Sarasota Supervisor of Elections, Kathy Dent (Rep.) was warned by the electronic voting machine company that supplied Sarasota’s voting machines of a software glitch responsible 18,000 undervotes two and 1/2 months before the 2006 Congressional election, but did nothing to fix the problem, or advise voters what they needed to do to insure their votes were counted. The same election currently being contested in the Florida courts by the Democratic candidate, Christine Jennings, who lost by the election to Republican Vern Buchanan by 369 votes.
WASHINGTON – Last August, Election Systems & Software sent Florida election officials a letter informing them of a glitch in their electronic voting equipment — a problem that should be fixed before Election Day in November “to avoid any potential issues at the polls.”
Instead, the problem was ignored, said Sam Hirsch, a lawyer for Democratic congressional candidate Christine Jennings, who has petitioned the court and the Congress for a new election in Katherine Harris’s old district in Sarasota.
Kathy Dent, Sarasota Supervisor of Elections, confirmed in a phone interview today that the manufacturer’s recommendation was disregarded, and no action taken: “No one in the State of Florida updated” the equipment after receiving the letter, she said, “and that’s because it was too close to the election. It was a state decision that it was too late to make changes.”
Either 18,000 voters who showed up at the polls in Jennings’s stronghold in Sarasota County then decided to skip over the hotly contested congressional race — or machines there malfunctioned, as per widespread reports from voters who said they could not get the machines to register any vote in that one race. The official tally showed Republican Vern Buchanan winning by 369 votes, and he has been provisionally seated in Congress.
“The problem they describe” in the letter from ES&S “matches the reports we got from voters,” Hirsch said. “The manufacturer admits there’s a problem and that it needs to be fixed – and then it never is?” […]
The race made Jennings a national poster girl for the perils of electronic voting, cited even by the state’s new Republican governor, Charlie Crist, who wants to prevent such problems in the future by converting Florida’s voting machines so that they produce a paper trail.
But lawyers for Jennings had not even seen the letter from ES&S until recently; it was not provided to them by election officials as it should have been under discovery motions in the case, Hirsch said. Instead, the legal team came across the document on a North Carolina-based website on election reform.
Sarasota County election officials clearly had seen the letter, though, because they referred to it in a series of emails that were among the thousands of pages of documents that were provided to Jennings’s legal team. “It wasn’t clear until we saw the letter what the emails were about,” Hirsch said.
Dated August 15, 2006, the letter from ES&S says, “It has come to our attention after a number of inquiries…that some of your screens are exhibiting slow response times…We have determined that the delayed response time is a result of a smoothing filter that was added…In some cases, the time lapse on these consistent reads is beyond the normal time a voter would expect.”
“The improvement will require an update to the firmware, and state-level certification,” in advance of the general election in November, the letter said. Meanwhile, for early voting, “In order to avoid any potential issues at the polls…it is our recommendation that you train your poll workers and voters to expect this slightly delayed response time…We have included with this mailing a sample voting booth instruction sign for your review and use.”
The poster advised voters that it might be necessary to hold their selection on the touch screen for several seconds in order to register a response.
But Dent said she decided against using the posters “because we already had instructions on voting on the touch screens” displayed in the voting booths, “and we hadn’t had that problem.”
Emails from Dent dated August 24 indicate that she not only decided against using the signs warning voters that there might be a delayed response – but instead used signs giving the opposite message: “Touch Screen Voting, Easy as 1, 2, 3.”
Two and a half months to fix the problem, or provide a poster in the voting booth advising voters to hold their finger on the screen until their choice registered, but nothing was done because it was “too close to the election.” How [expletive deleted in the name of civility] convenient. And it just happens to occur in a Democratic precincts. How [expletive deleted in the name of civility] convenient.
And not one of the election officials in Florida which are parties to the lawsuit by Christine Jennings saw fit to turn over the letter from ES&S describing the “glitch” even though they had a legal obligation to do so. How [expletive deleted in the name of civility] convenient.
Lucky for Ms. Jennings attorneys they just happened to come across a copy of the letter on an unrelated website, or we never would have learned of this outrageous behavior by Kathy Dent to deprive the people of Sarasota County of their right to vote. And no, it’s not really [expletive deleted, etc.] convenient.
This cannot be explained by simple negligence or even gross incompetence. This was intentional. A deliberate attempt on the part of Republican election officials to benefit their party’s candidate by not fixing a problem they were told existed by the voting machine manufacturer. The failure to turn over the letter in the discovery phase of the litigation proves that fact, if nothing else does.
Can we finally just admit that Republicans cheat — any which way they can? Voter suppression, phone jamming, caging lists, and now the deliberate failure to fix a known flaw in the electronic voting machines under their control. And then they cover up the truth when a lawsuit is filed seeking a new election. It should be clear to all that nothing is beneath Republicans when it comes to stealing elections. Nothing.
Also posted at Daily Kos
I’m pretty sure I dealt with Kathy Dent when I was organizing Sarasota Co. in 2004. Her office was a pain, but not as bad as Manatee.
C.F. BBV.
If your vote doesn’t count, then what? We’ve seen more than two elections, plus this one, where the outcome was so close…
I did a search on BooMan Tribune for “Black Box Voting,” and since I found no matches, I think I’d be remiss if I did not provide a shout out to BBV here on this thread: http://www.blackboxvoting.org
If you want to find regional or precinct resources, look to their bulletin board forums and ORGANIZE. Bev Harris founded the site and dug deep to find out some of the bad stuff going on with non-verified electronic voting, voting systems in general. There was an HBO documentary (late 2006?) that was OK as an intro, but 1 hour of TV is the slow way to learn just the tip of the iceberg.
Check ’em out. Go get ’em, Bev!
Interesting, I now see there are two organizations under the Black Box Voting mantle where there once was one. So, to disambiguate the two, note:
At http://blackboxvoting.com, David Allen runs a site that is not affiliated with Bev Harris (perhaps circa 2004 to May 2005). There are articles on this race there.
At http://blackboxvoting.org, Bev Harris is still posting. The forums there have an article here about this specific Sarasota race.
I don’t want to start a thread discussing this, but apparently Harris and Allen worked together on the .ORG prior to the .ORG – .COM split. Allen’s site now notes, “The ORIGINAL anti-BBV site!” and “Representations made by Ms. Harris or her foundations about this site and/or her former colleagues should be viewed with skepticism.” OK, got that. ‘Nuff said.
[expletive deleted in the name of civility] the [expletive deleted in the name of civility] to [expletive deleted in the name of civility] [expletive deleted in the name of civility][expletive deleted in the name of civility] and because [expletive deleted in the name of civility][expletive deleted in the name of civility] in [expletive deleted in the name of civility] [expletive deleted in the name of civility] thing!
So fucking civil.
There is a slight error in the article quoted. It’s not totally relelvent to the point being made here, but when I see such glaring errors as this, it just rubs me the wrong way and I can’t help myself. I just have to point it out…
Charlie Crist has not proposed “converting” these machines at all. He has proposed getting rid of them entirely and using paper BALLOTS that are counted by optical scan machines, which is the only proven way to run an election and still have it be auditable.
Okay. I feel better now. Carry on.
I’m confused. Isn’t it a crime to selectively fail to produce documents for a court case?
Not a crime, but it is something which the judge could sanction the rule breaker for. For example, failure to produce the discovery might result in a fine for contempt, or in having some part of the rule breaker’s case dismissed, depending on the facts and circumstances, and what punitive measures are permitted. The Judge would have to be convinced that this was intentional, however, and not merely a mistake by the attorneys.