Book Review: The Bridge, The Life and Rise of Barack Obama by David Remnick

The Bridge by David Remnick, Knopf (April 6, 2010)

Reprinted from the New York Journal of Books

 “Barack Obama is what comes at the end of that bridge in Selma.” —Congressman John Lewis

David Remnick, Editor-in-Chief of the New Yorker magazine, has stitched together a great book, The Bridge: The Life and Rise of Barack Obama.

Remnick is also the author of several earlier books, most notably Lenin’s Tomb: The Last Days of the Soviet Empire and The King of the World: Muhammad Ali and the Rise of an American Hero. The former deservedly won Remnick the Pulitzer Prize in 1994, and the latter book is the story of boxing legend Muhammad Ali.
The Bridge: The Life and Rise of Barack Obama was particularly resonant for this reviewer, as I am the author of another book concerning Obama’s path to the presidency.

In The Bridge, Remnick constructs sentences that are gripping and compelling. His research of his subject is also top notch, in part because he secured interviews that eluded others. Ben Smith of Politico complained he tried to get Bill Ayers and others who attended an event when Obama was running for Illinois State Senate, to discuss the event at Ayers’s home. The 2008 Republican Vice-Presidential candidate Sarah Palin attempted and failed to make an issue of Obama’s relationship of Ayers and futilely referred to Obama “palling around with terrorists.” But it took Remnick to actually get the interviews necessary for a clear narrative.

“When I first wrote about that gathering at Ayers’s and Bernadine Dohrn’s house that helped launch his political career, it took days to get two people who had been there to confirm the event happened. But the same people—including Ayers —are far more comfortable talking to the editor of the New Yorker after the election has passed and, ironically, telling a story that helps confirm Obama’s centrist past and give the lie to some of the more strident depictions of him today.”

A strength of Remnick’s book is that he interviewed many to whom others lacked access, in large part due to his tenacity, and dare I say, audacity. While not on the scene for many of the events described, Remnick’s access and analysis enabled him to masterfully recreate them. And like other great historians such as Doris Kearns Goodwin in the Team of Rivals, David McCullough in Truman, and Stephen Ambrose in Undaunted Courage, Remnick puts you there.

The Bridge is a must read for anyone fascinated by American History, or by Barack Obama. At this point in time, there there are a growing number of Obama books, but precious few that cover Obama’s rise from early childhood to his emergence into manhood. Indeed, The Bridge is the most comprehensive work to date. Most know and have read about Obama’s controversial relationship with the Reverend Jeremiah Wright and many may have seen interviews with two of Obama’s close friends and aides, David Axelrod and Valerie Jarrett. But Remnick also details the roles of lesser-known Obama associates such as Jerry Kellman, Bettylu Saltzman, Ron Davis, Al Kindle, Toni Preckwinkle, Will Burns, and many with an important role at seminal moments in Obama’s life.

Remnick interviewed all of these people and reveals much that has never before been public; this intelligence will no doubt be often cited as primary source for historians writing about this Presidency hundreds of years from now. Obama has a chance to achieve that same greatness as Presidents Abraham Lincoln and Franklin Roosevelt because achieving greatness is not possible without the nation being in crisis. As Lincoln and FDR before him, Obama was elected at a time of crisis. With the banking system on the verge of collapse and an increasingly unpopular war being fought in Iraq, Obama immediately took control and inspired confidence. Remnick tells the story in an engaging way.

The Bridge makes clear that Obama has no intention of becoming just another ordinary President, but wants and needs to be remembered as somebody who made a difference.

As evidence of this and Obama’s striving to excel, this boundless energy is taking shape in the early days of the Obama Presidency. The stock market, as an economic barometer of the future, is telling us that things are getting better and it may one day be referred to as the “Obama rally.” And the evidence is clear that the bleeding in employment has subsided with the March 2010 labor report showing an additional 136,000 jobs added to the economy with many economists predicting a sea change in this direction. The passage of an economic stimulus package is reaping many of these employment benefits, as will the historic passage of the most significant legislation since the passage of Medicare: the health care reform bill.

The Obama Presidency is on its way. Barack Obama is the ultimate student. When he came into the United States Senate, he was reading Master of the Senate by Robert Caro to gain insight into the workings of the Senate. Obama then devoured books about Franklin Roosevelt when it became obvious to him he would be elected in late 2008 and applied what he had learned about how Roosevelt dealt with the Depression in his decision-making as President.

And during the health care debate in Congress, Obama found his inner LBJ, who had a way of dealing with Congress that Obama studied and absorbed through books about President Johnson.

Don Hewitt, the producer of 60 Minutes, often admonished his reporters in four words, “Tell me a story.” This book, The Bridge, indeed tells us all a story. Some of the content perhaps we had heard before. But there are surprises, and the book will fascinate those eager to know more. In short, Remnick answers the most basic question, but one not answered until now: Where did Barack Obama come from and what makes him tick?

