When I was much younger, I attended what was considered a very good public high school in the United States. Yet like many schools around the world, much of what I was taught had very little to do with practical knowledge.
In a humble attempt to shine a light on what my former teachers missed, I present to you a new series I call Basic Learning. Many of you who read these articles may be far more well-versed on these topics than I, and I apologize if my discourses offend you. Furthermore, I am as much a purveyor of knowledge as I am still a student seeking it, and therefore remain prone to the fallacies of the non-expert.
Today’s Basic Learning: the American dollar.
At first glance, there doesn’t seem to be anything mysterious or unknown about the American dollar. Even if you live in Europe, Asia or Africa you’ve probably handled a few greenbacks in your lifetime and they’ve changed very little in appearance over the past 100 years. Simply put, the dollar (and its tangible form, the bank notes themselves) are the currency of the United States.
If you had asked me 5 years ago what a dollar actually was, I’d say “the money of the United States”. If you further asked me as to what a dollar was worth, what it signified other than a fancy green piece of paper, I’d have told you something like “it is worth a certain amount of fundamental value, backed by the American government” or something like that.
The truth however is much more elaborate. The first truth about the dollar is, quite simply, that it isn’t worth anything at all. The only fundamental value of the dollar is the paper its printed on, which is practically worthless except as a way to light a fire or something. As strange as it sounds, the only reason the U.S. dollar has any worth (beyond the paper it’s printed on) is that people, collectively, have agreed to give it value.
Let me give you an example. I could rent a printing machine, make up my own “Soj dollars” and print them up with any design I like. If the people of the world used them to trade and buy goods and services, my Soj-dollar would be on par with the American dollar. The fancy word for this is a fiat currency.
Historically speaking, modern money came in two forms. One was in coins, minted from a valuable material such as silver. The value of the coins was (roughly) the same as the amount of precious metal in the coin. Therefore a 1 ounce silver coin had the same value as one ounce of uncoined silver. Therefore the coins were traded as “money” because they were certified as being a certain weight and purity of metal.
Notes or paper money started when the banking system started in the Middle Ages of Europe. A person could deposit a certain amount of gold at a certain bank and receive a “note” from the bank attesting that the said sum was deposited there. The person could then trade or buy goods and services with this “note”, which the second (or third or fourth, etc) person could eventually take back to the bank and redeem for the stated amount of gold.
In the United States, the dollar was originally placed on what is known as the gold standard. This means that a dollar could be redeemed, if somebody so wished, for a certain amount of gold (originally 1.67 grams metric) that the U.S. government held in reserve. The coins of the United States were manufactured with a certain amount of silver, making them similar to the historic coins described above.
Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution states that Congress “shall have the power to coin money and regulate the value thereof” and that’s pretty much how things operated until recently. The thing to remember is that ALL American money could be directly traded for a specified amount of gold (or silver).
The second truth about the dollar today however is that it is neither printed nor particularly regulated by the American government. In fact, the American dollar is issued, controlled and destroyed under the aegis of the Federal Reserve. And despite the word “federal” in there, don’t be fooled – it is a private company.
So how did a private company usurp the American government’s own ability to power to regulate and produce money? That’s a long and complicated story, and my apologies to those of you experts out there for shortening and simplifying the issue. It is done merely for the sake of clarity – I have provided links for those of you who want more detail.
When a currency is fixed to a precious metal, this means the government cannot print more money than it has reserves of that metal. This is good in terms of preventing deficits and inflation but prevents the government from accessing other options, such as defeating a “bank run” or more elastic credit options. Again, for you experts, this is a simplified explanation and is not meant to be an exhaustive treaty on the subject.
Two separate issues combined to change the dollar as we know it today. The first was the creation of the Federal Reserve, which was passed by Congress and signed into law in 1913. The Federal Reserve is a private corporation that is owned by eight regional Federal Reserve Banks. The Fed is run however by a Board of Governors, including its Chairperson, and these positions are nominated by the President of the United States and have to be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. The positions on the Board are for a specified period of time (14 years) but as far as I can tell, the U.S. government has no power to dismiss someone once they are confirmed.
From 1913 to 1951, the main role of the Fed was to regulate the interest rate on Treasury bills and bonds. In 1951, the Federal Reserve officially became independent of the Department of the Treasury.
After World War 2, an important financial meeting was held in New Hampshire and became known as the Bretton Woods summit, named after the town in which it was held. These meetings created the World Bank and IMF, which I’ve written about earlier. They also changed the nature of modern currencies by making every other major currency directly linked to the U.S. dollar. And since the U.S. dollar was linked to the gold, this meant that every currency was pegged to the gold standard.
