Talk about convenient timing for the Bush administration.
Jammed off the radarscope this week by Ann Coulter’s mouth and the demise of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was the squaring off between Senator Arlen Specter (R-Pennsylvania) and Dick Cheney (unofficial master of the universe) over the NSA domestic spying investigation.
Under the fold: Springtime for Dubya
CNN and other news outlets reported Thursday that Specter “sent a stinging letter to Vice President Dick Cheney after learning Cheney had lobbied other Republicans on his committee without his knowledge.”
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Specter is galled that Cheney’s been breaking the legs of other Republican Judiciary Committee members to block subpoenas of phone company executives regarding the NSA domestic surveillance program.
It’s difficult to determine whether Specter is actually upset that Cheney has been kneecapping fellow Republicans on Specter’s committee, or if he’s just upset that Cheney did the kneecapping without telling Specter about it.
Specter’s three page letter said, “This was especially perplexing since we both attended the Republican senators caucus lunch yesterday, and I walked directly in front of you on at least two occasions en route from the buffet to my table.”
Is Specter more concerned about buffet table protocol or about whether the Bush Administration is tossing Americans’ constitutional rights in the trashcan in the name of “plenary” executive powers?
Whatever the case, the result is the same. The White House’s claims to “unreviewable,” absolute powers will go unchecked as long as the GOP owns the Senate and the House.
Springtime for Dubya
As I discussed last December in Smoke, Mirrors, and War Powers, the administration has consistently based its claims of supreme executive authority on the Constitution and the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) passed by Congress in September 2001 days after the 9/11 attacks.
But the Constitution grants no such wartime authorities to any President. Article II makes him commander in chief–of the military, not the country. And that’s it. The Constitution makes no mention of special powers in times of war, declared or undeclared.
Article I gives most of the actual war making powers to Congress.
The AUMF, often referred to as the “blank check,” and claimed by the administration to have given young Mister Bush unlimited authority to do darn near anything he wants to the Constitution in the conduct of his war on terror, states that ” Nothing in this resolution supercedes any requirement of the War Powers Resolution.”
The War Powers Resolution, passed in 1973, says “Nothing in this joint resolution…is intended to alter the constitutional authority of the Congress or of the President, or the provision of existing treaties…”
And there’s nothing in the Constitution that gives Congress the power to allow Presidents to exceed their constitutional authority.
We know that we can’t trust the administration to check its own powers. And since the ultimate arbiter of what constitutes the law of the land is now Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, the Supreme Court has become, for all practical purposes, irrelevant.
And as long as Dick Cheney controls Congress, there’s really no discernable difference between the United States in 2006 and, well, name your favorite historical tyranny.
Like Thomas Jefferson, I’d rather not get into heaven than have to go there as a member of a political party. And as I recall, I’ve only voted for one Democrat–John Kerry–in my entire life.
But I’ve more than gotten over my aversion to “Hollywood Democrats.” For the foreseeable future, any time I have a choice between voting for a Republican or Porky Pig, I’m taking the pig.
#
Commander Jeff Huber, U.S. Navy (Retired) writes from Virginia Beach, Virginia. Read his weekday commentaries at ePluribus Media and Pen and Sword.
Yes, and I read today that Cheney’s office is now claiming immunity from document classification oversite on raw story or somewhere. While the left blogosphere is up in arms about Armando’s outing, things like this get ignored. So, shipmate, it looks to me that the NRO did a good job at divide and conquer in our blogosphere – keeping us distracted with dirty tricks and gossip while really important stuff ebbs out of the time window of attentiveness.
Good catch.
JD,
I’m proud to say that this is the first I’ve heard of Amrando’s outing and that it’s the last I care to hear about it.
Do you think maybe the blogosphere is starting to suffer from the same self absorbed pursuit of celebrity as the MSM?
I’m not sure. Been gone for a month and just got my internet access back – right in the middle of this maelstorm. So my perspective hasn’t evolved slowly with this its very sudden. So what I gather is that this was a winger-op. Armando is somewhat of a famous/infamous persona of the left blogs. Therefore it seems like divide and conquer to me – it’s an election year, time to get the swift boats out of dry-dock. Not that this was something planned by Rove, I really mean a few fanatics with keyboards believing they are just doing their part for the cause.
Self absorbed celebrity? Again, not sure. I believe that this whole blog thing was started by well meaning people, Kos for example, he did a great thing. I also believe that MOST politicians start out as well-meaning as well. Nevertheless, they’re people, and all people have egos.
In our terms (I too, was a Naval officer [Dam Neck, Little Creek] after a few years enlisted in the Army) I see as the difference between the wardrooms of say, SBU-22 and the Abraham Lincoln. The pond is still SBU-22, Kos has become an aircraft carrier. The bigger the organization… Which is why the big problem at orange is getting diaries read, so many people. People who have egos who get hurt if a diary isn’t read. Therefore if a diary is frivolous, it gets flamed for wasting space. There’s a point to that but I also like a little light-heartedness as well.
It seems to me, however, that the Armando thing is wasting far more space. Not that it isn’t important, what happened to him is very important, but there are other pressing issues such as the one you brought up that has the potential to do real harm to the entire country. And it may get ignored in all of the brouhaha.
divide and conquer has been a strategy and tactic of the right for a long time and not just in the US.
I more and more convinced that the best course for me is to keep my head down and just write about what I know and think is important.
What else can one do?
You and me both, shipmate!
Just wanted to drop this link to an article from US News & World Report a few weeks ago on one of the cogs in the Cheney machine, David Addington: Cheney’s Guy, i.e. the lawyer Scooter alledgedly went to after Dick told him to leak portions of the NIE to the press.
This is exactly what I mean. Putting the pieces together. That’s a good catch too. All the little pieces of info put together … it’s very frightening and needs to get attention.
Sad to say Porky the Pig would get my vote before I’d give it to most Democrats too, especially those currently in positions of leadership within the party.
Coming in at the end of this string…
Yeah, Addington is one of the chief criminals.