The newswires and blogs are buzzing this evening with new tidbits of information about Fitzgerald’s investigation into the leak of covert CIA agent Valerie Plame’s name by “senior administration officials” in June/July 2003.
As SusanHu noted in her earlier diary, Judith Miller of the NYT is scheduled to appear before the grand jury for a second time on Wednesday. This appearance will allow Fitzgerald to question Miller about her previously undisclosed conversation on June 23, 2003 with Scooter Libby – which neither one of them, reportedly, brought to the attention of Fitzgerald before last week. Obstruction charges, anyone?
From the wires and the blogs, we have these new details tonite:
1) the possible release date of a NYT piece on Miller’s testimony
2) the content of Miller’s “newly discovered” notes
3) a push by several Democrats for a full report by Fitzgerald
4) speculation on the involvement of the White House Iraq Group (WHIG)
more…
On the NYT piece about Judith Miller’s testimony before the grand jury, an Editor & Publisher article informs us:
At The New York Times, meanwhile, Keller wrote in his memo to staffers: “Judy met this afternoon with the special counsel to hand over additional notes and answer questions. She is to return to the grand jury Wednesday to supplement her earlier testimony. We’ll be reporting this in the paper, of course. It means that for a couple more days she remains under a contempt-of-court order, and is not yet clear of legal jeopardy.”
The Washington Post reports on the contents of Miller’s notes:
Special prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald, who has indicated he is nearing a decision about whether to charge anyone in the case, questioned Miller about notes she said she discovered last week involving a June 23, 2003, conversation with Cheney’s top aide, I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, according to a source familiar with Miller’s account.
According to the source, the notes reveal that the two discussed Bush administration critic and former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV about three weeks before the name of Wilson’s wife, covert CIA operative Valerie Plame, appeared in a syndicated column written by Robert D. Novak.
That is significant news since we now know that the two did discuss Wilson as early as June, 2003.
One analyst noted today that it is unlikely Fitzgerald will wait until the final day of the grand jury’s term to announce any possible indictments, so the countdown may not last as long as we think.
The New York Times tells us in its Wednesday edition that several Democrats have now signed on to a letter requesting that Fitzgerald submit a final report to Congress following the conclusion of his investigation:
In another development, four senior House Democrats wrote to Mr. Fitzgerald in a letter dated Oct. 12, urging him to issue a final report to Congress when he concludes his inquiry. Such a report, they said, should address “all indictments, convictions and any decisions not to prosecute.”
The letter was signed by the top Democrats on their respective committees: John Conyers Jr. of Michigan, Judiciary Committee; Jane Harman of California, Intelligence Committee; and Tom Lantos of California, International Relations Committee. The letter was also signed by Rush D. Holt of New Jersey, the senior Democrat on the intelligence panel’s policy subcommittee.
A report, the letter said, would assure the public that “the investigation of this serious matter has been undertaken with utmost diligence and has been free of partisan, political influence.”
The representatives said Mr. Fitzgerald had the authority to issue such a report under the terms of his appointment as special counsel at the Justice Department.
As for the possible involvement of Chief of Staff Andrew Card’s WHIG, the Washington Post ran a lengthy and detailed story in August, 2003 about its participation in the planning for the Iraq war and their focus on possible nuclear threats. Thus, one can conclude that the members of that group would have been very concerned about any information that might have proven their evidence unsound.
The group met weekly in the Situation Room. Among the regular participants were Karl Rove, the president’s senior political adviser; communications strategists Karen Hughes, Mary Matalin and James R. Wilkinson; legislative liaison Nicholas E. Calio; and policy advisers led by Rice and her deputy, Stephen J. Hadley, along with I. Lewis Libby, Cheney’s chief of staff.
There’s Libby. And, there’s Rove. Who else may Fitzgerald be considering as he decides who to indict – if anyone?
Note: Earlier this evening, the Huffington Post speculated that the Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg News were “working on stories that point to Vice President Dick Cheney as the target of special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald’s investigation into the leaking of CIA operative Valerie Plame’s name.” I’ve read the (subscription only) Wall Street Journal article and it doesn’t tie Cheney into this story at that level of involvement. Sorry. We have yet to see what Bloomberg might post.
