but no appearance. It was apparent that Rendell and Casey, who are touring the state together in these last days of the campaign, were late, so Patrick told them to shut the music off. “I won’t sing for you,” he laughed. “My wife said that if I ever sang at one of these rallies, she’d become a Republican again.” The crowd roared with laughter, and Patrick returned to speaking about the issues, particularly embryonic stem cell research (his opponent, freshman GOP Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick, voted against it twice). Rendell and Casey finally showed up, and Patrick spoke for only a little longer before giving way to the next Senator from Pennsylvania – the man who is going to end the sad career of Senator Rick Santorum – Bob Casey.

A lot of people have this image of Casey being a very technocratic, ‘wooden’ politician. The positions he’s held at the state level – Auditor General and State Treasurer – aren’t glamorous positions, but he has been very effective in doing the people’s work in those positions, particularly in discovering wasteful spending. But the perception is a bit off; as Atrios noted on Thursday, Casey is actually a very down-to-earth guy. He had great fun cracking jokes – he thanked Rendell for starting the ‘Casey, Casey’ chant, and he mocked Rick Santorum’s ads that showed his face followed by mushroom clouds. “Do you really think I can do that?” he asked in a rhetorically funny way; Cleland in particular got a good laugh out of that line. Casey largely spoke in generalities about the need for change in Washington – and running against Santorum, it’s easy enough to win an election simply by running against the status quo – but in particular, he noted two issues – health care and Iraq – that he wanted to work on when he got to Washington. He gave credit to Rendell, who’s been working on an initiative to get universal health care for all kids in Pennsylvania, and he said that Santorum has only come up with 2 new ideas since he arrived in Washington: privatizing Social Security and privatizing the National Weather Service. Of course, there have been numerous statements, notably one involving man and man’s best friend, but Casey has been able to stay ahead of Santorum without the need to rely on the particularly outrageous statements Santorum has made in the past.

Rendell was the next speaker, and as is his style, he began by firing off a few quick crowd-pleasers. The man is the consummate politicians, and people in the Philadelphia area, including the suburbs, absolutely love him. He comes off as an ordinary guy just chatting with a group of people, and it’s no wonder that he is able to connect so quickly with people. After acknowledging Casey, Patrick, and Cleland, Rendell spoke about Fitzpatrick’s claim that Patrick does not have the requisite political experience to be a Congressman. In what is an obvious statement, he noted that his GOP opponent in the gubernatorial race – football player Lynn Swann (who Casey, if I recall correctly, said would be back to being an ABC sports broadcaster after the election) – is similarly lacking in political experience. It’s the hypocrisy that really sticks out, and Rendell called them out on it straight up. After letting ‘West Wing’ actress Melissa Fitzgerald take the floor for a few minutes, Rendell had the humorous task of announcing to the crowd that a car with a particular license plate number needed to be moved so that Gore could arrive. Although Rendell said he could ‘go on until 3 o’clock’ speaking about what he had done for Pennsylvania, he did overrun his time a little bit as he started speaking about education, the minimum wage, and alternative energy. He noted that the state was the largest producer of renewable energy east of the Mississippi.

I’m not a West Wing junkie (I’ve only seen a couple random episodes of the show), so I’m not particularly familiar with the character that Melissa Fitzgerald portrayed on the show. Nevertheless, she certainly was a lively speaker (afterwards, Rendell asked the crowd, ‘Now what do you think about her as a candidate, eh?’), and she implored all of us to vote. The country has been heading down the wrong direction at an exceedingly fast pace, she stated, and that’s why we needed to do all we can to get Democrats elected. She spoke about the reason why we were all there – because we cared. It’s because of that deep-seated feeling that something is horribly wrong that we need to talk to each and every person and tell them to vote. She’s proud to be a Democrat, a Pennsylvanian, and it’s time for us to be proud to be American again.

After Rendell noted one of his accomplishments, the crowd applauded for longer than usual. Through the entrance in the back, it was clear that the man of the hour had finally arrived, and Rendell noted how this person had always been prescient, and how America ‘had made a huge mistake six years ago’. As the DNC chairman at the time, Rendell got to know him quite a bit, and it was a reunion of sorts when he was finally introduced by the governor as ‘the former Vice President of the United States, the best Vice President this country has ever had…Al Gore.’

