The Guardian reports on a series of recent studies showing that feeding vitamin and Omega 3 fatty acid supplements may decrease violence among repeat offenders by as much as 37%. These results are leading researchers, and some psychiatrists, to conclude that at least some violent outbursts and other mental disorders are the result of vitamin and essential fatty acid deficiency.
For decades nutritionists discounted the notion that the type of oil one consumes has any impact on health. That is, until cardiologists discovered a strong causative link between high cholesterol blood serum levels and heart disease. For years heart patients were encouraged to reduce fat intake in order lower cholesterol levels, until further research untangled the distinction between High Density Lipoprotein and Low Density Lipoprotein, showing that not all cholesterol acts alike in affecting human health.
Cholesterol is just one of many lipids (fats) that act as an essential cellular building block. Like a brick forming only part of a wall, these fats form portions of the cell membrane – that division between the inside and outside of a cell that must both allow essential nutrients in, while blocking dangerous particles out. Thus, the story between cholesterol and heart disease is not one of a dangerous oil invading our bodies to make us sick, but instead one of a critical life-sustaining cellular building-block, that, in some circumstances, can lead to a blood serum lipid imbalance that then, over the long term, is believed to cause atherosclerosis and finally general cardiovascular disease (heart disease).
———————————–
So what does this have to do with Omega 3 fatty acids? Well, one might reasonably argue that the state of research into Omega 3s is at about where the research into cholesterol was in the 1970s: Like the discovery that rickets is caused by either a vitamin D or a calcium deficiency, so researchers are discovering tantalizing links between Omega 3 dietary consumption and mental health. For example, results from the Oxford-Durham study indicate that Omega 3 supplementation helps young children with dyslexia and attention-deficit disorder:
Conclusions: Fatty acid supplementation may offer a safe efficacious treatment option for educational and behavioral problems among children with DCD. Additional work is needed to investigate whether our inability to detect any improvement in motor skills reflects the measures used and to assess the durability of treatment effects on behavior and academic progress.
Further, in a recent randomized trial of severely uni-polar depressed patients that supplementing with Omega 3 fatty acids generated “… significant benefits …” for those who received the supplement and not a placebo.
RESULTS: Highly significant benefits of the addition of the omega-3 fatty acid compared with placebo were found by week 3 of treatment.
Though they do note that since the patients were also taking Lithium, it is impossible to determine whether the benefit from supplementing Omega 3 fatty acids acted alone, or in conjunction, with the drug.
Pubmed has an abstract of the study referred to in the Guardian article, which says:
Mechanisms by which aggressive and depressive disorders may be exacerbated by nutritional deficiencies in omega-3 fatty acids are considered. Early developmental deficiencies in docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) may lower serotonin levels at critical periods of neurodevelopment and may result in a cascade of suboptimal development of neurotransmitter systems limiting regulation of the limbic system by the frontal cortex. Residual developmental deficits may be manifest as dysregulation of sympathetic responses to stress including decreased heart rate variability and hypertension, which in turn have been linked to behavioral dysregulation. Little direct data are available to disentangle residual neurodevelopmental effects from reversible adult pathologies. Ensuring optimal intakes of omega-3 fatty acids during early development and adulthood shows considerable promise in preventing aggression and hostility.
So, given recent recent findings of a psychiatric benefit for some in consuming Omega 3s, it should not come as a surprise that there may also be a link to other, more violent, behavior disorders. And this is exactly what this recent research would appear to indicate.
The Guardian article describes a study conducted at UK prison trial at Aylesbury jail showing that violent offenders “…fed multivitamins, minerals and essential fatty acids, the number of violent offences they committed in the prison fell by 37%.” This is an astonishing number. As the article states that these findings:
… [call] into question the very basis of criminal justice and the notion of culpability. It suggests that individuals may not always be responsible for their aggression. Taken together with [this] study in a high-security prison for young offenders in the UK, it shows that violent behaviour may be attributable at least in part to nutritional deficiencies.
The article is careful to note that not all violence is caused by nutritional deficiencies; this is not a panacea that will rid the world of violence. But in understanding how nutritional deficiencies can cause certain mental disorders, the psychiatric community may soon be better able to tailor combinations of drug and nutritional supplements to better treat patients.
———————————–
But what is the underlying causative action? That is, why do Omega 3s impact mental health just as other forms of cholesterol affect heart health? Scientists are currently only able to offer an educated guess. However, there are some facts that lead these guesses to be considered good speculation.
To understand their thinking, one must also understand the differences between various lipids and their relationship to how the body processes them. Omega 3 is a polyunsaturated fat, or a fat with two or more structural points able to support hydrogen bonds that are currently unconnected. This leaves the carbon bond chains weak with respect to trans-saturated fats like animal fat, and is one reason why monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats tend to remain liquid at lower temperatures than trans-saturated fats. Thus, Omega 3 is one of many polyunsaturated fat (the type of fats most physicians recommend patients consume for heart health).
However, Omega 3 is not the whole story. Like how cholesterol lipids are separated into High Density and Low Density Lipoproteins, so are the essential Omega 3 fatty acids broken down into three sets called: alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). As the Wikipedia article states, what makes these lipids Omega 3, as opposed to Omega 6 or Omega 9 fatty acids is that:
… omega-3 (aka “n-3”, “ω-3”) signifies that the first double bond exists as the third carbon-carbon bond from the terminal methyl end (ω) of the carbon chain.
And speculates that the carbon ordering may explain certain relationships to cell membrane health:
Structurally, omega-3 fatty acids are helically twisted, because every cis- double bond, separated by a methylene group, changes the carbon chain’s direction. This configuration may explain a host of biological phenomena observed in structures that are rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids, especially the lipid bilayer of the cell membrane.
———————————–
It is without a doubt that these lipids are essential to proper metabolic functioning. But that doesn’t explain why these studies are showing nutritional deficiencies in the industrialized world. Rickets is rarely found outside of the poorest of the developing nations, so why are researchers finding that Omega 3 deficiencies are a common occurrence even in the western world? Current speculation revolves around the radical change in human diet throughout the western world over the last one hundred years.
The three Omega 3 fatty acids (ALA, EPA, and DHA) are called essential because the human liver cannot synthesize these lipids on its own, they must be consumed directly. Currently, the best source of Omega 3s comes from certain types of cold water fish, such as salmon, herring, or mackerel. Oil from some plant seeds, such as flax, chia, and hemp offer ALA, one of the three Omega 3s. It is believed that ALA may then be processed by the liver into EPA and DHA, however, this assertion is debated by others. For example, some claim that the conversion rate efficiency is so poor as to make consumption of only flax seed unable to meet the body’s need for the two other essential lipids. Which leaves fish as the only other primary source of Omega 3s.
Yet, according to the United Nations, worldwide fish stocks are at an all time low due to rampant overfishing.
According to a Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimate, over 70% of the world’s fish species are either fully exploited or depleted. The dramatic increase of destructive fishing techniques worldwide destroys marine mammals and entire ecosystems. FAO reports that illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing worldwide appears to be increasing as fishermen seek to avoid stricter rules in many places in response to shrinking catches and declining fish stocks.
So, assuming that these studies are correct, just as we discover a serious mental health impact due to a widespread dietary deficiency, the very fish species needed to treat this nutritional deficiency are also depleted throughout oceans worldwide. Which brings up the question: If there are not enough fish to supply a proper nutritional balance of Omega 3 throughout the world, who will be the ones to receive the benefit of this research? While one can’t say for sure, it is reasonable to conclude: it won’t be the poor:
The consequences [of current trends] could be dire, depending on whether supply gains are feasible,” says Mahfuzuddin Ahmed, a co-author of the study, which was done by the Penang-based WorldFish Center and the Washington, D.C.-based International Food Policy Research Institute. But a continuation of those gains–which have produced a sixfold rise in total fish catch since the 1950s–is doubtful, says his boss, center director Meryl Williams, because three-quarters of the current catch comes from fish stocks that are already overfished, if not depleted. “Those [who study] the population dynamics of fisheries would probably be pessimistic” about supplies, she says.
As one of the researchers quoted in the Guardian article concludes:
Gesch believes we should be rethinking the whole notion of culpability. The overall rate of violent crime in the UK has risen since the 1950s, with huge rises since the 1970s. “Such large changes are hard to explain in terms of genetics or simply changes of reporting or recording crime. One plausible candidate to explain some of the rapid rise in crime could be changes in the brain’s environment. What would the future have held for those 231 young men if they had grown up with better nourishment?” Gesch says.
If the poor can’t afford the necessary nutrition to stave off certain mental health problems that can lead to violent outbursts, are these criminals due for a proper prison sentencing or patients in need of a proper diet?
—
Text Copyright ©2006 J. Maynard Gelinas.
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License.
Article and updates archived at daduh.org.
Very interesting article. Do the cold water fish that provide these necessary lipids also absorb mercury into their systems readily or not so much? Even with expected declines in our ability to supply the population with appropriate nutrition, is our source of Omega 3 already being contaminated with Mercury?
As a person with heart disease, I take flax daily, but often do no eat enough fish, partially because I am concerned about mercury and other pollution.
I have read that, like all fish stock, mercury is yet another issue we must contend with when searching out O-3s (along with over fishing). It’s not just the fish, but also the supplements. Most good supplement manufacturers will filter and purify the oil to rid it of contaminants. However, my doctor recommended that eating fish once or twice a week is preferable since (according to him) quality control in the supplement industry is pretty bad.
This is fascinating, with a well-written diary to boot. Nice job.
That human health requires access to ocean fish as food, for the simple historical reason that over history many (perhaps most) humans have not had access to such food.
But if this IS true, as Peak Fish occurred in 2004, and we are now openly fishing the oceans to extinction, we are in deep, deep trouble. Oil from ocean fish will not be available from fish much longer.
Are fresh water fish also a source of omega-3 fats?
If not, this could be the punch-through that I have grown to fear, where we exterminate some environmental resource that is essential to our existence, and thereby set in motion our own extinction.
I suppose we shall see. Another dire possibility, but it is too soon to lose sleep over–a bit down on the list.
You’re not the only one to make that argument. It seems reasonable, however, it is founded on the presumption that:
a) there was never a point in global human history where mankind (or our antecedents) were dependend on fish as a primary foodstuff in our diet.
b) there are no Omega-3 available from other food sources that we have yet to discover.
Which is not to say you’re wrong, only that the presumptions upon which the arguement rests are unknowns. I would also argue that the evolutionary argument used here is a second order argument, whereas these researchers are building thier conclusions from first order data. Also, it is not a single researcher, but many. So, not only has some of this research been duplicated, but many of the differing study conclusions dovetail.
But I am not an expert in this field.
Thanks for the reply,
–M
a) there was never a point in global human history where mankind (or our antecedents) were dependend on fish as a primary foodstuff in our diet.
Umm, no. Only that after moving away from oceanside areas, they would have had to readapt to not depend on fish.
I agree–a second order argument. But it is second order arguments that keep you from making stupid mistakes.
A famous case: After he codified the laws of thermodynamics, Lord Kelvin noticed that based on those laws, and on all the possible and potential energy sources known (in his day), that the sun could be only 10 thousand years old. If he had ruled out extraneous arguments, he would have put forward this conclusion as a fact. Actually he was smarter than that, already knew that geologists had reasons to believe the earth was many millions of years old (later upgraded to several billions), and that his conclusion represented not a new fact, but a problem or puzzle, in need of solving.
b) there are no Omega-3 available from other food sources that we have yet to discover.
An obvious possibility. And of course we do not yet know. So things are “interesting” rather than settled.
Fish actually don’t produce omega-3 fatty acids, instead they act as bio-concentrators. The omega-3 comes from the algae that the fish eat. There are levels of omega-3 in grass-fed meat as well because they pick up the nutrients from the environment. When we ate our food fresh from the source without processing and drank straight from rivers and streams, we picked up more than enough omega-3 to meet our dietary needs. When we process the hell out of food to make it “shelf stable” and such things, the omega-3 is destroyed. As our diet has become increasing processed, we need to take in omega-3 from other sources because we aren’t consuming naturally like we once did.
There are also plant sources of omega-3, such as seed oil from flax, hemp, pumpkin, etc.
When you make your Jack-O-Lantern this year, separate the seeds from the stringy slimy stuff that grows inside the pumpkin and spread your seeds on a baking tray, stick them in oven at about 275-325 degrees and let em roast for an hour or two. It’s OK if you still have some of the stringy slimy stuff, it just adds a little flavor and it will dry up and disconnect from the seeds as you bake them. Turn the seeds (really, just stir them around, it would be hard to turn over a few hundred seeds one at a time!) two or three times during the baking and lightly salt them. Eat ’em like you would sunflower seeds.
I do this every year and I’m not quite sure exactly what my ‘recipe’ is, but that’s my general starting point. If you wanna keep in the holiday spirit, you might try some other spices on them as well, but I like ’em with just a little bit of salt. If you salt them and roast them, they’ll last for a month or maybe two in a sealed glass jar before they go bad.
Enjoy!
