a new york education

When I was eighteen years old I met an older woman in Manhattan named Ellen.  Everyone who went to my university knew her.  She was a fixture.  Like Amir’s or Mama Joy’s deli or the Cosmo restaurant.  A small, quick-moving woman always carrying two or three heavily laden bags with a voice that was pure New York…distilled through years of cigarettes and bus exhaust.  Her voice was kind of a female equivalent to Lou Reed’s: smoky, knowing, world-weary.

Ellen was in her late forties.  Her politics were radical.  An advocate for the homeless.  A tireless debater.  An opponent of both Reagan and Bush and everything bourgeois.  She was an inveterate smoker.  Bipolar.  A mother of three.  A veteran of years of New York politics.  And, like tens of thousands of other New Yorkers in 1987,  Ellen had no place to live.  She slept where she could.  She, too, was homeless.

I’m a city kid.  I grew up in the Reagan 80’s.  Things were tough all over.  I worked in soup kitchens as a teen in the midwest.  People I knew sometimes passed through the line.  In Manhattan things were magnified.  On my stretch of Broadway early one morning I once counted twenty-four people sleeping in the space of one block.  Where other people, I’m sure, would see Ellen as a “bag lady” and nothing more.  I didn’t.  It’s never that simple.  My friend Karl, a minister’s son coming from the city of Detroit, knew this too.  He befriended Ellen and helped her out with food and a place to stay a couple times. It was through Karl that I met Ellen.

What is there to say about the endless coversations that Ellen and I had in diners all over the city?  (Tom’s. College Inn. The Mill. Vaselka’s. The Kiev. Leshka’s.  Chock Full o’ Nuts.)  I don’t know.  Ellen was a complex person.   She was someone I’d always hoped would get it together enough to write her own story.  Hell, I lent her my first electric typewriter (never to be seen again) the summer she found a room in an apartment off 126th and Lexington.  She wrote some great letters to me.  I still have them somewhere.

But that was so long ago.  A year and a half friendship, when you’re eighteen…leaves a mark, but also becomes in some ways a part of your past.  To be honest, there is no way I can speak for Ellen.  There is no way I can do her justice.  Her sense of humor.  Her sense of outrage.  Her way of interacting with the city.  It’s all mixed up in how I see New York, and in some ways, in how I see myself…

—————–

I would get calls.  It’d be 9:30 at night, or 7 in the morning.  Ellen might be at a diner somewhere.  She might be in the lobby of my building.  She might be freaked out at a hospital emergency room.  I’m not rich, but I always had six bucks for a cheap meal and a pack of cigarettes.  And I always learned something new from Ellen.  About life.  About politics.  About New York City and the people I shared it with.  So I’d go.

I’d meet Ellen at homeless encampments in the subway.  Herald Square.  Grand Central Terminal.  Or at Tompkins Square Park or a nearby squat.  New York was different then.  Maybe for some the eighties in New York meant glitz and flash.  It was also a dirty, crack-smoke-filled decade riven with ruined lives.  At one point, the New York Times reported that one in nine New Yorkers used cocaine on a daily basis.  From where I stood, that was totally believable.

Ellen was different.  She was, let’s face it, mentally ill, but she was also an incredibly smart and fierce observer and reader of the politics of the day.  She’d grown up in a prosperous family on the Upper East Side.  She’d had two different families.  Her grown sons did their best to care for her at times.  But they didn’t share her world…and didn’t join it.  And Ellen in some ways chose to live the way she did, however desperate and difficult that made her life and those who cared for her.

There is too much that Ellen taught me to convey here.  But if I could communicate one essential point it would be this.  No one has made as clear for me the connection between poverty and privelege that Ellen did.  At her best, she was able to bring humanity, to bring a face and a story to the very real people who found themselves homeless on the streets of New York.  She was also able to explain clearly how racism, how economic injustice and pervasive discrimination boxed people in and kicked them to the curb, forced them into lives where they were treated like human trash, and often ended up living a literal reflection of that.

White, middle class kids like me saw the world as “cause and effect.”  That was so easy.  So simple.  You make mistakes, you end up on the street, you end up poor and destitute.  Ellen was able to show me how privileged I was.  How when I made mistakes….and I did…they were forgiven…solutions were found.  She showed me how I saw the world through a lens that made judging other people a very comfortable thing to do.  How easy all my assumptions were.  How those assumptions always justified…at the end of the day…a course of action that I was going to take anyway.  The easy way.

