U.N. human rights investigators say they have “information, from reliable sources, of serious allegations of torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment of detainees, arbitrary detention, violations of their right to health and their due process rights,” reports The Guardian:
“The time is up,” one investigator said.
The four independent specialists told reporters that U.N. experts had made numerous requests since early 2002 to check on the conditions of terror suspects at the U.S. Naval base in Cuba, as well as at U.S. facilities in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere.
You’ll recall my April 25 story, “U.N. Rights Monitor Ousted Under U.S. Pressure,” after the ouster of Cherif Bassiouni, a Distinguished Research Professor of Law at DePaul’s law school and President of the Int’l Human Rights Law Institute. Bassiouni spent a year in Afghanistan documenting [PDF] human rights violations by Afghanis against other Afghanis, and U.S. military/civilian torture and murder of Afghani detainees. Among Prof. Bassiouni’s many findings is this: “The Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission, created in 2002 during the early stages of the transition to Afghan self-governance, has collected a total of 120 reports of abuse by coalition forces; 50 of them were made just since last May.” U.S. abuse is continuing, despite all denials.
A key factor in the U.N. report: Unlike Red Cross (ICRC) findings, the U.N. report will be public … more below:
More from the story in The Guardian:
“At a certain point, you have to take well-founded allegations as proven in the absence of a clear explanation by the government,” he said, though he also noted: “We are not making a judgment if torture or treatment under degrading conditions has taken place.”
[…….]
The four experts are appointed to their three-year terms by the 53-nation U.N. Human Rights Commission, the global body’s top rights watchdog. They are unpaid for their work, although their expenses are paid.
[…………]
The specialists said they had yet to hear back from Washington on their latest request – made a year ago and renewed in mid-April – to visit the detention facility.
In an April meeting, U.S. officials refused to guarantee the right to speak to detainees in private – an “absolute precondition” for such a visit, Nowak said.
“We deeply regret that the government of the United States has still not invited us to visit those persons arrested, detained or tried on grounds of alleged terrorism or other violations,” the experts said.
“The time is up. We have to act now,” said Leila Zerrougui, an Algerian magistrate who reports on arbitrary detention. “If not, we won’t have any credibility left.”
Paul Hunt, a law professor from New Zealand who monitors physical and mental health, said he wanted to investigate in person “persistent and credible reports” of alleged violations.
“Reportedly medical staff have assisted in the design of interrogation strategies, including sleep deprivation and other coercive interrogation methods,” Hunt said.
The experts said they decided to express their misgivings because “the lack of a definitive answer despite repeated requests suggests that the United States is not willing to cooperate with the United Nations human rights machinery on this issue.”
“We are all worried about this situation,” said Argentinian jurist Leandro Despouy, specialist on the independence of judges and lawyers.
U.S. officials so far have allowed only the International Committee of the Red Cross to visit detainees at Guantanamo, which started being used as a detention center for terror suspects allegedly linked to the Taliban and al-Qaida after the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan in late 2001.
The ICRC keeps its findings confidential, reporting them solely to the detaining power, although some of the reports have been leaked by what the ICRC says were third parties.
The U.N. experts would be expected to make a public report.
I am glad that Zerrougui is not going to sit idly by any longer. Every day our Government looks like it is covering up more and more.
On a more personal note, this administration makes me feel so ashamed.
off a rant to a few friends of mine who support Bush. I am disgusted right now. How can they support torture? It makes me physically ill.
In other news, the Dems are fighting back against Karl Rove’s reprehensible remarks.
Now where did I put my hypertension meds….
<off to look>
Yet another reason for Bush to have the UN declared as insignificant: dismiss your accuser and hope they’ll go away. I am so glad that US torture/abuse keeps coming up over and over and over. I hope it’s sinking in to the US populace. If we do nothing about this, then we are allowing the torturers to speak for us all.
I happened to see the clip from this morning’s Senate hearing when Ted Kennedy dared to rip Rumsfeld the Torturer a new one. I have never seen Rummy so close to having his feathers ruffled. Ted let him have it with the Q word (Quagmire)… that got quite the rise out of the old coot… his little generals, too. You know, I would love to see a list of top Generals and stategists that have “left” the armed forces since Bush took office, as well as a list of their replacements. Could be interesting.
Ohhh … I wish I’d seen that. WIll CSPAN repeat?
Sorry, don’t know… I caught it on CNN. I would imagine that it will be repeated simply because of the interest. The exchange was in reference to Iraq, and Rummy’s incompetence in particular. Senator Ted asked if it wasn’t perhaps time for Rummy to resign?
stated that torture by Iraqi Interior Dept. personal was very common (60% of prisoners).
The adminstration has created an international climate that acccepts torture as business as usual. Really makes me sad how they’ve abandoned the US’s role as a leader in human rights issues.
Iraqi Human Rights Ministry Says Torture Common
I diaried this over at Kos if your interested.
More on “…medical staff have assisted in the design of interrogation strategies” from the WSJ, of all places (no link, sorry…)
BY: Yochi J. Dreazen, The Wall Street Journal
06/23/2005
A coming article in the New England Journal of Medicine says the Pentagon violated medical ethics and international law by deeply integrating physicians and mental-health professionals into the interrogation of detainees at Guantanamo Bay…
Drawing on several previously undisclosed military documents, the report in the publication’s July 7th issue says the prison’s health-care providers were told detainees didn’t enjoy medical confidentiality…
The report said that the documents also offered strong indications that mental-health professionals at the prison used detainees’ medical records to build psychological profiles of the prisoners and help interrogators figure out more-effective ways of gaining information from them.
…Doctors were effectively made “part of Guantanamo’s surveillance network, dissolving the Pentagon’s purported separation between intelligence gathering and patient care,” the report concluded.
The report’s authors, M. Gregg Bloche, a law professor at Georgetown University, and Jonathan H. Marks, a bioethics fellow at Georgetown University Law Center, said their findings raised new questions about the veracity of Pentagon assertions that detainees at the prison enjoyed medical privacy roughly comparable to that enjoyed by U.S. citizens and were treated by physicians interested only in their well-being.
…Pentagon officials rejected the criticism, arguing that medical confidentiality is never absolute and that military physicians have been repeatedly told that their highest responsibility is to protect detainees’ mental and physical health. “To date, no investigation has produced credible evidence of military physician participation in the inhumane treatment of detainees,” a Pentagon spokeswoman said…
(I interpret this last statement as a Pentagon admission that inhumane treatment occurred.)
“And the investigation was very thorough,” the spokeswoman added. “They stood on a beach outside Ft Lauderdale, faced SSE, craned their necks, and squinted really hard.”