The CIA has always tried to downplay the actual number of times terror suspects have been “extraordinarily renditioned”–in other words, flown oversees, imprisoned secretly, and tortured. No surprise, it’s a national disgrace that even many in the CIA are ashamed of.
The European Union Parliament today issued a report that blew the cover off the vague and disingenous picture painted so far by the Bush administration. The EU will have an ongoing investigation, but this preliminary finding shows that the CIA has run more than 1,000 secret flights through European airports since 2001. Many of the flights are so suspicious in nature that the known facts about their flight patterns and stop-overs draws attention to itself. Indeed, the number of suspicious CIA flights given by the EU is very preliminary; it is based entirely upon an analysis of the flights of fewer than 50 aircraft used by the CIA. There could be still other planes in use by the CIA.
The actual number of torture flights through European countries, therefore, is very likely to be much higher than the “100 to 150” prisoners Bush administration officials admitted in last December to having “renditioned”.
According to the Associated Press report on the EU report today:
U.S. officials previously said that as of late December, some 100 to 150 people had been seized in “rendition” operations involving detaining terror suspects in one country and flying them to their home country or another where they were wanted for a crime or questioning.
Let me add that in Dana Priest’s report on secret prisons from Nov. 1, 2005 in the Washington Post, the number of people sucked up into these hell-holes was reported to be “more than 100”.
More than 100 suspected terrorists have been sent by the CIA into the covert system, according to current and former U.S. intelligence officials and foreign sources. This figure, a rough estimate based on information from sources who said their knowledge of the numbers was incomplete, does not include prisoners picked up in Iraq.
That figure was intended by Dana Priest to be a conservative estimate, obviously. The release of this EU committee’s report gives some measure of just how much it may have underestimated the actual situation.
The committee, which set out initially in January to investigate reports of secret European prisons, ended up focusing on the CIA flights themselves. Information about the flights was given by Eurocontrol, the air-safety agency for the EU. As the AP reports:
“We were requested by EU Parliament to make an analysis of the flight routes for these planes. There may be others,” said Jean-Jacques Sauvage, a senior official of the Brussels-based agency. He said Eurocontrol did not keep track of who was on the planes.
The report said that on a number of occasions the CIA was clearly responsible for detaining terror suspects on European territory and transferring them to countries where they could face torture.
[Italian lawmaker Giovanni] Fava told the AP it was unclear how many people were transferred by the CIA on undeclared flights….
He accused the CIA of breaching the Chicago Convention, an international treaty governing air traffic. It requires aircraft used in military, customs and police operations to seek special authorization to land in signatory states.
The Guardian has further details.
Data showed CIA planes made numerous undeclared stopovers on European territory, violating an international air treaty requiring airlines to declare the routes and stopovers for planes on police missions, the Italian politician Giovanni Claudio Fava, who drafted the report, said.
“The routes for some of these flights seem to be quite suspect … they are rather strange routes for flights to take. It is hard to imagine … those stopovers were simply for providing fuel,” he added.
Mr Fava referred to the alleged secret transfer of an Egyptian cleric abducted from a Milan street in 2003, a German who claimed he was transferred from Macedonia to Afghanistan, and the transfer of a Canadian citizen from New York to Syria among other suspect flights.
He said documents provided by Eurocontrol showed the plane transferring suspect Khalid al-Masri, a Kuwaiti-born German national, from Macedonia to Afghanistan in 2004 flew from Algeria to Palma de Mallorca, Spain, on January 22; from Palma de Mallorca to Skopje, Macedonia, on January 23, and from Skopje to Kabul via Baghdad overnight on January 24.
Fava also said that according to his information, the groups of agents on these flights often were the same. In other words, the CIA has a cadre of rendition and torture specialists who are running something like a regular service on an illegal airline.
That would fit well with the observation by Ken Silverstein about what he’s been told about the current culture and climate at the CIA:
But what’s been little noted thus far is what looks to be a similar revolt brewing at the CIA. An ex-senior agency officer who keeps in contact with his former peers told me that there is a “a big swing” in anti-Bush sentiment at Langley. “I’ve been stunned by what I’m hearing,” he said. “There are people who fear that indictments and subpoenas could be coming down, and they don’t want to get caught up in it.”
This former senior officer said there “seems to be a quiet conspiracy by rational people” at the agency to avoid involvement in some of the particularly nasty tactics being employed by the administration, especially “renditions”–the practice whereby the CIA sends terrorist suspects abroad to be questioned in Egypt, Syria, Uzbekistan, and other nations where the regimes are not squeamish about torturing detainees. My source, hardly a softie on the topic of terrorism, said of the split at the CIA: “There’s an SS group within the agency that’s willing to do anything and there’s a Wehrmacht group that is saying, ‘I’m not gonna touch this stuff’.”