The story of Barack Obama begins with his childhood in Hawaii, and later his move to Indonesia and then back to Hawaii. Then to his college days, including a short stint in the Eagle Rock community of Los Angeles at Occidental College, and onto New York City to attend Columbia College and graduate. He then found his way to Chicago through Jerry Kellman. In Chicago he worked several different jobs, all low-paying, but for the young Obama, gratifying. Then to Cambridge, Massachusetts, to Harvard Law school, where he not only attended but also excelled and made an impact. And then back to Chicago for a bigger impact. Met Michelle Robinson. Married. Wrote a book that he thought sure would be a bestseller. It was, but not until much later than planned or expected.

Through this all, David Remnick places us there with Barack Obama and the people he met and interacted with on this journey. The book is a great mixture of personal detail of Obama’s life from a large variety of sources, including dozens of books. We meet friends, relatives, allies, acquaintances, and others that either had a direct or indirect influence on his life. The Bridge tells the tale of how Obama lost the 2000 Congressional race to Bobby Rush. And is if that were not humiliating enough, Obama could not gain entrance into the 2000 Democratic convention, and could barely pay for the trip because he had maxed out his credit card as a result of his ill-fated Congressional race. And then in the 2004 Democratic convention, Obama started on this road rock-stardom in giving a memorable speech that launched him onto the national stage. By 2008, when Barack Obama was the Democratic nominee for President, he owned the 2008 Democratic convention.

The book also relates many other interesting and never before revealed details, such as the admonishment of Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley about Obama’s running against Bobby Rush. “Why did you do that?” Daley asked. I could just imagine Daley telling Obama that it was “Silly, silly, silly.” But not so silly in the larger context of Obama’s life and history. Because had Obama won, it would have changed history. Had Obama not run, it would have changed history.

The Bridge, while groundbreaking, does not delve deeply enough into the grassroots efforts of the 2004 Senate campaign, which had its seeds planted in the 2000 Congressional campaign. These seeds were firmly planted on March 7, 2000, at a candidates’ forum held in the Beverly community of Chicago at Bethany Union Church. This forum was Obama’s “Coming Out” party—his first venture outside of Hyde Park. He mesmerized 600 voters, many of whom became lifetime supporters and grassroots volunteers. This event was one of the very few bright spots of the 2000 campaign, and was all the more significant because it is here that Obama met and enlisted many of his grassroots supporters and organizers. A newspaper columnist from the then Daily Southtown, Phil Kadner, passed off the event as being dull and ineffective in his March 8, 2000 column, but grudgingly acknowledged Obama’s impact:

“Talking to a handful of residents after the meeting, I would say that Obama was the most effective in pleading his case.

“‘I think Obama would be the most likely to sway opinions in Congress because he’s more eloquent,’” said one woman, pretty much summarizing Obama in his closing remarks.”

Obama confronted Kadner several years later and challenged Kadner’s views about that night. Kadner defended himself, and both men agreed to disagree—a common theme with Obama and his would-be detractors.

Remnick also passes off as “modest” the seeds of the “netroots” that formed in the summer of 2003 when volunteers outside of the inner circle of the campaign got involved with “meetup.com” and “Yahoo Groups for Obama.” It was these seeds that spread and grew throughout the campaign and were instrumental in recruiting volunteers throughout the state of Illinois and beyond. Further exploration of this period would have made for an even richer account of Obama’s rise.

Remnick found the title of his book in a quote by civil rights activist, author, and Congressman John Lewis who, during the most difficult days of the Civil Rights movement, led a march across the Edmund Pettus Bridge straight into a blockade set up by Alabama state troopers and the ensuing violent assault of these so-called officers of the law. The day before Obama’s Inauguration, which marked what would have been Martin Luther King’s eightieth birthday, Lewis told a visitor at his office in the Cannon House Office Building, “Barack Obama is what comes at the end of that bridge in Selma.”

The Bridge is rich in both factual detail and in its prose. Readers will find in this author’s voice both warmth and depth. At the end of “The Prologue: The Joshua Generation,” Remnick tells a touching story of the reenactment of the march across The Bridge in 2007. It reveals the compassionate and empathetic side of Obama that he acknowledges came from his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham.

“Unlike the ritual re-enactments of the Battle of Selma, the reenactments of the crossing of the Pettus Bridge involved no mock violence. The skirmishes were limited to the jostling of photographers trying to get a picture of the Clintons and Obama. Would they stand together and link arms? They would not. But they did share the front row with Lewis and Lowery and younger politicians like Arturo Davis. Along the way, Obama encountered Reverend Fred Shuttlesworth, a civil-rights icon in his mid-eighties, who had battled Bull Connor in Birmingham and survived beatings, bombings, and years of slanderous attack. Shuttlesworth had recently had a brain tumor removed, but he refused to miss the commemoration. On the bridge, he chatted awhile with Obama. And then Obama, who had read so much about the movement, who had dreamed about it, took off his jacket, rolled up his sleeve, popped a piece of Nicorette gum in his mouth, and helped push the wheelchair of Fred Shuttlesworth, across the bridge to the other side.”

As John Lewis said, it was Obama who was on the other side of the bridge, pushing those in need and followed by a large crowd of people of all races, beliefs, and creeds. Why did John Lewis cross the bridge? To get to the other side and find Barack Obama. In a larger sense, John Lewis found hope and change and what they were really fighting for all these many years: freedom.

John Presta is the author of Mr. and Mrs. Grassroots: How Barack Obama, Two Bookstore Owners, and 300 Volunteers Did It. He is also a regular contributor to the political blog, The Daily Kos, and is a columnist at the Chicago Examiner as the Chicago City Hall Examiner and the Chicago Grassoots Examiner.

Book Review: Mr. and Mrs. Grassroots: How Barack Obama Did It

Columnist’s note: The book review below has been reprinted in its entirety with the permission of the book reviewer, Dr. Quina Whitted, Associate Professor of English and African-American Studies at the University of South Carolina. I am grateful to Dr. Whitted for the kind and generous words about my upcoming book, Mr. and Mrs. Grassroots: How Barack Obama, Two Bookstore Owners, and 300 Volunteers Did It. You can read Dr. Whitted’s great literary blog at www.Literary Obama.com.

Appearing exactly one year into Barack Obama’s presidency, Mr. and Mrs. Grassroots: How Barack Obama, Two Bookstore Owners, and 300 Volunteers Did It takes us back to the early days of Obama’s political career and reminds us not of bumper sticker slogans and punditry blood sport, but of the hard work of campaigning – one handshake, one yard sign, one petition signature at a time.

Author John Presta is the co-owner of an independent Chicago bookstore who, along with his wife Michelle, became supporters of Obama’s vision shortly after his memoir, Dreams From My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance, appeared on their shelves. Indeed, the book is the driving force behind the efforts of Mr. and Mrs. Grassroots. Obama’s memoir encouraged the Prestas to learn more about the local community organizer who aspired to political office. But before becoming a best seller, Dreams From My Father sold poorly and was collecting dust around the time of Obama’s first failed run for Congress. Presta writes:

We kept his book on our shelves. In spite of the fact that the book was out-of-print. In spite of the fact that it was not our “modus operandi.” Books stay for so long and then move on. Sometime sixty, ninety days, at the most, unless they show saleability. It is that simple. We could not and would not give up on this book for emotional reasons. No one ever advised us not to get emotionally involved with our books. We would not and could not give up on the book or on Barack Obama.

Presta uses other well-known books and their plot points to convey the challenges and successes of Obama’s work with titles such as The Road Less Traveled, The Pied Piper, and stories by Dr. Suess. Popular publications such as The Da Vinci Code and Oprah’s Book Club selections help mark the ups and downs of the campaigns in particularly creative ways. Yet as the nation moves from one literary moment to the next, Presta describes how the 300 volunteers tirelessly spread Obama’s message by organizing debates, phone calls, and fundraisers. He even writes movingly about how his own Italian heritage and family motivated him to seek out “ringside seats to American history.”

Again and again, Presta tells us, “Change comes slowly, gradually, incrementally, and suddenly.” Although his book closes as Obama’s campaign moves from Illinois to the national stage, it is clear that without the energy and enthusiasm of volunteers like him, Barack Obama would not be President today. Filled with photographs, letters, newspaper clippings, and a heartfelt personal account, Mr. and Mrs. Grassroots is a loving archive of the power of change in our social and political moment. Chicago City Hall Examiner and The Chicago Grassroots Political Examiner.

John is the author of an upcoming book, Mr. and Mrs. Grassroots: How Barack Obama, two Bookstore Owners, and 300 Volunteers did it.  The book can be ordered from many places, preferably your local independent bookseller at Indie Bound. It can be ordered from another great independent, Powells Bookstore in Portland, OR. Or if you insist, from Amazon.com. Or Barnes and Noble. Or Borders. Or even Sears.

Read the Chicago City Hall Examiner’s and the Chicago Grassroots Political Examiner’s recent pieces on many issues: First booksigning for the Obama book that celebrates books and bookselling. Robert Gibbs lashes out at Limbaugh. Mayor Richard M. Daley is vulnerable. Obama book is a celebration of books and bookselling. Pamela Cotten is endorsed for Subcircuit judge of Cook County.

Channel 2’s Mike Flannery asks "Will Illinois Dems Lose U.S. Senate Seat?"

Mike Flannery, Political Director of Channel 2 News in Chicago (CBS), is one of the most astute and articulate political reporters on the Chicago political scene today and he asks a legitimate question, “Will Illinois Dems Lose U.S. Senate Seat?

As I discuss in my recently released book, Mr. and Mrs Grassroots, candidates become complacent and feel a sense of entitlement. There is the “entrenched incumbent” syndrome, and many of the “entrenched incumbents” are not the incumbents at all. But they feel a sense of entitlement for a variety of reasons.