December 13, 2000 is a day that I will never forget. I was only 14 years old at the time, but watching Gore give his concession speech from the White House, one could sense that something terrible had gone wrong. You can watch An Inconvenient Truth and wonder what could have been, but it’s an entirely different experience when you see the person who should’ve been president speaking right in front of you. Gore opened with the usual niceties – Casey is a long-time friend of his; he lauded Rendell’s record on biofuels and non-pollutive sources of power such as the sun and the wind; he complimented Patrick on his excellent campaign; and he recounted an incident when he was a freshman Congressman in 1976. He couldn’t get his car to start, so he hitchhiked a ride back to his house. The person who gave him a ride? Max Cleland, who was then the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

Although I was expecting Gore to mainly focus on environmental issues when he spoke, I was surprised at the tack he took. Aside from noting Rendell’s accomplishments, the vice president launched into a wonderful speech about the Founding Fathers. Clearly, he understood the context in which he was speaking. He spoke about Thomas Paine, Benjamin Franklin, and the rest of the the illustrious men who wrote the Constitution. In a moment of sadly humorous irony, Gore noted that they were resisting King George (he then went on to playfully chide Rendell that it wasn’t America’s fault 2000, a reference to the fact that he did win the popular vote; however, he did not press the matter further), and that when writing the Constitution, there was a reason that Congress – not the other branches of the government – was cited in Article I: it was meant to be an ‘independent check on the executive branch’. He noted how the Republican-controlled Congress had been a rubber stamp, agreeing to Bush’s requests even before a question was asked. If the Founders were to view what we had done today – whether it be going into Iraq, spying on our own citizens improperly, turning a budget surplus into record deficits – they would have been sorely disappointed. This fall, Gore told us, we were sending three messages: first, we were telling Dick Cheney that it’s a no-brainer that Democrats should be elected; second, we were sending a message to George W. Bush that we were going to ‘hold him accountable’ for what he has done (and has yet to do), a line that drew a lot of applause; and finally, that we were going to send a message to the Founders, from the state where the Constitution was written, that American democracy was still alive and well.

Al Gore could still be the president. He has the passion and the fire that so many Democrats lack nowadays. Afterwards, I absent-mindedly shook Rendell’s hand and greeted Patrick for what seemed like the millionth time before Gore made his way down to the rope line. I regret that I left my copy of the vice president’s extremely prescient Earth in the Balance at home, as having it autographed would have made my year. Nevertheless, he finally came around, and I knew he was running short on time (he was scheduled to hold similar rallies today with PA-07 Democratic candidate Joe Sestak), so I couldn’t ask him the question I really wanted. Besides, when you have your political idol standing in front of you, one tends to lose their train of thought. After shaking his hand – Gore has a ‘strong, firm’ shake, as they would say in ‘Seinfeld’ – I simply blurted out what was at the top of my mind, trying to speak as loud as I could with my weakened voice:

Me: Mr. Vice President, I hope you run in 2008.

Gore: (in a sincere voice) Thank you.

And then he was gone, left to briefly greet the other politicians and union leaders there before heading over to PA-07. Take from that what you will…but more than ever, we need Al Gore to be elected to the position he rightfully earned six years ago: president of the United States.

—–

The Ground Report

With only a few days before the election, everything comes down to how the GOTV operation is run. Patrick’s campaign is running like a well-oiled machine, with an apparatus that could possibly be even better than that of CT-Sen Democratic nominee Ned Lamont – and that’s saying something. Today, the office was bustling with way more volunteers than had been present in the past. Around noontime, shortly after I had come back from my first trip out into the field, Patrick addressed a massive influx of volunteers who had come to help out with the GOTV operation. Standing atop of the desk in the middle of the campaign headquarters, he thanked everyone for their help and gave them a brief rundown of what was going to be happening in the last few days. Everyone was enthusiastic, and it’s great to see Patrick take such an active involvement in meeting those who are volunteering their free time to make sure he gets elected. All day, people were flowing in and out of the office, and I would venture to say that there may have been over 100 volunteers – in this office alone. I was shocked to hear how many volunteers the campaign has signed up for Election Day; to say the least, it is going to be a spectacle to behold, and I’m just disappointed that I won’t be a part of it. I was so surprised that I asked a staffer if those volunteers included those from the Rendell/Casey GOTV operation (they are doing a joint one), but it’s true – the amazing number of volunteers are just for Patrick’s campaign alone.

