As you may know, thanks to tampopo’s diary earlier this week, today (Friday) is the latest installment of Petals for Peace that was spearheaded by BooTribber Boston Joe. He and I exchanged emails earlier today and he gave me the green light to share some of his thoughts with you all on another form of nonviolent protest. I’ll post them below the fold, but here is the info to participate in today’s Peace Rally (also known as an antiwar protest)
WHEN: Deliver 9am to 5pm and/or gather between1:30 to 2:30 pm Friday August, 18th 2006.
WHERE: Outside Rep. Mike Rogers office, 1327 E. Michigan Avenue, Lansing, Michigan FAX (517) 702-8642.
WHO: Called by Greater Lansing Network Against War & Injustice
To order flowers for Friday’s Michigan Protest, call Bancroft Flowers as early as possible at (866) 476-8608. Carnations are the preferred symbol of this particular movement.
There is an active call to spread this movement to other congressional districts. Please consider targetting your local war-supporting Congressman or Senators. Please let the Petals for Peace folks know if you participate by emailing: glnawi2004@yahoo.com
BostonJoe’s words below the fold…
[snip]
Without blogs, at once I am less informed, but perhaps more connected. Having to deal in the reality that the other (non-blogging people) around me are dealing in. They have a whole other mindset. They have a whole other set of information (probably far less informed). It affect me. And my perceptions. But it makes me closer to them. It is like when I was a trial lawyer, and I needed to watch pop-TV just to be able to talk to juries. You have to know what is going on in their lives.
[snip]
But yesterday, reading the historians and left-wing economists of empire, and walking back on a bridge across the Red Cedar River, it dawned on me that my very first instinct may have been right. The revolution can come. It can come, just one person at a time. Because all America is, is a windbag drunken bully at a dive bar.
The idea is simple enough. Everything we are doing is reliant on mass consumption. It accounts for roughly 70% of our GDP. And our GDP is the thing that allows us to borrow and spend our way to the evil empire that we’ve become. It will probably fall of its own weight. That is my view, anyway. I’ve been waiting for years. And may wait forever and be wrong. But it would certainly collapse if the sheep awakened and stopped the consumption.
Each individual. In revolution. A revolution of simplicity. No violence. No need for protests in the streets (though they are fun and good). Just a decision. I will live simply. My family will live simply. I will only consume out of necessity. And even then, I will consume locally or second hand.
I don’t know at what number of people it would take to stop consuming in this way, before the economy started to feel the weight of it. I asked Jerome in Paris and Stirling Newberry and perhaps even Bondad these things once, though I think the question might be alarming to the less that radical mind. What is the number of people whose reduced consumption can cause the economy to falter? Who knows? But I believe that I am not alone. In feeling that the status quo is killing our biosphere. Not just a nation. Not just a race. Or a species. But perhaps the ability of all life to survive.
I think a lot of us feel like this. If you have the courage to ask strangers. Is there something wrong here? Where homeless people are dying from the heat in Phoenix. Where biogengineered grasses are spreading like wildfires. Where a southern city can lie in ruins from the power of one storm. Where zones of ocean fisheries are deoxygenated deserts of sterile death. Many people say yes. Because they have eyes and ears and hearts.
So if enough people hear a simple message. Stop consuming anything you don’t need. And it could all end tomorrow. A paper tiger could be wadded up and thrown in the basket. I think that is the way the revolution could happen.
I’ll attach my original thoughts on de-consuming. Take my thoughts and make them your own if you like. Share them as if your name was Che, if you have any mind to do so. Because I’m in hibernation. Or leave them right here where they were born. In an e-mail.
Well, I thought long and hard on the words my Brother in Peace shared with me and decided that his words rang true for the emotions I’ve been feeling lately.
Somethings gotta give, and perhaps I need to do more to make it happen. So here’s the De-Consuming for Democracy message, written for an email campaign. After I finish formatting this diary, I plan to send it off to friends and family who are sharing in my anguish at the state of our nation and world. After that, I begin my process of DeConsuming.
As I’ve written many times in RubDMC’s Daily Witness Diaries – Peace – it begins within
Here’s the torch, I hope you run with it. Paz amigos.
De-Consuming for Democracy is an e-mail organized form of non-violent protest. Its goal is regime change in the United States of America. George Bush has to go! And if you want to help stop him in 2004, then read on.