So I say to the Democratic candidates for United States Senate, none of you are entitled to be the next United States Senator from Illinois. You must earn and work it. You must ask for every vote, recruit every volunteer, ask for every dollar, plant every yard sign, send friend cards, make phone calls, and do all of these things, one at a time. Slowly, steadily, confidently. But with complete resolve and a belief that what you are doing is the right thing.

So I say to all of the major Democratic candidates for United States Senate from Illinois: Alexi Giannoulias, David H. Hoffman, Cheryle Jackson, Jacob Meister. None of you own that seat and if you want it, you must fight for it and make a convincing case why you should be the next United States Senator from Illinois. This particular seat, I point out in my book Mr. and Mrs. Grassroots, is jinxed. In 1992, Carol Mosley Braun was elected to the United States Senate with much fanfare and hoopla. And she squandered her opportunity. Her successor, Peter Fitzgerald, who pointed out her weaknesses and flaws during the campaign in 1998, beat Braun. But he squandered it too.

And Then Came Obama. It seemed the jinx was lifted. He took running for office to a new level. He knew why he wanted to be the United States Senator from Illinois and could brilliantly articulate it. But alas, Blagojevich reinstated the jinx with his shenanigans. Selling the seat. All that mess that has been written about to death and is not even that interesting any longer.

So I say to Alexi, David, Cheryle, Jacob. Have a good primary fight and for the general election, run like you are the underdog. Make every voter and every vote count. Chicago City Hall Examiner and The Chicago Grassroots Political Examiner.

John is the author of an upcoming book, Mr. and Mrs. Grassroots: How Barack Obama, two Bookstore Owners, and 300 Volunteers did it. The book can be ordered from many places, preferably your local independent bookseller at Indie Bound. It can be ordered from another great independent, Powells Bookstore in Portland, OR. Or if you insist, from Amazon.com. Or Barnes and Noble. Or Borders. Or even Sears.

Read the Chicago City Hall Examiner’s and the Chicago Grassroots Political Examiner’s recent pieces on many issues: First booksigning for the Obama book that celebrates books and bookselling. Robert Gibbs lashes out at Limbaugh. Mayor Richard M. Daley is vulnerable. Obama book is a celebration of books and bookselling. Pamela Cotten is endorsed for Subcircuit judge of Cook County.

 

 

Obama book is a celebration of books and bookselling

My name is John Presta and my book titled Mr. and Mrs. Grassroots: How Barack Obama, two Bookstore Owners, and 300 Volunteers did it, is my first book and will be released on January 20, 2010. That is the first anniversary of the Obama Administration. I finally did it. I not only completed a manuscript, but I was able to get it published by the perfect publisher, the Elevator Group.

The book I set out initially to write was a celebration of books and bookselling.

Mission accomplished.
I wanted the world to know about the achievements of this special group of people: your local independent bookseller. I hoped to bring attention to the great things independent booksellers do for their communities everyday and hope that an increasing number of independent booksellers will tell their stories. I wanted to do for bookselling what Barack Obama has done for politics. The book details the success of two independent booksellers, me and my wife Michelle, how we helped launched the political career of Barack Obama with a hands-on approach. In bookselling, we call it “hand selling.” We hand sold Barack Obama to anyone that would listen.

I wanted to inspire interest in books and in bookstores. I point out in my book the importance of several Chicago area bookstores to Barack Obama’s political life and his personal life. It starts with our own store, Reading on Walden Bookstore. There was his community bookstore, 57th Street Books, along with its sister store down the street, Seminary Coop Bookstore. Obama also love to visit Powells Bookstore (of Chicago), just east of 57th Street Books. Obama received the endorsement of Congresswomen Jan Schakowsky at Women and Children First Bookstore in December of 2003. The endorsement was huge for Obama and was likely, as author Malcolm Gladwell would say, the Tipping Point of that campaign.

The back-story of the book is simple, how to overcome obstacles. An obstacle is a barrier worth overcoming. The barriers in Obama’s way were plentiful and we worked to remove those barriers. It is about getting up after you have been knocked down. The obscure State Senator from Illinois, Barack Obama, lost a Congressional race to an “entrenched incumbent,” Congressman Bobby Rush. Obama was knocked down and we were knocked down with him. We felt it as intensely as he felt it.

In the early fall of 1999, we met Dan Shomon, campaign manager at that time for the obscure State Senator from Hyde Park in the Chicago area, Barack Obama. Shomon wanted our support for this man named Obama. Our initial response to Shomon was lukewarm. Because of Shomon’s persistence and tenacity, he was able to convince us to eventually support Obama and support him in a big way. We organized a candidates’ forum for the Congressional race against Congressman Bobby Rush. The candidates’ forum was a smashing success for Obama. 600 people attended the event and were introduced to Obama. The community came to love Obama. Unfortunately, Obama lost this race to Bobby Rush. He had “lost the battle, but he won the war,” in the words of long-time aide Al Kindle.