Today’s objective wasn’t the typical canvassing. Instead, it was more of a race against the clock to see just how much ground we could cover, as time will be everything on Election Day. As I noted previously, the canvassing sheets were in great order once again – map on the front, addresses on the back, for a grand total of one sheet of paper. In the past, I had usually only covered one neighborhood in the afternoons; today, I was able to hit the streets in three different areas around the district as part of the effort to spread the word about Tuesday’s crucial vote. The neighborhoods I visited were, in order:

– a working-class neighborhood in Bristol:

– a working/middle-class neighborhood in Morrisville:

– a middle/upper-class neighborhood in Falls:

Because this was more of a time trial than anything else, I didn’t really stop and chat with the folks in the areas I visited. That being said, a couple of people spoke to me. As I approached one house, a very cute black dog approached me warily. Two guys standing by a truck across the street said, “Don’t worry, he won’t bite.” I gave the dog a pet, and they called out, “So you’re a Republican, eh?” I answered negatively, saying I was out hitting the streets for Rendell and Murphy. They nodded, saying, “It’s time for a change…we know who to vote for.” It’s good to hear that people are sick and tired of what’s been going on. A woman I spoke to in Falls noted that she’d received our flyer already, but she noted, “The system’s broken…it needs change.” We may be criticized for our policy stances, but simply put, people are well aware of the damage that unchecked GOP rule has caused to the country. They’re realizing that the madness, the insanity that this administration keeps pushing daily – it has to come to a stop. As I drove to and from canvassing, one driver noted that some enterprising individuals had put up a bunch of ‘Bush for Fitzpatrick’ signs around the county – and that they had all but been pulled out of the lawns that they had appeared in. A new lawn sign for Fitzpatrick spouted up today – ‘Working Families for Mike Fitzpatrick’ – but what is that supposed to mean? It’s not a political party, as it is in New York; instead, it’s just another effort by Fitzpatrick to position himself further and further away from the Republican Party. For example, let’s peruse a piece of direct-mail literature that the incumbent is sending out:

Notice that nowhere on the flyer does it mention that Fitzpatrick is a Republican. All of his campaign signs do not state his party affiliation. The big signs around the district put at major intersections say ‘Elect Fitzpatrick’ – clearly trying to stem a possible anti-incumbent vote and trying to make low-information voters think he is a new face in town. But the more interesting piece of literature that Fitzpatrick’s canvassers were leaving – and the only acknowledgement to date that the 72-hour Republican GOTV operation is underway – is this:

That’s a copied letter hand-written by Mike Fitzpatrick’s mother, courtesy of one of Patrick’s supporters who found it on their doorstep. In an attempt to make it seem even more personal, she wrote her home address on the top, which I painted over. To me, this is a clear sign of desperation on Fitzpatrick’s campaign. The letter isn’t even particularly substantive, as it tries to play on Fitzpatrick’s ties to the community (he was born there and has lived there his entire life) and on just how proud his mother is of him. I honestly don’t know how effective such a gambit may be; I would hope that voters are able to look past a transparently-designed political ploy and evaluate the candidates on the issues, not on what one family member says about their son. Nevertheless, I’m sure that a lot of people will be seeing this on their doors in the district soon enough. If another one of Patrick’s supporters receives it, perhaps they should actually pay Mrs. Fitzpatrick a visit and ask if her son shows ‘real concern’ for members of the community, why does he support continuing to put our soldiers in harm’s way in Iraq? Why does he vote against embryonic stem cell research, a science that could save the lives of millions who have no hope? I think it’s fair game; if she wants to put her address on the letter, it shows a clear willingness to engage in a discussion.

—–

Final Words

I first met Patrick last year, but as I’ve gotten to know him much better in the past 2 months, it’s clear that he will be an excellent representative that all of us – not just his constituents, but his supporters in the netroots community around the country – can be proud of. He is a true progressive, he has detailed policy positions, and he is someone who has a long, bright future ahead of him in politics. It’s been an honor volunteering my time for his campaign, and although I will not be available to help his GOTV operation, I will be liveblogging the post-election party. If you are available to volunteer any time between now and the election, please do so. If you need some inspiration, consider the excellent incentives the campaign is providing. It’s the best meal I had in a while:

As Al Gore said today, we, the people, are the fourth branch of this democracy. On Tuesday, not only in PA-08 but around the country, we will be heard again. The people of America will send a message loud and clear to the rest of the world, one that will be embodied by the likes of people such as Patrick.

It’s time for a change.