The Most Hopeless Middle East Peace Talks Ever

…..’hopeless’ was Huffington Post’s rendering of the New York Times coverage of the recently announced resumption of peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians, which spoke of ‘scant hopes from the beginning.’

Who cannot agree?

Last week, Israeli journalist Gideon Levy, speaking in Dundee, Scotland on a tour sponsored by the Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign, talked about Israel’s abandonment of the pretense of diplomacy in favor of a policy of provocation and raw military power, with the ultimate aim of denying Palestinians any chance of forming their own independent state.

And a week before that, Chris Hedges, speaking at a fund raiser for the US Boat to Gaza campaign, called the “peace process (a) cynical, one-way route to the crushing of the Palestinians as a people.”

Levy is really talking about the racist Likud agenda of the present government, which will screw Palestinians by offering them a group of Bantustans inside of what will become Greater Israel, the ultimate Likud goal.
Is it any wonder why Moumoud Abbas, the Palestinian leader at this time, has little faith in the peace process which is being encouraged by Mitchell, Clinton, and Obama, and even Netanyahu, who refuses preconditions, but then dictates conditions that can only lead the Palestinians into an unacceptable Apartheid existence? Obama, in one year or so, has turned himself from the savior of Middle East peace (per his Cairo speech) into Netanyahu’s poodle (a phrase coined by Booman), which well describes Obama’s latest obsequious pandering of the Israel Lobby.

The New York Times article is long, but here are a few paragraphs.

JERUSALEM — The American invitation on Friday to the Israelis and Palestinians to start direct peace talks in two weeks in Washington was immediately accepted by both governments. But just below the surface there was an almost audible shrug. There is little confidence — close to none — on either side that the Obama administration’s goal of reaching a comprehensive deal in one year can be met.

Instead, there is a resigned fatalism in the air. Most analysts view the talks as pairing the unwilling with the unable — a strong right-wing Israeli coalition led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with no desire to reach an agreement against a relatively moderate Palestinian leadership that is too weak and divided to do so. “These direct negotiations are the option of the crippled and the helpless,” remarked Zakaria al-Qaq, vice president of Al Quds University and a Palestinian moderate, when asked his view of the development. “It is an act of self-deception that will lead nowhere.”

(snip)

“Abbas is naked before his whole community,” observed Mahdi Abdul Hadi, chairman of the Palestinian Academic Society for the Study of International Affairs, an independent research institute in East Jerusalem. “Everyone knows that this Israeli government is not going to deliver anything.”

Most Palestinians — and many on the Israeli left — argue that there are now too many Israeli settlements in the West Bank for a viable, contiguous Palestinian state to arise there. Settlement growth has continued despite a construction moratorium announced by Mr. Netanyahu. Moreover, support for many of the settlements remains relatively strong in Israel. In other words, if this view holds, the Israelis have closed out any serious option of a two-state solution. So the talks are useless.

(Link to the rest of the article above.)

And yes, it contains mention of all of the “generous offers” Israel made to the Palestinians in the past, and it does so without blinking, without reference to the Oslo Hoax, which allowed the settlement of the Palestinian territories to double under the Clinton administration, Barak’s so-called “generous offer” at Camp David 2000, which he later confessed he was not able to deliver, or Olmert’s alleged secret offer, which was leaked a year later after negotiations stopped.

None of these Israeli efforts were bona fide.  Except for a few months during the Rabin administration, the colonization of Palestinian lands never ceased, it continues today, and will continue during these so-called peace talks. Is there more to know about where the talks will lead?

Netanyahu’s tact here, after the ploys of past Israeli PMs Shamir and Sharon, is to continue talking while establishing more facts on the ground. But today, it is Obama who is leading the Palestinians into this old trap.

RAMADAN KAREEM FROM NETANYAHU AND OBAMA

Earth Report – 2003 – Conflict over water in Israel/Palestine.
The cynical title of this essay is Jeff Halper’s way of introducing us to the latest news about the ongoing ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from their lands, while the Israeli PM Netanyahu simultaneously claims interest in negotiating peace through direct talks. President Obama released videotaped Ramadan wishes last Friday, sending “best wishes to Muslims in America and around the world” and wishing them “Ramadan Kareem” on “behalf of the American people, including Muslim communities in all 50 states.” ‘Kareem’ variously means ‘generous, bountiful, gracious, noble,’. in short, ‘Happy Ramadan.’

But for Palestinians, most of whom are Muslim, residing in the West Bank and East Jerusalem it is not a happy time.

Kayed Jaber is a Palestinian. For generations, his family has farmed a valley near Hebron. Kayed and his brother Ismael grow fruit and vegetables for market – an activity made possible in the parched desert by the ancient technique of storing rainwater in underground reservoirs. But the old reservoirs are not big enough so the brothers are building two new ones.

In the hills above Ismael and Kayed’s lands, there is an Israeli settlement called Kyriat Arbat, where the settlers enjoy lush green parkland and a swimming pool. The settlement is connected to the Israeli water grid so they don’t need to collect rainwater – they can just turn on the tap.

Now, Kayed and Ismael’s water problem has turned into a battle with the Israeli Civil Administration.

The Civil Administration believe that Kayed and Ismael’s reservoirs haven’t been built to catch rainwater but to store water illegally diverted from pipelines destined for Israeli settlements. Even though there is no proof of water-stealing, Israeli army bulldozers move in to destroy the reservoirs anyway. By effectively cutting off the Kayed’s water supply, the Israeli’s are making life virtually impossible for them.

Yesterday, the day before the Muslim holy month of Ramadan began, at 2:30 in the morning, workers sent by the Israeli authorities, protected by dozens of police, destroyed the tombstones in the last portion of the Mamilla cemetery, an historic Muslim burial ground with graves going back to the 7th Century, hitherto left untouched. The government of Israel has always been fully cognizant of the sanctity and historic significance of the site. Already in 1948, when control of the cemetery reverted to Israel, the Israeli Religious Affairs Ministry recognized Mamilla “to be one of the most prominent Muslim cemeteries, where seventy thousand Muslim warriors of [Saladin’s] armies are interred along with many Muslim scholars. Israel will always know to protect and respect this site.” For all that, and despite (proper) Israeli outrage when Jewish cemeteries are desecrated anywhere in the world, the dismantlement of the Mamilla cemetery has been systematic. In the 1960s “Independence Park” was built over a portion of it; subsequently an urban road was built through it, major electrical cables were laid over graves and a parking lot constructed over yet another piece. Now some 1,500 Muslim graves have been cleared in several nighttime operations to make way for…..a $100 million Museum of Tolerance and Human Dignity, a project of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles. (Ironically, Rabbi Marvin Hier, the Wiesenthal Center’s Director, appeared on Fox News to express his opposition to the construction of a mosque near Ground Zero in Manhattan, because the site of the 9/11 attack “is a cemetery.”)