Obama, in his own words, was “spanked” by Rush, but proceeded to pick himself up the next day because he believed in himself and his message. The book is about how my wife Michelle and I were emotionally effected by this defeat and how we picked ourselves up and dusted ourselves off and helped Obama in future elections. The obstacle was this haunting defeat. For us it was the elephant in the room.

Immediately after his defeat on March 21, 2000, we ordered a dozen copies (signed) of his book, Dreams from My Father, and placed them on the shelf. And they stayed on the shelf from March 2000 through March of 2004. We would not and could not remove them. On March 17, 2004, the day after Obama won the Democratic primary for United States Senate, the books vanished. They were bought quickly.

There was another elephant in the room. This man Obama, we believed, would one day become President of the United States. Could Obama overcome a crushing defeat in a Congressional race and inexplicably, come back and win a statewide, United States Senate race against some of the most formidible opponents in Illinois politics. Then capture the White House? What are the odds?  

For us it was not the beginning of the end, but the end of the beginning. We would stand by Obama, despite the loss. We stood by him in a tough primary fight in 2004 for a seat in the United States Senate, and this time he won. He personally asked us to support a local statewide candidate in 2006, as a test of his political muscle and political relevance and again he won. In spite of the opposition of the entrenched party leaders. Then in early 2007, he announced for the Presidency. And through a long struggle from lessons he had learned back in 1999, he won the Presidency. I started to write my story during this period. And two years later, a book is born. The book is a recording of American History of the Obama Presidency.

The book explains why were we so heavily recruited by the Obama campaign. Why would a little child, Sofia Clute, call us “Obama’s bookstore.” She would say to her dad during that period, “Daddy, take me to Obama’s Bookstore.” In our community, we will forever identified with Obama.

We were an ordinary bookstore run by ordinary people that made extraordinary achievements. We believed in ourselves and believed that books are not luxuries but essentials. We believed that books have transformative value and that books teach valuable lessons about life such as being physical health, spiritual health and financial health.

This is the story of how our community involvement led the Barack Obama campaign to our little bookstore. We were reluctant to embrace this obscure State Senator and it was not until Dan Shomon, the Obama’s campaign manager in 2000, mentioned that Obama was an author. He wrote a book titled Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance. That got our attention. It mattered little to us that the book had limited commercial success to that point. That is not what great literature is about but it is about the writing. And Obama’s book was well written. The book was a great introduction to this man, Barack Obama. It parallels the life of the book, Dreams from My Father, and the life of the man, Barack Obama.

We reinvested a large part of ourselves into the community and as such our level of community involvement. We further extended that reach beyond the doors of the bookstore and into the streets of the community to help make the community a better place to live for all. Businesses not only should reinvest back into their communities, it I essential.

We discuss our transformation from being just booksellers to community activists. How it all began after a series of break-ins at our store, which motivated us to not sit idly and allow these terrible things to happen to us and more important, to happen to our beloved community.  

The story is about how this bookstore transformed our lives and how the bookstore transformed other people’s lives. We give examples of specific books that can help people transform their lives. It is, if you will, a book about books, a biography of books, a short history of books.

The easy part for me was getting it all down in a readable form. The difficult part was finding the right publisher that would stand behind the book and be as enthusiastic as I was about the book and its content.

Again, mission accomplished.

I discovered, through the social networking site www.Linked.com, Sheilah Vance, President and owner of the Elevator Group. Sheilah started her own publishing company in 2005 and knows what it takes to win elections and keep the electorate energized. Sheilah is also learning what it takes to sell books. Sheilah is a former member of Pennsylvania Democratic State Committee and former press secretary to Robert P. Casey, Sr. when he ran his successful campaign for Governor of Pennsylvania in 1986. Sheilah recognized my story in Mr. and Mrs. Grassroots of how everyday people can make a difference that changes the country and the world will let the electorate see that they, too, could be the next Mr. and Mrs. Grassroots. Sheilah is planning a promotional campaign with buttons and rally signs at book signings, campaign style. This book will be a campaign.

A political campaign.

A political grassroots campaign to sell books. A great campaign would be to make the book number one and outsell Sarah Palin’s book. This book has a better message and I actually wrote it myself, although my publisher, Sheilah Vance, did a great job in editing the final manuscript. Help me make this book a bestseller and recapture the narrative from the Republicans.

Let’s help to rally the base of the Democratic Party. Yes, we don’t like the health care legislation that was passed. It is just the beginning. Had McCain been elected, we wouldn’t be having this health care discussion of a “bad bill.” We might be discussing “no bill.” At best, some watered-down, non-binding, “patient’s bill of rights.” It is what we expect from the party of “no,” the Republicans.

The book can be ordered from many places, preferably your local independent bookseller at Indie Bound. It can be ordered from another great independent, Powells Bookstore in Portland, OR.

