…The jobless and homeless in this nation, whose numbers are legion, are not freeloading parasites. They are, for the most part, people whose living has vanished as company after company has closed plants and “outsourced” the work to countries where people work for a few dollars per day, then moved them even further when they find a place that accepts pennies per day. These companies, or their managing staff, look upon every dollar spent on employee retirement funding, medical plans, or workplace safety, as money wasted; money which could go into their pockets or into the acquisition of yet another company which can be raided and dismantled for profit…
Read More Related Commentary Here:
http://www.populistamerica.com/commentary
Years ago, empathy used to be imbibed with mother’s milk. If you did something thoughtless or inconsiderate, mom or dad said, “How do you think that made them feel?” or “How would you feel if someone said (or did) that to you?”
Eventually, you learned to reflect upon the beliefs, customs and feelings of other people, not only in foreign countries, but in other areas of your own. If you were really lucky, your folks or your buddy’s folks subscribed to National Geographic magazine. After you got over your pre-adolescent sniggering over the occasional naked breast, you began to realize how diverse and rich in customs our beautiful world was. Now, with the advent of home entertainment centers and global satellite links, the world has shrunk to the size of our living room. With this benefit, we should be far beyond provincialism and jingoism, but unfortunately our current obsession with the “bottom line” seems to have blunted many of our human sensibilities. Empathy seems to have faded. The ability to put yourself in another’s place is now looked upon as a weakness. This extends not just to foreign nations and customs, but to our own.
The jobless and homeless in this nation, whose numbers are legion, are not freeloading parasites. They are, for the most part, people whose living has vanished as company after company has closed plants and “outsourced” the work to countries where people work for a few dollars per day, then moved them even further when they find a place that accepts pennies per day. These companies, or their managing staff, look upon every dollar spent on employee retirement funding, medical plans, or workplace safety, as money wasted; money which could go into their pockets or into the acquisition of yet another company which can be raided and dismantled for profit.
To these people, the workers they displace are not people, they are merely ciphers. There is no empathy, they do not put themselves in the place of those desperate men and women trying to feed, clothe and house their families.
Albert Pike, writing for Freemasons in the nineteenth century said:
“Teach the employed to be honest, punctual and faithful as well as respectful and obedient to all proper orders: but also teach the employer that every man or woman who desires to work, has a right to have work to do; and that they, and those who from sickness or feebleness, loss of limb or bodily vigor, old age or infancy, are not able to work, have a right to be fed, clothed, and sheltered from the inclement elements: that he commits an awful sin against Masonry and in the sight of God, if he closes his workshops or factories, or ceases to work his mines, when they do not yield him what he regards as sufficient profit, and so dismisses his workmen and workwomen to starve; or when he reduces the wages of man or woman to so low a standard that they and their families cannot be clothed and fed and comfortably housed; or by overwork must give him their blood and life in exchange for the pittance of their wages: and that his duty as a Mason and Brother peremptorily requires him to continue to employ those who else will be pinched with hunger and cold, or resort to theft and vice: and to pay them fair wages, though it may reduce or annul his profits or even eat into his capital; for God hath but loaned him this wealth and made him His almoner and agent to invest it.”
When Pike wrote this, the industry of the United States, and that of other industrialized nations was controlled by the robber barons, or “Captains of Industry,” as they preferred to be called. To get an idea of the condition of the working class, one should read some of Dickens’ novels, set in the slums of industrialized England.
Many writers, including Dickens, brought enlightened views as to the dignity of man, as our Constitution had put forth the rights of man. The great depression of the 1930’s brought forth Franklin D. Roosevelt, who instituted programs to provide jobs, and to see that none should be left to starve after their working years had ended. World War II left the world with hope, as the United States set out to help rebuild a ravaged planet. The United Nations was established so that all nations, all peoples, would have a forum to solve disputes without resort to war and violence; to promote programs to end famine, ignorance and poverty. To a degree, this worked. It was not perfect, but at least it provided a forum for understanding. People had empathy. They could put themselves in other’s places and understand and feel their problems. Slowly, we were taking steps forward.
Suddenly, at the beginning of the twenty-first century, which should have been a time of hope, we suddenly reverted to the days of the robber barons. Greed and expediency outweighed every other value. Laws and treaties which had given hope to the world were unilaterally discarded. The wealthy were given breaks beyond their wildest dreams. We suddenly became the power which, with overwhelming military force, could stand astride the globe, dictating what other nations must do, making war upon those that did not kowtow to the new power.
