By God! Those filthy little wogs are on the march again! They’re all hooking up! Iran, Al Qaeda, the Sunni militias! Why, probably the Irish Republican Army is involved in this plot up to its kneecaps too! It’s a Grand Coalition of the Evil!
Iran is secretly forging ties with al-Qaida elements and Sunni Arab militias in Iraq in preparation for a summer showdown with coalition forces intended to tip a wavering US Congress into voting for full military withdrawal, US officials say.
“Iran is fighting a proxy war in Iraq and it’s a very dangerous course for them to be following. They are already committing daily acts of war against US and British forces,” a senior US official in Baghdad warned. “They [Iran] are behind a lot of high-profile attacks meant to undermine US will and British will, such as the rocket attacks on Basra palace and the Green Zone [in Baghdad]. The attacks are directed by the Revolutionary Guard who are connected right to the top [of the Iranian government].”
The official said US commanders were bracing for a nationwide, Iranian-orchestrated summer offensive, linking al-Qaida and Sunni insurgents to Tehran’s Shia militia allies, that Iran hoped would trigger a political mutiny in Washington and a US retreat. “We expect that al-Qaida and Iran will both attempt to increase the propaganda and increase the violence prior to Petraeus’s report in September [when the US commander General David Petraeus will report to Congress on President George Bush’s controversial, six-month security “surge” of 30,000 troop reinforcements],” the official said. […]
US officials now say they have firm evidence that Tehran has switched tack as it senses a chance of victory in Iraq. In a parallel development, they say they also have proof that Iran has reversed its previous policy in Afghanistan and is now supporting and supplying the Taliban’s campaign against US, British and other Nato forces. […]
Tehran’s strategy to discredit the US surge and foment a decisive congressional revolt against Mr Bush is national in scope and not confined to the Shia south, its traditional sphere of influence, the senior official in Baghdad said. It included stepped-up coordination with Shia militias such as Moqtada al-Sadr’s Jaish al-Mahdi as well as Syrian-backed Sunni Arab groups and al-Qaida in Mesopotamia, he added. Iran was also expanding contacts across the board with paramilitary forces and political groups, including Kurdish parties such as the PUK, a US ally.
Already committing acts of war against US forces? I guess we will just have to hit Iran first, eh Mr. Bush?
Any US decision to retaliate against Iran on its own territory could be taken only at the highest political level in Washington, the official said. But he indicated that American patience was wearing thin.
Because, after all, your “officials” have “firm” evidence that the leaders of a Shi’ite nation, politically allied to Shi’a parties and militias in Iraq (whose death squads have been murdering thousands of Sunnis by the way), is now joining hands with the very same people who have been fighting and killing their Shi’ite brothers and sisters (with suicide bombers, mortars, etc.) and engaging in one big happy group hug while they plot their sinister master plan to f**k the United States in Iraq.
Oh, and they’re backing the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan too! And, and … don’t forget the Kurds! Iran’s grand evil strategy even has eyes for the same people who want to carve out an independent homeland that will include parts of Turkey, Iraq and Iran! They are so fiendishly clever these Iranian madmen. Oh, how devious is the oriental mind, eh?
It’s a shame that The Guardian is allowing themselves to be used tp push this piece of crap propaganda. C’mon people. You think this anonymous official has the goods then make him speak publicly about it. Or find some confirmation to back up his wild-assed claims. All I see is a bunch of US sources making these claims without any evidence to back them up other than their own anonymous voices.
And why should we believe this Rube Goldberg, kitchen sink, ginned up version of a Grand Islamo-fascist Conspiracy between Iran and Al Qaeda? Because the last I heard it wasn’t Iran that was backing Sunni groups linked to Al Qaeda, it was the Good Old US of A (and our friend the Saudis, too). Or don’t your reporters read Seymour Hersh anymore?
(cont.)
In the past few months, as the situation in Iraq has deteriorated, the Bush Administration, in both its public diplomacy and its covert operations, has significantly shifted its Middle East strategy. The “redirection,” as some inside the White House have called the new strategy, has brought the United States closer to an open confrontation with Iran and, in parts of the region, propelled it into a widening sectarian conflict between Shiite and Sunni Muslims.
To undermine Iran, which is predominantly Shiite, the Bush Administration has decided, in effect, to reconfigure its priorities in the Middle East. In Lebanon, the Administration has coöperated with Saudi Arabia’s government, which is Sunni, in clandestine operations that are intended to weaken Hezbollah, the Shiite organization that is backed by Iran. The U.S. has also taken part in clandestine operations aimed at Iran and its ally Syria. A by-product of these activities has been the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups that espouse a militant vision of Islam and are hostile to America and sympathetic to Al Qaeda.
Seems to me I’d love to be an Al Qaeda terrorist these days. The Saudis are paying me, the US is paying me and now even Iran is paying me! What a Middle East!
But seriously, does anyone trust unnamed US sources in the Bush government with a known propensity to lie and a known agenda to change the regimes of oil rich countries like Iran, over Seymour Hersh? I know, I know, maybe some Bush loving, Koolaid Kidz still flying their Confederate flags from their car antennae, Fox News anchors or Neocon ideologues in the bowels of the American Enterprise Institute, might believe this pile of doo-doo being tossed at us once again, but anyone else?
Seriously?
And this fits one of the standard psy-ops campaign tactics for the Pentagon. Push these stories first in the overseas media, preferably in one of the major British newspapers, and then, with the gloss of authenticity that gives, promote them in the mainstream American media, who do far less research and investigation of facts, and are more than happy to bolster their credibility (and save valuable reporter time checking the truth of the matter) by relying on the British news stories as their primary source. (If Judy Miller still worked at the NY Times, I’m sure she would have gotten this scoop, but hey no good “operative” lasts forever).
