Just in from Human Rights Watch and reported on Democracy Now! (and, see below, today’s LA Times):
Cross-posted at Daily Kos.
Continues Amy Goodman on Democracy Now!:
From Human Rights Watch:
… The Human Rights Watch briefing, “Cairo to Kabul to Guantanamo: the `Abd al-Salam `Ali al-Hila Case,” details how al-Hila, a Yemeni intelligence colonel and businessman who had been involved in helping Arab Islamists in the 1990s, was first picked up by Egyptian authorities [in] 2002 … he was taken within ten days to Baku, Azerbaijan [Susan’s note: That can’t have been a good place.] … to the Bagram air base in Afghanistan [Susan’s note: Here, the torturers are Americans.], and, finally, sometime in mid-2004, to … Guantanamo [Susan’s note: The same.]. …
Prior to detention in Cairo, al-Hila, a father of three, had been in daily contact with his family in Yemen. After his “disappearance” in September 2002, the family did not hear from him again until April 2004. Details of his whereabouts were not known until a letter al-Hila wrote was smuggled out of Afghanistan (a translation is reprinted in full in the attached briefing). …
The Men With No Name: “Most of the 540 detainees in Cuba — including dozens of other Yemenis — have no outside legal representation” because they have no names.
Today’s Los Angeles Times reports it’s almost impossible for the men to get legal help (note the Times’s headline):
A Yemeni reportedly jailed by Egypt in 2002 apparently has been in covert American custody since, without legal recourse.
. . . “One thing that we’re trying to point out here is the way in which these reverse renditions occur entirely outside the rule of law,” said John Sifton, a New York-based lawyer for Human Rights Watch. There has been no extradition process and no ability to challenge the detention, he said.
“What we’re saying is … use existing legal principles and laws,” Sifton said. “They will work.” …
Human rights lawyers say Hila’s case highlights a major obstacle facing them in their bid to represent detainees like the Yemeni: The Pentagon refuses to confirm or deny whom it has taken into custody and is holding at Guantanamo Bay. Military officials will provide details about a detainee, including his name, only after his lawyers sue in U.S. District Court in Washington, where such cases are heard.
News accounts and legal filings indicate that detainees have been seized in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Zambia, Pakistan, Thailand and elsewhere. But without a list of confirmed names, U.S. lawyers are unable to go to court. Most of the 540 detainees in Cuba — including dozens of other Yemenis — thus have no outside legal representation. …
The LA Times article reports that the “United States had reason to suspect Hila.”
But, guilty or not, these detainees deserve, at the very least, an attorney and preferably one who can communicate with them.
Then there’s due process and the outdated, quaint 17th-century concept of habeas corpus.
Can we even comprehend this? That MOST of the Guantanamo detainees not only do not have ANY legal representation, they also have no name.
I’d thought it was just a few who hadn’t been identified — mostly the ghost detainees. But, no. David Hicks, apparently, is one of the lucky ones. We know his name and he’s got two attorneys. The rest of them … and, of course, since almost all of the European detainees have been released from Guantanamo, that leaves — you guessed it. (Starting to rant. Takes deep breath. Pets cat.)
I bet Gonzales will take steps to ensure this doesn’t happen again in the future. Yup. (I too, find myself petting my cat more frequently these days – otherwise I’d lose it)
My cat’s coat has never been this shiney..ha! He is all black with peircing green eyes. The little sucker is lucky to have any fur left. He always curls up with me while I watch the Liars news each night and pet him faster and faster as the broadcast goes on. He does purr alot when Olbermann comes on though.