Bush needs to be removed from office. Here is why: 1) He was “elected” with less than a majority of votes under what can at best be called an election of questionable validity; 2) He has given gigantic tax breaks to corporations and the wealthiest U.S. citizens, and jeopardized the long term stability of our economy by racking up record budget deficits; 3) He gained support for a war of aggression against Iraq by lying to the American people, convincing them that Iraq presented an immediate threat against the U.S. through their development of WMD and their direct ties to Al Queada; 4) He launched a war of aggression against Iraq based on these lies, and in the process has damaged U.S. credibility around the world, in addition to killing thousands of innocent citizens in Iraq, and killing and injuring thousands of U.S. soldiers; 5) He chilled free speech and political dissent by labeling those who disagree with him as unpatriotic; and 6) He gutted federal environmental protections in favor of corporate industry.
Bush has used a national tragedy and an irresponsible spending binge to cynically manipulate public opinion in the U.S., to the point that the corporate media are already touting him as the victor in 2004. He will use any legitimate election in 2004 to further goals which are harmful to average Americans, and harmful to the standing of the U.S. in the world.
Can he be stopped?
Combining the power of e-mail, and some simple Macro Economics, we the voiceless masses might be able to bring down this tyrant.
First, spread the word. E-mail the message to every person you know.
Second, act individually to create conditions that will make Bush a vulnerable candidate. One of the single biggest factors in U.S. presidential election is the performance of the economy. (Bush knows this – consider the recent disclosures by Bob Woodward that Bush had an agreement with the Saudi government to try to bring oil prices down to $22- $28 per barrel in the months before the U.S. election in order to buoy our economy and re-elect Bush). Bush is selling our future through giant tax breaks, designed to give the economy an initial boost, but which will in the long run create a financially unsustainable environment with huge national debt.
We can combat this by slowing consumption. Consumer spending is by far the largest source of revenue to our national economy. Without you and I – the consumers – the economy collapses. Act individually by curtailing your consumer spending. Only buy what you need. Put off all non-essential purchases off until after the election in November. While individually, your actions have little impact, the collective effect of millions of anti-Bush patriots “De-Consuming” will slow the economy, and give some candidate who will restore Democracy a chance.
Stop Bush today. And everyday. Become a De-Consumer.
See you at the shopping mall after the election – when we will all be free again.
Lots to think about, eh? I’ll try to check in later but I’m starting a long weekend to decompress from real-life chaos. See you all on the flip. paz
By the way, feel free to advertise this on my blog space as well.
thx James. I’ll post it in a few.
long for you, but short for us.
This actually should be fairly easy for my family to do. We already have no credit cards and have been paying cash on the barrelhead for all of our purchases for a while now. That in and of itself has been liberating – and on my salary, that pretty well takes out a lot of the temptation for nonessentials.
OK, it’s ridiculously early, and I should know better than to snark at any hour when I’m barely awake, but. . . does this mean that “Bud blogging” will now mean “made at home” blogging??
I may even change the sigline just for you, Kidspeak! π
Please add these to your flower faxing:
Rep. Bill Shuster (PA-09 – 100 Lincoln Way East, Suite B, Chambersburg, PA Fax 717-264-0269).
Rep. Elton Gallegly, (R CA – 24). (He’s on the International Relations committee, chairing the Subcommittee on Europe and Emerging Threats, and a blogger sent a request for people to send him to receive our messages of peace.)
2829 Townsgate Road, Suite 315 Thousand Oaks, CA 91361-3018 (805) 497-2224 Toll Free: (800) 423-0023 FAX: (805) 497-0039
Thanks for the update on BostonJoe – I want to think about this more.
for those addresses, tampopo. My last stop before getting on the road to my vacation is by a fax machine, I’ll add those numbers to my list. Peace, and thanks for keeping this alive here at the frog pond.
As for De-Consuming for Democracy, I know what you mean about needing time to think about it. Lots to ponder and evaluate.
Thanks for passing along Boston Joe’s thoughts for us. He is greatly missed by this guy. And yes, he is a Brother in Peace. It’s no overstatement when I say that the world feels a little safer to me, and a little closer to having Peace, knowing he’s out there, as Damnit Janet would say, “walking his talk”. I’d rather miss him here, than to not have him out there.
True, but I still wish he’d come by to visit all the same. He is definitely one of the Good Guys.
he’ll be back to the blogosphere at all, he might but needed to put his focus and energy back towards writing for his novels and the on-the-ground activism that he liberally shared with us all. His inspiration is lasting though because it’s so ordinary – something we can all summon within us if we choose to, at least that’s where my thoughts are today. Paz hermano.
This diary ties in well with one of the best diaries (in my humble opinion) ever presented over on Big Orange, Everything I Own, Owns Me by mrsdbrown1. I look at all the clutter and junk of my life and think I would probably be pretty happy if I just had a computer (a good laptop would probably do), my banjo, enough food to eat and enough clothes to wear, and (sad to say) my medicine. Instead I have an unmanageable pile of stuff, much of which I can’t get to and don’t use.
