The editorial staff of the Concord Monitor would like a word with you:
Democrats must stop ducking torture debate
By sitting on their hands while a fractured Republican Party fights it out over torture and the proper treatment of detainees, Democrats have ceded the moral high ground in this critical debate.
How America treats its prisoners affects the safety of troops, the views of other nations and our view of ourselves. Setting the policies that guide that treatment is not a responsibility of the Republican Party but of all Americans.
President Bush has called the use of aggressive interrogation techniques that some consider torture “the most single potent tool we have in the war on terrorism.” He’s dead wrong. The most potent tool in the war on terror is the willingness of people in other nations to help us.[…]
A policy that condones torture or winks at it will make America’s troops less safe. It will also make them less effective. Enemies surrender when they believe they will be treated humanely. When the United States is perceived as fair and just, informants come forward.
“I continue to read and hear that we are facing a ‘different enemy’ in the war on terror; no matter how true that may be, inhumanity and cruelty are not new to warfare or the enemies we have faced in the past,” [Retired General and former head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff] Vessey said. “Through those years, we held to our own values. We should continue to do so.”
Among those values is the courage to speak out when an injustice is committed and to act to end or prevent that injustice. Although some Democrats have spoken out forcefully against Bush’s proposal, most have failed to demonstrate the courage to do so.
I am so fed up …
… when certain well known Democratic Senators, who have the ability to obtain air time for their views that other Democrats do not, stand on the sidelines and remain silent on the issues of torture and unconstitutional detentions, Ms. Clinton. And I am angry when certain Democratic Senators, who insist the Democratic Party needs to listen and reach out to “moral values” voters, abandon their own values by failing to speak out forcefully against the Bush Enemy Combatant Torture and Detention Enablization Act, Mr. Obama.
Where is your courage, Senator Clinton? Where are your values, Senator Obama? You are two of the most prominent Democrats in the country. You have the power, influence and authority to get your voice heard, and to have your views broadcast by our corporate media to the American public. Yet neither of you has made it a point to condemn this atrocity of a “compromise” which essentially legalizes the unlawful and deeply immoral conduct of the Bush administration, and shreds our Constitutional protections like so much confetti. A bill that will continue the use of torture as an official government policy, and gouge out a deep, and perhaps permanent, scar in our nation’s collective moral authority .
Neither of you has come out and simply said:
“Torture is wrong.”
“Unlawful and indefinite detentions are wrong.”
“Eliminating habeas corpus is wrong.”
“Trials without due process guarantees are wrong.”
“Allowing Bush to imprison US citizens as enemy combatants is wrong.”
Don’t you think it might be a good idea to stand up for what is right? Don’t you think showing a little courage in support of our Constitution, our liberties and our collective national honor is the least you can do? The editorial staff of the Concord Monitor thinks so, and so do I. Yet, here I am today, still waiting for you two to show the leadership and resolve that the country demands of its elected officials.
I expect I’ll continue to wait until hell freezes over. And that is what is really shameful: that the so-called leaders and “rock stars” of the Democratic Party are nowhere to be seen on one of the greatest moral issues of our times.
Also posted at that Orange place
A hearty Amen, Steven!!
I’m also furious that we won’t turn over a PROVEN, KNOWN terrorist, Luis Posada Carriles, to Cuba or Venezuela, because GASP, they might TORTURE HIM!
But the US won’t imprison him either, presumably because he knows all too well the identities of some skeletons in our national security state’s closet.
So guess what? In our vaunted war on terror, the U.S. is poised to release one of the most horrible terrorists of all time.
And we wonder why they hate us.
(Source)
I wrote my Senators, asking them NOT to release Posada. Feinstein gave me a horribly wimpy response – it’s in the judge’s hands, and no country wants him anyway. BS. Cuba and Venezuela both want the guy. And even if they didn’t, we shouldn’t be turning him loose. We should imprison him and face the fallout of that, whatever it might be, in order to purge the evil this man has done in our name. (He blew up the plane carrying the Cuban Olympic Fencing Team back in the seventies.)
Whether renditioning and torture would stop if Dems took over tomorrow?
Don’t tell me that standing up against these atrocities would make them soft on terrorists?
Where is Kennedy?
Where is Russ?
Frankly, Junior Obama doesn’t impress me that much any more since people started to tout him for ’08. Like Maxine Waters said a few months back, black politicians like Obama are going to have stop playing games and take a stand, whether it is on issues germane to the black community, or something like this…
If Democrats don’t stand up against torture and for habeas corpus, I’m done. The Republicans are horrible, no argument there, but if the people I’ve supported with time and money and my personal credibility will not fight for basic human rights, they don’t deserve my vote ever again.
Since I was a child I have asked why the good people of Germany didn’t band together en masse and stop the rise of fascism when the first brown shirt heaved a rock through a Jewish shopkeeper’s window. Now I am fated to watch it happen here as I impotently weep and rage, reading, studying, writing LTE that aren’t printed, (or are printed but make no difference) emailing Boxer and Feinstein and Honda, marching, leafleting, and sending more and more money to the ACLU and Amnesty International and the Democratic Party.
We have an administration of war criminals and MY OPPOSITION PARTY isn’t opposing them. I assume that it is out of fear of displeasing the portion of Americans who are so frightened, selfish, and immoral that they are willing to see some anonymous “others” tortured to they can pretend to be safe, and too bullheaded and stupid to realize that they are destroying the rule of law that protects them from summary arrest and indefinite imprisonment. Those people aren’t going to vote for Democrats. Those people are called “Republicans”.
I have been fed up with them for a long time. That’s why we busted our behinds on the Tasini campaign.
Once these politi-celebs get into office, they’re way over their heads between special interest and constituent pressures, money, publicity and … did somebody say leadership?
Forget them. I’m not for term limits, but I am for bouncing Peter Principle public officials.
The people can’t afford these big money, special interest-funded celebrity politicians.
They don’t get us anywhere. They don’t fight.
The party leadership hates primaries because it can cause intra-party personality fights between folks with big egos. Tough.
From here on, the progressive wing of the Democratic Party should promise the public that there will be a progressive alternative to every incumbent. And if the incumbent is a progressive, there needs to be a more progressive alternative candidate.
People need choices, informed choices, and real choices. The personality game has gotten way out of hand.