Or if you insist, from Amazon.com. Or Barnes and Noble. Or Borders. Or even Sears.

McCain’s V.P. running mate is lying, again

John McCain’s Vice Presidential nominee is lying again. This time the lie is that she is accusing “Obama-Biden Democrats” of lying.

(CNN)– Governor Sarah Palin accused “Obama-Biden Democrats,” of launching a series of unfair attacks against she and her family in a fundraising email sent to supporters Monday.

“Friends, in the course of a few weeks, the Obama-Biden Democrats have launched attack after attack on me, my family and John McCain,” Palin writes in the email. “They’re desperate to win and they’ll no doubt launch these attacks against other reformers on our ticket.”

Earlier this month, the McCain campaign said its $47 million fundraising record for the month of August was due in large part to the addition of the Alaska governor to the ticket. Her presence on the campaign trail has also translated into larger crowds at campaign events throughout the country.

The email to fundraisers doesn’t specify what lies she is referring to. I am not aware of any falsehoods being spread about “John McCain’s running mate.”

So please be specific: Lying about what?

We know it isn’t about Troopergate.

That ain’t it.

We know it isn’t about “rape kits.”

That ain’t it.

We know it isn’t about selling the Alaskan government plane on Ebay.

That ain’t it.

Or refusing money for the “Bridge to Nowhere.”

That ain’t it.

There are a couple other things I would like to see explained like your relationship with disgraced Senator Ted Stevens and how it came that you received the money for the “Bridge to Nowhere” but you are able to say you said, “Thanks, but no thanks.”

What I want to know is what can we believe about “John McCain’s running mate?”

Reading on Walden Bookstore.

John McCain favors an unregulated economy and wants government out of our lives: sometimes

Enough with the straight talking John McCain when it comes to the economy. “Mr. Straight Talk Express” likes to have it both ways. And the problem is when he has it both ways, he has it no way. I would like to see John McCain stand for something.

One way on the economy and economic policy.

One way on immigration reform.

One way on the Supreme Court appointments.

One way on the Iraq War.

It is no wonder the conservatives of the Republican Party distrust him. John McCain stands tall with you until he doesn’t. Is it any wonder he chose Governor Sarah Palin? I don’t like her politics and would never vote for her, but I do know where she stands: right wing, neoconservative, anti-government, laissez faire kind of person. He could learn so much from Sarah Palin.

The latest economic crisis is a particularly difficult position when a candidate has no strong views on the economy or how to fix it. He recently spoke out against bailouts, just hours before the Bush Administration announced a bailout.

Washington (AP): The US economic free fall has played havoc with Republican John McCain’s Presidential campaign, as he tries to distance himself from the unpopular Bush administration and walk away from his own record as a champion of government deregulation.

As the stock market has plummeted, polls show support rising for Democrat Barack Obama in recent days, erasing the bounce McCain enjoyed after the Republican National Convention and his surprise pick of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin as the party’s first female Vice-Presidential nominee.

McCain found himself in a particularly difficult spot on Wednesday as the bellwether Dow Jones Industrial Average fell nearly 450 points — slightly more than 4 percent and the second huge loss this week — after an $85 billion government bailout of one of the world’s largest insurance companies, American International Group McCain had vigorously opposed the bailout just hours before it was announced.

John McCain doesn’t get it because he is out of touch not only with Main Street, he is also out of touch with Wall Street. Even a key economic advisor says neither he nor his running mate couldn’t run an American corporation.

The public face of John McCain’s campaign on the economy disappeared from public view yesterday after she queried whether he and his running-mate, Sarah Palin, were capable of leading a large US corporation.

Carly Fiorina, who climbed her way to the top of the corporate ladder as the chief executive officer at the technology giant Hewlett-Packard, made her remarks in a radio interview. Yesterday, her planned television appearances were abruptly canceled. The gaffe was particularly embarrassing because they came from a businesswoman brought in to provide ballast to a candidate who admits that the economy is not his strong point.

Mr McCain has been racing to keep up with the turmoil in the US economy. The Republican candidate was wrong-footed by the $85bn (£47bn) government bailout of AIG, the world’s biggest insurance company, as he was forced to declare his support for an action that only hours earlier he had opposed.

In fairness, she also says the Democratic candidates couldn’t run one either, but it still begs the question: why would Fiorina say such a thing about John McCain. She is expected to trash the opposition. But trashing McCain and his running mate. Well, she knows him better than I do. If he can’t run a major U.S. corporation, according to Fiorina, how can he run the most complex institution in the world.

One thing is clear to me: I do not want John McCain leading this economy. Maybe he will lead this country to a bridge in Alaska going nowhere. Oh, that’s right, they haven’t built it yet. But rest assured, they will. Reading on Walden Bookstore.