And well they should be afraid. The “rendition” of even one human to be tortured at a convenient time in a place to-be-announced-later, is despicable. What word is available, then, to describe the “rendition” of hundreds or possibly thousands by our government?
Crossposted at Inconvenient News.
Imagine a criminal mob that could put together 1000 secret flights…the ones that have been discovered, forget about the probability that there have been many, many other flights for different reasons…through Europe over a period of years. A mob that was so powerful, so rich and so well organized that they had their own damned air force.
And we roll our self righteous little middle class eyes at the Sammy the Bull Gravanos and John Gottis of this world with their sleazy little backseat murders and secret meetups in borrowed apartments of old lady aunts. We lap up the mafia film genre where the bad guys always lose eventually and then go home to our safe little bedroom communities that have been bought, paid for and loan-secured by these official spook terrorists, their massive spook bank account and their kind efforts on our behalf in the Third World and elsewhere…including withing the U. S…. over the last 50 or 60 years.
The Meyer Lansky character in “Godfather II” says “We’re bigger than General Motors”.
Possibly.
But just think a minute.
How much uncounted and uncountable money…secret money, money that has no “congressional oversight” whatsoever…is now available to Spook America after 50+ years of secret appropriations and even MORE secret investments? Investments that can be managed to greater profit by the fact that markets themselves can be manipulated secretly, that events can be predicted and even caused by people with this kind of secret power and knowledge.
How big is THAT criminal enterprise?
Thugs in Brooks Brothers suits.
They make the various “Mafias” look like the gangs that couldn’t shoot straight.
And…shame on US for passively swallowing the ancillary profits of THEIR profits.
“AAAAAYYYY!!! They ain’t so bad!!! Dis neighborhood is SAFE because of the wiseguys!!!!”
Yeah.
Right.
Until one day…
“There goes the neighborhood…!!!”
You want America to survive?
To recover?
START with reforming the Spookocracy.
What?
Too scared?
Best do it now before it’s too late.
There ARE some relatively benevolent people involved in that line of work. There MUST be.
Who else ya gonna call?
Spook Busters, Inc?
Instead of an anti-war march, maybe we ought to have anti-S.S.marches.
Scared yet?
I am.
AG
Arthur, this is for you:
Thank you, BooMan.
There are probably HUNDREDS of Morales clones. Maybe thousands.
Most a great deal more discreet.
The Secret Government is quite possibly invulnerable to outside influence by now. Too big, too rich, too dangerous. Too…”intelligent”. (That’s why they are called “intelligence services”, after all.) Only its own fault lines and the influence of whatever well-meaning people manage to survive and prosper within its very strange ecological system can deliver us from its clutches, I believe.
That, and a continuing and concerted effort by those outside of that ecological system to study it and to continue to try to make the rest of the word aware of just how large…and how important…it really is.
I have often been accused of being “anti-CIA” on these blogs. Also anti-intelligence service and anti-American.
I am not.
I am simply anti-criminal.
Insofar as the intelligence services of this country have gone criminal…and that includes much of that system, including many of its most important leaders…then yes, I am “anti-” those people. But had my life gone in a different direction, I would quite probably have myself gotten involved in intelligence work. I am a patriot…a real American, with generations of ancestors who have lived and died trying to make a life in this country…I have that kind of mind, and I am quite prone to action.
For every nut-ball Morales (And believe it. He was mad as a hatter. Thus the drinking. Unassimilated guilt on a MASSIVE scale.) there are hundreds of spook workers with good intentions. The fact that a number of godfather types have used these agencies and their barely controllable buttonmen to assassinate their way to power and wealth despite the efforts of most of the people involved in that life on one level or another is something that every American man, woman and child ought to be told on a daily basis until it sinks into the national psyche.
From the first gunshot in Dealy Plaza right through to the worst efforts of Cheney, Rumsfeld and their controllers and helpers to dominate the entire world, we have been subject to a massive criminal conspiracy by “our” secret government.
Which is now “our” owner.
It controls the media, and it controls large parts of the market.
What?
You think Enron was an anomaly???!!!
It was just the one that got caught.
This information needs to get out, and right now the internet is the ONLY info system in place that is not almost totally controlled by these forces.
Thus, my efforts and the efforts of literally thousands of other…analysts, to use a spook term…to get the word out.
1984 came a little late this year.
But it’s here, now, and it is well beyond the imaginative powers of ANY novelist.
