(Cross posted from DKos)
It seems like many weeks since I sat down and wrote the sort of diary that I like writing. The one straight from the heart, where you want to say something that matters to you personally and that you want to share.
The trouble is that I have got too immersed in the mechanics of the world of blogging, too involved with the day to day worrying about how to get site visits up on New European Times, how to define its role better, how to attract some of you great posters to put up topics on there. Then we got infiltrated by someone running an experiment on our interaction there as if we were rats in an internet forum maze and I had all the issues of how does a liberal blog handle that sort of situation and was the banning process appropriate for an interesting guy.
This is not why I started writing on my first ever forum, Daily Kos, those long six or more months ago. Something was going askew somewhere.
It is true that during this time I was able to write two or three diaries that did matter to me. Things were happening in the UK that my senses said were building up to something big. A quiet election campaign was suddenly transformed by events that will remain long after it reaches conclusion and will have repercussions that will reverberate after the vote count tomorrow.
I wanted Kossacks to know about and to recognise that in the right hands of the right people, the events that were occurring could have an impact on George Bush and United States opinion.
It concerned, of course, the evidence about the legality of the Iraq war that was demonstrated in the leaked paper prepared by the Attorney General.
Then came the even more devastating revelation of the minutes of the Prime Minister’s meeting where the decision to go to war was acknowledged as having been taken by the US way before any of the charade on decision-making took place in out own Parliament, your Congress or in front of the wretchedly reduced world forum of the United Nations.
A great lie was enacted upon our people and the evidence is now available as the proof that even deep conviction needs if it is to overturn the power of the media control of those who perpetuated this shameful untruth.
Many people responded to those diaries that urged that this could have political significance in your own country. A number of Kossack said that they would be emailing their political representatives of whom Congressman Conyers was one. We will never know if this had an effect. As I have written before, in this sort of situation you never know what effect you may have, you can only do what your conscience says is right. And do it loudly and as often as you can.
Many of you saw the BBC Question Time programme when the leaders of the three main UK political parties had to sit and face real questions from real people. The most penetrating questions came, as it happens, from three women. The camera captured one of these, about whom I will add a comment to this diary when it is published, full on as she responded to an answer from Tony Blair “If you weren’t fraudulent, then you were criminally negligent”.
Did she, by this sharp and direct response, change anything? Did she help create a climate in the country by this lucid and precise statement, on the most widely watched election debate that we have had, and help make the rest of the media wake up and have the bravery to do what they have now done? I don’t know and she will not either. She did what she felt in her heart what she needed to do.
Now I have not started this diary to write about these issues. Yet I cannot move on before I say something else in regard to them.
One of the difficulties I had in those diaries was coping with those who would shrug them off and say the bulk of the American people would be unmoved by the events to which they referred. It was said that they had no relevance, that we should get Blair in handcuffs before expecting the States to take any heed and did anyone really expect this to happen. I needed and got help from many of you, including Armando to whom I am grateful, to keep those diaries afloat and on track.
Well, now Congressman Conyers has taken up the mantle more effectively than I ever could. His questions to Bush are questions with which he confronts the American people:
This is the first step before the Congressman and his colleagues can address the issue of the legality of the war for which again London has now provided vital evidence.
Trust his judgement that there is not just political capital to be gained here but something much more fundamental. It is to do with the rights of Congress and the upholding of the Constitution. It is just not about recognising yesterday’s wrong but about preventing another tomorrow.
Yesterday, he got overwhelming support. He will need it tomorrow and he will need it for the next few months. Even within our own ranks he hs been forced to justify himself:
A corollary to that is the view, reflected by many commenters, that this is “old news”. I agree that many of us have known and believed for a long, long time that the case for this war was a deliberate lie. The worst mistake in politics, however, is to assume that everyone else knows what you know. Many, many of our fellow Americans have not come to this realization yet. We need to continue to get this information out to them.
Please,let this not be just today’s issue that sinks down the recommended list as the next breaking story takes our attention. For this story to strike home, for it to take hold in the minds of that 1.8% that you need for 2006 and 2008, it needs your sustained activism. Put it on a yellow sticky on your monitor and don’t take it down until the Republicans, not just George Bush, are out of office – everywhere.
So I want to move on, but I do not want to let go. It is all part of the same coat of shame that covers our elected governments. The issue is this: an illegal war, now demonstrated, was started in our name based upon untruths, now revealed, that, and this is the next step, cynically and deliberately exposed a nation of men, women and children to unnecessary death and grievous injury.
You have known that for some time? You have evidence for that astounding indictment of your own government? Good, but does Congressman Conyers have to come on here and say again:
Knowing and saying is not enough. We can only get others to see by presenting he searing evidence to strip away the layers of accumulated Fox News disinformation from the eyes of those whom we need to address. We cannot wait in the hope that a leaked memorandum of a meeting in London will do it for us.
Think about what we are saying. Our countries decided on a policy knowing that a consequence would be the deaths of innocent civilians not as a collateral to a bomb or a shell that was necessarily fired in order to secure the safety of our sons and daughters in the military but as a part of a coldly calculated strategy.
I will tell you right now, I do not know if this statement is supportable. I do know that I could only argue at this time from conviction to a Republican that is so, and not from clear evidence.