The month-long period between Netanyahu’s July 6th visit to Washington and the start of Ramadan has provided Israel with a window to “clear the table” after a frustrating hiatus on home demolitions imposed by the “old,” mildly critical Obama Administration – although there is no guarantee that Israel will not demolish during Ramadan, especially if it wants to exploit the period until the November elections, knowing that until then Obama will not overtly oppose anything it does in the Occupied Territories. In fact, the process of demolishing Palestinian homes never ceased. On June 6th, for example, a year after the demolition of more than 65 structures and the forced displacement of more than 120 people, including 66 children, nine families of Khirbet Ar Ras Ahmar in the Jordan Valley, totaling 70 people, received a new round of “evacuation orders.” A week later the Israeli High Court ordered the Civil Administration to “step up enforcement against illegal Palestinian structures” in Area C, the 60% of the West Bank under full Israeli control.

And so, on July 13th, upon Netanyahu’s return (Palestinian homes are not demolished without an OK from the Prime Minister’s Office), three homes were demolished in the Palestinian East Jerusalem neighborhood of Issawiya, followed by three more homes in Beit Hanina. The Jerusalem Municipality also announced the planned demolition of 19 more homes in Issawiya this month. In the West Bank, the Israeli “Civil” Administration demolished 55 structures belonging to 22 Palestinian families in the Hmayer area of Al Farisiye in the northern Jordan Valley, including 22 residential tents and 30 other structures used to shelter animals and store agricultural equipment. According to the UN’s Office of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA): “This week [July 14-20, the week of Netanyahu’s return from Washington] there was a significant increase in the number of demolitions in Area C, with at least 86 structures demolished in the Jordan Valley and the southern West Bank, including Bethlehem and Hebron districts. In 2010, at least 230 Palestinian structures have been demolished in Area C, forcibly displacing 1100 people, including 400 children. Approximately 600 others have been otherwise affected.” Two-thirds of the demolitions for 2010 have occurred since Netanyahu’s meeting with Obama. More than 3,000 demolition orders are outstanding in the West Bank, and up to 15,000 in Palestinian East Jerusalem.

The demolition of homes is, of course, only a small, if painful, part of the destruction Israel wreaks daily on the Palestinian population. Over the past few weeks a violent campaign has been waged against Palestinian farmers in one of the most fertile agricultural areas of the West Bank, the Baka Valley, steadily being encroached upon by large suburbs of the settlement of Kiryat Arba, in Hebron. Israel already takes 85% of the West Bank’s water for its own use, either for settlements (settlers use five times more water per capita as do Palestinians, and Ma’aleh Adumim is currently building a water park in addition to its four municipal swimming pools and the huge fountains constantly flowing in the city center) or to be pumped into Israel proper – all in flagrant violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention, which prohibits an Occupying Power from using the resources of an occupied territory.

Accusing the farmers of “stealing water” – their own water – the Israel water company Mekorot, supported by the Civil Administration and the IDF, has in recent weeks destroyed dozens of wells, some of them ancient, and reservoirs used to collect rain water, which is also “illegal.” Hundreds of hectares of agricultural land have dried up as irrigation pipes have been pulled out and confiscated by the Civil Administration. Fields of tomatoes, beans, eggplants and cucumbers are dying just before they can be harvested, and the grape industry in this rich valley is threatened with destruction. “I’m watching my life dry up before my eyes,” Ata Jaber, a Palestinian farmer who has had his home demolished twice, most of whose land lies buried under the Givat Harsina neighborhood of Kiryat Arba and whose plastic drip irrigation pipes are destroyed annually by the Civil Administration just before he can harvest. “I had hoped to sell my crop for at least $2000 before Ramadan, but all is gone.”

(You can see a BBC report on the destruction of Palestinian reservoirs on YouTube Earth Report – 2003 – Conflict over water in Israel/Palestine (above) and a heart-rending scene filmed just a week ago when Ata’s cousin was arrested in front of his small child for resisting the destruction of his water system Hebron Palestinian Child’s Torment Caught On TV (below).)

Settlements continue to be built, of course. The much-trumpeted “settlement freeze” amounted to no less than a temporary lull in construction. (Indeed, Netanyahu never used the word “freeze”; in Hebrew he refers only to a “pause.”) According to the August report of Peace Now’s Settlement Watch, at least 600 housing units have started to be built during the freeze, in over 60 different settlements – meaning that the rate of construction is about half of that during the same period in an average year when there is no freeze. Given that the approval process has never been halted – the Israeli government announced the planned building of 1600 housing units in the settlements when Vice President Biden was visiting, if you recall – making up for lost time when the “freeze” ends in late September will be an easy task. According to Ha’aretz, some 2,700 housing units are waiting to be constructed.

The fact that the so-called settlement freeze did not really end settlement construction is obvious. The American government seems ready to accept lip-service only from Israel, as against overt and brutal threats towards the Palestinians if they do not acquiesce to the charade. Palestinian negotiators revealed last week the Obama Administration threatened to cut all ties with the Palestinian Authority, political and financial, if they continued to insist on a genuine freeze on settlements or even clear parameters on what the sides will negotiate. (Netanyahu refuses to accept even the elementary principle of the 1967 borders being the basis of talks.)

Just as destructive of any real peace process, however, is the fact that the focus on settlement freeze deflects attention from attempts by Israel to create “irreversible facts on the ground” which will defeat the very process of negotiation. Even if Israel did respect a settlement freeze, there is no demand, no expectation, absolutely nothing to prevent it from continuing to build the Wall (the enclosing of the Shuafat refugee camp inside Jerusalem and the town of Anata is being completed in these very days, and the village of Wallajeh, some of which spills into Jerusalem, is losing its lands, ancient olive trees and homes even as we speak). Nothing is preventing Israel from continuing to impoverish and imprison the Palestinian population through its twenty-year economic “closure,” including the siege on Gaza, having reduced the Palestinian economy to ashes. Nothing stands in the way of completing a system of parallel (though not equal in size and quality) apartheid highways, big ones, going through Palestinian lands, for Israelis; narrow ones for Palestinians. Nothing keeps Israel from expelling Palestinian from their homes so that Jewish settlers can move in – on July 29th nine families living in the Muslim Quarter of the Old City, returning home at night from a wedding, found themselves locked out of their homes by settlers and prevented from entering by the police. (Palestinians, of course, have no legal recourse to reclaiming their properties, whole villages, towns and urban neighborhoods, farms, factories and commercial buildings, confiscated from them in 1948 and after.)

Nothing prevents Israel from terrorizing the Palestinian population, whether by its own army or the surrogate militia founded by the US and run by the Palestinian Authority to pacify its own population, whether by settlers who shoot and beat Palestinians and burn their crops with no fear of arrest, or by undercover agents, aided by thousands of Palestinian forced to become collaborators, many simply so that their children could receive medical care or so they could have a roof over their heads; whether by expulsion or the myriad administrative constraints of an invisible yet Kafkaesque system of total control and intimidation. Nothing opposes Israel’s boycott of the Palestinian people, isolated from the world by Israeli-controlled borders, or policies that effectively boycott Palestinian schools and universities by preventing their proper functioning. And nothing, absolutely nothing, stops Israel from demolishing Palestinian homes – 24,000 in the Occupied Territories since 1967, and counting.

Perhaps this way of welcoming Ramadan comes at no surprise in terms of the Occupied Territories. It took on an entirely different cast when, on July 26th, more than 1,300 Israeli Border Police, the shock-troops of the police’s Yassam “special operations” unit and regular police, accompanied by helicopters, descended upon the Bedouin village of al-Arakib, just north of Beer-Sheva, a community within Israel inhabited by Israeli citizens. Forty-five homes were demolished, 300 people forcibly displaced. One of the most grotesque and dismaying parts of this operation was the use of Israeli Jewish high school students, volunteers with the civil guard, to remove the belongings of their fellow citizens from their homes before the demolition. Besides reports of vandalism and contempt for their victims the students were photographed lounging in the residents’ furniture in plain sight of its owners. Finally, when the bulldozers began demolishing the homes, the volunteers cheered and celebrated. Over the next week, as Israeli activists helped the residents pick up the pieces and rebuild their homes, the Jewish National Fund, the Israeli Land Authority, the Ministry of the Interior and the “Green Patrol” of the Ministry of Agriculture (established by Ariel Sharon to prevent Bedouin “take-over” of the Negev) sent in police and bulldozers and had the village demolished twice more.

Although al-Arakib is one of 44 “unrecognized” Bedouin villages in the Negev – of which only eleven have even rudimentary education and medical services, no electricity, extremely limited access to water and none have paved roads (see http://rcuv.wordpress.com) – it is nevertheless populated by Israeli citizens, some of whom serve in the Israeli army. While demolitions of Arab homes within Israel is not a new phenomenon – last year the Israeli government demolished three times more houses of Israeli (Arab) citizens inside Israel as it did in the Occupied Territories (the destruction of up to 8,000 homes in the Gaza invasion aside) – it signifies that the term “occupation” cannot be restricted to the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza (and the Golan Heights) alone. The situation of Arab citizens of Israel is almost as insecure as that of the Palestinians of the Occupied Territories, and their exclusion from Israeli society almost as complete. While around 1,000 cities, towns and agricultural villages have been established in Israel since 1948 exclusively for Jews, not a single new Arab settlement has been established, with the exception of seven housing projects for Bedouins in the Negev where none of the residents are allowed to farm or own animals. Indeed, regulations and zoning prohibit Palestinian citizens of Israel from living on 96% of the country’s land, which is reserved for Jews only.

The message of the bulldozers is clear: Israel has created one bi-national entity between the Mediterranean and the Jordan River in which one population (the Jews) has separated itself from the other (the Arabs) and instituted a regime of permanent domination. That is precisely the definition of apartheid. And the message is delivered clearly in the weeks and days leading up to Ramadan. It is papered over with fine words. Netanyahu issued a statement saying: “We mark this important month amid attempts to achieve direct peace talks with the Palestinians and to advance peace treaties with our Arab neighbors. I know you are partners in this goal and I ask for your support both in prayers and in any other joint effort to really create a peaceful and harmonious coexistence.” Obama and Clinton also sent their greetings to the Muslim world, Obama observing that Ramadan “remind us of the principles that we hold in common, and Islam’s role in advancing justice, progress, tolerance, and the dignity of all human beings.” Both the White House and the State Department will hold Iftar meals. But the bulldozers and other expressions of apartheid and warehousing tell a much different story.

Jeff Halper is the Director of the Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions (ICAHD). The Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions is based in Jerusalem and has chapters in the United Kingdom and the United States.

The second video quoted by Halper:


TV cameras capture the distressing moment when a five-year-old Palestinian boy sees his father arrested for stealing water.

Yes, arrested for stealing water, his own water!

Obama waffles on the Ground Zero mosque

Crossposted from OpenLeft (USA) with commentary.

This fucking guy is really something. He recently said that he knows how to politik! Is this what he means?

Obama’s Ground Zero Mosque Comments: President Recalibrates

My intention was to simply let people know what I thought. Which was that in this country, we treat everybody equally in accordance with the law. Regardless of race. Regardless of religion. I was not commenting on and will not comment on the wisdom of making a decision to put a mosque there. I was commenting very specifically on the right that people have that dates back to our founding. That’s what our country’s about and I think it’s very important that as difficult as some of these issues are, we stay focused on who we are as a people and what our values are all about.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

Comments

How is that waffling?

He didn’t change his position at all. He just corrected people who misinterpreted his original statement. If he wanted to prevent Republicans from twisting he his words around, he would never say anything. Not sure how you can blame him for Republicans’ dishonesty.

by: miasmo

I disagree.