Whatever happened to empathy? How did the world suddenly become inhabited by good, red-blooded Americans and a bunch of gooks, slopes, ragheads, hadjis and any other pejorative which makes them seem less than human? How did the world suddenly become us and them? How is it that no one’s beliefs and concerns have validity except ours? How has it come about that the world is now divided between us, our few allies, and a world of terrorists?
Islam is not a religion of terror. It is a kind and loving religion, drawing its influence and origin from the time of Abraham. It regards the religions of Israel and Christianity as also being, “People of the Book.” Unfortunately, it has its fanatical adherents, just as we do, but in the main, the Muslim peoples are no different than us. All they ask of us, of the world, is the chance to live in peace, to raise their families and provide food, clothing and shelter for them. To educate them and teach them to live in peace when their generation matures. These are hard lessons to teach in the midst of death, starvation, war and killing. When this is all you know, you lose your ability to have empathy and put yourself in another’s place. You then grow to learn that there is you and the enemy, and you kill the enemy. If you have no hope, then life becomes cheap and it is easy to sacrifice it; to strap a bomb on your body and walk into a building full of humans, who are no longer humans, but the enemy, and push the button.
Somehow, we must take hold of our destiny and our lives and return to a path of peace and construction. War, greed and destruction is not working. A good start would be to once again learn the skill of empathy, and learn again to put ourselves in another’s place. As we would not be treated, so should we not treat others. Come to think of it, isn’t that covered in the Golden Rule?
Written by Stephen M. Osborn, and published at www.populistamerica.com. Stephen is a freelance writer living on Camano Island in the Pacific Northwest. He is an “Atomic Vet.” (Operation Redwing, Bikini Atoll 1956, ) who has been very active working and writing for nuclear disarmament and world peace. He is a retired Fire Battalion Chief, lifelong sailor, writer, poet, philosopher, historian and former newspaper columnist. He welcomes your feedback at theplace@whidbey.net
Wonderful diary! Read and recd.
but it turned into a long rant against the Religious Reich…so I’ll just say thanks for sharing this and slap a “recommend” on this puppy… 🙂
Amen. Somewhere along the line the value of a person’s character was changed over to the dollar standard…. but there are some things that should never be measured in dollars and cents.
When it is more important to us to avoid “being scammed” or “taken advantage of” than to respond to another’s request for aid, where does that put us? Now to avoid the appearance of “rewarding laziness” in a few, it is considered preferable to withhold aid from many who need desperately need it. Because our Puritan ethic demands that only the “truly needy” deserve to be aided, and it seems a greater sin to give that aid to someone who doesn’t qualify, who isn’t needy enough or is “just taking advantage” of our “generousity…” than it is to allow someone in need to slip through the safety net entirely.
Something is truly wrong with this picture. And it is hard to break free of that mindset, even for progressives. There’s something in us that wants to ensure our charity is “worthwhile” by some standard; that the money given isn’t “wasted” — whatever that means. And this is pervasive throughout our culture, this sense that by extending aid to someone else, we become entitled to make judgments on what they do with what we have given them. Where is the line between reasonable oversight and self-righteous judgment?
No easy answers there. (Not even going to get into the whole faith-driven side of that discussion).
Your excellent comment reminded me of a discussion my wife and I had about “charity.”
We were walking through a grocery store parking lot and a guy walked up to us with the standard for our town freeloader story about how “my car ran out of gas and I just need $5 to get enough gas to get home, can you spare something?” So I gave him $5.00. He said thanks and left to go wherever he was going.
After he had left my wife chided me for giving this guy money because “he’ll either go buy drugs or liquor with it and then how much good will you have done him? By thinking you’re helping you’re really hurting him because you don’t take into mind what he’ll do with the money.”
My response was that I didn’t care what he did with the money. If I take the message of Jesus seriously, (and I’m not even close to be a Christian, and would kick anybody’s ass who tried to call me one given what current Christians have done to the name) my responsibility is for my action, which was to be helpful to somone needing help. How I act in this situation is between God and me. How the guy uses the money I gave him is between God and him.
I’m perfectly willing to let God judge us both. I guess that’s why I’m not a Christian. Christians are too busy telling God what to do to have time for empathy.
than most of the folks who claim the title. When Christ does make it back to earth, I hope He’ll consider some legal action against those who have misappropriated His name…
If you do get the inclination to darken the door of a church, I’d be happy to scoot over and make room for you in my Episcopalian pew… 🙂
Agreed…wholeheartedly too.
Between federal, state, and local taxes, as a nation, we have to give up nearly 50% of our national income, but we don’t get to decide where any of it goes (seems to end up in the military quite a bit). But, $5 to someone who might use it “poorly” or “correctly” and we question it as being unwise. Something seems wrong about that.
