Remember back in January when Iraqis made a brazen attack on a U.S. base in Karbala and they killed and kidnapped U.S. soldiers? Remember how the military blamed it on Iranian agents and financiers? Well…forget it.
According to a U.S. Army investigation, the Iraqi Police assisted a brazen January assault on U.S. troops in the southern city of Karbala — an attack that a U.S. military spokesman tied to Iranian operatives earlier this month.
USA Today obtained a copy of the Army’s February 27 report. The report found that the Karbala policemen exploited “a level of trust” that U.S. commanders placed with them to provide security for a provincial headquarters where a contingent of soldiers were stationed. In the assault, one of the most sophisticated on U.S. troops to date, gunmen passed themselves off as part of a U.S. security team and entered the compound past police checkpoints, eventually killing five soldiers.
USA Today reports that in advance of the attack, Iraqi police abandoned their stations, as did Iraqi civilian employees of the compound’s PX. The gunmen exhibited signs of knowing how U.S. forces would defend themselves under attack, and used that apparent knowledge to pin down and abduct soldiers and officers.
I guess that makes these people look kind of foolish. It’s always amusing when a bit of the military’s psychological operations is exposed for the baloney that it is. I hope Joe Lieberman doesn’t cry. This news gives the lie to Lieberman’s recent opinion piece:
According to Brig. Gen. Kevin Bergner, the U.S. military spokesman in Baghdad, the Iranian government has been using the Lebanese terrorist group Hezbollah to train and organize Iraqi extremists, who are responsible in turn for the murder of American service members.
Gen. Bergner also revealed that the Quds Force — a special unit of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps whose mission is to finance, arm and equip foreign Islamist terrorist movements — has taken groups of up to 60 Iraqi insurgents at a time and brought them to three camps near Tehran, where they have received instruction in the use of mortars, rockets, improvised explosive devices and other deadly tools of guerrilla warfare that they use against our troops. Iran has also funded its Iraqi proxies generously, to the tune of $3 million a month.
Based on the interrogation of captured extremist leaders — including a 24-year veteran of Hezbollah, apparently dispatched to Iraq by his patrons in Tehran — Gen. Bergner also reported on Monday that the U.S. military has concluded that “the senior leadership” in Iran is aware of these terrorist activities. He said it is “hard to imagine” Ayatollah Ali Khamenei — Iran’s supreme leader — does not know of them.
Except it turns out that that ’24-year veteran of Hezbollah’ was Gen. Bergner’s source for the Karbala attack. Bergner was either lying through his teeth, duped, or 100% wrong. Pity the fools that listen to a word the neo-cons say.
.
…
Some Democrats have been trying for months to rein in the presidential war-making powers and ensure that the Bush administration seeks congressional authorization for any preemptive strike against Iran, but those attempts have failed in part because of divisions among Democrats. Some are concerned that restricting Bush’s war powers could endanger Israel’s security in the Middle East.
Lieberman recently generated controversy when he said that Iran, by its actions in Iraq, has declared war on the U.S. and that the U.S. government should keep open the possibility of using military force against Iran .
● Even Israelis Don’t Believe Joe’s Lies
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
I don’t see how this disproves Iranian involvement.
It also doesn’t disprove Argentine involvement. Let’s nuke the Falklands to glass.
You want to nuke the UK’s property?
following the links should make it clearer, but you’re right, the Iranians could actually be training the Iraq police forces in their off-hours when they are not being trained by us.
Here is how the USA Today article mentioned Iran.
http://usatoday.com/printedition/news/20070712/1a_lede12.art.htm
Whether or not Iran was actually involved, Baghdad Bergner omitted pertinent information from his presentation. He knew (if he’s competent) that the Iraqi police (and the Iraqi barbers, Iraqi PX clerks, etc., etc.) were involved.
Did somebody in the Army leak this story to USA Today in order to make Baghdad Bergner look bad?
If so, it’s not quite working yet.
It’s been over 36 hours since the “Today’s Papers” column at slate.com mentioned this story, but so far the establishment media, other than USA Today, are maintaining strict silence.
If a story falls at USA Today, does it make a sound?
Warfare by proxy is an old tradition.
An equally old tradition is the absurd idea that escalation is always the best response to proxy war.
General MacArthur insisted on that absurd idea, and insisted on crossing the Yalu River, into China, so Truman fired MacArthur.
So then MacArthur ran for the Republican nomination, but the Republicans in 1952, luckily for the world, rejected MacArthur’s presidential bid, and chose a more prudent general, Eisenhower.
Two days ago, Stephen Kinzer compared Iran to China, and compared Senator Joe Lieberman to General MacArthur.
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/stephen_kinzer/2007/07/the_new_drumbeat_on_iran.html