Progress Pond

The generals are not worthy of their soldiers

Continuing with our salvoes at the oh-so-deserving generals who have betrayed their troops and country, trading the lives of others for promotional and advancement purposes, we came across this important article from back in April.

Despite being written by one of the most repected journalists working today and appearing in the first or second most prestigious newspaper in this country, the subject matter of the following didn’t quite make it into any news cycle.

And yes, the title of this blog entry comes from a quote in the article.

    Army Officer Accuses Generals of ‘Intellectual
and Moral Failures’
    Thomas E. Ricks
    Washington Post Staff Writer
    April 27, 2007; A04

    An active-duty Army officer is publishing a blistering attack on U.S. generals, saying they have botched the war in Iraq and misled Congress about the situation there.
    “America’s generals have repeated the mistakes of Vietnam in Iraq,” charges Lt. Col. Paul Yingling, an Iraq veteran who is deputy commander of the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment. “The intellectual and moral failures . . . constitute a crisis in American generals.”

    Yingling’s comments are especially striking because his unit’s performance in securing the northwestern Iraqi city of Tall Afar was cited by President Bush in a March 2006 speech and provided the model for the new security plan underway in Baghdad.

    He also holds a high profile for a lieutenant colonel: He attended the Army’s elite School for Advanced Military Studies and has written for one of the Army’s top professional journals, Military Review.

    The article, “General Failure,” is to be published today in Armed Forces Journal and is posted at http://www.armedforcesjournal.com. Its appearance signals the public emergence of a split inside the military between younger, mid-career officers and the top brass.

    Many majors and lieutenant colonels have privately expressed anger and frustration with the performance of Gen. Tommy R. Franks, Lt. Gen. Ricardo S. Sanchez, Lt. Gen. Raymond T. Odierno and other top commanders in the war, calling them slow to grasp the realities of the war and overly optimistic in their assessments.

    Some younger officers have stated privately that more generals should have been taken to task for their handling of the abuses at Abu Ghraib prison, news of which broke in 2004. The young officers also note that the Army’s elaborate “lessons learned” process does not criticize generals and that no generals in Iraq have been replaced for poor battlefield performance, a contrast to other U.S. wars.

Go here for the rest:

http://tinyurl.com/2qyuye

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Exit mobile version