Maybe we should be questioning all the billions of dollars of charity we give to the federal government, who turns around and uses it to oppress, control, and murder innocent people.
Patrick Henry probably said it best:
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the People; it is an instrument for the People to restrain the government.”
Exactly. That’s exactly it.
Thank you for that story. I ALWAYS give money to panhandlers, usually $5 or $10 these days, and sometimes more, and I don’t think it’s any of my damn business what they do with it.
You see, there are some Gospel passages that say . . .
Back when I was in college, I was walking with some friends and a guy came up to us and asked for money. One of my friends, Jim, gave him some money. My other friend started giving him crap about it after the guy had gone, saying he was probably just going to get drunk off it. I said very firmly, “That’s not our responsibility.” What I meant was that it is our responsibility to help people in need, not to worry about what they do with that help. Jim looked at me and blinked and said, “I think it is.” He thought I meant it wasn’t our responsibility to help so I had to fall over myself to explain, and I was embarrassed. But also glad that he stood up to me over what he thought I meant.
I guess you, like me, didn’t get the memo January 2001. But according to the media and the popular culture, empathy is wimpy, wussy, shows weakness and all those other dispaging things that those “real macho” folks believe in.
Like for example, military action is better at preventing terrorist attacks than law enforcement. Oh really? How long did it take Clinton to get the first bombers of the World Trade Center behind bars? And the Bush administration has botched what should have been a slam-dunk case with Moussauai. Not to mention the fiascos in Afghanistan and Iraq, “special rendition”. To do things right would, in Cheney’s words, “be sensitive” like that wimpy group therapy stuff.
Instead of a hypocritical Lucy-like “Be of good cheer”, we now have a growling “So what! Suck it up.”
the only thing the government botched was being able to satisfy their blood-lust by executing him — he’ll still be behind bars for the rest of his life.
But you’re right — and what about the anthrax attacks back in 2001? Never found who was responsible…of course they were against Democrats, so that’s okay…it’s not like they were attacking real Americans…
Values — they come, they go. These days empathy seems to have been replaced with judgmentalism. I think it went out the door during the Reagan era Republican Cultural Revolution that taught “Greed Is Good.”
In the eighties kids learned, as the fundamental principal of that philosophy, that it’s hard to empathize with the other guy when you’re busy planning to step all over him on your climb to get to the top in your furture big bucks career. It’s much easier to feel the other guy’s a schmuck and just move on. Don’t you love that phrase?
The William J. Bennetts of the world have been waging a war on the egalitarianism of cultures. Western Civilization must be touted as the gold standard to which all others are inferior. Consequently, judgmentalism requires Westerners to feel superior. One can’t empathize with the poor backward types who just won’t assimilate when you know your values are right and theirs are wrong, now can one?
I confess, I don’t always empathize with Moslems. In spite of what their religion preaches, what too many of its believers practice gives the gory lie to their faith. Unless and until organized Islam more forcefully abjures violence in a vocal and directed action, I will be unable to empathize with too many Muslims, especially in the Mid East. I have the same problem with Christycons, too. There’s no evidence if Christianity in them. And I remain judgmental.
Empathy left town along with consideration circa January of ’80. Greed moved in to fill the vacancy, and later was joined by fear, that union gave birth to more of both hate, and bigotry.
Empathy, where it exists, has always been selective.
Some people can happily watch contestants on “American Idol” be ridiculed, but draw the line at boxing. Others may support rape victims, but have no problem paying their illegal cleaning woman less than minimum wage.
I am empathetically challenged when it comes to Ken Lay; I want to see him married to Ann Colter, working a minimum wage job, and living in the projects for the rest of his life.
I want him to face true justice under law — maybe one day, he’ll share a prison cell with his good friends George and Dick…
That’s too good for him. I want to see him homeless, and begging.
The image I see of current society is a bunch of rats being more and more tightly packed into a small space. In short order they turn on each other.
For an example of how the stresses of downsizing, health insecurity, pension insecurity, and stagnating or declining standard of living, are affecting people just look at the roads.
We have a whole new term: “road rage”. We have aggressive driving and people feeling so insecure they need to buy armored Behemoths to pick up a quart of milk.
We can see the next phase developing as well – finding the scapegoat. It appears that it is going to be Mexicans. How governments can consistently blame things on the poorest and weakest sectors of society and be believed is one of the mysteries of sociology…
And I wonder if habits related to our physical health aren’t also affected, as the percentage who seem to be apprenticing sumo-wrestlers here in the US is increasing markedly.