If he hadn’t meant to do anything except recite the Constitution’s freedom of religion clause, he should have kept his mouth shut. I for one construed his initial remarks as being supportive of the construction of Cordoba House. I’m sick and tired of parsing his words.

by: bmull

That’s nonsense. Republicabs only believe in the 2nd Amendment.

I think it’s a good idea for the President to remind us every now and then of the other ones.
This will turn into another example of how Gibbs was right after all.

by: steviez314

I think Obama is terrible, but I don’t think he waffled on this issue

Here’s the real waffler:

435 Dem Primaries 2012
Coffee Party Usa
TheRealNews.Com

by: metamars

Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League essentially said the same thing.

When Obama refused to comment on the “wisdom” of building a mosque near Ground Zero, he threw the insensitivity point back out there. And that’s all that Foxman meant to say.

What he should have said is that Muslims have a right to build a mosque anywhere in the US, two blocks from Ground Zero or otherwise. As it stands, it is as if ordinary decent Muslim-Americans must share in the blame for 9/11, which is just to stir up more Islamophobia.

by: shergald

And now we have NY Governor Patterson waffling.

You can’t really have it both ways, disagree with Foxman and then agree with him in an afterthought:

Albany – Sponsors of the proposed mosque near Ground Zero are not slamming the door on Gov. Paterson’s idea to build the center someplace else.

“We are open to a conversation to find out more on what the governor has in mind,” the center, Park51, said in a Twitter post yesterday.

While mosque opponents charge the chosen site is insensitive to 9/11 victims, Paterson doesn’t oppose the planned location.

He suggested earlier this week it might ease tensions if the center was further away from Ground Zero, and raised the possibility of offering state-owned land.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_...

Ease tensions for whom. Just who is creating the tension? Sarah Palin? What a joke this is.

by: shergald

A further thought.

If the Muslim organization is forced by dint of social pressure to move the site of the planned mosque, the 9/11 terrorists will have won another victory: they will have succeeded in chipping away at American freedoms, perhaps of even institutionalizing Islamophobia.

The Ground Zero mosque is only one of many antiIslamic efforts to stop mosque building across the country. It seems to be just another right wing GOP effort to create a new racism upon which they can recruit voters. With Reagan’s racism against Blacks having dissipated, what is left for the GOP to run against?

Muslims (terrorism) and Hispanics (aka the anti-immigration effort)!

For what it’s worth: a New York Daily News internet poll.

Poll Results

A Landmarks panel vote clears the way for a mosque near Ground Zero. Is it an appropriate location for the mosque?

Yes, there is no reason why it should not be there. 69%  

No, it does not belong so near the site of the 9/11 attacks. 24%  

I’m not sure. 7%  

http://www.nydailynews.com/nyd...

by: shergald

The Israeli high school curriculum: Bigotry 101 UPDATE

Photobucket

The “Summer Camp Of Destruction:” Israeli High Schoolers Assist The Razing Of A Bedouin Town

AL-ARAKIB, ISRAEL — On July 26, Israeli police demolished 45 buildings in the unrecognized Bedouin village of al-Arakib, razing the entire village to the ground to make way for a Jewish National Fund forest. The destruction was part of a larger project to force the Bedouin community of the Negev away from their ancestral lands and into seven Indian reservation-style communities the Israeli government has constructed for them. The land will then be open for Jewish settlers, including young couples in the army and those who may someday be evacuated from the West Bank after a peace treaty is signed. For now, the Israeli government intends to uproot as many villages as possible and erase them from the map by establishing “facts on the ground” in the form of JNF forests.

One of the most troubling aspects of the destruction of al-Arakib was a report by CNN that the hundreds of Israeli riot police who stormed the village were accompanied by “busloads of cheering civilians.” Who were these civilians and why didn’t CNN or any outlet investigate further

(Link to the rest of the article above)

Those civilians referred to were Israeli high school students apparently taught to hate Israeli Arabs like the Bedouin people, who resided in the Negev village of AL-ARAKIB. No they are not Hitler Youth; they are normal Israeli high school students just reacting to the Israeli high school curriculum. These Bedouins are bad folk, who need to be removed from the land of Israel.

Here’s more coverage:

Israel’s Teen Age Police Volunteers

This sentence in the CNN report caught the eye of members of Ta’ayush, a small movement within Israel that organizes joint Palestinian-Jewish resistance to the Israeli occupation. They wanted to identify who the “cheering civilians” might be and so sent a delegation to al-Arakib soon after the demolitions took place. There they interviewed the village leaders and others, all of whom are now camped out in tents at the site of their demolished homes. The report of what they learned, accompanied by pictures, is now posted on the web. Here is some of what it says:

  1. The cheering civilians were all Israeli Jewish high school students who had volunteered as “police civilian guards” to take part in this assault.
  2. These teenagers did more then cheer. “Prior to the demolitions, the student volunteers were sent into the villagers’ homes to extract their furniture and belongings.” In the process they vandalized the sites, “smashing windows and mirrors…and defacing family photographs.” With the furniture piled up outside, the students “lounged around” on it while waiting for the bulldozers. This was done “in plain sight of the owners.”
  3. While the bulldozers were doing their work, the teens “celebrated.”

What Does it All Mean?

The incorporation of Jewish youth into the racist and destructive pattern of behavior exhibited in this incident is almost inevitable. You simply cannot raise up generation after generation within an environment of officially sanctioned racism and not get many of the young seeking confirmation of their place in the community through unjust socio-political actions. We can expect to hear more about this sort of officially organized youth thuggery in Israel. It is a logical tactic for the state to use, particularly at a time when the country is becoming increasingly criticized and isolated.

Max Blumenthal, wondering why Jewish Israeli high school students could react in such a way toward Arab citizens of Israel, came up with a report that went way back to 1963, when Israel was just developing but still had the remnants of the Palestinian people, who were somehow missed during the ethnic cleansing of 1948.

