The U.S. trade deficit widened to $59 billion in August as record crude oil prices caused imports to rise, keeping the nation dependent on foreign investors to fund the shortfall.
The gap in goods and services trade was the third-largest on record and followed a $58 billion deficit in July, the Commerce Department said today in Washington. Both imports and exports were at all-time highs during the month, and the gap with China widened to a record on more shipments of textiles.
“The risks are to the upside for this number,” said John Shin, an economist at Lehman Brothers Inc. in New York. “No one thinks the appetite for imports will genuinely diminish in the U.S.”
Isn’t that comforting? The risk for the trade deficit is to the upside. No one seems to be doing a damn thing to change the course of this number. The US continues to consume more assets than it produces – and no one gives a damn. Hell, Treasury Secretary John Snow and President Bush think a trade deficit of this magnitude is good because it means the US is growing faster than other countries. Technically, this is correct. However, it is a convenient argument to paper over the real problem: The US must still borrow about 2 billion dollars a day to finance its standard of living.
But wait! Today’s news is a two, two, two for the price of 1 deal!
Import prices rose 2.3 percent after a 1.2 percent gain in August, the Labor Department said today in Washington. The increase excluding oil was the largest since record-keeping started in January 1989 because of increases in natural gas prices.
Prices for imported oil, natural gas and other raw materials surged after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita slammed into the Gulf Coast, snarling port traffic and shutting down production and refining facilities. The Federal Reserve is warning of quickening inflation, and some companies such as consumer-goods producer Georgia-Pacific Corp. are passing on the additional costs to customers.
I have a great idea! Let’s import inflation. We don’t have enough here in the US; we need more. Send us your poor, your tired, your inflationary pressures.
This is what an oil dependent economy means. When the price of that commodity increases, we stand a good chance of importing inflation. Which means the Federal Reserve will keep increasing interest rates, placing more stress on the housing market which has driven the US economy for the last 5 years…..you get the idea.
Here’s the bottom line with the trade deficit, in the words of Paul Volcker:
As a nation we are consuming and investing about 6 percent more than we are producing.
What holds it all together is a massive and growing flow of capital from abroad, running to more than $2 billion every working day, and growing. There is no sense of strain. As a nation we don’t consciously borrow or beg. We aren’t even offering attractive interest rates, nor do we have to offer our creditors protection against the risk of a declining dollar.
No one on the right will listen to him how that he didn’t give them Kofi Anan’s head on a platter in the oil for food scandal. He’s no longer a good Republican. But we could use a strong-willed economist who speaks his mind right now more than anything. Although painful, he saved this country once in the early 1980s. We could use that kind of leadership again.
of locating ten things in our house with different countries of origin. It was very easy: Made in USA was quite hard to find.
Another tidbit: I had Paul Volcker teach a Senior seminar to ten of us in my final undergraduate year. I believe the theme was simply money policy. He was sharp, personable, and undogmatic. I think that was his Dr. Jekyll side.
What happened to the Democrats’ new “Contract with America”-type plan? If it doesn’t contain a specific goal for renewables and energy independence, stick a fork in us. We can’t just sell each other our houses in perpetuity and pretend that’s an economy.
But we can sell each other stuff on e-bay! That’s the “New Economy.”
How anyone can look at this administration and conclude “Republicans are fiscally responsible” is beyond me.
sell my house on EBay. Welcome to the new economy!
I don’t think many Republicans see Bush as fiscally responsible any longer. (Let’s not show them the track records of past Republican Presidents either–it could speed their dementia.) But Kool-Aid takes a long time to wear off…
Actually, you can! As I type, there are 212 listings under real estate!
I will buy your house if you’ll buy my house and both of us will buy wood from Knoxsville to remodel them.
Then I’ll buy the house you just bought from me. You will buy the house I just bought from you. Then we will both rip out the remodeling jobs we just did and buy more wood from Knoxsville to re-remodel.
Hey! Lookie here! The economy is BOOMING!
Hey now, you can even buy wood on ebay!
Anybody want to buy some wood?
I’m sure his haircut was made in the USA. It might be the only thing, but it’s something.
Overall that is the deal.
China, Japan, the EU, & etc will continue to purchase debt instruments as long as the American consumer buys their ‘stuff.’ The negatives to this deal are (1) eventually the debt has to be served by income leaving less $ available for consumption and (2) the holders of the debt instruments are loosing PPP due to inflation on those debt instruments. As the American consumer stops buying their ‘stuff’ foreign holders have less reason to buy the debt instruments.
Oil used for transportation is relatively inelastic. So not much hope there. Housing, food, medical, and etc are also inelastic.
This leaves only aggregate consumer goods as the potential area for lowering cash outlays which is exactly the primary reason China, Japan, Indonesia, & etc purchase the debt instruments.
Not a pretty picture.
What effect, if any, would repeal of the tax cuts have on the economy?
Ideally, they would start a process of lowering th efederal deficit. This in turn would lower interest rates and strengthen the dollar. Ideally.
Lemme pontificate some more.
A return to fiscal sanity means going back to the Clinton tax era but also a return to balancing the budget. You can raise taxes all you want BUT if you keep spending more than you take in it doesn’t matter if the Fed Tax Rate is 100%… still have to borrow to cover the difference.
Grover Norquist says the deficit is a meaningless number!
To: Grover Norquist
From: Bonddad
Re: Your beating
Dear Mr. Norquist,
Should I ever meet you in person, I will beat you as a matter of principle.
Bonddad
PS Have a nice day
To: Bonddad
From: Grover Norquist
Re: My beating
Dear Mr. Bonddad:
I appreciate your kind letter.
Should we ever meet in person, I will of course run away screaming. Nothing personal, you understand.
yrs,
Grover
If one day soon we read in the papers this obituary:
Now that would be Ironic!
So you would support repealing the tax cut? If so, you’re in good company. Most of those in the upper brackets apparently aren’t concerned.
I prefer “restoring balance” to “raising taxes”. I’m not among those who can still write off Bahamian vacations as a business lunch.
BondDad: Thanks. That’s what I thought. One step on the road to Wellville. Attack the deficit, balance the budget.
rba: “Support” is the wrong word. “Concluded” is more better.