What was the social issue that drove Bill Clinton into office and then drove the wingnuts into nuttiness?
Universal Health Care.
It’s the liberal, progressive issue that no one has been willing to talk about since then. It’s taboo. It’s scary. It is not at all CENTRIST or an issue of TRIANGULATION. Indeed, Hillary Clinton, once the hero of UHC is now AGAINST the idea. So, who is the 800 Pound Gorilla that is bringing this issue to the forefront again? Who is it that is mentioning the uninsured at every event as a moral issue that America has to face?
In other words, who is it that is running a truly Progressive campaign?
John Edwards pushes universal health coverage
May 23, 2006
…
These true situations exemplify the current healthcare system’s faults and why universal health coverage is essential for all Americans and especially Hispanics, said former North Carolina senator John Edwards on Monday at the University of Texas-Pan American Field House.
Out of the nearly 46 million Americans without health insurance, 13.7 million are Hispanics.
“I think all of us have the responsibility to do something about this,” he said to rousing applause at the National Uninsured Latinos Conference.John Edwards: Democrats Need ‘A Little Backbone’
Possible presidential candidate and former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards told some 3,400 union delegates and others Monday that the Democratic Party needs to show “a little backbone” by taking up the cause of universal health care again.
“One of the ways we can show some backbone and courage is we can speak out and we can say we’re not for access to health care … and all those weasel words that politicians like to use,” he said.
“We’re for universal health care for every single man, woman and child in America and we are going to fight for it every single day when we’re running this country, when we’re running the Congress, when we’re running the White House.”Taking a stab at the current administration, both state and federal, he used health care as an example.
“Look at what George Bush and Arnold Schwarzenegger have done about health care. Neither Schwarzenegger nor Bush support universal health care, unlike Phil Angelides who Edwards said will, “stand up for universal health care.””We have 37 million of our own people who wake up every day worried about feeding and clothing our children,” he said. “How can that be, in the richest nation on the planet? It’s not OK that single moms who are waking up in the middle of the night with a sick 4-year-old have to go to the emergency room and beg for medical care. We’re better than that.”
Democrats ”have to lead the way to universal health care,” he said to about 100 cheering supporters. ”They” — Republicans — “will never do it.”Edwards: here’s what I say … and it’s not just net neutrality … if the Democratic party is going to lead this country, we have to have a backbone. No more mealy-mouth. It’s not “access to health care” … it should be “universal health care.” Net neutrality is a place where we could do that.
We also need to show that we can be the example for the world here at home by enacting universal health care coverage, defending the constitution and human rights, and leading the world toward energy independence.
This message of economic fairness and justice resonates not only in Virginia, but all across America. A few specifics: raise the minimum wage; universal health care coverage; tax system reform so that income is treated with at least as much respect as wealth; making college available to everyone regardless of wealth (College for Everyone); a trade policy that includes both free trade and fair trade (enforcable environmental and labor protections).
As to healthcare, it is clear to me that we have a dysfunctional health care system. We have the moral issue of approximately 47 million Americans who have no health care coverage, plus many millions who are terrified they will lost their coverage. The only answer is universal health care coverage.
Although I can’t go into the details now, I’ve been working on a universal health care plan for months, and look forward to making it public when it’s finished.
Folks, I’ve been a fan of John Edwards since his first trips to New Hampshire and Iowa. His willingness to stand up as a Progressive, instead of slithering towards the center like every other candidate out there just endears him to me more. Taking up Universal Healthcare, the fight I chose to make my own, is just the final act that makes it impossible for me to support anyone else in 2008.
I hear rumors that the Edwards for President office will be located in the Chapel Hill area. If so, and if they will have me, you can just consider that my night office. The kids are in bed by 8pm and there MUST BE SOMETHING I CAN DO EACH NIGHT.
A Progressive. Imagine that. No “weasel words”. No “centrist” positions. Just progressive, Democratic policies designed to make the WORLD a better place.
Count. Me. In.
I’m not here to recruit, I’m just saying…
Count. Me. In. Too.
I’m a big fan of Edwards. He ain’t perfect, but who is? And if he could get done half of what he is running on, it would be a huge-mongous step forward for America.
I believe that triangulation was so bad because it moved the country to the center, and then the Republicans promptly declared that “far left”. At least if we run on truly “left” policies, it will move the country back towards a real center and hopefully tug it slightly to the left.
Amen Brother. You’re talking my language. I used to be a left-leaning moderate and my positions haven’t changed, just the discourse, so that makes me a flaming liberal and I’m damned proud of it. Edwards has a few votes in the Senate that I have a beef with, but I think he has seen the error of his past ways. He apologized for his Iraq War vote before it was popular to do so, fr’instance.
Now that Russ has declined, its good to see another standard-bearer begin to emerge. I’m really tired of the hold-yer-nose voting
Seemed like a fairly innocuous comment. I gave you 4 just to try to counterbalance the troll rating.
Good going. I’m definitely AGAINST hit and run troll-rating. I think that down-raters could at least leave a comment as to why they feel the need to rate someone other than a four, unless someone has already troll-commented on it or the comment is totally off the charts. It seems only fair to do so.
