BREAKING: Rosenberg gives birth to Hackett

Parker

19 years ago

Well… one begins to wonder… since somehow mysteriously Rosenberg’s name seems to be constantly linked to Hacketts

I mean one would think that Rosenberg actually …DID SOMETHING… in regards to Hackett’s success. It is true what they say success has many fathers… failure is an orphan.

It is kinda of dispicable that Rosenberg is trying to link his name with Hackett…since he did not lift a finger… even moreso… that the blogoshpehere has blacked-out the deeds of the Howard and Jim DEAN. DFA was on the case early and Hackett had made the DFA-Listand Jim Dean sent out emails to a million people on the DFA mailing list and they also activated the local DFA groups. Dean in the DNC also reacted BEFORE the DCCC in this campaign.

So for Rosenberg… to worm his way in on the Hackett success is really tasteless… but I am not expecting the blogs to say anything because Rosenberg is paying the bills.

“The blogosphere’s most profound impact in Ohio was its ability to raise money and to give Hackett the tools to get his voice heard, when traditionally a candidate like that would never have had that kind of money and simply wouldn’t have been competitive,” said Simon Rosenberg, head of the New Democrat Network

In addition, the number of liberal bloggers on the Web has been growing at a fast pace, and their blogs have become both central forums for debate over party strategies and hugely successful vehicles for campaign fundraising, including raising through online contributions more than two thirds of the $750,000 used in the surprisingly competitive House campaign of Democrat Paul Hackett in Ohio. Rosenberg has created the New Politics Institute, an organization that works with bloggers.

Alliance organizers said they are seeking to avoid involvement in the ideological disputes that have plagued Democrats in recent years.But it may prove difficult to avoid them when the list of organizations eligible for contributions is drafted.

Funny, I thought *Hackett was VERY CLEAR ABOUT HIS IDEOLOGICAL STANCES… HE IS PRO-CHOICE, ANTI-WAR and PRO-GUN… so he would not have even stood up to Rosenberg’s “litmus test” of “non-ideological stances”.

0 0 votes

Article Rating