Progress Pond

Rewarded for Prisoner Abuse: the Envelope, Please

   I once knew someone from judo dojo who was Jewish, from Cairo.  Following the Six Day War a campaign was instituted there against all Jews, or at least, all Jews with assets.  No one was allowed to emigrate with more than $25.  The government seized this guy’s family jewelry business and bank accounts.  His father and older brothers were imprisoned, never to be seen again, and he was the next likely target.  So, at age 15 he escaped as a stowaway.  
   When the Yom Kippur War started, he wanted to enlist in the Israeli military.  Instead, Israel hired him as a guard over Egyptian war prisoners.  He had no qualms about kicking or hitting them, he told me, in vengeance for what happened to his father and brothers.

   That abuse, while not excusable, is at least understandable.  His assault on prisoners was personal.  It was not at anyone’s direction, not part of national policy.  It wasn’t like American policy, the one shoveled under heaps of Pentagon dung.  

   The Pentagon has only itself to blame if its lack of credibility translates into poor public support.  Look at its “investigations.” Can you see any substantive results?

   Despite the Pentagon’s twelve-plus investigations into prisoner abuse in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Guantanamo Bay, only one commander was reprimanded: Brig. Gen. Janis Karpinski, demoted. Frontline offered more in “The Torture Question: Who’s to Blame for Abu Ghraib?” Author Mark Danner commented on investigation conclusions:

 But none of the people in actual positions of responsibility — I’m talking about [Lt. Gen.] Ricardo Sanchez; … I’m talking about Col. Mark Warren, people who actually were in positions of responsibilities — have in fact not been punished. So we have several times people using the phrase “failure of command,” but the interesting question is, how can there be a failure of command if none of the commanders failed?

   Michael Ratner, president of the Center for Constitutional Rights, agreed, pointing to how Gen. Miller and Gen. Sanchez, as well as Gonzales and Rumsfeld, were rewarded.

 … the Bush administration wants to at least give up some…less important people to at least make it appear as if there’s a real investigation going on here and we’re really disciplining the right people…
  But the people who actually put this policy in place have gotten promotions.

   Who are they and what are they doing now?  Maybe somebody, ahem, wants to subpoena them.

   Human Rights First has a list.  HRF changed its name from “Lawyers Committee for Human Rights” to reflect the breadth of professions involved in its advocacy, research and analysis.  It joined the ACLU earlier this year in suing Rumsfeld on behalf of five Iraqis and four Afghans who were tortured and abused. The organization has an “End Torture Now” campaign featuring a where-are-they page.

   Unless publicly identified, they slip under the radar.  So, I’ve turned them into face cards. We already know who the Joker is.

   Enough with rewarding war crimes and whitewashing reports.  Let this not be a casualty of public overload because so much about Iraq has gone so wrong.      

   

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Exit mobile version