I actually understand. I have a fear of blogs turning into campaign-based tools. I like blog posts to be from the heart and if others agree with you so much more the better. Now, I have lots of friends who support Senator Edwards and I let them know when I post after the fact, but that doesn’t change how I feel.
I can guarantee you that I won’t be trolling “Clark” or “Clinton” posts trying to make trouble, it just isn’t my way. In the same vein, when I post something about the Senator, it is because I believe in it. Kind of like actors that only do ads for things they use.
and if there’s one thing you can count on him for it is stunning integrity.
I’m not on the JE bandwagon (yet) but I expect I’ll get there. And his persistent enthusiasm will be one of the big reasons.
Well, thank you A.
That works for me.
Atm, I’m basically an independent who keeps an open mind, and of the front-runners Edwards is one of the better ones.
I don’t think the rater meant to troll-rate. He has elsewhere stated strong liking for Edwards – I’m not going to bother to make a link, just take my word for it. I suspect it is a slip of the mouse. I’ve been troll-rated like that once, and it was a complete accident.
If a comment is rated and the user navigates around the page with arrows or Page Up/ Page Down the ratings change because the drop down box is still active. It is easy to change the rating without realizing it before hitting the Rate button elsewhere.
I’ve very nearly done that due to my affinity for the mouse scroll-wheel.
Here’s a 4, counter balance the hit & run. Most likely a mistake.
Thanks.
Hey, haven’t I seen your brother Racer on TV?
I think Edwards has been unfairly tainted by his candidacy for vp w/ kerry. However, he impressed me during the campaign and post election with his outrage at the lack of kerry’s spine re: voter fraud. With Feingold out, he is the best progressive choice I see out there.
It’s a long haul though…and the DLC…aka Hillary…are formidable, if unelectable, opponents.
Edwards will benefit from NOT holding political office. He still has that pesky vote on Iraq hanging around his neck though.
The other night, he said something along the lines of
“I apologized for my vote against the war a long time ago, and I’ll continue to say it was wrong. I think everyone who voted for it should do the same.”
It seems to me, that he is really and truly running as a no-B.S. candidate. He’ll say what he means and mean what he says. If so, he will capture a lot of independents.
primary timing
If people really want JRE to win, then they need to get him a win in NH. He can take NV and SC for various reasons. A local Iowa politician in the race might be his saving grace, since he could avoid the state.
If he goes X, 1, ?, 1 in the first four primaries, he would really be in the drivers seat. Especially if it turned otu 2, 1, 1, 1.
Edwards is a good man and a good Dem. He has the backbone and the intelligence needed (unlike the sorry excuse that holds that office now), I hope he declares for ’08!
I was for Edwards even before Feingold dropped out. I think he is one of the few potential candidates that can capture the working class vote. He is for Universal Healthcare, but he is also for increased wages, workplace safety and worker’s rights. He is smart and articulate and would certainly get my vote over Hillary.
He was the first Democrat my dad ever voted for, well he voted for Kerry/Edwards because of Edwards. Working class people understand that once upon a time he was just like them, just like their kids, and he got ahead and made something of himself.
This is why Edwards has been at the top of my list for awhile now. As blueneck said upthread, no candidate is perfect. But I think he is the most progressive candidate that actually has the chance of beating both Hillary and the Republican candidate.
I’m also a big fan of Edwards(and had voted for him in primaries for President)…yeah his war vote bothered me a lot but as has been mentioned he came out very publicly and stated flatly he was wrong quite awhile ago.
One other reason I like Edwards is that he seems to be the only white guy actually talking about race and poverty consistently..white politicians only seem to mention race if at all during elections.(if then)
Edwards and his wife-a massively smart woman herself make a very winning combination..if he doesn’t run I’ll be very, very disappointed.
He’s a modern day New Dealer, near as I can tell.
I’m an Edwards supporter at this point, too. I like his progressive stance on important issues. And as a Southerner, I think he has a chance to make strong inroads in the South as well as bringing in the traditional base of the Democratic party. He also talks about poverty and race as well as health care, two other issues that seem to have slipped off the agenda under the influence of the triangulators.
With Vilsack running as a favoriate son in Iowa, that removes one state where Edwards did very well. I can’t help but thinking that’s a deliberate DLC sort of strategy. It will be a hard fought battle, at least.
I read just today that Hillary has much less money in her war chest that everyone expected – apparently rampant spending that many consider unwise given that she was virtually assured of reelection. That’s good, in my view. Gives others some real chance.
Edwards stands a good chance in NV due to the unions and will win SC, his home state. If I were the team, I would come out saying they were going to respect the local popularity of Tom Vilsack and skip Iowa. Then, they win NV, place or win in NH, and win SC and the momentum has started.
I think if Edwards is able to make the connection between the costs of our Imperial Adventures,the cost of providing Universal health Care and how such a healthcare program will improve our economic competitiveness, he will touch a nerve with everyone.
It does not take a genius to see that companies like GM, Ford and other auto parts makers have been hurt badly because of the legacy costs they carry for providing health care for their retirees.