Glenn Greenwald beat me to the punch this morning. His essay on the Washington Post’s advocacy for immunity for the telecommunications corporations hits all the right points. In fact, he was so thorough that I am left with nothing to say but, what he said.
I will reiterate one part that touches on Fred Hiatt. Hiatt says the following:
There is one major area of disagreement between the administration and House Democrats where we think the administration has the better of the argument: the question of whether telecommunications companies that provided information to the government without court orders should be given retroactive immunity from being sued. House Democrats are understandably reluctant to grant that wholesale protection without understanding exactly what conduct they are shielding, and the administration has balked at providing such information. But the telecommunications providers seem to us to have been acting as patriotic corporate citizens in a difficult and uncharted environment.
To which, Greenwalds responds in part:
Let’s leave to the side Hiatt’s inane claim that these telecoms, in actively enabling the Bush administration to spy on their customers in violation of the law, were motivated by the pure and upstanding desire to be “patriotic corporate citizens” — rather than, say, the desire to obtain extremely lucrative government contracts which would likely have been unavailable had they refused to break the law.
I previously editorialized that I could forgive the telecoms for cooperating with the administration in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, provided that the corporations and the administration divulge everything that they were doing. There can be no forgiveness for cooperation in the spring of 2001, regardless of their cooperation. That is just lawbreaking, with no mitigating circumstances.
In fact, if we know nothing else, we now that that the administration totally failed to take the terrorism threat seriously when they first came into office. Whatever their motivation for warrantless eavesdropping, it was not related to the terrorism threat.
We know we have criminal acts here. We know they are almost certainly impeachable offenses. But Fred Hiatt says the telecos “were motivated by the pure and upstanding desire to be “patriotic corporate citizens””.
That is why the Washington Post editorial board is now considered a full-time wanking operation. They’ve lied down on the job. They no longer can be taken seriously as free press.
the fact that we are to assume there is a free press is beyond believable in and of itself. they, the republicans have been working on this entity for many years now. they ahve just now gotten tot he point of owning it the way they do. this has been goin on for many years now. talk about being hood winkled! yes what the telecommunications have done is beyond forgivable! I am waiting to hear more from Quest as to what they were doing in the first damned place as to this topic.
seems like you aren’t the only one on this topic here
‘What Glen said’ is something that could be posted every day. The guy GETS it.
I like what he said at the end;
<The Telecom Immunity law that Congress seems well on its way to enacting is one of the most conclusive pieces of evidence yet not only that our Royal Beltway Court is corrupt and decayed at its core. It also proves that they no longer care who knows it.>
They don’t care who knows it because everybody that the Post cares about agrees with them.
Once again `no consequences’.
nalbar
Fred Hiatt has been failing upward for a long time.
When has it become “patriotic” to perform an act that is in violation of the Constitution of the United States. I believe there is something morally wrong with the Bush Administration.
Hiatt’s argument is so obviously, embarrassingly bogus that it’s impossible to believe that anyone could make it with honest intentions. No reasonable, informed person can really want Congress to just give lawbreakers a pass without even investigating what they did and why. Nobody can really think that a clear law is a “difficult and uncharted environment.”
Which brings me back to the old question: what motivates Hiatt and the dozens or hundreds of media figures to so shamelessly distort reality and reason? Hiatt’s no O’Reilly or Scarborough; I’m sure he sees himself as a responsible journalist. So how does one explain him and his ilk? Is he really so embedded in ruling-elite propaganda that he truly believes the telcos and the administration should get a pass without even a hard investigation? Does he think he’s allowing a minor distortion for some greater good (as viewed by the ruling elite)? Or are grosser imperatives at play here, like access or advertising or social climbing?
Snark is easy, but I think the case of the Hiatts of the world is important and hugely puzzling. I’m sure he believes he values integrity and journalistic ethics. So what the hell is going on in his mind? The answer would probably require a major novel, but any insight would sure be welcome.
Always glad to see people coming to grips with the possibility that privacy in America is truely a concept as dated as the middle ages.
They have been listening to us since 1945.
http://www.cdt.org/privacy/medical/
I trust you can all Google Medical record privacy.