Bush-Cheney beat Kerry-Edwards in the Electoral College vote, 286-252. That might seem like a large margin, but it really all came down to Ohio. Barack Obama does not want to get into a situation where his fate depends on the outcome of any single state. Here’s my advice:
Obama should divide up the states into the following categories:
- Vulnerable Kerry states: New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. (Minnesota is looking safe for the moment).
Midwestern Bush states: Iowa, Missouri, Indiana, and Ohio.
Southern Bush states: Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Mississippi, and Arkansas.
Plains Bush states: North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Nebraska, and Kansas.
Southwestern Bush states: Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and (yes) Arizona.
And Texas.
In the early pre-convention stage of the campaign, Obama needs to solidify his strength in the vulnerable Kerry states, while probing for weaknesses in each of the other categories of states. And, as you’ll see, there are some surprising weaknesses in the Republican map. Let me start by looking at Obama’s home region, the Midwest.
Midwest
Obama is actually ahead of McCain in Indiana in two of the last three polls taken in the state. He’s also been polling ahead of McCain in Iowa all year. Winning just these two states, while holding all Kerry’s turf, would give Obama the bare minimum victory of 270-268. But Obama cannot relax in this region because he is in a virtual tie with McCain in Michigan and Wisconsin. As for Missouri, the latest SurveyUSA poll has him down but polling within the margin of error. This region will probably be the deciding factor in the campaign.
Southern Bush States
Obama showed real strength in the South all through the primary season, losing only in the border states in the heart of Appalachia. Obama won crushing victories all throughout the Coastal and Deep South, and his head-to-head polling reflects this unexpected strength. He has occasionally polled ahead of McCain in Virginia, although recent polling shows him narrowly behind. A new SurveyUSA poll out of North Carolina shows Obama down by eight. The only poll we’ve seen out of South Carolina was taken back at the end of February, but it showed McCain with a precarious 48-45 lead. Head-to-head polling has been sparse throughout the region and will not be truly reliable until Obama solidifies the Democratic Party behind him. It will pay to keep an eye on Mississippi and Georgia because heavy black turnout in those states could easily turn them into competitive states. And Arkansas heavily favors Hillary Clinton over McCain, so it is at least possible for a Democrat to compete there. The Republicans didn’t even field a challenger to Sen. Mark Pryor, so that’s an indication of how strongly Democratic the state looked when Clinton was the presumptive nominee. Obama will be doing heavy voter registration efforts in the South, and he should make some early campaign stops, too. Florida, of course, is a whole other category. Winning Florida would salt away the nomination and Obama should be competitive there.
Plains Bush States
The most interesting Plains state is Nebraska because they divvy up their Electoral College votes by Congressional District. Obama is polling well enough in eastern Nebraska to possibly poach at least one EC vote out of the state. That could actually matter. If Obama holds Kerry states and wins Iowa, New Mexico, and Nevada, that would result in a 269-269 tie. One vote out of Nebraska would throw the race to Obama. But Obama is polling well throughout the region. Obama actually led McCain in a February SurveyUSA poll of North Dakota. An April poll of Montana showed Obama down by just five points. If Obama puts Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius on the ticket it could make Kansas competitive and help throughout this region of the country. There are not a lot of electoral college votes available here, but they could wind up making the difference.
Southwestern Bush states
Obama has consistently polled ahead of McCain in Colorado. Capturing its 9 electoral votes should be a top priority for the Obama campaign. Obama is polling even or ahead of McCain in New Mexico, and he’s competitive in Nevada. The latest poll out of Arizona showed that Obama was polling within nine points with 15% undecided. This is a region where demography can be destiny. If Gov. Bill Richardson is on the ticket, the whole Southwest could fall into Obama’s column. If Obama holds all the Kerry states and wins Nevada, New Mexico, and Colorado, he wins the election 271-267. If anyone tells you that everything depends on Ohio and Florida, remember this about the Southwestern Strategy.
Texas
Texas defines Bushism, but Texans now hate Bush, too. Obama is polling behind 52-39 right now, but I expect that number to close substantially once Obama has united the party. Obama should probe here early, as a psychological blow, if nothing else. Tying McCain down in Texas will prevent him from expanding his own map.
Overall Strategy
Obama should explore his longest shots first at the same time that he plays a little defense to shore up his few weaknesses. That means he should focus on three areas as soon as the primaries are over (and, time permitting, before they are over). Obama needs to campaign in Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and, especially, New Hampshire, right off the bat. He should combine this with an effort to probe his longest shot, which is the Southern Strategy and Texas. Obama is in Florida for the next couple of days, but he should soon make stops in the coastal arc between Virginia and Texas.
He should follow that up with his second longest shot, which is the Plains States Strategy. He should campaign in the Dakotas, Montana, Nebraska, and Kansas. I’d throw some love Idaho’s way for giving him such a massive victory.
As the nomination draws nearer, he should begin focusing on his two main areas of interest, which are the Midwestern and Southwestern regions. Campaign stops in Iowa, Missouri, Ohio, and Indiana should be combined with stops in Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona (another psych-out), and Nevada.
Then once the convention goes down, Obama can do extensive polling and see where he has weakened McCain up. In September and October he will have to narrow his focus to the states that are polling close.
I don’t want to get too much into campaign themes here, but I would suggest that Obama campaign in the South with a coterie of foreign policy advisers, like Sam Nunn, David Boren, Lee Hamilton (and possibly Chuck Hagel) that will add gravitas to his national security credentials. Focusing his stops in places like Pensacola, Florida, where there are large military installations and populations is probably a good idea, even though he won’t ultimately pull many votes out of such areas. In the Midwest and Plains states he should make good use of leaders like Gov. Sebelius, Sen. McCaskill, and adviser Tom Daschle.
