Update [2005-9-29 22:7:24 by BooMan]: NY Times article is up.
Update [2005-9-29 23:0:44 by BooMan]: Miller’s Statement
I went to jail to preserve the time-honored principle that a journalist must respect a promise not to reveal the identity of a confidential source. I chose to take the consequences — 85 days in prison — rather than violate that promise. The principle was more important to uphold than my personal freedom.
I am leaving jail today because my source has now voluntarily and personally released me from my promise of confidentiality regarding our conversations relating to the Wilson-Plame matter. My attorneys have also reached agreement with the Office of Special Counsel regarding the nature and scope of my testimony, which satisfies my obligation as a reporter to keep faith with my sources.
This enables me to appear before the Grand Jury tomorrow. I’ll say nothing more until after my testimony. I do, however, want to thank The New York Times, and my husband, family and friends, for their unwavering support. I am also grateful to the many fellow journalists and citizens from the United States and around the world, who stood with me in fighting for the cause of the free flow of information. It was a source of strength through a difficult three months to know they understood what I did was to affirm one of my profession’s highest principles.
Judith Miller has been released from jail.
“It could not be immediately determined whether Miller has now agreed to testify.”
There is no other confirmation of this and no story about it has appeared on The New York Times site as yet.
“I have no comment. I have no guidance,” said Randall Samborn, a spokesman for ther special prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald.