So much for priorities. It seems the Democrats have decided to put its voting reform legislation on the slow train to nowhere. Why am I not surprised.
Under pressure from state and local officials, as well as from lobbyists for the disabled, House leaders now advocate putting off the most sweeping changes until 2012, four years later than planned.
Overhauling voting systems before next year’s presidential election had once been a top Democratic priority, primarily to allow greater accountability and be certain that all votes registered on computerized touch-screen systems were counted. But state and local elections officials told Congress they could not make the changes in time for the balloting in November 2008, particularly in light of the extra workload involved in preparing for next year’s much-earlier presidential primary season.
Confronted by similar concerns, Senator Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of California and the chairwoman of the Senate Rules Committee, said she had already decided against seeking any major changes in voting equipment before 2010.
They’ve caved on Iraq. They’ve caved on Iran. They never had the chance to cave on impeachment since they unilaterally decided to disarm before they even assumed control of Congress. And now they have caved on voting reform, a critical issue to many of their constituents who put them in office to insure that all our votes would be counted next election in light of the vote fraud and voter suppression efforts engaged in by Republicans over the last 4 election cycles.
I have to ask: Is there anything Congressional Democrats stand for at this point other than getting elected? It’s getting harder and harder to make the case that they do, when their deeds consistently fall so far short of their rhetoric. No wonder Congress’ approval rating is in a free fall. They were elected to at least try to get something accomplished. All too often they’ve refused to do even that much.
The elections officials created tremendous pressure. Even so we did succeed in banning the future use of DRE’s, but we had to do so over the Governor’s veto. In this case the Republicans were better than the Democrats.
They could have put something in place this year, if they really wanted to do so. Many of these state election officials have been bought and paid for by the voting machine companies, imo. I would have made the legislation require secure, accountable machines, and if they couldn’t do so by the time of the election, require them to use paper ballots. Not a perfect solution, but better than our current situation while we work toward a complete overall of our voting system.
But the dems decided to punt on election reform. Just like on every other significant issue.
Congressional Dems apparently just don’t get that they can be removed from office in the next round of elections by manipulating the ballots. The GOP was caught off-guard by the degree of discontent among the electorate this time; next time, they will be ready.
All of which assumes that Bush won’t have started a war with Iran, conducted false flag terror attacks inside the US, and declared martial law by November 2008, rendering the whole point moot.
If impeachment and voting reform are off the table, we are truly and deeply fucked.
Looks like manipulating the voting machines goes back up to plan A.
.
In their October 4th 2006 broadcast, a Dutch TV program EénVandaag showed that Nedap voting computers could easily have their software exchanged and that large numbers of these computers were stored in unprotected locations. The National elections were scheduled for November 22, 2006.
The Dutch government ordered the necessary adjustments at the municipal level, rejecting a number of voting machines and returned to handcounted paper ballots in parts of Amsterdam. Turn-over time for implementation: 6 weeks!
Note: Animal Rights group got two seats in Dutch parliament.
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
Indeed. I’m not sure why handcounted paper ballots have suddenly become anathema. The problems in the 2000 elections in Florida were the result of punch card problems. It seems like the more we try to automate the vote-counting process, the less reliable it becomes.
(I am omitting the “butterfly ballot” debacle, which was the result of a deliberate attempt to skew voting. No system is resilient enough to overcome being operated by criminals.)
Every election integrity advocate should serve as an election officer. You learn a great deal.
To hand count ballots in a presidential system you would need something like 40 election officers per precinct to count the ballots.
Optical scan with mandatory audit trails would be fine. That is what the Holt bill proposed, but Congress wouldn’t do it. Shame on them.
As I understand it, Canadian elections function just fine with hand-counted paper ballots. And it would certainly be within the capabilities of the National Guard to provide the manpower, at least under normal circumstances, if there were not enough volunteers. Or perhaps the excess personnel could be called up from the general voting public the same as jury members.
I contacted the Canadian Embassy, the Liberal Party and the Conservative Party, but never received any response. I have also heard that they count the ballots by hand, but VA voting integrity activists told me that Canada uses optical scan with the paper ballot being the ballot of record. That last part is extremely important in recount situations.
I wish I was surprised by this. I have serious doubts there will be a 2008 election of any kind. A war with Iran and terror attacks in the US will justify no elections, they won’t even need Marshall Law.
Why else is there the continued power grab, day after day by BushCo? They intend to turn all this power over to a Democratic President elect? Hillary? Obama? John Edwards? Hardly. No matter how hard I try, this one just does not compute.
the foundations of our constitutional republic are lying shattered by the side of the road, dying, and nobody is calling 911… i’m as concerned for our country right now as i have ever been in my life, and, given the past 6 1/2 years, that’s really saying something…
F*cking sickening.