If I could find a way to have less stuff in my life I could cut back on expenses. For one thing, I wouldn’t be paying as much to store all my stuff. And yet . . . I find it difficult to do anything about the stuff. I might need this someday. I remember when we got that. I thought the doodad over there was so clever when I found it at the Aquarium. Or was it the Science Center?
I am at least trying my best to acquire less stuff. Nowadays I try to at least justify purchases before I make them. I try my hardest to give my family experiences (movie and theater tickets, for instance) instead of stuff for Christmas. I listen to music and entertainment on streaming audio rather than buying CDs (or go to the library when I just have to hear Suite: Judy Blue Eyes off of the Crosby, Stills and Nash album).
I’m not sure how long it’s going to take me to make up for past indiscretions, but going forward I’m at least trying to be less of a consumer. In fact, now that I think about it that’s one of the great things about being a musician and programmer, When you perform a song or write some code, you’re putting something into the world rather than taking something out of it. Thus do we defeat entropy.
last January I was disgusted with myself at all of the crap I had accumulated. Aside from the big things like couches, bed and table, I did the rest pretty much alone. I got to carry everything I had owned and decided that it was not productive to surround myself with so many stagnant things. I’m getting better and have donated alot of unused things, including clothes, to local shelters. I don’t miss the stuff, so why shouldn’t someone have it who could definitely utilize it. Thanks for that link to the DKos diary, I remember it and had forgotten until now about its poignant message. paz, Omir
I think it’s a worthwhile idea, Manee, for the election and beyond. IMHO overconsumption is tied into our biggest problems as Americans — the sense that we deserve, and can buy, absolutely anything we can dream up.
I’d like to put in a plug for the Freecycle Network. There are 3717 local groups worldwide dedicated to reducing consumption and keeping crap out of landfills by providing an electronic forum to give away and find unwanted items. There are Freecycle Network groups in cities all over the country — I just read it began in Tucson. (I’ve read that there’s a man behind Freecycle who is hung up on his trademark. But that has nothing to do with the spirit that infuses the local groups.)
Freecycle freed me to begin giving away stuff I’ve held onto for years, once I started. What you and Joe have written today is a good reminder.
Thanks for the link Lil! There is an active chapter on this side of the Bay too. I just read about this movement recently, but was under the impression it was small and mostly in the midwest. Boy, was that a wrong impression!
Sadly, I cannot take part in the nonconsumerism thing for a while. I am moving and getting rid of all my old stuff, which is good. But, I am also buying all new stuff for my new apartment. I plan on spending more in the next two months than I have in the past five years combined. But, on the upside, I will be in a significantly smaller space (less footprint) and will have rid myself of 10 years of accumulated junk.
Good luck with moving — what a pain. I’m glad you’re making plans not to do what I did the last time I moved — most of my junk came along with me. I was distracted ’cause my dad was dying, but still.
You might want to check out Freecycle now anyway — it’s surprising the things people post on there. Lately there’s been: a variety of electronic gizmos, furniture, school supplies, gardening soil, envelopes, picture frames, and I just got an ergonomic keyboard for my PC! Plus people put up “wanted” postings to find what they need — so often we have stuff we don’t even remember until someone needs it.
I recently moved four times in a three year period, and after the first move, sold/gave away/through out years worth of accumulated…stuff. It’s just stuff. Move #3 was to Vermont to work on the Howard Dean campaign, and basically, if it didn’t fit in the UHaul trailer that carried the sum total of my belongings, I got rid of it. I have been fairly good in resisting the urge to accumulate anymore. Move #4 was to LA, and I lucked into a furnished place. π It’s nice to know when I move next, none of that will be my responsibility.
When it came right down to it – the things I kept were intellectual creations that moved me. Paintings. Books. Movies. Music. Beyond that, what really matters?
We’ve been doing this for some time. De-consuming. Started with the move and simplifying our lives and closets..
It is very HARD to find things that are local to buy.
Not much is even made in the USA any more. To find these things, you have to find the local artists, carpenters and farmers. NOt many of them as they are having a tough time in America.
I miss BostonJoe so much. I know that he is tremendously busy and that is why I don’t email him. But I do miss reading his words, thoughts and ideas. They gave me strength.
Losing him from the blogosphere was a direct loss for me. I understand his needing to be closer to the streets and quite frankly I don’t find fault for him not wanting to be involved in the blogworld not after what has happened to many of the activists…
but activists need other activists… I feel like a piece of me was kidnapped due to his departure.
As to de-consuming.. Hooray! All Bush wants us to be is
Consumers or Cannon Fodder… I won’t be either one.