But Ellen took it further than that.  Conversation by conversation, example by example…over endless cups of coffee….Ellen showed me how my privelege was actually linked to other people’s suffering, how in order for some to have plenty, plenty others had to have not much. It’s like the line to all the good things in life was six billion long, and I happened to be born (like Ellen herself) right up near the front…

I didn’t earn that.  No one does.  And there are times, asleep in my comfortable bed in California that I wake with a start.  I’m dreaming about a voice from my past.  A cigarette-fueled voice from New York City.  Someone with whom I’ve lost touch…someone I don’t know what happened to.  (I last spoke to Ellen in the early nineties when she was in the hospital for an operation.)

I’d call her my conscience, but that would be lying.  I’d call her a lost friend, and that would be closer to the truth.  But more and more I feel like there’s something specific to that voice that I can’t quite pin down.  On some level…it’s like New York City itself is speaking to me.  Telling me to open my eyes.  Telling me to wake up.

essay © 2005 paul delehanty / kid oakland

Trouble at Homeland Security?

There was a little piece today in my free morning paper (amNY) that caught my attention.

WASHINGTON — The Homeland Security Department’s former independent watchdog says he was twice summoned to then-Secretary Tom Ridge’s office last year and asked why his reports criticizing the agency were being sent to Congress and whether they could be presented more favorably to the department.

Ridge “was trying to get me not to give things to Congress and also to try to spin reports in a way most favorable to the department, and I resisted both of those,” former Inspector General Clark Kent Ervin said in an interview.

Watchdog Details Confrontations With Ridge  

Ridge denies this:

Ervin’s statements are “untrue and deserve no further comment,” said Ridge, who left as secretary last month.

Read the interesting article, Inspector General Ervin does not mince words:

According to Ervin, Ridge asked, “What can we do to coordinate our messages on these reports so that you and we are saying the same thing about it?”

Ervin recalled: “I said, `I’m not in the spin business. We don’t coordinate our messages with the department. You can characterize it and spin it however you want, but that’s your business, not ours, and we’re not going to coordinate anything with you.'”

AS you will note from the article, IG Ervin is a former inspector general.  I had missed this back in December, but here is what I found.

From USA Today on 27 December 2004:

By Mimi Hall, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON — The government agency responsible for protecting the nation against terrorist attack is a dysfunctional, poorly managed bureaucracy that has failed to plug serious holes in the nation’s safety net, the Department of Homeland Security’s former internal watchdog warns.

Ervin lost his job this month in mysterious fashion. Appointed by President Bush in December 2003 when Congress was out of session, Ervin was never confirmed by the Senate. Nor was he renominated by the White House this month when his “recess appointment” — which lasted until the congressional session ended — expired Dec. 8.

A key senator won’t say why. Elissa Davidson, spokeswoman for the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, wouldn’t comment on why Chairman Susan Collins, R-Maine, never held confirmation hearings for Ervin. “The decision not to renominate Clark Kent Ervin was purely a White House decision,” she said.

And then there is this: POGO Project on Government Oversight – follow the link to Post 9/11 Security.  The DHS is trying to suppress even unclassified information.  The Inspector General is not reconfirmed because the White House did not want it, yet

Congress created the federal system of inspectors general in response to the Watergate scandal.

(from the above link to amNY).

Now ex-IG Ervin states that Ridge tried to make him spin his reports to Congress.

I profess no knowledge beyond what this amNY-article stated and what I found on some links, but it seems that the DHS and the Administration are extremely eager and vigilant in ensuring a lid on things.
What’s going on?

European Kos equivalent – a call for help

[promoted to the front page. And a big welcome to Jerome a Paris]

As many of you have probably seen, we have started some discussions on whether to have a European Kossacks convention, and whether to create a Euroopean Kos website.

My questions to you guys:

  • it looks like this site could a model of sorts for the site. Could anyone explain to me what it requires to be built (in terms of competences, effort, time, manpower, etc…) and what kind of modularity it has if we want a European site with various flavors yet to be discussed?
  • maybe this could be a place to conduct some slightly more discreet conversations on the topic without boring dKossacks with all the details – nor being swamped by the diary flow. Would you mind?

Feedback and input welcome!

Raw Story: Interesting Interview with Scott Ritter

Raw Story: Do you feel the latest flurry of warnings with regard to biochemical and/or nuclear attacks are part of this strategy–fear–or is something coming down the pike?

