There is little love lost between Venezuela President Chavez and Bush and bis band of neo-cons. Events Tuesday point to a coup being set up for next week. Bush of course will not want to be seen to be involved so we are not in the “back to the future” days when the CIA was much more obviously involved in influencing the politics of central and south America.
Next Sunday elections are due to be held for the Venezuala National Assembly. The main opposition party,Democratic Action pulled out of the election on Tuesday, claiming that the election commission is biased against them. Another minority party the Social Christian Party late followed suit. Without them, Chavez’s supporters are likely to win more than two thirds of the 167 member body. That would give them the power to alter the constitution.
While the Chavez side claims it is because the other parties are likely to lose, the DA head’s reason is interesting in the light of the disquiet in the US over Diebold. The opposition claim that the computerised voting machines fail to ensure voter confidentiality.
I am not in a position to comment about the fairness of the elections but they are being observed by both the European Union and the Organisation of American States, which the USA is a member of. While I am prepare to suspend judgement until they report, it is probably unlikely that the opposition parties will do the same. Instead they are likely to organsie “spontaneous demonstrations” against the results once they are announced. A perfect cover for any “popular uprising” against Chavez.
Chavez has often complained that the USA is trying to undermine his presidency however as the old saying goes “just because you are paranoid does not mean they are not out to get you”. The anti-Chavex movement has every reason to take this opportunity to stage a coup. As recently as Monday, Chavez signed adeal with Spain to buy $2 billion worth of military transport aircraft and patrol boats. Chavez has also signed deals for Brazilian aircraft and Russian rifles. The Russia deal is for 100,000 rifles and was criticised by Rumsfeld in March during a tour to Brazil. The deal also included a plant to manufacture more and was criticised by the US claiming they would fall into the hands of drug smugglers or the dissident FARQ in Columbia as they exceeded the numbers in the Venezuela army. A more likely destination came to light in April when Chavez initiated a plan to involve up to two millionin a newly formed local militia organisation.
Another source of aggravation to the neo-cons was the decision last month to exclude the “New Tribes Movement” (NTM) from their main areas of operation. In what might almost be a dress rehearsal for a coup the NTM site reports ten tribes “gathered” to protest this exclusion.
Like me, you may be cynical that indigenous tribes would arrange for such well printed banners to be made.
The NTM is based in Florida and purports to be nothing more than an evangelical Christian movement undertaking missionary work to native peoples. There is another side to their activities as its location in Florida might suggest. This is from a paper delivered by Prof/ Glen Morris of the Univeristy of Colorada, Denver to a working group of the UN Commission on Human Rights, Sub-Commission on Prevention on Discrimination and Protection of Minorities in Geneva during 1988.
Although this point [religious freedom]
may seem insignificant in the face of challenges to the very
physical existence of some indigenous nations, the spiritual
continuity and well-being of our nations is an important issue
which demands continuing attention by this Working Group. Our
spirituality is central to our individual and collective
personalities, and is essential to our continued survival as
indigenous nations.
At first glance, there is an appearance of state acceptance
of the principle of religious freedom generally, and for
indigenous peoples in particular. In practice, however, many
states hold traditional indigenous spiritual beliefs in contempt
and would welcome their demise or destruction. This is evidenced
by the collusive activities of the Summer Institute of
Linguistics, New Tribes Movement, and other Christian evangelical
sects and various governments, particularly in Latin America and
Asia
Chavez is a proponent of native peoples’ rights so a clash between him and the NTM might be expected but there are even more reasons for suspicion about what the NTM movement was up to. This report at the time of Chavez’ announcement of their exlusion details:
New Tribes, an evangelical organisation that has long had close ties with the U.S.-based Summer Institute of Linguistics, is active in a number of countries in Asia and Latin America, and in Venezuela has focused its efforts on the Yanomami, Ye’kuana and Panare indigenous groups and other ethnic communities in the southern part of the country.
The Summer Institute of Linguistics was founded in 1934 with the declared purpose of translating the Bible into indigenous languages.
Since the 1970s, New Tribes has drawn heavy criticism from many quarters, including leftist political groups, environmentalists, indigenous organisations, academics, Catholic Church leaders and even members of the military. The controversial group has been accused of prospecting for strategic minerals on behalf of transnational corporations and of the forced acculturation and conversion of indigenous people.
Sociologist and environmentalist Alexander Luzardo, who 20 years ago published a report on the New Tribes Mission’s operations in the Amazon jungle, welcomed Chávez’s decision.
He told IPS that the decision “complies with what is stipulated in the constitution of 1999, which establishes indigenous peoples’ right to self-determination and to respect for their beliefs, values and customs.
He also said the expulsion of the group would be in line with the recommendations of numerous government and parliamentary reports that had warned about the group’s activities in Venezuela.
“New Tribes has westernized indigenous people by force, while spreading a sense of shame and guilt, disguised as teaching the gospel: they taught the Panares that Satan had turned into a Panare Indian and that they were guilty of the crucifixion of Jesus Christ,” said Luzardo.
However, New Tribe missionary Richard Bruce said in an interview with the local press four years ago that “we want to respect the way of life and customs of indigenous peoples, not change them overnight. This is not a corner of the United States.”
During the group’s most active period, roughly 20 years ago, New Tribes missionaries from the United States numbered close to 200, said Luzardo. They were mainly concentrated in Tama-Tama, a spot where several rivers meet in the heart of the southernmost Venezuelan state of Amazonas.
This area is believed to be rich in minerals like uranium. For many years, New Tribes built airstrips and modern installations that contrasted sharply with the rustic constructions in the indigenous communities they ministered to.
The now defunct National Identity Movement, which grouped together cultural, environmental and indigenous organisations in the 1980s, maintained that New Tribes acted as a cover for the prospecting of geological and mineral wealth coveted by corporations that provided funding for the Summer Institute of Linguistics. These included General Dynamics, a defence industry contractor, and Ford.
Update [2005-11-29 20:29:6 by Londonbear]: I may well have got the competence of the NTM wrong. Browsing around I found this at the end of their description of the UK which some may find amusing for an evangelical site:
Still, a country that gives a wig-wearing ex-junkie balladeer a knighthood must be doing something right.
Sir Elton John (that really should be Sir Reginald Dwight but never mind) announcd today he is planning a private wedding to his long term partner David Furnish in a civil partnership ceremony on December 21.
I’ve been complaining about some of this for a long time. When Ashcroft was Attorney General, he directed a deal with Justice Department and Choicepoint for datamining/information on citizens in several countries. The power of this knowledge is immeasureable.
full story at link
I’ve also mentioned before who some of the main connections in Choicepoint are…
There’s but a few degrees seperation from Tim Spicer if that’s any indication of who owns our information and our future.
without chavez, how are poor bostonians going to afford heating oil? (link)
The Boston deal must have brought the timeline forward.
I had read somewhere last summer that the program was to start in Chicago. No matter whether it is operational there yet, or not. This kind of thing is why Chavez will likely end up being more popular than Bush among citizens of the USA. Who knows? Maybe Chavez is already more popular here than bush is? lol
They wanted to do heating for the poor in Chicago but most of the homes and apts there are heated with natural gas, which Venezuela doesn’t have. So they offered diesel to orgs with buses and if you live in Chicago and need eye surgery but can’t afford it you can call the Venezuela consulate there and they will pick you up, take you to Caracas, fix your eyes, and fly you back to Chicago.
They want to expand this to other cities and also other medical treatment as Venezuela gets its medical care ducks in a row, and eye surgery is the one that is far enough along to offer right now. They have allotted 25% of their eye surgery resources for poor Americans.
I did post on this a while back in one of the happy story threads but I am in a hurry now so you can search and google for links!
Thank you!
I forgot about the buses… Though I did not know about the program to fix eyes.
I’m not sure it will all go down next Tuesday, but between your diary and rumi’s comments, there certainly seems to be a lot of mischief afoot, and the “unrest” may kick up a notch, and soon.
Thanks for bringing this to our attention.
US knows there’s insufficient support for a coup. The first one didn’t go so well. Neither did the recall referendum. And now Chavez’ coalition is poised to elect a majority to the National Assembly.
The voting machines (by Smartmatic) now appear to be a non-issue, & the opposition’s boycott purely political.
With the opposition facing an expected decisive defeat at the polls, Chavez’ charge that this is a propaganda ploy to delegitimize the results seems justified.
Vice-President Rangel . . .
Watch for further destabilization efforts and the propaganda heat to be turned up in the following months.
Even the BBC reported the opposition had pulled out because they could no longer organize big demonstrations and faced a huge defeat in the election. Chavez has been helping the poor and the poor represent 70% of Venezuela’s population. It doesnt take much to work out how the election will go.
During the recall the opposition claimed the Diebold machines had been rigged by Chavez. However, a hand count of the paper receipts actually increased his majority.
To launch a military coup would probably need us to buy off the whole Venezuelan military. Considering how well that went last time, I doubt even Bush would waste the money.
I’d guess the opposition parties have withdrawn to enable later accusations of loss of democracy and totalitarian rule to be made when Chavez amends the constitution. Those accusations would look a lot better than if he achieved the two thirds majority by totally trouncing the opposition in an election. The sad thing is that the opposition is starting to look like a tool of the US leaving the people of Venezuela with no opposition parties to vote for even if they wanted.
Third Time’s A Charm.
Don’t put anything past these rat bastards.
I’d appreciate the opinions of those more knowledgeable on the subject concerning this article I found. Is this fairly accurate?
Chavez has publicly announced his intention to achieve zero illiteracy not only in Venezuela, but in the region, and purchased some huge number of copies of Don Quixote to distribute at no charge to all the Venezuelans who have recently learned to read as a result of his ruthless education offensive.
Are the neocons especially afraid of literate, educated, healthy poor folk? My thoughts are yes, yes they are but are Chavez’ goals also ones that should concern the non-neocons too? I don’t think so, except for the part about him arming a few million for militias but I need to hear what others here think about him.
Any capacity for independent, evaluative thinking amongst the public is anathema to the neocons. Their entire strategy for global hegemony rests on exploiting ignorance and then weaponizing it.
As for chavez, I suspect the bright lights of celebrity on the world stage might ultimately have an adverse effect on him, but overall I believe he’s doing good for the Venezuelan citizenry directly and, because of his stand against US domination, I feel he’s helping to strengthen all those other emerging liberal democracies that are blossoming again in the region after 2 decades of US supported dictatorships.
Yeah, that’s about what I have for an understanding of it. Of course, there are plenty of other ulterior motives but that seems to be the main assessment.
There’s such a fine line between a future ally or adversary and it all comes down to trust.
The stark contrast of consecutive actions in Iraq that punish, degrade or undermine human dignity is apparent in the neoconservative approach.
The Barbach piece seems in line with most of the independent reporting I’ve read. I won’t pretend to be an expert.
A societal model of healthy, literate indigenous people populating the Third World has never been in the the “interests” of the US. An alternative paradigm of independent development is, well, simply intolerable.
Btw, Here’s VP Rangel on the opposition’s withdrawal from the elections:
That’s from the second article I cited above. One more item from it; two major opposition parties have withdrawn, however:
I’m afraid that so long as the neoliberal approach dominates US foreign policy, Chavez & the Bolivarian model will be seen as “enemy” no matter which party occupies the oval office. The neoliberal approach is simply one of the topics that’s not allowed.
What’s referred to as “neoliberalism” barely qualifies as an “ism”, much less a philosophy. It’s basically a euphemism for “oligarchy”, and is a doctirne that is anathema not only to participatory democracy, but stands in direct opposition to the fundamental raison d’ etre of government, that reason being to serve, protect, and when possible contribute to the improvement of the lives of all the people it presumes to govern.
Whether it’s called Reaganomics or anything else, it’s a looter’s rubric, one that the US has been using in Central and South America for most of the 20th, and now 21st, Centuries.
And it’s no accident that there’s been a precipitous decline in educational standards in the US since the Nixon era. Our government’s power in the world is based pretty much on it’s ability to create dependencies in other countries and then exploit those dependencies through foreign policy extortion, demanding all manner of quid pro quos in order to collect whatever benefits the US has created said dependencies for.
My hope is that Mercosur, (the S. American “common market” scheme), will gain strength and independence despite the efforts of the US govt. to screw it up. There arealot of ruthless psychopathic millionaires and delusional, powermad military sadists in South America in collusion with the US for their own selfish reasons, and it’s my hope that these new liberal-left governments will be able to prevail against them. (If the butcher Pinochet finally stands trial and is sentenced to prison for the remainder of his life this would be a very good sign.)
“Looter’s rubric” — that’s priceless.
If I’m understanding things correctly, the success of Mercosur depends on Brazil.
There’s an interesting piece by an Argentinian that looks at the US military presence in Paraguay as an effort to “crack” the Mercosur block.
Pinochet? We’ll see . . . kinda frail, yanno?
(I just re-read the opening here, that claims the CIA isn’t as involved as it used to be in S America. A lot of the work of destabilizing other countries’ governments has been shifted over to NGO’s, particularly the National Endowment for Democracy & US AID. Phillip Agee (yea, the guy for whom they wrote the IIPA) wrote a 3-part article, “How United States Intervention Against Venezuela Works,” that analyzes how these agencies do the work once done by the CIA — and speculates that they are still in fact running the show.
Wherever there is the US AID there is the CIA in one iteration or another.
If it’s accurate that Lula’s agenda in Brazil is of this “neoliberalist” cast, ultimately Mercosur will wind up being far less successful if for no other reason that it won’t attract the regional support it needs in order to truly flourish. And, of course, lacking this support it will be embarrassingly way for outside interests to sabotage it.
Unity against those from outside is essential to any long term and deep-seated economic success in S. America. Sadly, I’ve spent quite a bit of time there, (mainly in Argentina), and I have to say the rivalries and enmity between countries has an ongoing paralytic effect on real progress and economic independence.
Thanks Artucus, sbj and DTF for the extra insight into the situations down south. It’s over my head but that’s never stopped me from trying to understand. It’s a big help to see the key points from opinions I trust. The diversity of experience and voices is one of the best attri-boo-ts of this site.
My research has been in a tangential line but it leads back to the same factors you’ve all mentioned here. I think we have witnessed the alternative news/blogs staying ahead of breaking events but even those are long running problems by the time they’re openly discussed on an average basis. Have the NGOs that were mentioned been a covert mechanism for a decade or more? My guess is that they have, (although this might be common knowledge beyond my own) especially the influence of the religious based mission type orgs that serve multiple agendas.
If that’s the case, then we’re probably also seeing the beginning of the next wave of influence that started several years ago but seems to be gaining power and control for the future. The PSCs are the global ‘privatized militia’ that serve the wealthiest interests where global power is concentrated. All of the players in Iraq-CIA-support I’ve seen mentioned in many of the questionable dealings in countries that are as you all described.
The big difference now is that these private groups and their PSCs also own a majority of the technology for current and future control in many aspects of life, globally.
rumi:
My memory isnt always the best & I don’t have time now to look it up, but I want to say that destabilization efforts were shifted from CIA to the happy face of NED & US AID sometime after the Church investigations of the 70’s? Certainly in place in time for Nicarauga.
There’s a grad student at Stanford, Sasha Kramer, who has published some top-notch writing on US AID in Haiti.
sbj: Do you think Brazil will continue to straddle the fence, as it were, betwwen allegiance to Mercosur & pursuing its self-interest in the greater free-market world? or is Mercosur doomed?
After all, Bush already orchestrated a coup in Haiti and America by and large ignored it. Venezuela might be more challenging, but we know Bush is quite willing to destroy democracy abroad the way he has been destroying it here.