Through a series of complicated reasons, the price of gold began to rise and this caused worldwide inflation. Under President Nixon in 1975, the U.S. dollar was removed from the gold standard. Since that time, the U.S. dollar has had no fixed correlation to any commodity. It is instead “pegged” to what economists call a “basket” of other valuables, which include precious metals but also includes other currencies.
More simply put, the U.S. dollar today is worth what a number of other currencies are worth, the vast majority of them worth nothing more and nothing less than other currencies as well. Which as strange as it sounds means that most of the money in the world is a complex equation of faith-based value with little grounding in any tangible substance (the Swiss franc remains the only major currency still on the gold standard). For more information on this, click here.
In 1963, the words “will pay to the bearer upon demand” disappeared from all American dollars, meaning the U.S. government would no longer be required to cough up something of intrinsic value for their own notes. In 1965, a new law removed all the silver from coins and all change circulated in the United States today is made of cheap metals with almost no inherent value.
There is a lot of confusion about what exactly the Federal Reserve does besides control and regulate the money supply. If you follow the news, you’re likely to hear that the Fed controls “interest rates”. This refers primarily to what is known as the “overnight rate”, the interest rate that banks can charge each other for loans. This in turn affects the rates that banks charge their customers, which is you and I, and directly impacts the economy as a whole.
The Fed also affects the interest rates of U.S. Treasury securities. These are pieces of paper in which the U.S. government does promise to pay the holder a certain amount of money after a certain amount of time. In effect, Treasury securities are the sole remaining form of “money” that is backed by the United States government, although the currency used to pay the bearer is in itself printed by the Federal Reserve.
If the Fed wants to inject money into the economy, it buys Treasury securities (with money it prints itself), thereby lowering the interest rates. If it wants to decrease the amount of money in circulation, it sells off its securities (or buys less of them), thereby raising interest rates on the securities. What this translates to in practical means is that the Federal Reserve, a private corporation, “owns” much of the debt of the American government (and thereby the American people).
Although the Fed is technically a “non-profit” corporation, it operates in a curious way. It orders money to be printed (done by the U.S. Treasury) and then “sells” this money to the Federal Reserve banks at a certain rate of interest. For example, the Fed can print $100 and sell them to Bank X with an interest rate of 10%. This means Bank X has to repay the Fed with $110. The Federal Reserve banks then “sell” their money, from the Fed, to other banks at the interest rate that the Fed proscribes. If that rate is again 10%, this means Local Bank Y has to pay Federal Reserve Bank X $121 for the initial sum of $100 to be returned to the Fed. These transactions are handled via computer of course, meaning that much of this money exists in electronic circuits only and just a tiny fraction is actually printed on paper as notes.
The banks who “buy” money from the Fed don’t actually buy it. Instead what they do is “buy” a certain amount which is kept “on reserve” at the Fed. Under the system of fractional banking, the banks can then lend out money based on how much they have on reserve at the Fed. This means that for Bank Y can “buy” $100 and keep it “reserved” in the Fed and then lend out $1000 ($900 of which doesn’t even exist and is created out of “thin air” quite literally), since it only has to have a fraction of what it lends (in this case, 10%). Since all this money that Bank Y is lending is repaid with interest, it’s a very beautiful way to make enormous profits and easily allows Bank Y to pay back the interest it owes to the Fed.
There are many people who strongly oppose the Federal Reserve controlling the money supply of the United States. A large part of this is because the shareholders of the Federal Reserve make money on every dollar it issues because they must be paid for with interest and also because the Federal Reserve owns or “buys” government debt, with money it creates itself. You can read some startling information from opponents of the Fed here.
A man named Eustace Mullins wrote a very long book on the subject of the creation of the Federal Reserve that’s worth reading. What’s undisputed is that the idea to create it was hatched during a secret meeting on the coast of Georgia by a very small group of powerful politicians and bankers, who later profited enormously from the Fed’s creation.
Another log on the conspiracy fire was that President Kennedy issued U.S. Treasury dollars, which look like modern dollars only with a red font. These were printed and regulated directly by the U.S. government without being issued by the Federal Reserve – the interest on their purchase then was returned directly to the U.S. government instead of the Fed.
Many Fed opponents use Thomas Jefferson’s quote on the subject as a rallying cry:
“If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”
It’s also worth noting that many of the Federal Reserve banks are multinational or international in nature, which means the profit they make flows out of the United States and into non-American pockets.