Forgotten 1963 Survey: Majority Of Israeli Jewish Youth Could Support Genocide Against Arabs

In my recent post about the “summer camp of destruction,” I cited figures from Israeli social psychologist Daniel Bar-Tal’s survey on the political attitudes of Jewish Israeli high school students. In polling conducted in the aftermath of Operation Cast Lead, Bar-Tal found that a majority of Israeli high schoolers favored at least some form of apartheid, and that the desire for apartheid among religious nationalist youth was nearly universal. The disturbing findings have been generally read as a reflection of Israel’s comprehensive shift to the hard right since the collapse of the so-called peace process (see Bar-Tal’s polling on Israeli attitudes toward territorial concessions here). But there is considerable evidence that a majority of Jewish Israeli youth had been been successfully conditioned to consent to indiscriminate violence against Arabs well before the most recent phase of radicalization, and years before the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza even began.

(snip)

In his excellent collection of essays, “Israel: Politics, Myths, and Identity Crises,” Orr explored in detail the political attitudes of the generation born in independent Israel immediately after 1948. He identified the first curriculum approved by the Ministry of Education as a key factor in the radicalization of this generation of youth. Orr wrote, “Already in the early 1950’s special lessons on `Jewish consciousness’ were introduced into all schools to inculcate Jewish identity into the minds of the very young. These lessons present Jewish history as a unique — and inexplicable — martyrology… The motto is: `Masada will never fall again.'”

Orr described a document that exposed the consequences of indoctrinating the young and impressionable: A 1963 poll published by the Israeli psychologist G. Tamarin entitled, “A Pilot Study in Chauvinism: The Influence of Ethnico-Religious Prejudices on Moral Judgment.” Tamarin’s research compiled responses by over 1000 Jewish Israeli schoolchildren of ages 8 to 14 to two texts. (The children represented a broad range of social groups and classes spanning the whole of Israeli society — only Arab students were exempted). The first part of the first text presented to the children read:

(Read the full article to get an understanding of why the peace activists are in the minority in Israel, and the ethnocentric Zionists are in the majority.)

The impediments to Israeli-Palestinian peace run deep; how will two-states ever come to pass?

UPDATE: See the latest and very relevant Jeff Halper article posted as a comment below.

The ‘Audacity of Hope’ boat to Gaza

The next US boat to break the siege of Gaza is named, appropriately, the ‘Audacity of Hope.’ after Obama’s book. Its purpose, obviously, is to remind us of Obama’s backtracking on the cause of the Palestinian people for freedom and self-determination, and ending the brutal siege of Gaza. But it also reminds us of US government complicity in the continuation of Israel’s occupation, colonization of Palestinian lands, and the siege, as well as Obama’s total capitulation to the will of Israel’s right wing PM, Netanyahu and his Likud agenda. Who is not embarrassed by seeing our nation taken over by a foreign government and its agents in the US.

The Press Conference shown above (video) at the start of the U.S. Boat to Gaza fund raising evening on New York City’s Harbor and rivers on August 5th, 2010 fills in the blanks as well.

Chris Hedges talked at the New York City fundraiser, which was covered in an Alternet article entitled, It’s Israeli Officials Who Are Terrorists, because ‘those who send tanks and fighter jets to bomb the concrete hovels in Gaza with families crouching, helpless, inside — they are the terrorists.’ Hedges provided an interesting glossary for understanding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which is instructive:

Let me call things by their proper names. Let me cut through the jargon, the euphemisms we use to mask human suffering and war crimes. “Closures” mean heavily armed soldiers who ring Palestinian ghettos, deny those trapped inside food or basic amenities–including toys, razors, chocolate, fishing rods and musical instruments–and carry out a brutal policy of collective punishment, which is a crime under international law. “Disputed land” means land stolen from the Palestinians. “Clashes” mean, almost always, the killing or wounding of unarmed Palestinians, including children. “Jewish neighborhoods in the West Bank” mean fortress-like compounds that serve as military outposts in the campaign of ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians. “Targeted assassinations” mean extrajudicial murder. “Air strikes on militant bomb-making posts” mean the dropping of huge iron fragmentation bombs from fighter jets on densely crowded neighborhoods that always leaves scores of dead and wounded, whose only contact with a bomb was the one manufactured in the United States and given to the Israeli Air Force as part of our complicity in the occupation. “The peace process” means the cynical, one-way route to the crushing of the Palestinians as a people.

(Read the rest of Chris Hedges moving speech at the link.)

Phil Weiss (via Mondoweiss) earlier provided some background on the “Audacity of Hope” boat:

On Thursday (last) week, the group that is planning a US boat to Gaza (had) a sunset cruise in New York harbor to raise money. There is a lot of excitement about the boat.

A group of Americans opposed to Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza is raising money online to pay for a ship from the United States to take part in a new protest flotilla scheduled to set sail for the Palestinian territory in September or October.

In an appeal for money posted on the Web site UStoGaza.org, the activists say they are “planning to launch a U.S. boat to Gaza, joining a flotilla of ships from Europe, Canada, India, South Africa and parts of the Middle East.

The evolved Times ledeblog has covered it, and so the cruise is almost sold out, 400 passengers. Look at the list of people who are behind the US boat: Phyllis Bennis, Leslie Cagan, the Corries, Russell Banks, Anna Baltzer, Rashid Khalidi, Donna Nevel, Felice Gelman, Michael Ratner, Michael Smith, Judy Walker, Alice Walker, Noor Elashi, Rebecca Vilkomerson, Iara Lee. Good people…..There are rumors that Iker Casillas, the amazing Spanish goalie who reportedly expressed outrage over the siege even in the midst of the Spanish victory, and Rafael Nadal (currently No.1 ranked tennis player), will also be on that flotilla.

(Other links and information in the full article.)

How is life in Gaza for children? This video Where-should-birds-fly??????, tells the story:

A young girl sits among the rubble of her family home. She talks of the many people she knows who have been killed. When asked if she lost many family members she says: “Not many. Just my mother, my father and my brother.” Mona is 10 years old.

Omar stands before the rubble of the house he began building on the day his first son was born. Over the next twelve years he painstakingly added brick upon brick, wiring, plumbing, a new room, another floor. A fine house for his growing family, filled with precious mementos, well-kept furniture, wall hangings, children’s toys, all the necessary silver and flatware for daily meals and special dinners. Twelve years to the day of his son’s birth the bulldozers plowed into his home, destroying his family’s shelter, possessions and security. As the camera attempts to record the effect of this devastation, to read his emotions, he raises his hands gently: “What are we supposed to do now?”

