From Raw Story
After receiving an internal e-mail indicating an extreme state of unrest at the Social Security Administration, Representative Henry Waxman (D-CA) has written Speaker Hastert regarding the situation.
Waxman claims that other internal documents indicate a “hemorrhaging” at Social Security call centers, and a flood of inaccurate information to seniors regarding the prescription drug plan.
Here is a message sent from Deputy Commissioner of Operations Linda McMahonare:
Ordinarily I would be sending you a Happy New Year note at this time, but the circumstances we are facing seem to call for a different message. I didn’t want you to think I’m out of touch with reality and don’t know about the significant challenges you are experiencing.
Ever since the Medicare Modernization Act passed, those of you on the front line have been expressing your deep concern that SSA is not positioned well to help people understand, enroll in and negotiate the new Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Program. Now we are seeing the consequences of that fact. Our National 800 Number Network has been overwhelmed for weeks, with busy rates running above 35 percent many days. In the last few weeks, those folks who can’t get us on the phone have been coming into our field offices in large numbers. In fact, during the first two weeks in January, we had nearly 200,000 visitors a day – as many as 60,000 more than we saw in the fall. We already had large backlogs in our Processing Centers, and those will be exacerbated by the need to put more people on the phone to bring down the busy rate and keep people from needing to visit field offices. Of course, if we aren’t careful, we will generate more calls and visits from the folks whose actions will have to pend longer in the PCs.
It’s not a rosy picture, and the news doesn’t get better. Congress finally passed our FY06 budget in late December, and they gave us $300 million less than the President requested. That means we will not be able to replace all the employees we lose to retirement this year or accomplish all the automation projects we had intended to do to streamline work processes. At the same time, we have been given new mandates to do more thorough screening before we process Social Security Number applications and to include children under the age of one in that process.
So, where does that leave us? What are we going to do to cope with these problems? …
I won’t try to kid you. This is going to be a very difficult year, and the budget picture for next year doesn’t look any better. I commit to you that I will continue to work with the Commissioner to tell our story and enhance our chances of getting a better budget. I will be closely monitoring the impact of our decisions and will make adjustments as necessary to ensure that we maximize the use of our resources and minimize the negative fallout from the shortfall. Of course, that means we will probably be changing priorities as the year unfolds, so please prepare yourselves mentally for that possibility.
continued
LA Times
The email was released by Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Los Angeles). His office said it verified the authenticity of the message, which is labeled “Difficult Times.” Waxman called for immediate congressional action to restore a recently enacted cut of about $200 million in Social Security’s administrative budget.
“The problems faced by the Medicare program in implementing the benefit are spilling over and having significant impacts on the Social Security program,” he said in a letter to House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.).
Jammed phone lines have been widely reported at Medicare offices and at private insurance plans, however, problems at Social Security have largely gone unnoticed or overlooked.
Although the law that created the Medicare D provided additional funding for Social Security in 2004 and 2005, it earmarked no funds for when the agency is at its busiest, according to Waxman.
Congress cut the agency’s administrative budget by .2 billion dollars for 2006. Also, the Social Security Agency has gained approval to reduce disability reviews, which are supposed to determine the continuation/existence of a disability. In theory, this saves the agency money. In reality, it does not appear to tell the Social Security Agency anything it did not already know.
However, despite the growth Medicare and Medicaid, veterans in Congress aren’t expecting much progress on the deficit.
Accoding to Senate Budget Committee Democrat Kent Conrad of North Dakota,
“It’ll largely be a do-nothing year, unfortunately…We all know the history, which is that very little in terms of bold action gets done in an election year.”
Wish I could be that optomistic!!!
xposted atdkos and MLW
Hi Kid..I was reading these articles this morning also..no big surprise. It was hard enough before to get through to SS. I remember trying sometimes all day to talk to someone back in the early 90’s..and it would literally at times take me days of calling to get through to someone. I can’t even imagine what is happening now.
That’s doubly disgusting for the disability review..that is already backlogged up to years behind timely reviews. People’s lives hang in the balance on those reviews and if you have to wait a year or more for a review….then again my understanding was you automatically get turned down the first two times(which is what happened to me)then go on the the review before a judge. Really was a hideous, hideous time and mess for me.
This cutting back after knowing about that 300 Billion the IRS talks about makes me so furious I can’t even begin to do a good rant on that..there really is a war on poor people…by these phony christian neocon thug bastards.
My experience w/SS was also a nightmare! What I had thought was that the disability reviews were the periodic reviews that determine the continuation of a disability. (Been thru 2.) But, maybe you’re rght on that!
Know what you mean about a good rant–not up to one either!
(I am half-thnking of contacting Waxman’s office re: all of the shit that I have been going thru lately.)
I’ve only had one review in the last ten years. However when I had to do that one-it was only written information I had to submit I also sent a letter with it wondering why they were bothering with reviewing someone who had a permanent disability that not only would not get better but could only get worse…I wrote that it seemed a real waste of time/money and used up peoplepower on a given permanent disability when their time could be better suited to reviewing new claims…when they are so backlogged. Sure I’m going to be miraculously cured of my genetic neuro-muscular disease.
I got a dumb letter back stating that they ‘had’ to do reviews every several years-yeah right as I said I’ve only had one in ten years..all bullshit.
Is there any system in this country now that isn’t either a screwed up beaurocratic mess/underfunded or corrupt? Or all 3?
Also been permanently disabled–a traumtic brain injury doesn’t miraculously heal! And, there have been other health problems as well. And they still keep at it! I call it the “Proving Game”, as you repeatedly have to prove yourself. And I am sick and tired of having to prove myself–go after all the back taxes instead! Have been giving some thought to contacting Waxman’s office re: all of this Medicare D crap, but if I do, it wouldn’t suprise me in the least if the SSA did another review and said that I wasn’t disabled. Fucked either way!