We must all wake the fuck up.
Or eventually we will all sleep with the fishes.
Thugs ands good citizens alike.
Our choice now.
Have fun…
AG
My sense is that Morales was special. When outright criminals like Cline think you are a loose cannon with no moral compass, then you know you are, as Gen. Corman said, ” out there operating without any decent restraint, totally beyond the pale of any acceptable human conduct.”
BooMan.
You have a good heart.
Too innocent by a thousand, I think.
Morales had no morals. Moral-less, Mr. Morales.
But…how about the carpet bombing of North Vietnam?
Morales in his busiest decade was a little FART compatred to THAT shitstorm.
How about those who managed the Iran/Contra dealings in Central America?
The death squads?
How about the massive criminality of the drug trade in America? A drug trade that has crippled this country on every level imaginable. Crippled its inner cities, its working classes, made a mockery of the justice system, put a burden on the welfare system that has literally destroyed large and important parts of what was once a well-functioning culture.
And INEXTRICABLY linked to intel services on every level.
If crazy Morales was bad…how bad was Krazy Kissinger?
“…no moral compass…”?
“…out there operating without any decent restraint, totally beyond the pale of any acceptable human conduct.”?
I got yer “no moral compass”, right HERE!!!
Just for STARTERS!!!
FUCK Morales.
He was just a go-fer.
A servant.
A mechanic, in the gangster patois.
As David Rockefeller informed a young Gore Vidal after lunch at one of the Rockefeller manisons (Paraphrased for want of Google time.):
“Did you like that food? Yes,I am sure that you did. You have to understand, young Gore…we hire cooks to do those sorts of things.”
Don’t blame the messenger?
Don’t blame the servant, either.
AG
Oh, the irony of you throwing North Vietnam in my face after I quote about Colonel Kurtz. Priceless.
Morales did a job. He was good at it. So good that his comrades, men not prone to squeamishness, though he was batfuck crazy…as well as dangerous, and well as a loyal son of a bitch that go to hell and back for Ted Shackley at the word: boo.
Did he drop Jack personally? Did he trust anyone else to do it? We’ll probably never know. He did enough even without carrying out the crime of the century. Another HSCA heart attack. 1978 was a bad time to be someone with information.
“We took care of that SOB”. Yeah, Morales was special. I’d say.
I threw nothing in your face, BooMan.
Just trying to get the parameters straight.
What was big and what was not so big.
Aree 100,000 deaths worse than 20?
I think so.
AG
P.S. Sorry for the double post. I hit the wrong button.
Different type of thing, though.
Kissinger would crap his pants before he pulled the trigger on anyone.
Morales was a bad-ass’s bad-ass. That’s all I’m saying.
He reminds me of the guy in the Eastwood movie “In the Line of Fire”. The military trained him to be an assassin and gave him a bunch of work, but then he turned on the government and went after the President. In fact, that character might have been based on Morales.
We create these lunatics and think we can control them. But, they are not all that controllable.
As for Vietnam, I don’t know how we let that get so out of control. Maybe the problem was that we just couldn’t accept defeat and the idea that no amount of violence could change the fundamental problems with the South Vietnamese government. We just kept upping the ante until the level of violence outstripped any rational good that might have come of it. I’m not sure because I wasn’t there, but it doesn’t seem to me that guys like McNamera and the Bundys ever intended to let things get so out of hand.
Kissinger inherited that. And he was no better. But the really appalling actions of Kissinger, to me, were his anti-democratic policies couched in anti-communism. It defied all our principles and flew in the face of what we were trying to do in Europe.
The same crew has been at it since WW Two ended. Making the world safe for American business using the threat of nuclear annihilation/WMD is a way of life for these folks…and potentially a self-defeating prophesy.
worth noting on this thread, maybe, how many people dismissed the CIA drug-running story from the 1980s. Also, how many people attacked Gary Webb for daring to report the facts as he found them. And while we’re at it, let’s recall how the San Jose Mercury News let Webb dangle in the wind rather than defending his work and demanding to know why it was inconceivable that the CIA would be involved in such a dirty business.
Or maybe I just have spent too much time at Counterpunch.
I read a while back that concerns were raised about US flights landing on Cdn soil for refuelling.
I haven’t heard anything more recent about the investigation of these flights. This is the most recent article:
Last week I read that Ottawa denied a plane from Belarus to land for refueling, and look at their reason for denying (my bold):
I threw nothing in your face, BooMan.
Just trying to get the parameters straight.
What was big and what was not so big.
Aree 100,000 deaths worse than 20?
I think so.
AG