Spiro Agnew with lipstick (there’s an image) that is Sarah Palin

The striking similarities between Spiro Agnew and Sarah Palin are a bit unnerving. At the time Spiro Agnew was selected as Richard Nixon’s choice for Vice-President, he had been governor of Maryland for “less than two years.” Wikipedia says he was “Running as a reformer and Republican outsider, he took advantage of a bitter split in the Democratic Party and was elected” as a Baltimore County Executive. Spiro Agnew had lost a couple of attempts at public office prior to election as a Baltimore County Executive in 1962.
Sarah Palin has been governor of Alaska for “less than two years,” getting elected in 2006 as a “reformer and Republican outsider.” Sarah Palin served on the Wasilla, Alaska city council and as mayor between 1992 and 2002. After an unsuccessful campaign for lieutenant governor of Alaska in 2002, she chaired the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission from 2003 to 2004.

Spiro Agnew’s role was as an “attack dog” against anti-Vietnam War critics and activists. His job was to defend Richard Nixon’s flawed Vietnam policies. Sarah Palin’s role is as an “attack dog” against anti-Iraq War critics and activists. Her job is to defend “George W. Bush/John McCain” flawed Iraqi War policies.

Spiro Agnew used inflammatory rhetoric in his use of alliteration, such as “nattering nabobs of negativism,” “pusillanimous pussyfooters,” and “hopeless, hysterical hypochondriacs of history” when referring to the media. Politico points out Sarah Palin’s role as a media basher.

The Daily Kos and other bloggers have been pointing out these similarities, such as Sarah Palin’s Troopergate.

In 1968 the American people elected Nixon/Agnew but we hope this November the American voters will see through this George Bush/John McCain/Sarah Palin charade and not make the same mistake again. Reading on Walden Bookstore.

It is time to grant Cuba "full diplomatic relations"

For nearly fifty years the United States have shut out an island that is ninety miles from American soil. Of all the Presidential candidates this election, Barack Obama has come the closest to saying he would extend an olive branch to Cuba by having face-to-face talks with Cuban leader Raul Castro. But he falls short of ending this destructive embargo against the Cuban people. Fidel Castro wrote an editorial critical of Obama but also reaching out to Obama as a great hope for Cuba. It is clear that Castro understands American politics and knows that his best hope is Obama.

HAVANA (AP) — Former President Fidel Castro says Sen. Barack Obama’s plan to maintain Washington’s trade embargo against Cuba will cause hunger and suffering on the island.

In a column published Monday by government-run newspapers, Castro said Obama was “the most-advanced candidate in the presidential race,” but noted that he has not dared to call for altering U.S. policy toward Cuba.

“Obama’s speech can be translated as a formula for hunger for the country,” Castro wrote, referring to Obama’s remarks last week to the influential Cuban American National Foundation in Miami.

We need to end the diplomatic freeze against Cuba. The fact that Obama has said he would meet with Raul Castro is an important first step, but it needs to be pursued toward “full diplomatic relations.” The argument that they are a Communist country no longer holds water. That shipped passed long ago when we recognized the USSR many years ago and currently have full relations with, yes, Communist China, although few refer to it that way anymore. China has in fact become an important ally with the United States.

So why the paranoia about Cuba. I am convinced, and it is not based on any evidence I have found, that had Nixon finished his second-term in office, he would have taken the next logical step and recognized Cuba too. It took a life-long Commie basher like President Richard Nixon to open the doors to the old USSR and China. Nixon had his personal demons and had self-destructive tendencies, but I grudgingly admit that he a was simply brilliant analyst and policy-maker when it came to world affairs and understanding how the world fit together.

So if a Commie-hating Republican like Nixon could seize the historical moment when he open the doors to the USSR and China, then it is difficult for me to understand the missed opportunities of Jimmy Carter, who didn’t open the doors to Cuba in his four years, or the missed opportunities of Bill Clinton during his eight years when he failed to open the doors to Cuba. Presidents like Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush and George Bush never had a vision of the world, so I would not have expected them to open the doors to Cuba.

I have high hopes that Barack Obama, should he become the next President, will right this grievous wrong against the Cuban people. John McCain, should he be elected, would continue the stale foreign policies of his Republican predecessors Reagan, Bush and Bush.

The policy seems to be that when the Castro passes on, we’ll think about opening the doors. But we are not punishing Fidel and Raul Castro in our failure to do the right thing. We are punishing the great people of Cuba. We are depriving them of basic needs and that is inhumane. We should be ashamed of our policies. Cuba is hardly a security threat the the United States. But I would be willing to bet if they were a military threat to the United States, we might be more willing to sit across the table from the Cubans.

I hope and pray that the next President of the United States brings humanity back to the world stage. Cuba would be a great start. Reading on Walden Bookstore.

Recall amendment targeted at the sitting Governor is closer to passage in Illinois

A change in the Illinois constitution to allow the recall of the Governor of Illinois is closer to passage. The Illinois Senate, in which some of the Senate leadership that are closely allied to the Governor, changed the original bill to include other elected officials.

