I’m not sure if it’s being a Devil’s Advocate or if I’ve just got too much Reynolds Wrap on the noggin this week, but Natasha’s article on peak oil and a review of A Crude Awakening over at Crooks and Liars got me thinking last night.
Does “Peak Oil Theory” explain the Bush Administration’s position on Iraq?
Really, think about it.
You’re Dubya. It’s 2001, and you’re an oil man. Your friends are oil men from an oil state. Your Veep is an oil man. You’re pretty sure oil is damned important.
Dick and his energy company buddies sit you down and explain Peak Oil to you. They explain that without cheap oil, America is fucked. The solution, Dick says, is to control the oil. Whoever does, wins. There’s gonna be wars over this stuff. Big, nasty wars. We’re going to need to go into places that have oil and set up bases and defend this stuff, or America is going to go belly up.
And, Dick says, if you don’t do this now, they are going to blame you when the crash comes, because you didn’t do it. You’re going to be the President that lost America. Food riots. Millions dying. The end times are a-comin’ and all that, Georgey. This is it. This is the 21st century. One big oil war.
So Dubya goes along with the plan to hit Iraq and turn it into our base camp. 9/11 happens, and Dick says Hey man, suddenly we have 85-90% of America behind you and we can invade the country and kill the guy who went after your dad and you’ll save the country, George. You’ll be a goddamn American War President.
Well, Dubya’s the Decider. He’s a big picture man. He’ll save America, dammit. So we go to war in Iraq. We say it’s one thing, but we mean another. Just have to catapult the propaganda. Just have to fight the War on Terrah. Cause when the real shit hits the fan, and a tank of gas is half a week’s pay, and groceries is the other half, and they will come for you, man. But if we control the oil and we get the sweetheart deals, then it won’t happen. Oil will remain cheap, but not TOO cheap. And it’ll buy America another couple of decades to find a more permanent solution.
Everybody else? They’ll have to pay up. But we’ll be okay. The oil companies will play along because they’ll make record profits. The Saudis will play along, and so will the rest of the Middle East, because they need the money too. Iraq’ll be a cakewalk, you see George. This is a great plan. Glad you thought of it. Win-Win for America and the world, really. It’ll weaken the Chinese and keep Russia in its place, and Europe will come to us as friends.
And somehow, I can see the light bulb go off over Dubya’s head as he realizes that “future historians will praise him as a visionary President” and all that, and he turns to Dick and says “Hell yeah, let’s do it. Let’s save ‘murrica.”
Now…maybe I’m reading way, way, way too much into this. Occam’s Razor strongly supports simple greed and power lust, if not good ol’ fundie Armageddonism.
But Peak Oil does, at least partially I think, explain why we’re in Iraq, and we’ll never leave…and why nobody will admit why we’re really there.
Not just the oil, but control of oil and its price. And of course, that kind of power grab makes the rest of it: the civil liberties violations, the rape of the Constitution, the naked soft dictatorship, the persecution of dissent…it makes all of it that much easier, because it’s being done by people who believe they are doing it for true patriotism.
It’ll be necessary to control the riots, Dick says. You need the ability to respond quickly if things get out of hand. You gotta get out ahead of this. We’ll handle the heavy work, we just need your okay, Mr. President.
And so…yeah. Maybe I’m just terribly cynical like Steven D says, but…I think there’s merit in thinking Peak Oil is part…maybe a very large part…of why we’re in Iraq today.
It doesn’t justify a single drop of blood, of course. But the underlying logic, such as it is, does seem to hold.
Well, put up a tip jar, so that we can! 😉
Your portrait of Dubya is too innocent, and events hardly began with Cheney–the key decision was made not in 2000 but in 1980–but you have indeed caught the essence of why the War for Oil is here to stay.
Meanwhile, you will forgive me for piggybacking a diary from last winter on this subject.
.
There were many more hot spots that ‘we’ could have invaded, but oil was the essence. The extended plan was too ambitious, the Afghan war also had the region of the Caspian Sea in mind. The US intended to gain allegiance from the former Soviet satellite states: Kirgistan | Azerbaijan | Kazakhstan | Turkmenistan | Uzbekistan. The Orange revolution ended with Georgia and the Ukraine.
With the lucrative high oil prices set by OPEC, the Arab states and Russia profited immensely. By strenghtening the Islamic nations in the Gulf area and Putin’s Russia, the US dug itself into a deeper hole financially, economically and politically.
Originally, the revolution should have come from within, like the fall of the Berlin wall and the collapse of the Soviet Union. With peak oil, time was running out and the neocons changed politics to use the means of destruction, meaning war. When Iraq went all bad as the Baker commission reported, didn’t Bush speak faintly about a need to look for alternate energy resources?
So far, Cheney was unable to find a general willing to wage war on another front: Iran. Cheney may die a disillusioned man, not witnessing fulfillment of his oil dream, a great oil empire from the Persian Gulf to the Caspian Sea.
Even Hillary Clinton speaks of regional US military presence with ME oil reserves in mind. Read also interview with Noam Chomsky.
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
Christopher Shays from Connecticut pretty much admitted that oil is a primary reason we’re there. He was being interviewed by Wolf Blitzer, and I think Conyers was on as well.
Conyers had a great response to Shays: He highlighted what Shays said about the oil and reminded him American men and women are dying for that policy.
Shays, briefly, looked ashamed.
Peak oil certainly explains Cheney.
It’s a factor (not sure of its relative significant) with Bush, along with Rove pushing the “crusade” meme to keep the fundie base inflamed, and Bush’s own psychological issues.
Now that Iraq has been reduced to “mess-o-potamia,” the big oil guys are having to face up to the cold reality that they need to diversify and plan for a post-oil existence. Cheney’s failed effort for his petro-overlords is now looked on with pity and disgust (mostly the latter in those shark-infested waters; nothing is more shameful than failure) as they plan for a future under “Plan B.”
They’d get rid of him and Bush, but it’s not worth the effort (yet); easier to let things ride out to the end of the term as they lay the groundwork for what will need to be done under the next administration.
Our oil addiction is a current Great Unspoken Matter, just taken as a face value assumption like the sea of air around us, like slavery once was, or how we stole the continent from Native Americans at gunpoint, or how our economy is addicted to cheap credit and trade deficits.
You can almost hear the sotto voce discussion in polite society circles: “Blood for oil? Of course it’s unpleasant, but we just don’t speak of such things, dear. To use Kipling’s phrase, it’s just another part of the white man’s burden. You can’t have a cilvilization without taking on some collateral damage; look at Rome…”
Something I was reading just reminded me of this gem, which certainly answers the question of this diary:
One of the Bush Administration’s primary goals in Iraq is to have the Al-Maliki government adopt an “oil sharing law,” which would turn over 75% of Iraqi oil reserves, both proved and unrealized, to international oil corporations…
… I believe the phrase is QED?