Furthermore, since the Federal Reserve has such a strong ability to influence the national economy, it has a direct affect on national elections, particularly the presidential race every four years. Many of the Fed’s critics say it manipulates the interest rates to suit the candidate it prefers.
Regardless of your opinion of the Federal Reserve, what is uncontestable is that the U.S. debt is absolutely enormous and the revenue generated through taxes every year is doing little but paying the interest on that debt without reducing the principle amount owed. Anyone who has had problems with credit cards know exactly how this situation is entirely untenable in the long run, and in the case of the United States, those owning the debt rake in enormous profits paid for by converting the natural wealth of the nation into a faith-based currency.
And now you know what my teachers never told me about…
Peace
.
Hmmm … August 1971 – during reign of Richard Nixon and the huge expenses of the Vietnam hitting home. Thanks to U.S. monetary policy of the seventies and the high inflation which caused much anguish throughout the Western World. The rest of U.S. allies and friends helped to pay for the Vietnam War through this economic and fiscal policy, aggravated by the Arab Oil boycott of 1973 and exploding oil price. Thanks to cooperation of the largest oil corporations who had filled up every cubic ton of oil tanker fleet throughout the world as reserve, Europe managed barely to survive a major crisis.
The world did dive into a economic recession during the eighties, which was turned around somewhat by the optimistic presentation of President Reagan, although not much was done for the majority of workers in U.S. industry. Not much different as the Bush Cabal of today!
August 1971, not easy to forget after our marriage on Friday the 13th – very easy to make all arrangements that day lol – we traveled to Germany on our honeymoon. So, you buy traveler’s cheques in good old U.S. currency (1US$=3.60 dutch guilders). Right, before getting to any bank in Germany, Tricky Dick and the US Central Bank let the dollar float against the Gold standard. Result as I recall a drop in value of 10% overnight – poor old me. Never considered voting Republican before, but certainly not after being treated as newly weds in such an awful manner.
Today’s value 1 US dollar = 0.83 = Hfl1.84 :: just about 50% of it’s value in 1971. So in the end I win!
“Treason doth never prosper: what’s the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason.”
▼▼▼ READ MY DIARY
Incredible. I’m heading to the library aas soon as it opens.
This is why BT rocks.
Wow – my ignorance astounds me sometimes – thanks for this.
I think your intended series will educate me quite a bit. I look forward to it.
This caught me out:
“The first truth about the dollar is, quite simply, that it isn’t worth anything at all… As strange as it sounds, the only reason the U.S. dollar has any worth (beyond the paper it’s printed on) is that people, collectively, have agreed to give it value.”
This is true for silver and gold also, yes?
A few years ago I arrived at the same conclusion about currency, i.e., it is a “faith-based value.” Continuing along these lines of thinking, I consider it significant that the American currency has the words, “In God We Trust.” For many, the “God” referred to IS the dollar.
As we do more and more of our business with credit/debit cards and online, we don’t even handle money any more. The whole system is becoming even more ephemeral and “faith-based.”
So, what does that mean? I’m not sure. More to think about.
As strange as it sounds, the only reason the U.S. dollar has any worth (beyond the paper it’s printed on) is that people, collectively, have agreed to give it value.”
This is true for silver and gold also, yes?
Well technically speaking gold isn’t any more valuable than paper except that people AGREE that is – in that sense you’re right.
That being said, gold has a number of intrinsic physical properties which have nothing to do with how people might otherwise value them. Gold is non-reactive, it’s malleable, it’s shiny, and there’s only a limited amount of it.
American dollars are just fancy pieces of green paper and have no other use aside from the faith-based value assigned to them.
Pax
My dad was an economist, so I had a lot of this “basic learning” very early on and often. When I went to college and majored in Economics ( in the College of Arts and Sciences NOT the Business School), I was amazed at the widespread ignorance about monetary systems and the basic nature of the discipline of economics.
I have explained numerous times that economics is only marginally about money and banking (only one required course in my major field of study) and mostly about social systems and the assignation fo value — usually answered by a blank stare when I say economics is a social science.
How societies choose to prioritize value and barter both tangibles and intangibles within a social system (familial, national or global) is a fascinating study. The faith-based component of money is something that too few people ever stop to think about, but it is worth doing as it points out how fragile the systems that we depend on really are — if we all stop agreeing that the pieces of paper have value, then what? We might be forced to rethink quite a few things, eh?
😉
Thanks, soj! So good to see you back and writing!
You’ve posted an interesting diary. I remember hearing many of these same points from a high school history teacher that I had in the 1970’s who was a member of the John Birch Society.
So I thought to myself, “That’s interesting, but not the first time the left is echoing positions once held by the right… It used to be the right that waved their copies of the constitution like a blood shirt, and murmured darkly that some day we might need those guns the Second Amendment allows us to keep, to defend our freedom…”
I’m like most Americans, and assumed the Federal Reserve is some kind of non-profit federal corporation, like the US Postal Service, that is loosely tied to the government in some vaguely-defined way…
So I thought, “I’ll go check out the details in one of your links, and learn more.” Unfortunately, what I found gives me pause:
Those paragraphs appear about one-third of the way through the document. Since I’m at work I don’t have time to read it all right now, but it’s starting to smell a little fishy to me…
The references to the trilaterals and the Council on Foreign Relations is definite vintage 1970’s John Bircher, anti-UN material.
The referenced “Declaration of Interdependence” was, IIRC, a progressive document from the 1980’s. Wikipedia lists it as a secular humanist document from 1988. That sounds consistent with Paul Tsongas, Democratic presidential candidate and no Fascist, signing it.
The references to numerous banks and bankers by name, names such as “Rothschild,” also set off alarm-bells from my teenage tutelage under the far-right’s influence… I could be wrong, I’m no economist, but I have a concern about this source’s reliability.
The thought also occurred to me that if the creation of the Federal Reserve is unconstitutional, why has no one ever challenged it in the Supreme Court? Or are they (along with the government and the media) part of the Conspiracy.
I’m no economist, but this is all starting to get seriously tinfoil-hatty to me.
Hopefully, someone like Bonddad or Jerome will stop by and tell me either that I’m crazy to doubt Soj, and should be very alarmed, or that I can go back to worrying about the environment (something I’ve got more expertise in)…
I appreciate your skepticism. I do not come to preach but to inspire further inquiry 😉
I’ll add a couple of quick comments:
And yes I’d definitely love to hear Jerome and anyone else’s input on this!
Pax
“”If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”” Key word homeless. When the housing market goes boom, and much of America ends up on the streets homeless, dumb-shit Americans will look around clueless…. Some mean-spirited mantra chanter(greenspan or rice for example), will come out and chant who could have imagined. WAKE UP AMERICA….
Why do they loan you money, as if their was a money tree?
Quite simply for some, there is…. Look at the patterns of the great depression, look at today….. Guess what is coming??? An even greater depression….. Excellent diary, excellent quote from Jefferson….. HOMELESS, coming to your neighborhood…. Compliments of the banking regime.
“With the stroke of a pen, Mr. Kennedy was on his way to putting the Federal Reserve Bank of New York out of business. If enough of these silver certificats were to come into circulation they would have eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve notes. This is because the silver certificates are backed by silver and the Federal Reserve notes are not backed by anything. Executive Order 11110 could have prevented the national debt from reaching its current level, because it would have given the gevernment the ability to repay its debt without going to the Federal Reserve and being charged interest in order to create the new money. Executive Order 11110 gave the U.S. the ability to create its own money backed by silver.” Just one reason why Kennedy was killed.
http://www.john-f-kennedy.net/executiveorder11110.htm
Btw for anyone interested, here is a picture of a dollar from 1891.
Notice that it says the U.S. government will pay “one dollar to bearer in coin” meaning one dollar’s worth of gold (or silver). It’s also issued by the U.S. Treasury instead of the Federal Reserve (the Fed not having been created then).
The back has similar wording to today’s dollars, in the sense it’s valid for “all debts public and private”.
Pax
“We have all heard that Kennedy had vowed to break the CIA into 1,000 pieces. But how many have ever heard how he planned to do it, and what policy he had established to achieve that goal?
In brief, on June 28, 1961, President Kennedy himself signed National Security Action Memorandum #55. This important order was directed solely to the Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff who at that time was General Lyman Lemnitzer. Its subject, clearly stated, was “Relations of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to the President in Cold War Operations.” In layman’s terminology
“Cold War Operations” meant “Clandestine Operations.”
Kennedy opened that directive with memorable words:
“I wish to inform the Joint Chiefs of Staff as follows with regard to my views of their relations to me in Cold War Operations:
a) I regard the Joint Chiefs of Staff as my principal military advisor responsible both for initiating advice to me and for responding to requests for advice. I expect their advice to come to me direct and unfiltered.
b) The Joint Chiefs of Staff have a responsibility for the defense of the notion in the Cold War similar to that which they have in conventional hostilities…””
Maybe a touch off topic, but in looking at what happened then, and now, quite important to the health of our democracy, or will it be the destruction of our democracy.
http://www.prouty.org/johnson.html
a little more from the article: “Interpreted as the President intended, this policy, if carried to its conclusion and not interrupted by his death, would have brought about an enormous change in the way the Vietnam situation, that from 1945 to 1963, had been under “operational control” of the CIA, would have been pursued. Without question this new policy was the major stepping stone on the way to Kennedy’s promise that “the bulk of all U.S. personnel would be out of Vietnam by the end of 1965.””
Kennedy’s attempt to neuter the CIA, and put an end to the money making adventure known as the Vietnam War, may have led to Kennedy’s death.
To reflect back….. An end to the Federal Reserve, an end to the murderous ways of the CIA, and an early end to the money making Vietnam War, how much stronger would America be; TODAY ????
Robert Kennedy wanted to investigate this further, guess what happened?
Martin Luther King went to bat for the American people, guess what happened to him?
Thomas Jefferson warned us, and told us what we needed to do……
This comes up periodically. Here is the most famous version of this discussion:
Cross of Gold Speech – William Jennings Bryan
The use of precious metals, or paper money has now been replaced by electronic money. Just as banks can create “money” by lending, individuals can now create their own money by using their credit cards.
I’m afraid the description above is too simplistic in today’s world markets.
Might as well put the following here as anywhere else.
One use, but only one, of money is as a store of value.
The history of money in the US shows specie (gold and silver coins) was given a higher value than greenbacks (bank notes, paper money). Specie has a specific metal content and thus a value outside its face value. Paper money does not have that.
Both specie and paper money can be devalued. The first by lowering the percentage of precious metal in the coin – as was done during the latter stages of the Roman Empire. Paper money is devalued by a printing press. The single advantage of specie is the coins previously issued still contine the metal whereas issurance of additional paper money affects older issues of paper money. Devaluing specie is much more difficult and is never 100% effective as Gresham’s Law observes/predicts.
If we add another use, money as a medium of exchange, specie has severe disadvantages versus paper money. Some of these are technical, and I won’t go into them, but an obvious disadvantage is the darn things are awkward for both consumers and merchants to handle for the smaller purchases of daily life. To be able to handle this teeny-tiny coins were produced which are a pain to handle and are easily lost. Plus varying metal content of the various different issues by various different issuers results in a bewildering array of purchasing power. Paper money, as a means of exchange, is vastly superior to specie.
So which is it going to be? Or, rather, which use is going to predominate? A cynic would observe since Americans don’t save anyway one might as well grease the wheels of commerce. Another view is Americans don’t save, as I have elsewhere observed, because inflation eats away at the store-of-value.
I’ve only mentioned two of the many uses of money, another is money-as-a-unit-of-account. And while the diary entry is true, in one sense, it is also true, as Robert observed, “the description above is too simplistic in today’s world markets.”
This stuff gets real complicated, real quick.
for possible relationship; “The biggest “terrorist” threat to the People in the U.S.A. is not Ossama bin Laden or any other so-called “terrorist” leader or group. While Americans are preoccupied with a rigged phony election and “wars for PROFIT” in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Illuminati controlled Federal Reserve “terrorists” are orchestrating a financial collapse in the U.S.A. that could destroy the U.S.A. and other countries in the world much more than the Great Depression of 1929-32.”
http://rense.com/general60/illum.htm
Coincidence ????? Ben Bernanke, Greenspan’s replacement, google Ben Bernanke with Federal reserve or illuminati… Kinda eye-opening.
http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2002/20021108/default.htm
Remarks by Governor Ben S. Bernanke
At the Conference to Honor Milton Friedman, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
November 8, 2002
On Milton Friedman’s Ninetieth Birthday
“Let me end my talk by abusing slightly my status as an official representative of the Federal Reserve. I would like to say to Milton and Anna: Regarding the Great Depression. You’re right, we did it. We’re very sorry. But thanks to you, we won’t do it again.”
Feel safer ??
http://illuminati-news.com/banking.htm
“Greenspan’s Remarkable 1966 Admission About Gold
– “…This is the shabby secret of the welfare statists’ tirades against gold. Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the confiscation of wealth.” “
More Jefferson: “The History Of Lawful Gold and Silver Legal Tender and
the Debt Brought On By Unlawful Fiat Paper Money
– “I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.” (Thomas Jefferson)
Interesting: “The Federal Reserve – An Astounding Exposure 1934
Interesting: ” Elite Bankers Pulling Plug On US Economy & Currency
Feel safer ??????
Do visit: http://illuminati-news.com/banking.htm