As for Obama’s weakness in Appalachia, it is so pronounced that he cannot win there no matter what he does. But he can help his cause in North Carolina and Virginia by announcing, perhaps with John Edwards, his intention to set up some kind of Appalachian Economic Development plan once he becomes president. And, if he feels like he can afford the time, he could tour the region on a fact-finding mission with regional leaders like Sens. Webb, Rockefeller, and Byrd, Govs. Bredeson, Kaine, Easley, Strickland, Rendell, and Manchin, and Reps. Heath Shuler, Rick Boucher, Nick Rahall, Lincoln Davis, Travis Childers, and Ben Chandler. At least, this would signal that he cares about helping people in need even if he knows most of them won’t vote for him.
Money Race: in TX, FL, PA and OH, even if BHO is not doing particularly well there he can repeat his PA strategy to out spend JMC to the ground, leaving him limping and dependent of 527’s (all style politics) and the RNC (stretched thin by local races). with emphasis in the Latino vote in TX and FL with several big and expensive TV markets
AZ: with a popular Dem gov. as surrogate BHO could challenge JMC on his home turf, forcing him to spend money and time there.
in Tampa, Fla, today before a crowd of 15,000, Obama takes McCain over the coals on lobbyists:
wtf’s wrong with this picture?
obama’s talking about unity:
while hillary’s continuing to make threats while trying to change the rules she accepted when the campaign began:
the hypocrisy of the clintons is absolutely astounding.
the hypocrisy of the clintons is absolutely astounding.
The Audacity of Hopelessness.
hubristic impertinence…the precursor to nemesis.
aren’t word games fun?
No.
They hypocrisy of the Clintons is par for the course.
What’s astounding is how many of her supporters are throwing out their own integrity to follow her off that cliff!!
Hillary has placed the Party and Obama in a tough spot.
As other have pointed out, she’s lost and is now de-legitimizing the process and Obama’s win.
How does Hillary return to the Senate with any dignity?
Check this out, while recalling the Clintons remained silent during the 2000 Florida vote saga:
My call: next week, Clinton’s going to be claiming that she’d won if the primaries were run under the “USSR system”. It’s only slightly less democratic than the Republican first-past-the-post model, after all, and she’s already pushing for the DNC to consider a USSR-style to be valid…
We in Missouri have a heavy burden … sigh. 🙂
I think it may come down to Wisconsin and Michigan. Actually I don’t believe Wisconsin will go to McCain in any event, although it might be uncomfortably close; no, the first time I got a look at the electoral map this month I got that gut feeling about Michigan that I had about Florida back in early 2000. I don’t know if there’s any recent polling out of there but under more normal circumstances it should be very doable.
The primary delegate seating battle is the wildcard here, and Obama’s gonna have to do some serious outreach to offset whatever damage Hillary does to him with her efforts there.
Anyway, that’s my early call, totally gut feeling but nonetheless: Michigan. Watch for it.
I agree. New Hampshire and Michigan are McCain’s best blue states by far.
excellent analysis boo, very concise, and l think very close to what l expect to happen.
most, if not all, of the things that went into the 50 state campaign that he’s run are, imo, directly applicable to the GE…given he’s had this guy leading his, very successful, delegate strategy…l’d love to be a fly on the wall in the meetings and brain storming sessions for the GE.
l also think the so called western strategy, based on the evidence, has been a part of the focus from day 1. it’s a winner, and will be absolutely necessary to overcome the deficiencies in florida, ohio, etc.
now, if hrc would just find some semblance of grace and put aside her ego trip and get on board we could, indeed, be looking at an election blow-out that may well be pivotal in the future of the country.
Damn, Boo – when are YOU going to run for office? Love your suggestion re Appalachia.
Hillary is also the person who keeps repeating that if the DNC used the GOP rules (winner takes all) she would have the nomination. I guess she doesn’t really want to count all the votes.
Good analysis Boo. I came to the same conclusion about the Southwest strategy and also put Richardson on the top of my list of likely VP.
His handling of the Chinese spying flap while at Energy could be a liability though
Obama has a nice lead in Virginia.
The real issue is not how well Clinton, Obama, or McCain might do in the closely divided battleground states, but that we shouldn’t have battleground states and spectator states in the first place. Every vote in every state should be politically relevant in a presidential election. And, every vote should be equal. We should have a national popular vote for President in which the White House goes to the candidate who gets the most popular votes in all 50 states.
The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC). The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral votes — that is, enough electoral votes to elect a President (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC).
The major shortcoming of the current system of electing the President is that presidential candidates have no reason to poll, visit, advertise, organize, campaign, or worry about the voter concerns in states where they are safely ahead or hopelessly behind. The reason for this is the winner-take-all rule which awards all of a state’s electoral votes to the candidate who gets the most votes in each separate state. Because of this rule, candidates concentrate their attention on a handful of closely divided “battleground” states. Two-thirds of the visits and money are focused in just six states; 88% on 9 states, and 99% of the money goes to just 16 states. Two-thirds of the states and people are merely spectators to the presidential election.
Another shortcoming of the current system is that a candidate can win the Presidency without winning the most popular votes nationwide.
The National Popular Vote bill has been approved by 17 legislative chambers (one house in Colorado, Arkansas, Maine, North Carolina, and Washington, and two houses in Maryland, Illinois, Hawaii, California, and Vermont). It has been enacted into law in Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, and Maryland. These states have 50 (19%) of the 270 electoral votes needed to bring the law into effect.
See http://www.NationalPopularVote.com
Obama opts for the Southwestern strategy up front. Works for me.