(cross-posted at Daily Kos and Euro Tribune)
This morning when I went out to buy a newspaper, I found that “La Repubblica” has already printed the names of the American CIA agents who allegedly kidnapped Abu Omar on February 17, 2003, shipping him off to Egypt for an impromptu exotic vacation. They sure didn’t waste time.
They say they are “three women and ten men: two “over 60’s”, an Arab, a Moldavian, and one who speaks Italian.” The names have been published in full, but for the time being I will use just their initials in my translation of the article, even though they have now officially entered the public domain, at least here in Italy.
Those who will not show their faces in Italy again are the other 12. The “team” that the CIA had put together and that R.S.L. had run before, during, and after the kidnapping of Abu Omar. Starting with the women.
M.A., 32 years old, born in Seattle and resident in Virginia; C.L., 45 years old, born in Maryland and with an improbable domicile in a mailbox in Washington, D.C.; P.R., 44 years old, born in California, of Mexican origin, and residing, like C.L., in an anonymous mailbox in Washington.
“Perhaps they are real names,” observes an investigation source, “and perhaps only aliases. In both cases they correspond, even if not in all cases, to the photographs we have. And therefore these are people who, as of today, have been definitively ruined.” At least if they are not people who had been called back from retirement. Which is what comes to mind if you read some of the names and birth dates of the other nine men.
G.A., 50 years old, born in Maryland and resident in Washington, D.C.; L.C. (my note: it’s an Italian name), 34 years old, born in Texas and sent to Milan because he was able to speak Italian and Spanish; D.C., 40 years old, from New York; J. D., 53 years old, born in Illinois and resident in a mailbox in Pennsylvania; R.H., 66 years old, born in Alaska, domiciled in a mailbox in Virginia; B.A.H., 61 years old, of Arab origin and language, but born in Iowa; G.L.P., born in China and resident in Virginia; J.S., 52 years old, born in Moldavia and resident in Virginia; M.V., 43 years old, born in Greece and residing who knows where.
“It is truly a curious company,” suggests an investigation source. “Seeing them all together, judging by the ages and assortment, they seem to be people assembled for a comfortable mission in Italy.” A mission so comfortable that the question again arises. On February 17th, did they do everything by themselves?”
As for whether they are real names or aliases, I did a quick search for some of them on US Search, and they all turned up. I even found a Virginia residence for the last name (the “who knows where” one). So they might just be real. Or else maybe a case of identity theft, an activity so in vogue these days. Interesting, in any case.
I wonder what will come up next?
Donna – thank you for your translation. This is exciting news, and I’m very grateful that you’ve made it available.
I went to their home page and to their Milan edition and saw nothing in any of the headlines indicating this.
My Italian is quite limited, but if pointed at the correct article I might find it something I can comprehend. I am especially interested as I live in N Virginia, know a fair number of people at CIA (including operational), and in fact go toe Quaker Meeting not too far (less than a mile) from their headquarters. I might be able to do some verification on anyone in N Virginia
Unfortunately, online the article is probably buried in their “read the newspaper online” section (“Leggi il giornale” button in left column), which requires a paid subscription. I haven’t been able to find it there otherwise, either.
Yahoo Italy has an incomplete list (8 of the names).
So should we expect the Bush administration to stand by its agents or to talk about “a few rotten apples”?
(I know, it’s a rhetorical question)
found reference to
Maga Creative Services, LLC
13325 BURKITTS RD FAIRFAX, Virginia
here
Just um…random curiosity…???
How will this play diplomatically now that these agents have been outed? This seems like a very delicate legal issue.
You can find all of their names on Booman’s diary this morning “More on the Milan 13.” Both the Corriere della Sera and la Repubblica published there names this morning in the meatworld editions. Neither of the two Italian papers has published the names on the web as of today.
I put them up this morning before I went to work. Once they have been published there is no delicate legal problem. Actually, a preliminary sentence by the gip as well as the investigators’ dossier are of public dominion. So as far as Italy goes, it’s no big legal problem whatsoever. The incriminations do not mention that the commando is a CIA operation. We are talking about individuals who conspired to commit a crime.
If they belong or act for the CIA, that’s the US government’s problem. They can thrash it out among themselves. I’ld suggest they do it using cell phones in luxury suites.
From June 25 NYT
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/25/international/europe/25milan.html?oref=login&pagewanted=print
“There is no shadow of proof of any Italian involvement,” one senior investigator said. “If someone came to tell us that the Italians were involved, we’d open up the investigation again.”
But a second senior Italian investigator said it was possible that the government had approved the operation because the C.I.A. operatives had operated openly and without apparent concern about being detected. For instance, the official said, the American agents used their Italian cellphones at the precise moment Mr. Nasr was abducted; they kept the phones switched on for hours at a time, making it easier to track their movements; and they dialed many phone numbers in the United States, most of them in northern Virginia, including at least one number at agency headquarters.
More troubles for Berlusconi?
Mr. Berlusconi could be open to criticism in any case: Not knowing could bring into question the government’s competence and add to a sense here that the United States has taken Italy’s friendship for granted, especially given the 3,000 troops it supplied for Iraq.
And an interesting note:
So the US disrupts an active Italian investigation of an alleged terrorist, and then on the same page on the West Coast print edition of the NYT is this:
MADRID, June 24 – The Bush administration has refused to allow the Spanish authorities to interview a man accused of being an operative of Al Qaeda whose testimony could be crucial to the prosecution of two men on trial here charged with helping to plan the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Spanish officials say.
With little more than a month left in the trial, the chief prosecutor in the case said he was still pressing the request to interview the accused man, Ramzi bin al-Shibh, who is suspected of playing a central role in organizing the attacks.
The two defendants, Imad Eddin Barakat Yarkas and Driss Chebli, are charged with arranging a meeting in Spain in July 2001, for Mr. bin al-Shibh and Mohamed Atta, one of the Sept. 11 hijackers, as part of the final preparations for the attacks.
“An interview with bin al-Shibh could change everything,” Pedro Rubira, the chief prosecutor in the case, said in a recent interview. “He is very important for knowing what happened at that meeting.”
Kevin Madden, a Justice Department spokesman, said the department would not comment on the request from Spain.
The court said the American refusal had denied a fair trial to Mr. Motassadeq, who is being retried in Hamburg.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/25/international/europe/25spain.html?pagewanted=print
What is going on here?