Here is a note from Laurie Arbeiter on the importance of the US boat to Gaza, and below that, an appeal from the organizers:

First I think that it is important to note that the name of the boat, THE AUDACITY OF HOPE, has captured the imagination of people all over the country because the phrase succeeds in expressing the political will and collective desire to challenge the U.S./Israeli alliance… In order to challenge such a stronghold on power held by governments that have this much military might it requires audacious nonviolent acts such as the freedom flotilla sailing to break the illegal Israeli blockade of Gaza.

It requires us to face the facts of the blockade head-on, placing ourselves in the presence of an illegal criminal regime, asking ourselves to have the courage to face a condition constantly being faced by the Palestinian people living under occupation and siege.

Gaza is an open-air prison, without a doubt, when you consider that the definition of a prison camp is a place where people and goods cannot go or come without the say so of the guards — in this case Israel. One can argue whether the guards are nice guards or mean guards — or the prisoners well treated or poorly treated. But there can be no argument that Gaza is a prison for 1.5 million people who are being collectively punished. The mission of the flotillas is to sail to the walls of the prison and demand that they be taken down.

Also the U.S. government has sent and continues to send boats to that region carrying aid, only it is military aid. This will be a U.S. boat carrying a U.S. delegation with the message that the U.S. government has treaty obligations to obey universal human rights and international law and therefore it must stop all military aid to Israel, a country whose government has abused power and committed war crimes.

And here is an excerpt of the appeal:

This is an important moment in history. In the aftermath of the Gaza Freedom Flotilla massacre and increased world-wide scrutiny of Israel’s blockade of Gaza, the Israeli government has mounted a huge public relations campaign spreading the lie that by letting a few more items into Gaza the blockade has been lifted. This is not the reality. Gaza is still under siege…

We are planning to launch a U.S. boat to Gaza, joining a flotilla of ships from Europe, Canada, India, South Africa and parts of the Middle East due to set sail in September/October of this year. In order to succeed in this essential but costly human rights project, we need significant financial support.

Citizens around the world have responded to the plight of the Palestinian people and are taking action to help break the blockade which is suffocating the lives of the people of Gaza and denying them their liberty. The U.S. government is complicit through established policies that uncritically support Israel in its brutal attack on the Palestinian people and on those who attempt to intervene on their behalf. We in the United States must continue to step up and do our part. We must join with others from across the world to support an end to the collective punishment of 1.5 million Palestinians in Gaza.

We turn to you to help make the U.S. boat, The Audacity of Hope, a reality. We must raise at least $370,000 in the next month. These funds will be used to purchase a boat large enough for 40-60 people, secure a crew, and cover the licensing and registering of the boat. In addition, the funds will subsidize some other costs of sending a U.S. delegation.

Impressed. Well, there goes another hundred, every dime worth it. Join the peace movement in any way you can.

Footnote for Obama: Al-Walaja villagers stop construction of the Wall while soldiers attack protesters, including children

This is everyday stuff we don’t hear about in the US.

Anti-Islamic bigotry spreading across the US

Apparently inspired by the ADL-Ground Zero mosque controversy and the appeals of prominent Republicans like Newt Gingrich and Tea Partiers, a wave of anti-Islamic bigotry seems to be spreading across the country. As reported by Laurie Goodstein of the Times,

In Murfreesboro, Tenn., Republican candidates have denounced plans for a large Muslim center proposed near a subdivision, and hundreds of protesters have turned out for a march and a county meeting.

In late June, in Temecula, Calif., members of a local Tea Party group took dogs and picket signs to Friday prayers at a mosque that is seeking to build a new worship center on a vacant lot nearby.

In Sheboygan, Wis., a few Christian ministers led a noisy fight against a Muslim group that sought permission to open a mosque in a former health food store bought by a Muslim doctor.

Expressed fear that the Constitution would be replaced by Sharia Law was one reason for the protests. And once again we see the term “moderate Islam” used to characterize these religious groups as if Islam was inherently extremist and widely prevalent among them. Ignorance and bigotry are bedfellows for sure, but better is expected from news sources like the Huffington Post.

In an update on the ADL-Ground Zero mosque controversy, Fareed Zakaria returned the Hubert Humphrey Award for First Amendment Freedoms he received from the ADL five years ago, stating that, after the ADL’s intolerant position on the Ground Zero mosque, “I cannot in good conscience keep that award.”

Over the same controversy, Paul Krugman, the economist, spoke out on the Anti-Defamation League opinion. Responding to a piece by Peter Beinart who wrote about the ADL’s double standards, as Hateful Ground Zero Hypocrisy, Krugman, a Jewish liberal, let his views on Abe Foxman, director of the ADL, be known.

PHOTO ALBUM: What’s out of sight in Israel-Palestine

A sampling.

While we wait for the Netanyahu games to begin, anticipating the resumption of Israel’s building of homes on Palestinian land in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, the further emptying of the Jordan Valley of its remaining Palestinian villages, and the development of the future Apartheid state of Israel, it seems like a good time for people to take a look at the reality on the ground as far as the dwindling peace activist movement is concerned. Actually, the problem is its silence or lack of publicity. Here’s some.

These photos were shared this morning by the British site, Bristol to Gaza showing a little of what the reality is in Palestine, or whatever is left of it today, August 4, 2010.
Photobucket
Israeli border police officers detain an Israeli protester during a demonstration against the construction of Israel’s separation barrier in the West Bank village of Walajeh, outside Jerusalem, Wednesday, Aug. 4, 2010.

Photobucket
A mother and her baby after Israel bulldozed its home, village and 45 neighbouring villages. 4 August
(this could be a picture from the Bedouin village demolition of last week)

Photobucket
Israeli border police officers detain an Israeli protester during a demonstration against the construction of Israel’s separation barrier in the West Bank village of Walajeh, outside Jerusalem, Wednesday, Aug. 4, 2010.