Ritter: No, they are using fear. [FBI director] Robert Mueller said he is a 100 percent certain that the US will be attacked by chemical and biological weapons. That’s a stunning statement if you think about it. I am a firefighter here in New York state, if we are going to be attacked by chemical/biological weapons; then why am I and other first responders not being mobilized to be trained in responding to that environment… in an emergency fashion? I mean this is a national security imperative.

<a href="http://rawstory.com/news/2005/index.php?p=174

“>Raw Story

I don’t know about Ritter. But I know he’s pissed off.

New Suggestion Box

Here is a new suggestion box.  The site is almost a day old and we have established a few things.

One: a lot of people do not like the default comment titles.  If anyone likes ’em, speak up now.

Two: people are freaking out about the spellcheck feature.  For now, you cannot post in comments or a diary until you uncheck the spellcheck button.

You can turn off the default spellcheck button in Display Preferences.

If you want to use spellcheck, just remember to uncheck the box before hitting post.

Three: we have to fix the New message lights so they don’t count our own posts as new.

Hmmm.  Anything else?

Hunting down the CIA

The CIA has apparently been conducting “extraordinary rendition” operations in Europe and they have left a trail. Police in Italy, Germany and Sweden are in pursuit, according to the Washington Post’s Foreign Service.

The Italian probe is one of three official investigations that have surfaced in the past year into renditions believed to have taken place in Western Europe. Although the CIA usually carries out the operations with the help or blessing of friendly local intelligence agencies, law enforcement authorities in Italy, Germany and Sweden are examining whether U.S. agents may have broken local laws by detaining terrorist suspects on European soil and subjecting them to abuse or maltreatment.

More below the fold…
When you piss-off your best friends and kidnap their residents, you should do a better job of erasing your tracks.

Milan investigators, however, now appear to be close to identifying his kidnappers. Last month, officials showed up at Aviano Air Base in northern Italy and demanded records of any American planes that had flown into or out of the joint U.S.-Italian military installation around the time of the abduction. They also asked for logs of vehicles that had entered the base.

[snip – you should read the whole thing]

Flight logs also support Masri’s claim that he was flown out of Macedonia by U.S. secret agents. Aviation records show a U.S.-registered Boeing jet arrived in Skopje at 9 p.m. on Jan. 23, 2004, and departed about six hours later. Masri had provided German investigators with the same time and date.

The flight plan shows the aircraft was scheduled to go to Kabul, but later amended its route to include a stopover in Baghdad. The existence of the flight logs was first reported by Frontal 21, a news show on the German television network ZDF. A copy of the logs was obtained by The Washington Post.

The jet, with tail number N313P, was registered at the time to a U.S. firm, Premier Executive Transport Services Inc., that records suggest is a CIA front company. The same firm owned another aircraft, a Gulfstream jet, that has been used in other rendition cases, including the one in Sweden.

Imagine if British Intelligence was kidnapping Irish people with similar sounding names as, say, Jerry Adams, from the streets of Boston and hauling them off to to be tortured for their alleged ties to the IRA without the advice and consent of the FBI.

There is more on the plane and the company here written by a WaPo staff writer:

The story of the Gulfstream V offers a rare glimpse into the CIA’s secret operations, a world that current and former CIA officers said should not have been so easy to document.

Not only have the plane’s movements been tracked around the world, but the on-paper officers of Premier Executive Transport Services are also connected to a larger roster of false identities.

Each of the officers of Premier Executive is linked in public records to one of five post office box numbers in Arlington, Oakton, Chevy Chase and the District. A total of 325 names are registered to the five post office boxes.

An extensive database search of a sample of 44 of those names turned up none of the information that usually emerges in such a search: no previous addresses, no past or current telephone numbers, no business or corporate records. In addition, although most names were attached to dates of birth in the 1940s, ’50s or ’60s, all were given Social Security numbers between 1998 and 2003.
[snip]
on Dec. 1, the plane, complete with a new tail number, was transferred to a new owner, Bayard Foreign Marketing of Portland, Ore., according to FAA records. Its registered agent in Portland, Scott Caplan, did not return phone calls.

Like the officers at Premier Executive, Bayard’s sole listed corporate officer, Leonard T. Bayard, has no residential or telephone history. Unlike Premier’s officers, Bayard’s name does not appear in any other public records.

Cross posted at dKos

Frogmarch Lieberman!

[promoted to the front page. And a big welcome to Pastor Dan]

This is an edited copy of this post on faithforward.