This is old news, but it sure is interesting that John Bolton visted Miller twice in jail. In fact, she had quite the parade of people making the trip.
Does calamine lotion help with pre-indictment rash?
The June meeting between Miller and Libby piqued my curiosity this morning and I would like to throw in my two cents’ worth.It occurred to me that as a NYT insider Miller might have gotten wind of Ambassador Wilson’s op-ed piece on the Niger Yellowcake matter several weeks before its publication date. She may even have had access to what was in that op-ed piece.Given her cozy relationship with Libby and others at the White House, she may have relayed that information to Libby setting the WHIG in panic mode.
Although this is pure speculation on my part,I think it makes sense if you realize Judy has a habit of popping up, Forrest Gump like, at all critical occassions on the Plame Affair.As a student of probability theory, I have to say that can only occur if she is the prime mover of these events and not a simple bystander.The meeting in late June was for Libby to receive Judy’s input on discrediting Ambassador Wilson so that those words of wisdom could be relayed to the WHIG.Without leaving a paper trail, of course.
Diagramming would put her at the eye of an info vortex — just too many different ways information could pipeline through her in all directions (Chalabi, Libby, Rove), not to forget disinfo to public and directing battle unit in Iraq. When she first went to jail (and oh please, let it not be last) I decided she had to be involved deeply, because she hadn’t published a story. A reporter who would go to jail simply to protect unpublished sources? Why didn’t she specify/justify her actions to the public? (The vague grandiose comments from her and the NYT at the time don’t qualify.) Whether or not she’s really a mole is moot. She’s gotta be on the inner-circle payroll, and it’s not a coincidence that Fitzgerald was willing to squeeze her so hard after two years of groundwork.
A more realistic take, and easier to explain, is that Judy found out who the “source” was for the many articles that were popping up to discredit the Niger memos before Wilson finally wrote his own op-ed. Who knows?
In the meantime… The White House is already hell-bent to tear Wilson a new ASHEhole since they have access to the CIA memos on the “who and why” of Wilson’s trip and connections…
No matter the reason why they talked then, the conversation may indicate a bigger conspiracy.
Maybe even Wilson had called Judy to offer to be a “source” of the faulty Niger memos himself, prior to her earlier conversations with Libby, and had told Fitz this. Giving Fitz a tool to entrap Judy into perjury charges for “non-disclosure” of this info, and negating any previous agreements on testimony.
Now he has the tool to flip her and force her to testify about any and all of her sources for any information regarding “the big picture”.
I’m interested in how the information about Wilson gathered from the WHIG and the INR intersect. Any involvement by the WHIG suggests two paths of information about Wilson.
.
E&P link fix in your diary plus additional reference NationalJournal.com
FINEMAN: And that runs through a whole lot of things, whether it`s Harriet Miers or Katrina. But it all starts with Iraq.
And some submerged, but now emerging divisions within the administration over why we went into that war, how we went into that war and what was done to sell it. There are people are out for Karl Rove inside that White House, which makes his situation even more perilous.
My understanding, from talking to somebody quite close to this investigation, is that they think there are going to be indictments and possibly Karl Rove could be among them, if not for the act of the leaking information about Valerie Plame, then perhaps for perjury, because he`s now testified four times.
WSJ :: Focus of CIA Leak Probe
Appears to Widen
▼ ▼ ▼
Thanks for the link fix.
I see Boo picked up that Fineman bit and front paged it. This just gets more interesting every day.
I think this war could have gone on without Plamegate. It would be natural.
I don’t know what to make of Fineman;s comments. He’s always just trying to keep his job and seems to know little.
It’s out of character for him to make a difinitive statement that they think there will be indictments.
SUPER WORK, Catnip!
Descriptions of this case can get caught up in webs that end up confusing for the reader — and you make it very clear, and interesting.
Here’s a little present — drink it in with your first cup of coffee: