According to this AP story, CIA Director Porter Goss reveals the following in an upcoming June 27 Time Magazine article:
“‘When you go to the question of dealing with sanctuaries in sovereign states, you’re dealing with a problem of our sense of international obligation, fair play,’ Goss said. ‘We have to find a way to work in a conventional world in unconventional ways.'”
The implications are gripping: The U.S. knows where Osame bin Laden is, but he is under the protection of a sovereign government. Yet, while we’re willing to savage an unrelated sovereign Mideast nation for no clear purpose, our “sense of international obligation, fair play” is keeping us from going after the man who brought us 9/11.
Or… is it prelude to a new attack? Is it the building of a new pretext for a new offensive against another sovereign nation?
Either way, I thought it worth noting…
I think it’s Pakistan. Pakistan has nukes, Aghanistan and Iraq didn’t.
… it’s Pakistan. If this signals the next move in BushCo’s game, he means Iran or Syria, or God knows…
That would make sense then…
Donald H. Rumsfeld, Sunday, March 30, 2003 – 11:30 A.M. EST
Hopefully Donald Rumsfeld will have it beaten out of him…
the Republican representative from Pennsylvania is sure that he is in Iran, or has been in and out of Iran. See here.
There is speculation that a build up to a US attack on Iran is happening now. See this diary over at DKos.
Something seems to be going on. Why is Porter Goss all of a sudden making these pronouncements in Time magazine.
Goss disagrees with Weldon. Weldon has relied on a single Iranian source “Ali” who has been discredited. Goss believes OBL is still in the area around the Afghanistan/Pakistan borders, afaik.