1 2 3 4 5 … 248

Comments

    Maybe correct as to your intended meaning, but not what you wrote.
  •  View post
    • LOL at the pathetic, cowardly, anonymous downrates! Can't rebut/refute? Downrate! Oh, and by the way, Booman, there's another for your…
  •  View post
    • I bet that Republicans know they are now the minority party, but . . . Precisely. As I've said many…
  •  View post
    • No, I'm reading it as it was actually written. Note that your misreading requires you to change the original "because"…
  •  View post
    • Aaaannnd . . . you got what you cared about!
  •  View post
    • Distinction without a difference. The "investigation" Nadler declared underway in his court filing is the very definition of an "impeachment…
  •  View post
    • " . . . in all but name" is superfluous. This clearly declares that an official impeachment inquiry is underway:…
  •  View post
    • Schiff's closing statement was likewise excellent, essentially saying "now it's on us." And Nadler's now made it official that an…
  •  View post
    • The court filing is very explicit that it is, in fact, an impeachment inquiry (see my UPDATE comment, this thread,…
  •  View post
    • Well, except they're now doing pretty much the opposite of that (see my UPDATE comment, this thread).
  •  View post
    • I think you're mostly wrong about most of that. Note, for example, that whether because of or despite Mueller's performance,…
  •  View post
    • The more important thing (imho) is that yesterday was another step in the right direction, i.e., towards an impeachment inquiry.…
  •  View post
    • Most importantly, whether despite or because of Mueller's hesitance, Nadler appears to have decided "well, just fuck all this waffling…
  •  View post
    • UPDATE: "Impeachment proceedings" are officially underway. (Quoting myself there at atrios' place:)Is it just me, or is this huge? Felt…
  •  View post
    • You can be unpatriotic because you don’t stand for the national anthem.Um, no. Absolutely not. You could have unpatriotic reasons…
  •  View post
    • Except in narrow village streets! (See Kelly's Heroes for some Sherman/Panzer humor.)
  •  View post
    • So. Plausible chance lightning takes him out, then. Is Pence attending, too? One can dream.
  •  View post
    • In fact, he (or his brain worms) specified that "new" Sherman tanks -- which haven't existed since 1957, I think…
  •  View post
    • Yeah, and to be clear, I'm not promoting that take as how it necessarily is, nor even how I think…
  •  View post
    • Alternate take: Yes, he's reportedly "a close personal friend of Barr", I think. Therefore, he was genuinely taken by surprise…
  •  View post