Joe Lieberman is hanging out with Sam Brownback and the Richard Scaife sockpuppet Institute on Religion and Democracy. The Reuters article is basically a hack rework of the IRD press release:

Evangelical Christians, known for opposition to abortion rights and same-sex marriage, flexed their political muscle on Thursday and one said Democrats suffer from a “religion gap” at the polls.

“The religious left is political smoke and mirrors,” Diane Knippers, president of the Institute on Religion and Democracy, said in a statement read at a gathering of the National Association of Evangelicals. “It simply doesn’t have a significant voting base.”

Citing polls showing strong evangelical support for Republican President Bush (news – web sites) in the 2004 election, Knippers, who couldn’t attend the meeting, said in her statement: “The Democratic Party needs to begin to close its religion gap. Its leaders would do well to seek out advice from religious leaders who have a genuine constituency.”

Does Lieberman even pretend to be a Democrat anymore?

Lieberman talked about his commitment to stemming global warming, and the place of religious faith in the U.S. government.

“I think your presence, your advocacy on a whole host of issues is not only welcome but necessary and classically American,” Lieberman said. “America itself is a faith-based initiative.”

For more on the IRD, see here, and tikkun’s excellent diary here.

Is Gale Norton our Seretary of Interior or our Secretary of Energy?

I don’t have any expertise on the whole issue of ANWAR and energy exploration. But I find it very disturbing that Gale Norton has decided to advocate for oil drilling on the Editorial Pages of the New York Times. She is nothing but a shill for the mining, timber, and now, oil industries. Isn’t that the exact opposite of what the Secretary of Interior is supposed to be?

Even though it is noon, the landscape is pitch black. The wind chill stands at 70 below zero. A lone man drives across a vast frozen plain on a road made of ice. He sits atop a large, bug-like machine with enormous wheels. He is heading for a spot on the tundra pinpointed by satellite imagery to explore for oil. When the spring thaw comes and the road melts, any evidence that a man or a machine ever crossed there will be gone.

This is the world of Arctic energy exploration in the 21st century. It is as different from what oil exploration used to be as the compact supercomputers of today are different from the huge vacuum tube computers of the 1950s. Through the use of advanced technology, we have learned not only to get access to oil and gas reserves in Arctic environments but also to protect their ecosystems and wildlife. Gale Norton’s NY Times Editorial

I’m willing to entertain the idea that we have made advances in environmentally friendly ways of exploring for oil. But what about when we actually find oil?

Will we have one lone man up there pumping oil. Will there be no activity except during winter months?

In 1980, when Congress created the refuge, it set aside the 1002 area for possible future energy development. To date, Congress has not approved this development because of environmental concerns. In the meantime, America’s domestic production of energy has declined and we have become more and more dependent on imported oil.

Has Gale Norton advocated for alternative energy sources? Or just for less regulation for her special interests masters?

Not today:

more on the flip…

As part of a comprehensive energy strategy of promoting conservation and reducing dependence on foreign oil, we must increase our energy production here at home.

No mention of alternative energy sources. And she claims her plan is comprehensive

The 1002 area is potentially the largest untapped source of oil and gas on American soil. While we cannot promise that there will be no impact on the wildlife and habitat of the 1002 area, we can promise no significant impact.

Define significant impact, Gale.

Technological advances in oil exploration are at the heart of a debate over America’s energy future. Congress will soon decide whether to open up a sliver of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge – called the 1002 area – to energy development. Opponents will pretend that new, less invasive technology doesn’t exist. It is important for Americans to understand that it does, and that it works.

In past decades, Arctic oil development involved huge amounts of equipment that had to be moved over gravel roads and laid upon large gravel pads. The machines that transported this equipment often scarred the land, especially in spring and summer.

American ingenuity has tackled this problem. Today, oil exploration in the Arctic occurs only in the frozen winter. Workers build roads and platforms of ice to protect the soil and vegetation. Trucks with huge tires called rolligons distribute load weights over large areas of snow to minimize the impact on the tundra below.

Meanwhile, innovations in platform development and directional drilling mean that we need fewer and smaller pads to tap into oil and gas reserves. From a single platform, we can explore an underground area nearly the size of the District of Columbia.

That’s all very nice. But exploration is one thing, and a full extraction and production operation is another. Am I wrong or she is describing what the environmental impact would be if we never found any oil?

Christopher Lydon Returns to the Airwaves (w/poll)

A heads up for any Christopher Lydon fans out there.  After a 4 year haitus, Chris will be returning to the airwaves (4 days/week) with a new, one hour show.

