In a sharp rebuke to the Bush administration’s changes to existing National Forest policy, U.S. District Court Judge Marsha Pechman has deemed the modifications illegal.
Link
SEATTLE, Washington, January 11, 2006 (ENS) – In a victory for environmental groups, a federal court has declared illegal a Bush administration’s decision to eliminate safeguards for old growth forests and the rare plants and animals that inhabit them.
The Survey and Manage plan had served the purpose of controlling logging to protect the multitude of species living in the old growth forests.
In March 2004, the Bush administration eliminated the Survey and Manage standard – a central part of the Northwest Forest Plan, since it was adopted nearly 10 years ago. The Plan was declared to be legal in 1995 in part because the Survey and Manage standard gave federal officials some assurance that wildlife in the forests would be adequately protected from logging. A fundamental principle of the survey and manage rules is to protect habitat for threatened wildlife to prevent the animals and birds from becoming endangered.
Over one thousand species living in the forests would be protected by the standard. But limits on logging gave rise to a lawsuit by the logging industry. And Bushco answered the call.
Pete Frost of the Western Environmental Law Center:
Frost says the Bush administration attempted to eliminate the Survey and Manage standard along with other safeguards as part of a settlement agreement with the logging industry over a lawsuit logging interests filed in 2001.
Before a judge could rule on the merits of the case, the Bush administration agreed to the demands of the logging industry by removing the Survey and Manage standard.
Industry calls and Bushco answers the need. Have we heard this theme before? Oh, once or twice.
In rendering the present decision, Judge Pechman ordered sales stopped that could be potentially dangerous to numerous species.
The judge ordered a halt to 144 timber sales in California, Oregon, and Washington that might jeopardize about 300 species of animals and plants.
It’s good to get some good news on the environment. Thanks for posting this.
Wow, someone actually remembered that the National Forests aren’t George’s to destroy any way he pleases? Great news.
This is Bush “I can do anything I want to do as Presnit” remember. NO LAWS NEED APPLY!
Especially w/that nutcase appointment.
Fingers crossed for whatever happens next. It’s not as if these guys EVER give up.
It’s important to recognize our victories as well as our losses — thanks for pointing this out.
Mr. Tree, do you have any comments?
“Ya, I heard about the win, but it’s like this, me and my buddies here are still pissed off. When he gets done telling the Gulf States what good shape they’re in, tell him to drop by the Apple Orchard so as we can taked turns shoving yellow bricks up his phoney cowboy ass. Bush is a WORM!”
There you have it folks, a man on …. er… tree on the street response after the initial news. Back to you in the newsroom.
LOL. Thanks for that!
I heard that Mr.Tree will be branching out and will write future comments on his new blog entitled Bark By Popular Demand.
I look forward to the fruits of this discussion.
(Damn, I don’t know how to do bolded).
* “bold” * remove “s”, close asterisks, get this:
bold
/ “italics” / remove “s”, close slashes, get this:
italics
Peace
Ah but you will if you go read this.
On a somewhat related note a study came out that shoots down the Bush adminstration’s insistence that logging burned forests is a good idea.
Full article here.
Makes one wonder and ponder…
all those forest fires lately… was that Bush trying to help out his logging buddies?
Anybuddy wanna buy some wood? ACK
Hate to let George off the hook but the fires are mostly the result of decades of fire suppression. Plus fires are good for forests and the seeds of some species of trees are opened only by fire.
/unasked for lecture
when I learn something from you, Andi 🙂
Yes AndiF, but isn’t it also good to leave the burned trees in situ? Some species thrive only in burned out forests. It’s the logging in the aftermath of the fire that is questionable, imo.
Check the article I linked to which discusses the study which shows that forests recover better when they are left alone after a fire.
Hey that’ll teach me to ignore your links! “Scorched Forests Best Left Alone”, indeed. Thanks for the reply and the link.