Actually things are far worse now than at that earlier time. Some of the robber barons left large sums to charity. (At least one of the Vanderbilts left 80 million in cash and property to charity.) I believe that the elder Rockefeller (John D. ?) gave something like 900 million (or its equivalent) to charity, over time.
You would not see anything like this now. You are exactly right, it is seen as a sign of weakness today. Only a “weak” liberal would display such values today.
Andrew Carnegie, steel magnate and library building philanthropist, was reported to have said something to the effect that a man who became rich could be virtuous but a man who died rich was a sinner.
But these days, empathy doesn’t generate cash flow or tax writeoffs, so there’s no point to it.
IIRC, Carnegie was also into violent union-busting, so were others of the original robber baron set. Bill Gates may plan to die rich, but I don’t think there’s any real blood on his hands.
I quite agree, and I’m not holding any of the originals up as role models, quite the opposite.
However, the originals DID make occasional forays into the category of decent human being… which most of their latter-day descendants (Gates and Soros being notable and significant exceptions) would never consider doing and in fact seem to think of as a weakness.
Can you, for example, see any of the Waltons, or Eisner, or Cheney, going so far as to ENCOURAGE employees to further their education, or willingly spend their own money to promote the welfare or prospects of anyone below the top 1%? I find it difficult even to imagine such, never mind consider it as a real possibility.
Interesting discussion.
I truly believe that those at the top of the economic food chain think they ARE empathetic.
I used to work in the archives of a very elite social club in Chicago. It was not uncommon to run into the likes of Ralph Reed or Elaine Cho in the lobby. (You get the picture.) I often wanted to go home and shower after a day spent there. …But some of them gave tons of money to charities like the Boys and Girls Club. If you suggested they should support a raise in the minimum wage or support a tax increase to make sure everyone had access to health care, they would go balistic. I think it was a control issue. They wanted to decide when, and how much, and to whom their “well-deserved” wealth would go. They had this idea about “worthy poor” and the “not so worthy poor.” They would pat themselves on the back for their generosity. But they could never see the draw backs of their approach. They could also never see the role of luck, connections, or genetics in their own success. They WORKED hard, for God’s sake. The illegal immigrant holding down two or three minimum wage (or less) jobs and working 60 hours a week apparently did not.
I recently joined a Unitarian Universalist Church after decades of avoiding organized religion like the plague. One of the things that drew me there was their first precept: A belief in the inherent worth and dignity of all people.
mainstream at this time.
People frequently, and not inappropriately draw parallels between the US today and the latter days of Rome, and various other empires throughout history.
I suppose it is a sort of natural circling of the wagons thing, On some level, they know that the current situation is not sustainable. It is more marked in the US maybe, because of the brutality, the crimes against humanity, which puts more of a spotlight on the American elite whose support and/or complicity makes all that possible, but Europe also is facing many of the same realities, not only of percentage of resources in percentage of hands, and of course there are hours of fun for the social anthropologists, with the demographic shift, and the inevitable and useless batting of mothlike wings against the twin gentle zephyrs of Mendel and math.
Americans are taught from birth that they are an exceptional master race, that the entire world is counted among what their right hand possesses, brutality, ignorance and insularity are seen as virtues, empathy almost as great a sin as poverty or being foreign, non-white, or female. If it were not for the great harm and suffering caused by their possession of such weapons and wealth, it would be almost charming, in a sort of quirky, quaint sort of way.
It is impossible not to pity them, even as the world slowly, even reluctantly, accepts its own culpability in allowing things to progress to this point, and seeks to mend its ways.
I’m late to this party, so I won’t get all the reads I deserve, but anyway–
I’m blessed by God with a huge capacity for empathy. That is called a bleeding heart. I really do genuinely care for complete strangers. I have become well known in my field of immigration law for my eagerness to take on seemingly impossible humanitarian cases, and for my nearly 100 percent record of success. I give the credit to God. I have a gift of feeling the pain of others– even greater than Bill Clinton’s!
So I’m a big fan of empathy. This is a great diary.
I want to also mention tithing. My wife and I give at least 10 percent of our after-tax earnings to charity, about half to Catholic charities and the rest to lots of other charities. That’s a lot of money. Some checks have been for $10,000. That is at a time when our total retirement savings are incredibly less than what we realistically need.
Money does not follow arithmetic laws. I have observed over and over again that the more I am generous in helping others, the more comes back to me.
You’ve got to pay to play at the God-given duty of empathy, in other words.
Try some experiments. It will expand your mind. More importantly, it will expand your heart.
Good intentions are great. But if you don’t actually give from your own stash until it hurts, it doesn’t really count.