Let me ask you a question Mr. Bush. Why should we believe a word from any US official about your “Grand Unified Islamofascist Conspiracy” (GUIC for short)? I can’t think of a reason why I should, and I’m surprised and deeply troubled that the editors of The Guardian are allowing themselves to be used in this way. To me this “story” sends a clear signal that you and Mr. Cheney still haven’t taken your collective wet dream of a military attack against Iran off the table. This late in your thoroughly discredited and scandalous reign, that is perhaps the worst news I’ve heard in a long while.
I’d be much more inclined to believe a conspiracy involving Russia or China.
I’d be more inclined to believe one involving S.M.E.R.S.H., frankly.
Thanks Steven, for staying with the story.
This is just too obvious.
It makes you wonder how stupid they think we are.
It also makes me question the integrity of The Guardian’s publisher. I wonder if this is a last favor that someone at The Guardian owed Tony Blair. For the life of me I can’t understand why this paper, usually reliable and not prone too engage in such nonsense (unlike The Telegraph and other Murdoch rags) printed what they have to know is unmitigated sewage.
My thoughts were similar. The Guardian being such a tool…
Professor Juan Cole thought it a silly, sinister posit.
They think we are very stupid. Great post Steve.
Hopefully, fewer and fewer people will be falling for this crap…I can dream, right?
Even if we were to believe a single word of this — if we weren’t there they couldn’t attack us and would thus have no need to conspire with anyone.
A good argument for getting the hell out, IMHO.
Thanks for this, Steven. I heard Sey Hersh this morning on CNN talking about this.
And, I think it’s instructive to re-read James Bamford’s article Iran: The Next War published by Rolling Stone.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/10962352/iran_the_next_war
He mentions:
“On August 4th, 2005, Rosen and Weissman were indicted, and on January 20th, 2006, Franklin, who had earlier pleaded guilty, was sentenced to twelve years and seven months in prison. In an attempt to reduce his sentence, he agreed to testify against the former AIPAC officials. The case is set to go to trial this fall.”
Of course, since this article, I think the trial begins next month.
Time for diversion! Don’t want us thinking about THAT!
Man they really went all out in this truly craptacular bullshit ‘news’ article didn’t they now. About the only thing that wasn’t in this kitchen sink story is that Saddam didn’t really die and is back hiding in a hole somewhere up to no good and plotting again to kill georgie’s daddy while he also tries to find a way to buy his buddy Imelda Marcos some new shoes.
The Rosen/Weismann SPYING/TREASON trial begins JUNE 4. Oh, and this:
http://www.amconmag.com/2007/2007_05_07/print/articleprint.html
Here are just a few of the eye-opening paragraphs (selected):
A recently unsealed defense memorandum details a Feb. 16, 2005 colloquy between Rosen’s lawyer, Abbe Lowell, and Nathan Lewin, AIPAC’s legal counsel, in which the latter reveals that Paul McNulty–then the U.S. attorney for the eastern district of Virginia and chief prosecutor in the case–“would like to end it with minimal damage to AIPAC.” Lewin told Lowell, “He is fighting with the FBI to limit the investigation to Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman and to avoid expanding it.” This is hardly the behavior one would expect of contemporary anti-Dreyfusards in the Justice Department plotting to scapegoat AIPAC and the Jews.
…..
Efforts to embarrass the administration go beyond accusing DOJ and extend to prominent figures such as Condoleezza Rice, who is accused by Abbe Lowell of leaking national defense information to AIPAC as Franklin did. Gen. Anthony Zinni is being targeted in a similar manner. Both have been subpoenaed, along with David Satterfield, deputy chief of the U.S. mission to Iraq, and William Burns, U.S. ambassador to Russia, to testify. If Rosen and Weissman are going down, the Israel lobby seems to be saying, then so are a lot of prominent people–some of whom, like Zinni, just happen to be their enemies.
…..
This isn’t greymail, it’s blackmail. It was Zinni, after all, who said of the Israel lobby and the neoconservatives: “I think it’s the worst-kept secret in Washington. Everybody–everybody I talk to in Washington–has known and fully knows what their agenda was [during the run up to the Iraq War] and what they were trying to do.”
The intrigue thickened last October as word leaked that a proposed deal was dangled in front of Rep. Jane Harman: AIPAC would back her to become head of the House Intelligence Committee if she would urge the government to treat Rosen, Weissman–and AIPAC itself–with kid gloves.
The Forward reported, “Several congressional sources confirmed that major donors to the Democratic Party have been lobbying Pelosi on behalf of Harman’s nomination to head the intelligence committee and that these attempts were not welcomed by the House Democratic leader.” Time named Haim Saban, the billionaire Hollywood producer and major AIPAC moneybags, as one of the supplicants. Pelosi didn’t fall for it, and Harman was rebuffed. Perhaps this was in the background when the speaker was booed as she addressed the subsequent AIPAC national conference, although
Pelosi got back in the Israel lobby’s good graces
after she stripped a provision from the military appropriations bill
that would have required the president to go to Congress for
permission to attack Iran.”
Great. We’re going to bomb Iran to make AIPAC and a bunch of crazy fundies happy.
And Cheney. Lot’s not forget Cheney. Though I think if Iran suddenly tossed Halliburton a major oil infrastructure reconstruction contract (say 50 billion or so over the next ten years) he might jump of that bandwagon.
There’s nothing we can do to stop it. If they decide to, they will. The only chance of this not happening is the military telling them to go fuck themselves. Their little game in Lebanon that Hersh wrote about just blew up in their face. And they’re running out of time…..