Photobucket
The threat of Israel-Lebanon war mounts in face of open provocation

Photobucket
….nervous celebrations as five out of the remaining seven are acquitted for decommissioning EDO MBM in solidarity with Palestine. (sorry but I can’t supply the details)

Photobucket
:Resistance to the Nakba continues – 4th August

Photobucket
Israeli border police officers detain an Israeli protester during a demonstration against the construction of Israel’s separation barrier in the West Bank village of Walajeh, outside Jerusalem, Wednesday, Aug. 4, 2010.

ADL Comes Out Against Ground Zero Mosque

Who would have guessed?

ADL Comes Out Against Ground Zero Mosque

Once a venerable if checkered organization at the forefront of fighting bigotry in general and anti-Semitism in particular in the US and Europe, the Anti-Defamation League under Abe Foxman has stooped to a new low and essentially acknowledged its support of Islamophobia, prejudice against Muslims.

The Anti-Defamation League came out against Ground Zero Mosque. So much for religious tolerance.
Says Wikipedia about the ADL,

Defending Other Religions

As its goal is to defend not only Jews, but also “all citizens alike and to put an end forever to unjust and unfair discrimination against and ridicule of any sect or body of citizens,” the ADL has periodically made statements against misrepresentations of other faiths.

From the Huffington Post coverage,

The Anti-Defamation League has joined the likes of Newt Gingrich, Sarah Palin, Rick Lazio, and a slew of other Conservative protesters in standing against the building of a mosque in the vicinity of the World Trade Center site.

In a statement issued by the Jewish organization, the group claims that while “proponents of the Islamic Center may have every right to build at this site, and may even have chosen the site to send a positive message about Islam,” it is ultimately “not a question of rights, but a question of what is right.”

Moreover, despite “the bigotry some have expressed in attacking” those behind the building of the mosque (which the ADL deems “unfair” and “wrong”), it is their judgment that “building an Islamic Center in the shadow of the World Trade Center will cause some victims more pain – unnecessarily – and that is not right.”

While the ADL rarely shies away from controversy, news of their opposition left many journalists and pundits stunned.

Other views from the story,

As Tablet’s Marc Tracy puts it: “Founded in 1913, the ADL, in its words, “fights anti-Semitism and all forms of bigotry, defends democratic ideals and protects civil rights for all.” Except when it does the precise opposite.” And, “We regard freedom of religion as a cornerstone of the American democracy, and that freedom must include the right of all Americans – Christian, Jewish, Muslim, and other faiths – to build community centers and houses of worship.” And, “We categorically reject appeals to bigotry on the basis of religion, and condemn those whose opposition to this proposed Islamic Center is a manifestation of such bigotry.”

(But, but, but…..)

….there are understandably strong passions and keen sensitivities surrounding the World Trade Center site. We are ever mindful of the tragedy which befell our nation there, the pain we all still feel – and especially the anguish of the families and friends of those who were killed on September 11, 2001..blah, blah, blah….

The controversy which has emerged regarding the building of an Islamic Center at this location is counterproductive to the healing process. Therefore, under these unique circumstances, we believe the City of New York would be better served if an alternative location could be found.

Here’ a comment  from Dan Stewart who got to the gist of it when he said,

“It is not news that the Abe Foxman’s ADL opposes building a mosque anywhere.

It would be simpler to just report that, “Abe Foxman’s ADL opposes anything that is not in complete sympathy with fanatical Zionism.”

Then report when there’s an exception. Now that would be news.”

It is safe to say, that the ADL should now be unequivocally grouped with American and European organizations like AIPAC, ZOA, AJC, the Israel Lobby in general, as a supporter of right wing Likud politics in Israel, the Greater Israel dream, anti-Islamism, anti-Palestinianism, and the voices that scream for an attack on Iran, hopefully by the US?

(copied from a comment on Booman’s feature on the topic: The Entitlement of Bigotry)

200 children homeless Israel destroys Negev village UPDATE

First came this urgent email from Dr. Yeela Raanan, Regional Council for the Unrecognized Villages (RCUV, no link, tel +972 54 7487005, email yallylivnat@gmail.com):

Thousands of police evacuating and demolishing the village of El-Araqib in the Israeli Negev

Thousands of police are in the village of el-Araqib right now – beginning a mass evacuation, demolition, and erasure of this historical Bedouin village.

If you have access to the media, please send them to this village as soon as possible!

The village of el-Araqib is between Rahat and Beer Sheva, and in a location that the Goldberg commission deemed outside of the areas allowed for the Negev Arabs… an area designated only for Jews… the JNF (Jewish National Fund) is planting a forest on this village lands – to make sure that the Bedouin cannot live on their village lands or use them for agriculture. The villagers turned to the Israeli courts, as the JNF were planting this forest at the bequest of the Israeli government, but against Israeli law… the people of El-Araqib won the court battle… But this morning it seems that the Government of Israel has started a war — of the Government against its own citizens.

It was then followed by the details from Occupation Magazine:

Police destroys a whole Negev village – 200 children left homeless

Al_Arakib Popular Committee
Negev Coexistence Forum for Civil Equality
July 27, 2010

Destruction implemented though land ownership still pending in court. Netanyahu calls Bedouin citizens of Israel `real threat` – and next, an entire village in the Negev is demolished

Early this morning police raided the unrecognized Bedouin village of al-Arakib in the Negev, destroyed all 40 of its houses, and evicted more than 300 residents. The residents, mostly children, were left homeless. The unprecedented raid began at about 4:30 in the morning, residents were surprised to wake up surrounded by a huge force of 1,500 police with guns, stun grenades, helmets and shields, including hundreds of Special Riot Police (Yasam) as well as mounted police, helicopters and bulldozers.

At the residents` call, dozens of left-wing activists and volunteers arrived from all over the country, helping them to offer non-violent resistance. Several residents were bruised and beaten by police, though not needing medical attention. One woman demonstrator was detained by the police. The police removed the residents` property into prepared containers, and bulldozers demolished the residential buildings and sheepfolds and destroyed the residents` fruit orchards and olive tree groves.

The villagers, mostly children and old people, were left stunned near the destroyed village, shelterless and waterless under the blazing sun

The destruction of the village was carried out despite dispute over ownership of the land still pending in the courts. Residents of al-Arakib are neither squatters nor invaders: their village has existed many years before the creation of Israel in 1948. Residents had been evicted by the state in 1951, but returned to the land on which they live and which they cultivate. Ownership of the land is now the subject of proceedings in the Be`er Sheva District Court, where academic researchers have already testified in confirmation of the residents` ownership right in the land.

The destruction`s declared aim is to facilitate plans by the Jewish National Fund to plant a wood on the site. We regard this demolition as a criminal act. Bedouin citizens of Israel are not enemies, and forestation of the Negev is not a reasonable pretext for destroying a community, which is more than 60 years old, dispossessing its residents, and violating the basic rights of hundreds of Israeli civilians, men, women and children.

This act by the state authorities is no `law enforcement` – it is a act of war, such as is undertaken against an enemy. This act cannot be dissociated from yesterday`s statement by Prime Minister Netanyahu, who at the cabinet meeting sounded a warning about `a situation in which a demand for national rights will be made from some quarters inside Israel, for example in the Negev, should the area be left without a Jewish majority. Such things happened in the Balkans, and it is a real threat.`

Presenting the Bedouin citizens of Israel as `a real threat` gives legitimacy to the expulsion of Israel`s Bedouin citizens from the Negev in order to `Judaize` it. We call on all who care for democracy to give their support to this threatened community.

Apartheid can take many forms. Yesterday, in Israel, we witnessed another step in that direction. Already, considerable numbers of Bedouin citizens of Israel have been herded into small towns following similar actions involving house (and tent) demolitions and deprivation of water. Since they can no longer lead their traditional lives in the Negev, 95% now work as cheap labor inside Israel, in the same manner as Black citizens of South Africa worked in white-owned industries and mines during the Apartheid period.

The Israeli newspaper, Haaretz, also ran the story (in Hebrew).

Permissions granted.

UPDATE: Villagers Rebuild Razed Bedouin Village

Written by Providence Knolls & Tania Kepler
Posted: 30 July 2010 10:31

One day after Israeli authorities razed the Bedouin village of el Araqib, village residents joined with Palestinian, Israeli and international volunteers to rebuild the village.

“We successfully rebuilt all the structures and tents destroyed, noted Dr. Awad Abu Freih, spokesperson of the el Araqib village and member of the el Araqib Popular Committee and the Arab Education Forum in the Negev. In a conversation with the AIC, Dr. Abu Freih stated that the residents of el Araqib “plan on building more than what was destroyed, in an attempt to prevent future demolitions….”

Despite being unrecognized by Israel, the village of el Araqib has existed since before the creation of Israel in 1948. Bedouin residents were evicted by the newly declared Israeli state in 1951, but returned to the land on which they live and where they cultivate. Ownership of the land is now the subject of proceedings in the Be’er Sheva District Court.

Dr. Abu Freih calls on internationals to help the Bedouins of El-Araqib in their struggle for survival to remain in their village. He states that they are currently in need of “everything,” from money to visits to media attention. He encourages anyone interested to speak to the villagers and spend the day or night with them.

http://www.just-international.org/index.php/villagers-rebuild-razed-bedouin-village.html

Justice deserves persistence.

Don’t Boycott Israel? Why not?

Because according to Jacob Weisberg, Newsweek columnist, “The very idea is repellent.”

Really? Let’s listen to some of what he has to say:

If you follow the news closely enough, you might have caught a small item recently noting that Meg Ryan had canceled a scheduled appearance at a film festival in Jerusalem to protest Israeli policy. This was significant not because anyone should care what the nose-crinkling movie star thinks about the Mideast but precisely because no one does. Ryan, a conventional Hollywood Democrat, is a barometer of celebrity politics. Her sort of sheeplike, liberal opinion once reflexively favored Israel. Now it’s dabbling in the repellent idea of shunning the entire country.

Support for the Israeli cultural boycott has been growing in surprising places lately. After the Gaza flotilla incident in June, rock bands including the Pixies canceled performances at a music festival in Tel Aviv. Elvis Costello announced in May that he was canceling two upcoming performances to protest the treatment of Palestinians. Unlike Ryan, Costello is a thoughtful person whose views are worthy of respect. So why, exactly, do I think he’s wrong, too? Why is a private embargo–which includes an academic boycott and the push for divestment on the anti-apartheid model–an unacceptable way for outsiders to protest Israeli treatment of Palestinians?

One argument is that academic boycotts are intrinsically unacceptable because they violate the principles of free expression and the universality of science and learning. A parallel objection applies to cultural boycotts, which directly target the most forward-thinking members of a society. In the case of Israel, shunning writers like Amos Oz and David Grossman, who serve as national consciences, seems not only intrinsically vile but actively counterproductive. On the other hand, it would be hard to justify a blanket rule that cultural and academic sectors are always off-limits. In authoritarian societies, cultural institutions do tend to become ideological proxies–think of the National Ballet in Cuba, or the East German gymnastics team.

It won’t work? So why is the Israeli Kenesset passing legislation that would criminalize boycott efforts inside of Israel and the West Bank?

Let’s see. Did Weisberg even begin to mention the reasons why boycotting Israel is justified, like the 43 year long military occupation of the Palestinians, whose sole purpose it is to colonize—well, let’s be frank about it—steal their lands, which continues today? And what about the atrocities perpetuated by Israel against the Palestinians, like the massacre of 1,400 mostly civilians in Gaza recently, including over 300 innocent children? Let’s not even mention the past 60 years. And what about the suppression of non-violent protests, including the deaths of protesters as well as the arrest of its leadership, the so-called Gandhis of Palestine, who are are jailed interminably. Not a word.

Instead, what we get from Weisberg is a repetition of Israeli propaganda talking points (could have been out of GIYUS or even StandWithUs): that “supporters of this boycott seldom focus on China or Syria or Zimbabwe–or other genuinely illegitimate regimes that systematically violate human rights,” and “because Israel is a refuge for Jews persecuted everywhere else, this kind of existential challenge is hard to disassociate from anti-Semitism.”

It’s those old defenses: why us and criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic!

Even though we finally get an admission from Weisberg that cultural and sports boycotts against South African Apartheid were effective, somehow Israel is not South Africa. It is a democracy. Well so was South Africa, and so was America when it supported slavery and then Jim Crow segregation for a hundred years.

Weisberg is just not convincing.