As to de-consuming.. Hooray! All Bush wants us to be is
Consumers or Cannon Fodder… I won’t be either one.
You’re all right, Janet. I don’t care what Abu Gonzales says about you.
I miss him too, but as he’s always told me either here or via email – we can all be an Accidental Activist. It just takes a decision inside, from there the fire will spread to others if we’re willing to share it with them. Thanks for doing your part to motivate me and others to get out into the world to vocalize our frustration and push for Peace.
As for De-Consuming, it’s all about doing what is in our power to do. We all know ways to simplify our lives, so baby steps can help us get to a place where we are doing much less to contribute to George’s War Fund. (((DJ)))
I spoke to the people at Bancroft and they are offering some carnations for 75 cents, so for example, if you order ten bucks worth you’ll probably get more than 10 carnations, which equals 10+ different deliveries to Mike Rogers’ office by constituents demanding peace. They’re very close to reaching their goal of 1000 for the project.
And with that, I’m off to the San Francisco Mountains near Flagstaff. Time for retreat and quiet for me so I can ponder this idea and other ways to build Peace, have a great weekend. Paz
I have mixed feelings about the de-consumption idea.
On the one hand, I have been trying to simplify my own life a lot in the past two years. Part of this is the awakening to the realization that I would rather do things than own things. I turned from an over-consumer into just a consumer, and I am really happy about it.
However, if this were indeed to happen on a large scale, in a relatively short time, there are some serious consequences. Yes, it makes the economy tank, which is good for getting those responsible out of office. But, the people who are hit hardest by economic downtimes are those on the bottom rung of the fiscal ladder.
There are an awful lot of people who are just barely hanging on. Drastic cuts in consumption will lead to less jobs, and the jobs that go first are going to be the low wage earners.
So, I guess my advice (unsolicited, I know) is to not ‘de-consume’ and put off all non-essential purchases. Instead, just do what you can to make sure you’re living within your means, and if you’re carrying any debt (especially credit) do what you can to pay it off.
Why I try to buy local and not from big box. π
Like with food: If I can’t get it organic… I’ll get it local.
Instead of Target or other big box… I’ll go to some small, indy, locally owned shop/store.
You have to really think and hunt down your purchases that way. Helps the community, and makes you aware of your buying.
I hope when Manny returns, this will evolve to more discussion. Thanks for your views.
I recall BostonJoe had done a book discussion (which I regretted being away for) which included the book Ishmael. What is sustainable? Could everyone on the planet live as you (or I) do? Can the planet handle it?
How many pairs of shoes does one really need? And where are those shoes made? By whom? Under what conditions? And what are the human, energy. and environmental costs of those shoes? I am coming to the realization that free trade isn’t free at all!
Thanks again Ejmw.
Hi tampopo!
I remember that BostonJoe diary very well, it was one of the more interesting discussions that I’ve been a part of in a long time.
One of the main points to come out of that was (as you point out) how humans as a species moved from a sustainable existence to one based on growth.
I think now we’ve moved to a point where, with current technology and societal norms, just sustaining the status quo is a mutually exclusive goal from sustaining our environment. So, it follows that there are really only 3 solutions to the problem (given in increasing order of probability):
Here’s a diary from earlier this year that I thought was really interesting, by OrangeClouds115 over at dKos: Vegetables of Mass Destruction – Food, Environment, & Poverty Edition
I think there was another one from longer ago that had many of the same themes, but focused more on exactly what you’re talking about : even if we buy ‘cheap’ goods, what are the non-monetary costs? How is it affecting the environment? Is it cheap because workers are being taken advantage of? I can’t find the diary right now, but I’m going to look for it because it was fantastic (should have hotlisted it).
I’ve started the slow process to de-consuming. I have made a conscience effort to shop at the local farmers market and local bakeries. I have done a little freezing and canning of the area fresh produce, so we can use it over the winter. I haven’t had the time I’d like to do it, but we are trying.
If only I could fully convince my husband. Old habits are hard to break, but I try to be gentle with my nudging, rather than a complete nag.
It is quite old, but I recommend E. F. Schumacher’s 1989 book Small is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered. It was very influential in helping point out some of the excesses of consumerism of the Reagan era (a lesson largely lost since that time). It has spawned a successors: Small is Still Beautiful (2000) by Joseph Pearce, which I have not read.
We began the process 15 years ago when we combined our home and office. After that, there was no office rent and no commute, a huge expense gone! A lot of people in this area are doing the same. I know this is a luxury many can’t have, due to the nature of their work, but its a great resource saver for those who can.
We’ve even been caught working in our pj’s a few times;-)
I have a couple of other part-time jobs but still drive less than 8k miles in a year.