Every bomb that goes off, and there are more and more of them every day, that kills the men and women and children in Iraq is an insurgents bomb – it is an atrocity committed by Iraqis against Iraqis; a terrible and ignominious harm against their own people. It is with just that truth that is how Fox News lets your countrymen and my countrymen sleep more easily at night.
There is another truth and I believe we must gather the evidence. The other truth is that we made this happen, but not through stupidity, or mistakes or by misjudgement in the way that we have characterised these events. Characterisation now willingly encouraged by the White House “I think, yes, on balance, with hindsight, it was a mistake to disband the Iraqi army and the police”.
It has happened because we calculated that it would happen. It is taking place because it was there in our Pentagon model and we decided it was acceptable collateral that we would plan to and allow for in our post-war occupation strategy.
Is it worth taking this next step that will clutter up DKos with diaries which attempt to gather and display such evidence as may be out there? Is it “old news”, made tired by repetition here? Are those of us concerned to take the laser down right to the end of this rotten war with a vigour, if without the resources, applied to investigating Gannon, going to be told it has no relevance and no interest for the bulk of the American people?
Tell me and save my time. I have a three week old DKos alumni site in its infancy, “New European Times”, that needs nurture, support and encouragement.
Last week, I posted a diary that expressed the views of many on the left — Amy Goodman, Tom Hayden, etc. — that we need to get out of Iraq. I didn’t weigh in… I thought there should be an open back-and-forth discussion of their views.
On Kos, especially, I got a lot of comments that said that we mustn’t just pull out of Iraq, that there’ll be terrible consequences, etc.
I am in agreement with those concerns which, I feel, come wholly out of a sense of responsibility for ameliorating the mess in which we’ve gotten the Iraqi people and ourselves.
There are problems with that view, however:
we are endorsing, in effect, ongoing military action by teh U.S./UK for the foreseeable future
it disallows us from promoting a clear-cut oppositional stand
it hints at a bit of hubris in that we think that, without our guiding hands, Iraq might fall into a worse situation
Anyway, I think until we’ve got a very coherent oppositional stand, we’re sunk.
And, you’re right. Whatever history we dredge up does little if it doesn’t change current events. And merely listing the latest atrocities accomplishes little, particularly if we are only speaking to the choir.
P.S. Thank you for a powerful, passionate diary.
..if Democrats do not say that we should get out then they should demand the draft is re-instated so that there are enough soldiers serving in Iraq to give proper protection to the civilians who are so exposed there and will remain so for as long as we stay.
Think of it this way. The deaths now are greater than certainly in the last few years under Saddam. We took the country and it became our responsibility. In the name of humanity, we must protect the people who are in our care. The draft is the only way we can put enough men in there to do this properly.
Yeah, yeah crazy I know. So we get out by asking the Arab countries and the United Nations to clean up our mess and paying them every damn dollar they need to do it.
We can’t have it both ways.
“so we get out by asking the Arab countries and the United Nations to clean up our mess and paying them every damn dollar they need to do it.”
The simplest, the best, the most sane, and the most corrective action. Bravo.
Not mine. It is the official policy and statement made throughout the election campaign by the UK Liberal Democrat Party. I hope tomorrow they get some reward for it.
Enable these bastards further? They need to be tried for war crimes, no more wars. They have killed enough of our troops. The UN and the Arab countries can do a heck of job for 10 cents on the dollar, vs cheney’s hali-born-again crime team. Our cartoonists strike again,
MORE said in one cartoon, than many of the talking heads say in a year. http://www.comics.com/editoons/stein/archive/images/stein2005029297506.gif
Die &&* American puppets
They do not hate America, they do not hate our freedom, they just what America the hell out of their country. Especially the robber barons. As a very wise woman told me, in her blunt ways, shit is shit !! The bush robber barons are robbing the American taxpayers blind, as well as their children’s future piggy banks as well. America falls further into debt, but the robber barons are paid in full. It is all about the oil, and the money. Draft the politican’s children and grandchildren; this I could handle.
This is all you need to say.
Every single westerner who comes to understand that enough to be able to compose it is one more chance that human life on earth may survive.
I regret that I can’t concur with your suggestion of reparations. Unfortunately, neither the UN nor the US has positioned itself in a way that would make it likely for such a plan to be helpful or productive.
In the unlikely event that the majority of US voting class were ever inclined to favor such a notion, the best reparation they could make would be to voluntarily cease aggression and disarm, and remove the greatest threat the world faces today, and spare the world, and themselves, more deaths and more bloodshed that will surely ensue if such is imposed externally.
I believe it is.
The cynicism at dKos on this issue was most disheartening to me. A wise person once told me, “Your cynicism is costing you more than you think.” It was true of me then, and I believe it’s true of my country now.
The current regieme in my country must be stopped before they kill more and further rape our democracy. There’s no waiting for 2006. My cynicism makes it hard for me to believe we’ll have a trustworthy election again.
I want to say much more, but there are too many people talking in the room I’m in right now. I’ll go back to Kos & rate-up the non-cynics since I can’t think.
Excellent rant, what more do we need to see. We need a Judge Roy Bean style leader at this time, for the American people.