I LOVE roasted pumpkin seeds! That was the best part of pumpkin carving when I was a kid, we’d scoop the guts out and then my mom would roast the seeds while we carved. I still carve a pumpkin every year just to roast the seeds, as I don’t have kids just yet. π
The seeds are my main reason for bothering with the jack-o-lantern, too. But its still kinda fun anyway! I do illuminate it and set it on the porch on halloween, to let the neighborhood kids know that we have plenty of treats…
Please note that those seed sources of Omega 3 supply only AHA, not DHA or EFA. While liver synthesizing of DHA and EFA from AHA is possible, it is highly inefficient. The wikipedia article states:
whoops: link to said wikipedia article.
Very true, yeah. It’s easier to get it from a high source like fish or a supplement. However, what would be even better would be to make a bigger change. The problem with our North American diet is that we only get Omega-3 from fish because there’s almost no grass-fed beef in supermarkets and everything else is processed, irradiated, frozen, heated, etc, etc which kills all the little algae and things that are natural omega-3 sources. If our diets included a wider range of food that had just a bit of omega-3s and more organically produced items, we wouldn’t be as reliant on fish for omega-3.
We really need very little omega-3s a day, 200-300 mg of EPA/DHA is enough. Even at the low conversion rate from AHA to EPA/DHA, that would mean you’d need to take in about 5 grams worth of flax oil, which would only add about 50 calories to your diet. I think that’s about right, my math skills were never my strong point. π
Thank you, Maynard, for this informative diary. I forwarded a link to one of my husband’s co-workers. We’ve been trying to convince him to alter the diet of his hyperactive, aggressive boy-child. Why is it so hard for some people to see the danger in Fruit Loops and Pop Tarts? <shrugs>
Another source of Omega 3 is eggs from chickens who have been fed flax seed oil or meal and fish meal along with grains and fresh greens. There are brands that promote the Omega 3 content of their eggs and keep their feed formulas secret.
But, something tells me, that chickens who live naturally in sunshine and graze on grass, bugs and worms probably lay eggs with high Omega 3 even without special feed formulas. I know the eggs my chickens lay look and taste very different from store-bought. One of these days when we can afford it, we’re going to get our eggs tested and find out.
So like if W and Dick had taken their Omega 3 supplement we wouldn’t be in Iraq tody?
I am pretty certain that Bush’s diet, at least, was much healthier than that of the average U. S. kid now. Most of the secular increase in aggression has taken place since Bush was a kid, anyway.
but it is fairly recent – 2002. About 20 years ago, there was a study of prisoners diets in Britain. Their diets where, as you might expect, awful – whether their choices in prison, or reported by them of what they typically ate before they went to prison. About 18 years later, there was finally an attempt to make their diets better, at the Aylesbury Jail – which mostly was a prison for young adults. As noted above, on ramdomly assigned improved diets (due to taking various supplements, not just Omega-3), violent behavior dropped by about 1/3. When the good diets were stopped, violent incidents rose again.
Does this apply to young people, especially kids today?
yes and no. Diet does not cause ADHD, as might be implied above (and as many diet-sellers have tried to “sell” to parents). If it did, the vast majority of U.S. children would have ADHD. There is excellent research proving that there is no relationship here. But bad diet may very likely cause more general difficulties.
However, bad diet is at epidemic levels in the U.S. particularly among poor children. And the school lunch and breakfast program isn’t really helping this. At my husband’s school, for example, breakfast may be a Pop-tart and a carton of milk. Fruit juice has largely displaced milk in children’s diets. sugared cereal is the most popular for most kids – often with as much sugar as a candy bar. Too much sugar, salt, and fat is damaging kids terribly. Omega 3 alone isn’t going to solve this problem. Frankly, more children are at risk for diabetes than for a life of crime and violence.
And I am very worried about mercury contamination of fish, which is worse for growing brains than for adult brains. That, along with lead pollution and the presence of hormones artificially introduced in the food chain are a very wide spread problem.
We do need good diets, organically grown foods, and absolute protection of children’s diets.
Good diary.. I’m always glad to see one on health issues.
That being said, I don’t consume animals or animal products and yet there’s plenty of O-3 out there, especially as people have mentioned – in a variety of seeds and nuts (also walnuts btw).
The human body does best on fresh food with lots of variation. The fresher and the more variety the better, thats really the secret in one sentence.
Beans, nuts/seeds, clean water, whole grains, raw vegetables and fruit and you’ll live practically forever π
When I think of what the average American eats, and how 99% of it comes in either wrapped in plastic or cardboard or from an aluminum can, it makes me want to cry.
I’m quite sure that its not JUST O-3 that many westerners are lacking but lots of other critical minerals and vitamins and nutritional essentials as well π
Pax