SPRINGFIELD – The question of whether to amend the state Constitution so Illinoisans can recall corrupt or inept politicians devolved Tuesday into a legislative game of chicken that must be decided by the weekend if voters are to get a chance to oust scandal-plagued Gov. Blagojevich before his term ends.

By a 12-1 vote, a Senate panel approved a newly-tailored plan that would enable voters to oust statewide officeholders, legislators, judges, mayors and county board officials – a vastly larger group than what was contained in an earlier, House-passed plan targeting only state officeholders.

Senate Democrats also tweaked the plan so that if a recall drive is launched against Blagojevich, his running mate, Lt. Gov. Pat Quinn, also would be targeted for removal. Quinn is an ardent backer of the recall and a frequent Blagojevich critic.

The Illinois Senate leadership thought that this “poison pill,” which included recall the Governor and Lt Governor as a team, would effectively kill the bill. In an act of political courage, the Lt. Governor Quinn announced he is supporting the revised bill. This in spite of the fact that he would be a innocent victim of a recall. Quinn is placing “principal over self-preservation” in an act that could get him a chapter in Caroline Kennedy’s next version of Profiles in Courage. This act by Quinn shows once again how the Governor has underestimated the depth of this animosity toward him.

It has not as the Speaker of the Illinois House, Michael Madigan, announced they would vote on the bill as is if passed by the Illinois Senate.

This political intrigue in Illinois has become much more interesting, at the moment, than Presidential politics.

Passage of this bill, which would amend the constitution, would allow the Governor and the Lt. Governor to be recalled. The bill as rewritten by the Illinois Senate also calls for the recall of other state officials. The political animosity between the Governor of Illinois and most of the State legislature has reached such a high pitch that passage of a bill that the legislature does not particularly want, is still likely. In spite of the fact that some of these same officials could be hurt by this bill. Should the bill pass, it will be placed on the November ballot for ratification by the Illinois electorate which most expect to pass easily.

There is no question that should this bill pass and then ratified by the voters in November, steps would be taken to recall the Governor. Although Illinois is clearly a “Blue State” with a Democratic Governor, the recall of the Governor would sail through. The Democratic Governor of Illinois is nearly as unpopular as President George Bush. And that, my friends, is no small feat. In 2002 Governor Blagojevich came into office with high hopes, but since that time he has made mistake after mistake and clearly doesn’t learn much from those mistakes except to make bigger mistakes.

The last straw was the budget battle of 2007 that took eleven months. The Governor called for special session after special session. In many cases the legislature simply ignored the call into special session.

To get a detailed history of this merry-go-round, check out Rich Miller’s Illinois blog at http://thecapitolfaxblog.com/. He has done a great job in covering this circus with lots of insider stuff. Reading on Walden Bookstore.

Hillary Clinton sacks Mark Penn, but what took so long

Hillary Clinton has finally sacked chief strategic advisor, Mark Penn. What is truly incredible is he was sacked for the ultimate sin in a political campaign: getting off message. The message was that Hillary opposes NAFTA yet Mark Penn was discussing it with the Colombians as if to say, “Don’t worry about what she says, NAFTA’s is here to stay.” That is the message Penn conveyed and I believe it is the unofficial position of the Clinton campaign.

Hillary Clinton only talks against NAFTA because it is a campaign issue and is important in states like Ohio (which she won) and in Pennsylvania (she is ahead in the polls). It is popular for her to be against NAFTA. In spite of the fact that her husband, Bill Clinton, as President pushed NAFTA through Congress with the help of the Republican Party.

In view of the Mark Penn situation, Hillary Clinton needs to come clean about NAFTA. “Is you is or is you ain’t?”

There is plenty of evidence that Hillary Clinton is pro-NAFTA.

WASHINGTON — The Obama campaign Tuesday challenged Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s claim that she spoke out against the North American Free Trade Agreement before its 1993 passage.

And the campaign said Clinton’s claim goes beyond the crucial issue of jobs and raises questions about her ability to tell the truth.
Advertisement

“The question people have to ask themselves is, ‘If she won’t be candid about where she was before, how can you have confidence about where she’ll be in the future?”‘ Obama strategist David Axelrod told Indiana reporters.

Mark Penn’s latest gaffe reopens this wound about where Hillary Clinton is on NAFTA. Because of the close relationship of the Clintons and Mark Penn, it is hard to believe that the Clintons were unaware of this Colombian contact.

And here is further evidence that the Clinton are not that upset with Mark Penn. He will continue to work for the campaign.

But his polling firm, Mark and Penn, Schoen and Berland Associates, will continue to provide polling and advice to the campaign.

So the Clinton campaign sacked Mark Penn, but. Yes, but what. A clean break from Mark Penn is needed if the Clinton campaign expects to maintain any credibility on NAFTA and many other issues. Again I ask, “Is you is or is you ain’t.” Reading on Walden Bookstore.