More below the fold…
Titled “Open Source”, it will focus on journalism on the internets, media and blogging.  Initially, it will originate from Boston’s WGBH studios and will eventually move to the studios of U Mass Lowell, the shows syndicator.

A few quotes and links for your purusal…

Boston Herald:

“Open Source” will be broadcast Monday through Thursday at 7 p.m. on WGBH in Boston and the university’s WUML (91.5 FM) and nationally syndicated by Public Radio International.

      Lydon will also work with UMass-Lowell to design a new communications major, contribute to WUML programming, and help with a student-produced local radio program, according to the college. The student program will start in the next academic year.

7:00PM?  Uh oh, Eric in the Evening fans won’t be happy.

From the initial press release:

Open Source aims to begin conversations on the Web each day and invite a worldwide audience to contribute topics, guests, and information that advances understanding of issues and ideas.  Lydon says, “My ambition, with producer Mary McGrath, is to thread the seeming chaos of the Web into a coherent skein of ideas and argument.  We want to launch the smartest, most various, wide-open, irresistible, and democratic conversation anyone’s ever been invited to join, in any format.  The Internet transition we’re living through is a boundless opportunity.  It extends the rim of the roundtable and the range of the give-and-take to the whole planet.”

Lowell (MA) Sun:

LOWELL — In hiring well-known public-radio talkmeister Christopher Lydon for $12,500 a month, UMass Lowell says its getting much more than a locally produced radio program.

Not only will “Open Source” be heard across the country on other stations, Lydon and his longtime producer, Mary McGrath, will serve as consultants and instructors in creating a new UMass Lowell communications degree program, which will be centered around WUML.

“That’s a great buy. I don’t care what people say,” said Lou DiNatale, the UMass Lowell public affairs director, who is spearheading the university’s plan to expand its programming on WUML 91.5 FM. “We hope the radio program is a smash success, but we’re ready
to take Lydon as an instructor in the communications program, too.”

$12.5K per month?  Not a bad chunk of change.

Lastly, extensive coverage from The Boston Phoenix:

IF CHRISTOPHER LYDON is feeling any schadenfreude this week, he’s not letting on. But who could blame him if he does? Just a little more than four years ago, he and producer Mary McGrath were fired by WBUR Radio (90.9 FM) general manager Jane Christo in the midst of a very public, very ugly contract dispute. Then, last fall, Christo resigned during an investigation into whether she had mismanaged the Boston University-owned station’s finances. Now Lydon and McGrath are back with a new program, a new place on the Boston dial (WGBH Radio, 89.7 FM), and a new, unlikely partner: UMass Lowell, which will eventually become their base of operations.

* *

“I hope the range of the listenership will basically be global. Through a very active Web site, we’ll be engaging people before, during, and after the program on each subject,” Lydon says, declaring himself to have “a blogger’s enthusiasm about this.” He adds: “We just want to make the show incredibly zesty and original and fresh…. We’re just happy to be cranking.” Says McGrath: “It’s an incredible opportunity for us, and we’re enormously grateful to everybody” — that is, PRI, WGBH, and UMass Lowell.

Oh, and one more thing.  If you’re in the Boston area, Chris is giving a 90 minute talk next week at the Brookline Public Library as part of the Brookline Adult Education Program:

An exciting and rapidly expanding revolution aimed at the transformation of media is well underway. Concealed within the little miracle of minuscule electronic files, information is being globally distributed by the people, and for the people. The once vital production studios, broadcasting moguls, central distribution hubs, and major networks are now potentially less important to a journalist than a high speed Internet connection and MP3 files. Growth away from major market media has led to wonderful and experimental Internet news mediums like Slate, and Salon.com, and to unparalleled journalistic potential. But it has also left many questioning the standards of journalistic integrity, filtering and censorship, and the monitoring of trustworthy source material.

This evening, Christopher Lydon will discuss his own unique and extensive experience living and working on the brink of a new system of social expression and information. Christopher Lydon started his professional life writing about politics for The Boston Globe, moved through The New York Times, public television, and one of the smartest talk radio programs on the air, The Connection. He is currently pioneering the audio blog media format, by electronically distributing uncommonly interesting interviews and commentary in a form known as ³podcasting.² Join us as we discuss the fruits, as well as the faults, of the new electronic world citizenship that is radically transforming the manner by which information is reported, produced, and received.

Thanks to Boston Radio Watch for the links and for bring this to my attention.